Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- William & Mary Law School (481)
- University of Michigan Law School (479)
- University of Colorado Law School (258)
- Columbia Law School (96)
- Boston University School of Law (87)
-
- Roger Williams University (82)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (78)
- Duke Law (71)
- Emory University School of Law (68)
- New York Law School (63)
- Georgetown University Law Center (56)
- University of Baltimore Law (49)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (43)
- St. John's University School of Law (42)
- Cleveland State University (39)
- University of Georgia School of Law (38)
- Wayne State University (38)
- University of Richmond (36)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (36)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (32)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (32)
- University of Miami Law School (32)
- American University Washington College of Law (30)
- Notre Dame Law School (30)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (27)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (26)
- University of Dayton (25)
- Georgia State University College of Law (21)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (21)
- Brooklyn Law School (20)
- Keyword
-
- United States Supreme Court (841)
- Supreme Court (400)
- Constitutional law (153)
- Congress (108)
- Constitution (96)
-
- First Amendment (95)
- Discrimination (87)
- SCOTUS (85)
- Judicial review (79)
- Federalism (77)
- Sixth Amendment (65)
- Supreme Court of the United States (65)
- Jurisprudence (61)
- Abortion (57)
- History (56)
- Police (56)
- Fifth Amendment (55)
- Civil rights (52)
- Due process (51)
- Supreme court (49)
- Constitutional Law (48)
- Admissibility (47)
- Statutory interpretation (47)
- Race (45)
- Equal protection (42)
- Federal courts (42)
- Judges (42)
- Separation of powers (42)
- Race and law (40)
- Constitutional interpretation (39)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Articles (474)
- Supreme Court Preview (281)
- Faculty Scholarship (277)
- Publications (262)
- Faculty Publications (210)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (157)
- Faculty Articles (84)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (65)
- Scholarly Articles (64)
- Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar (54)
- Popular Media (48)
- Scholarly Works (48)
- Book Chapters (46)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (43)
- Journal Articles (43)
- Articles & Chapters (40)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (38)
- Other Publications (38)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (36)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (32)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (32)
- Law Faculty Publications (30)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (28)
- Educational Leadership Faculty Publications (22)
- Faculty Publications By Year (21)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (21)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (19)
- Reviews (18)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (17)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (16)
- File Type
Articles 2191 - 2220 of 2813
Full-Text Articles in Law
Foreword (Symposium: Finding A Path To Gender Equality: Legal And Policy Issues Raised By All-Female Public Education), Nadine Strossen
Foreword (Symposium: Finding A Path To Gender Equality: Legal And Policy Issues Raised By All-Female Public Education), Nadine Strossen
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
The Federal Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege After Jaffee: Truth And Other Values In A Therapeutic Age, Christopher B. Mueller
The Federal Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege After Jaffee: Truth And Other Values In A Therapeutic Age, Christopher B. Mueller
Publications
No abstract provided.
Gender Sex Agency And Discrimination: A Reply To Professor Abrams, Katherine M. Franke
Gender Sex Agency And Discrimination: A Reply To Professor Abrams, Katherine M. Franke
Faculty Scholarship
According to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, sexual harassment is the fastest-growing area of employment discrimination. In fact, the annual number of sexual harassment complaints filed with the EEOC has more than doubled in the last six years. No one, or at least no one who has given this problem her serious attention, can deny that workplace sexual harassment is a grave problem and that it significantly impedes women's entrance into many sectors of the wage labor market.
Notwithstanding these impressive numbers, sexual harassment legal doctrine remains remarkably undertheorized – particularly by the Supreme Court. For these and other reasons, …
Is There A Future For Future Claimants After Amchem Products, Inc. V. Windsor?, Alex Raskolnikov
Is There A Future For Future Claimants After Amchem Products, Inc. V. Windsor?, Alex Raskolnikov
Faculty Scholarship
In September 1990, the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court appointed an Ad Hoc Committee on Asbestos Litigation in response to what was widely perceived as a "'failure of the federal court system to perform one of its vital roles in our society.'" Less than a year later, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred all untried asbestos cases to the eastern district of Pennsylvania for pretrial proceedings. In January 1993, these proceedings produced a global settlement class action of historic proportions, which the district court eventually approved in August 1994. In May 1996, in Georgine v. Amchem Products, …
Authorizing Interpretation, Pierre Schlag
Subtracting Sexism From The Classroom: Law And Policy In The Debate Over All-Female Math And Science Classes In Public Schools, Carolyn B. Ramsey
Subtracting Sexism From The Classroom: Law And Policy In The Debate Over All-Female Math And Science Classes In Public Schools, Carolyn B. Ramsey
Publications
No abstract provided.
