Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Abortion (1)
- Abuse (1)
- Advertise (1)
- Advertisement (1)
- Advertising (1)
-
- Attract (1)
- Child protection (1)
- Clinic (1)
- Consumer (1)
- Control (1)
- Court review (1)
- Custody (1)
- Dependency (1)
- Dependency adjudication (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Dissemination (1)
- Employment (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Foster (1)
- Griggs (1)
- Individualized (1)
- Intentional (1)
- Interference (1)
- Intervention (1)
- Investigation (1)
- Judicial action (1)
- Juvenile (1)
- Keywords: medical (1)
- Law firms (1)
- Legal problem (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law
Medical Dependency In Arizona, Mary E. Berkheiser
Medical Dependency In Arizona, Mary E. Berkheiser
Scholarly Works
Analysis of In re Cochise County Juvenile Action No. 5666-J, 650 P.2d 459 (Ariz. 1982).
The Use Of Statistics To Prove Intentional Employment Discrimination, Elaine W. Shoben
The Use Of Statistics To Prove Intentional Employment Discrimination, Elaine W. Shoben
Scholarly Works
Two decades after the once fiery debate about the meaning of "discrimination" in employment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the issue has recently been rekindled. In simplest form, the question is whether the type of discrimination statutorily prohibited is only purposeful exclusions, or whether it includes unintended exclusions caused by tests or requirements that disproportionately affect a group defined by race, sex, or ethnicity. The Supreme Court's decision in Griggs v. Duke Power Co. resolved the question in one major area, thus causing the issue to lie dormant since 1971. Griggs held that liability under …
Why Lawyers Should Be Allowed To Advertise: A Market Analysis Of Legal Services, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Why Lawyers Should Be Allowed To Advertise: A Market Analysis Of Legal Services, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
In Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, a 1977 decision, the United States Supreme Court overturned the American Bar Association's (ABA) sixty-nine-year-old prohibition of advertising by lawyers. The Bates holding invalidated comprehensive bans on lawyer advertising but left unsettled the scope of permissible regulation. While the Bates Court found attorneys' price advertising to be protected speech under the first amendment, it also stated that false and misleading advertising could be prohibited. The majority expressly declined to consider the problems of advertising claims relating to the quality of legal services.
The organized bar's reaction to Bates has been hesitant and inconsistent. …
Lawyers And The Abortion Debate: Presenting A Balanced View, Thomas B. Mcaffee
Lawyers And The Abortion Debate: Presenting A Balanced View, Thomas B. Mcaffee
Scholarly Works
The author is pleased to see the publication of A Lawyer Looks at Abortion because legal scholars have much to contribute to the understanding of public questions. Lay readers too often receive distorted impressions of legal issues from the media, and those who understand the system best are frequently too busy writing for the legal community to contribute to popular literature. Yet it is legal scholars who are best equipped to make the intricacies of law accessible to lay persons by defining and explaining legal terms and doctrine and by examining the reasoning found in relevant judicial decisions. Lawyers are …