Law Commons^™

Watch Out For Whistleblowers, Leslie C. Griffin

Scholarly Works

No abstract provided.

Summary Of Waid V. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, Chris Orme

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Vestin Funds sought compensation on a loan from the guarantors of the loan Frederick Waid and M. Nafees. Waid and Nafees retained Noel Gage as their attorney. Gage, however, had previously represented the CEO of Vestin in previous litigation. Nevada prohibits a lawyer from representing a party that is adverse to the interests the lawyer’s current client if the matters are substantially related. To determine “substantially related” the court adopted a three-part test from the Seventh Circuit and applied it to Gage. The court upheld the decision of the lower court.

Lawyers, Justice And The Challenge Of Moral Pluralism, Katherine R. Kruse

Scholarly Works

The debate over whether it serves or undermines the interests of justice for lawyers to temper the zeal of their advocacy based on considerations of morality or justice has largely been polarized between two camps: traditionalists and moralists. Traditionalists defend the amoral role of lawyers, arguing that lawyers should remain moral neutral in their representation of clients. Moralists propose alternative social justice lawyering models, which urge lawyers' morally engagement in their choice of clients, their interpretation of law, and their counseling of clients.

This article revisits the debate by recasting the question at its center. Instead of inquiring what a …