Mandatory Arbitration Of Employee Discrimination Claims: Unmitigated Evil Or Blessing In Disguise?, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Mandatory Arbitration Of Employee Discrimination Claims: Unmitigated Evil Or Blessing In Disguise?, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Articles
One of the hottest current issues in employment law is the use of mandatory arbitration to resolve workplace disputes. Typically, an employer will make it a condition of employment that employees must agree to arbitrate any claims arising out of the job, including claims based on statutory rights against discrimination, instead of going to court. On the face of it, this is a brazen affront to public policy. Citizens are being deprived of the forum provided them by law. And indeed numerous scholars and public and private bodies have condemned the use of mandatory arbitration. Yet the insight of that …
Light On A Darkling Plain: Intercircuit Conflicts In The Perspective Of Time And Experience, Arthur D. Hellman
Light On A Darkling Plain: Intercircuit Conflicts In The Perspective Of Time And Experience, Arthur D. Hellman
Articles
The time has long passed when the Supreme Court resolved every intercircuit conflict properly brought before it in a petition for certiorari. Is that a problem we should be concerned about? Three decades ago, Congress asked the Federal Judicial Center, the research arm of the federal judiciary, to conduct a study to ascertain “the number and frequency of conflicts among the judicial circuits … that remain unresolved because they are not heard by the Supreme Court.” Congress further requested that the Center determine the extent to which the unresolved conflicts are “intolerable.” The Center asked me to design and conduct …
The Reluctant Justice: Lewis F. Powell Jr. Personifies The 'Quality Of Attentiveness', Christina B. Whitman
The Reluctant Justice: Lewis F. Powell Jr. Personifies The 'Quality Of Attentiveness', Christina B. Whitman
Articles
Lewis F. Powell Jr. came to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1972 reluctantly and at an age when many professionals are anticipating retirement rather than a career change. But the Court suited him. He grew to love the work, although he often found it agonizing, and he thrived on the role he played in the history of the Constitution.
Truth And Its Rivals In The Law Of Hearsay And Confrontation (Symposium: Truth And Its Rivals: Evidence Reform And The Goals Of Evidence Law)." , Richard D. Friedman
Truth And Its Rivals In The Law Of Hearsay And Confrontation (Symposium: Truth And Its Rivals: Evidence Reform And The Goals Of Evidence Law)." , Richard D. Friedman
Articles
In this paper, I will look at the problem of hearsay and confrontation through the lens offered by this symposium's theme of "truth and its rivals." I will ask: To what extent does the law of hearsay and confrontation aspire to achieve the goal of truth in litigation? To what extent does it, or should it, seek to achieve other goals, or to satisfy other constraints on the litigation system? And, given the ends that it seeks to achieve, what should the shape of the law in this area be? My principal conclusions are as follows: In most settings, the …
The Reluctant Justice: Lewis F. Powell Jr. Personifies The 'Quality Of Attentiveness', Christina B. Whitman
The Reluctant Justice: Lewis F. Powell Jr. Personifies The 'Quality Of Attentiveness', Christina B. Whitman
Book Chapters
Lewis F. Powell, Jr., came to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1972 reluctantly and at an age when many professionals are anticipating retirement rather than a career change.
But the Court suited him. He grew to love the work, although he often found it agonizing, and he thrived on the role he played in the history of the Constitution.
