Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 15 of 15

Full-Text Articles in Law

Brief Of Respondent Indian Tribes In Opposition To Petitions For Writs Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit Nov 1975

Brief Of Respondent Indian Tribes In Opposition To Petitions For Writs Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit

Washington v. United States, Northwest Steelheaders Council of Trout Unlimited v. United States, Washington Reef Net Owners Association v. United States, Docket Nos. 75-588, 75-592, 75-705 (423 U.S. 1086 (1976))

No abstract provided.


Petition Of Washington Reef Net Owners Association For A Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit Oct 1975

Petition Of Washington Reef Net Owners Association For A Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit

Washington v. United States, Northwest Steelheaders Council of Trout Unlimited v. United States, Washington Reef Net Owners Association v. United States, Docket Nos. 75-588, 75-592, 75-705 (423 U.S. 1086 (1976))

No abstract provided.


Petition For Writ Of Certiorari Oct 1975

Petition For Writ Of Certiorari

Washington v. United States, Northwest Steelheaders Council of Trout Unlimited v. United States, Washington Reef Net Owners Association v. United States, Docket Nos. 75-588, 75-592, 75-705 (423 U.S. 1086 (1976))

No abstract provided.


Bryan V. Itasca County, Minnesota, Lewis F. Powell Jr. Oct 1975

Bryan V. Itasca County, Minnesota, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.


Reply Briefs Of Appellants Puyallup Tribe And Ramona Bennett Aug 1975

Reply Briefs Of Appellants Puyallup Tribe And Ramona Bennett

Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 43736 (86 Wash 2d. 664 (April 8, 1976))

No abstract provided.


Brief Of Respondents Northwest Steelheaders Council Of Trout Unlimited And Gary Ellis Aug 1975

Brief Of Respondents Northwest Steelheaders Council Of Trout Unlimited And Gary Ellis

Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 43736 (86 Wash 2d. 664 (April 8, 1976))

No abstract provided.


Brief Of Appellant Puyallup Tribe Jul 1975

Brief Of Appellant Puyallup Tribe

Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 43736 (86 Wash 2d. 664 (April 8, 1976))

No abstract provided.


Brief Of Appellant Ramona Bennett Jul 1975

Brief Of Appellant Ramona Bennett

Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 43736 (86 Wash 2d. 664 (April 8, 1976))

No abstract provided.


Appellants' Reply Brief Jan 1975

Appellants' Reply Brief

Sohappy v. Smith, Nos. 74-2409, 74-2376, 74-2617 (529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976))

No abstract provided.


Appellant State Of Washington Reply Brief Jan 1975

Appellant State Of Washington Reply Brief

Sohappy v. Smith, Nos. 74-2409, 74-2376, 74-2617 (529 F.2d 570 (9th Cir. 1976))

No abstract provided.


Appellants' Reply Brief Jan 1975

Appellants' Reply Brief

United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 to 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))

No abstract provided.


Reply Brief Of Intervenor-Appellant Northwest Steelheaders Council Of Trout Unlimited Jan 1975

Reply Brief Of Intervenor-Appellant Northwest Steelheaders Council Of Trout Unlimited

United States v. Washington, Docket Nos. 74-2414, 74-2437 to 74-2440, 74-2567, 74-2602, 74-2705 (520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1975))

No abstract provided.


Brief Of Cross-Appellants Northwest Steelheaders Council Of Trout Unlimited And Gary Ellis Jan 1975

Brief Of Cross-Appellants Northwest Steelheaders Council Of Trout Unlimited And Gary Ellis

Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 43736 (86 Wash 2d. 664 (April 8, 1976))

No abstract provided.


Brief Of Respondent Department Of Game Of The State Of Washington Jan 1975

Brief Of Respondent Department Of Game Of The State Of Washington

Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc., Docket No. 43736 (86 Wash 2d. 664 (April 8, 1976))

No abstract provided.


Indian Tribal Trust Funds, Nell Jessup Newton Jan 1975

Indian Tribal Trust Funds, Nell Jessup Newton

Journal Articles

The United States government has long managed most Indian tribal money. Frequently, however, the government's failure to make sound investment decisions has resulted in substantial losses to the tribes. Such losses have been difficult to redress, for there is still uncertainty concerning the standard of care to which the government must be held in managing these funds. Although the courts have borrowed terms from trust law in characterizing the government's position, its responsibilities have never been clearly delineated. Attempts by Indian tribes to clarify the relationship through litigation have been hindered by the fact that access to the courts was …