Law Commons^™

Can You Keep It? An Examination Of The Individual Health Insurance Market, Rachael Carnale

Honors Scholar Theses

The passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA, ACA, or Obamacare) in 2010 significantly altered the structure of the individual health insurance market. The new regulatory environment and establishment of the health insurance exchanges forced insurers to adopt to be successful in the reformed individual market. However, the complexity of the law and uncertainty surrounding both the law itself and the newly insured have threatened the stability of the individual market. This thesis will explore the history of the individual health insurance market, the issues that current afflict the exchanges, and viability of possible solutions. Special attention …

The Retirement Strategy Of Supreme Court Justices: An Economic Approach, Kayla M. Joyce

Honors Scholar Theses

Previous research has identified strategic behavior in the nomination, confirmation, and retirement processes of the Supreme Court, each independently. This paper analyzes the interaction between the justices, the president, and the Senate in these processes. I constructed a game theoretic model to consider the nomination and approval process of Supreme Court justices and the change in dynamics that might result from an impending election. I hypothesize that sitting justices take into account the party affiliations of the president and the Senate when they are deciding whether it is the optimal time to retire to achieve their own strategic objectives. The …

"Plausible Cause": Explanatory Standards In The Age Of Powerful Machines, Kiel Brennan-Marquez

Faculty Articles and Papers

The Fourth Amendment's probable cause requirement is not about numbers or statistics. It is about requiring the police to account for their decisions. For a theory of wrongdoing to satisfy probable cause-and warrant a search or seizure-it must be plausible. The police must be able to explain why the observed facts invite an inference of wrongdoing, and judges must have an opportunity to scrutinize that explanation.

Until recently, the explanatory aspect of Fourth Amendment suspicion-"plausible cause"-has been uncontroversial, and central to the Supreme Court's jurisprudence, for a simple reason: explanations have served, in practice, as a guarantor of statistical likelihood. …

Regulating Milk: Women And Cows In France, Mathilde Cohen

Faculty Articles and Papers

Animal milk, most commonly cow’s milk, is one of the most heavily regulated commodities in both France and the United States. With the increasing popularity of breastfeeding and the possibility of pumping, freezing, and storing breast milk, a cottage industry has emerged for people wishing to buy, sell, or donate milk produced by humans. Yet the legal landscape for human milk remains inchoate, prompting public health officials and medical professionals to call for tighter regulation. Animal and human milk are typically viewed as two distinct substances with little in common beyond a name. In contrast, this Article highlights the analogies …

Construction, Originalist Interpretation And The Complete Constitution, Richard Kay

Faculty Articles and Papers

In recent years, the literature of constitutional originalism has adopted a new concept, "constitutional construction." This Essay critically examines that concept. Contrary to some claims, the difference between "interpretation" and "construction" is not well established in common law adjudication. Contemporary descriptions of constitutional construction end up leaving some ill-defined discretion in the hands of constitutional decision-makers. Finally, the Essay disputes the claim that constitutional construction is unavoidable because the constitutional text is inherently incomplete. It fails to provide a decision-rule for manyindeed for most-constitutional disputes. This conclusion follows, howeveronly when the Constitution is interpreted according to the "new" or "public …

Protein Found At The Scene Of The Crime: The Potential For Using Proteomics For Identification, Gavin R. Tisdale

Dissertations and Honors Papers

Hair has long been collected from crime scenes as part of trace evidence. Originally, hair was used for some exclusionary purposes—only general qualities about an unknown source could be determined. Eventually, DNA was used to help identify the source but only if the root was still attached. Within the last two years, however, two major studies have used proteomics—the study of human protein sequences—to extract and identify protein sequences in an unknown source in order to match it to a known source. These two studies support the same hypothesis: proteomics is currently a viable method for narrowing down the source …

Improving State Regulation Of Homeowners Insurance: The Essential Protections For Policyholders Project, Jay M. Feinman

Connecticut Insurance Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Unlocking Exchanges, Brendan S. Maher

Connecticut Insurance Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Remedies For Breach Of The Pre-Contract Duty Of Disclosure In Chinese Insurance Law, Zhen Jing

Connecticut Insurance Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Agreeing In The Shadow Of The Policy: How Corporate Insurance Policies Impact The Resolution Of Governmental Investigations Into Corporate Crime, Beth Olsen

Connecticut Insurance Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Mutually Assured Protection Among Large U.S. Law Firms, Tom Baker, Rick Swedloff

Connecticut Insurance Law Journal

No abstract provided.

A Jurisprudential Survey Of The Tort Of Spoliation Of Evidence: Resolving Third-Party Insurance Company Automobile Spoliation Claims, Steven Plitt, Jordan R. Plitt

Connecticut Insurance Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Regulation By Government-Sponsored Reinsurance In Catastrophe Management, Qihao He

Connecticut Insurance Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Hope For Indian Tribes In The Us Supreme Court: Menominee, Nebraska V. Parker, Bryant, Dollar General … And Beyond, Bethany Berger

Faculty Articles and Papers

There has long been concern that the U.S. Supreme Court is hostile to Indian tribes. Between 1990 and 2015, tribal interests lost in 76.5% of Supreme Court cases distinctly affecting them; the loss rate rose to 82% in the first decade of the Roberts Court. With four Indian law cases on the docket last year, Native communities were poised for disaster. Newspapers speculated on why tribes could not win in the Supreme Court. By the end of June 2016, however, tribal interests had lost just one case, won two, and the Court split four-four in a fourth, affirming a lower …

Of Milk And The Constitution, Mathilde Cohen

Faculty Articles and Papers

Central cases in our constitutional law canon share an unexpected similarity: they all arose out of litigation involving cattle and milk. The Slaughter-House Cases, Nebbia v. New York, Carolene Products, and Wickard v. Filburn are familiar to generations of law students as iconic cases that address key concepts such as equal protection, the states' police powers, and Congress' commerce powers. Importantly, they also ground the Supreme Court's "dairy jurisprudence "-the series of cases about milk and cattle decided between the 1880s and the early 2000s. This Article argues that this dairy jurisprudence expresses an underlying ideology of nutrition, which glorifies …

Corporations As Conduits: A Cautionary Note About Regulating Hypotheticals, Douglas M. Spencer

Faculty Articles and Papers

No abstract provided.

Teaching Law As A Vocation: Local 1330, Promissory Estoppel, And The Critical Tradition In Labour Scholarship, Michael Fischl

Faculty Articles and Papers

A central feature of early work associated with critical legal studies was an effort to ‘break the seal’ between teaching and writing, the supposedly dichotomous dimensions of academic life. This essay locates the link in a ‘demystification’ project – a relentless focus on the recurring rhetorical structures of legal reasoning and argument – and nowhere is it more evident than in critical labour scholarship. The essay offers an extended illustration by deploying a series of critical classroom techniques in a study of Local 1330 v. U.S. Steel, a tragically unsuccessful effort by a union to prevent the closing of a …