By the time he retired in 1987, after more than 15 years on the Court, Powell had come to represent a kind of ideal justice -- moderate, flexible, careful. In a sense, his entire life had been preparing him for this …
United States V. O'Hagan: Agency Law And Justice Powell's Legacy For The Law Of Insider Trading, Adam C. Pritchard
United States V. O'Hagan: Agency Law And Justice Powell's Legacy For The Law Of Insider Trading, Adam C. Pritchard
Articles
The law of insider trading is judicially created; no statutory provision explicitly prohibits trading on the basis of material, non-public information. The Supreme Court's insider trading jurisprudence was forged, in large part, by Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr. His opinions for the Court in United States v. Chiarella and SEC v. Dirks were, until recently, the Supreme Court's only pronouncements on the law of insider trading. Those decisions established the elements of the classical theory of insider trading under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). Under this theory, corporate insiders and their tippees who …
On The Meaning And Impact Of The Physician-Assisted Suicide Cases. (Symposium: Physician-Assisted Suicide: Facing Death After Glucksberg And Quill), Yale Kamisar
Articles
I read every newspaper article I could find on the meaning and impact of the U.S. Supreme Court's June 1997 decisions in Washington v. Glucksberg' and Vacco v. Quill.2 I came away with the impression that some proponents of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) were unable or unwilling publicly to recognize the magnitude of the setback they suffered when the Court handed down its rulings in the PAS cases.
Physician-Assisted Suicide: The Problems Presented By The Compelling, Heartwrenching Case, Yale Kamisar
Physician-Assisted Suicide: The Problems Presented By The Compelling, Heartwrenching Case, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Now that the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld New York and Washington state laws prohibiting the aiding of another to commit suicide,2 the spotlight will shift to the state courts, the state legislatures and state referenda. And once again proponents of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) will point to a heartwrenching case, perhaps the relatively rare case where a dying person is experiencing unavoidable pain (i.e., pain that not even the most skilled palliative care experts are able to mitigate), and ask: What would you want done to you if you were in this person's shoes?
The Future Of Physician-Assisted Suicide, Yale Kamisar
The Future Of Physician-Assisted Suicide, Yale Kamisar
Articles
I believe that when the Supreme Court handed down its decisions in 1997 in Washington v. Glucksberg and Vacca v. Quill, proponents of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) suffered a much greater setback than many of them are able or willing to admit.
An Ode To Probable Cause: A Brief Response To Professors Amar And Slobogin, Scott E. Sundby
An Ode To Probable Cause: A Brief Response To Professors Amar And Slobogin, Scott E. Sundby
Articles
No abstract provided.
Treating Sexual Harassment With Respect, Anita Bernstein
Treating Sexual Harassment With Respect, Anita Bernstein
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court, 1996 Term: Leading Cases, Dana Brakman Reiser
The Supreme Court, 1996 Term: Leading Cases, Dana Brakman Reiser
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Section 1: Overview Of The Supreme Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Overview Of The Supreme Court, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 2: Moot Court, Piscataway Township Board Of Education V. Taxman, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 2: Moot Court, Piscataway Township Board Of Education V. Taxman, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 4: Criminal Law & Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 4: Criminal Law & Procedure, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 3: The Court And Race Relations, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 3: The Court And Race Relations, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 5: Speech And Elections, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 5: Speech And Elections, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 6: Civil Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 6: Civil Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 8: Federalism: A Court In Search Of Itself, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 8: Federalism: A Court In Search Of Itself, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 9: Also This Term, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 9: Also This Term, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Section 7: Business, Commerce, And Property, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 7: Business, Commerce, And Property, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
A Postscript On Vmi, Elizabeth M. Schneider
Comment: Seminole Tribe V. Florida, Gordon G. Young
Comment: Seminole Tribe V. Florida, Gordon G. Young
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Loyal Lieutenant, Able Advocate: The Role Of Robert H. Jackson In Franklin D. Roosevelt's Battle With The Supreme Court, Stephen R. Alton
Loyal Lieutenant, Able Advocate: The Role Of Robert H. Jackson In Franklin D. Roosevelt's Battle With The Supreme Court, Stephen R. Alton
Faculty Scholarship
This Article presents a chronological, narrative account of Jackson's participation in the court fight over Roosevelt's so-called "court packing plan." The larger history of that campaign and its players also are presented in order to illuminate Jackson's role. Although a number of secondary works-both old and new-review the history of the fight, the main purpose here is to relate Jackson's part in this larger history, drawing on. those secondary works only to the extent that they are helpful. This Article first recounts the historical background of the tension between the New Deal and the Supreme Court as well as the …