Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Roger Williams University (17)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (13)
- University of Colorado Law School (7)
- American University Washington College of Law (5)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (5)
-
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (3)
- Duke Law (2)
- Pace University (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Montclair State University (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (1)
- Syracuse University (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Maine School of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (16)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (8)
- Articles (5)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (5)
- School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events (5)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Scholarly Works (4)
- The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (4)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Law Library Newsletters/Blog (2)
- Publications (2)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- College of Law - Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Department of Justice Studies Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works (1)
- Department of Psychology: Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Working Papers (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
- Law School Blogs (1)
- Pro Bono Collaborative Staff Publications (1)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (1)
- Utah Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Working Paper Series (1)
Articles 61 - 72 of 72
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Implications Of Transition Theory For Stare Decisis, Jill E. Fisch
The Implications Of Transition Theory For Stare Decisis, Jill E. Fisch
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Movement Toward Federalism In Italy: A Policy-Oriented Perspective, Siegfried Wiessner
The Movement Toward Federalism In Italy: A Policy-Oriented Perspective, Siegfried Wiessner
Faculty Articles
No abstract provided.
The Struggle For Sex Equality In Sport And The Theory Behind Title Ix, Deborah Brake
The Struggle For Sex Equality In Sport And The Theory Behind Title Ix, Deborah Brake
Articles
Title IX's three-part test for measuring discrimination in the provision of athletic opportunities to male and female students has generated heated controversy in recent years. In this Article, Professor Brake discusses the theoretical underpinnings behind the three-part test and offers a comprehensive justification of this theory as applied to the context of sport. She begins with an analysis of the test's relationship to other areas of sex discrimination law, concluding that, unlike most contexts, Title IX rejects formal equality as its guiding theory, adopting instead an approach that focuses on the institutional structures that subordinate girls and women in sport. …
Judicial Fact-Finding And Sentence Enhancements In A World Of Guilty Pleas, Stephanos Bibas
Judicial Fact-Finding And Sentence Enhancements In A World Of Guilty Pleas, Stephanos Bibas
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Interplay Of Race And False Claims Of Jury Nullification, Nancy S. Marder
The Interplay Of Race And False Claims Of Jury Nullification, Nancy S. Marder
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Myth Of The Nullifying Jury, Nancy S. Marder
The Myth Of The Nullifying Jury, Nancy S. Marder
All Faculty Scholarship
Jury nullification, an issue that has received much public attention, has been used loosely to describe verdicts with which members of the press and public disagree. One aim of this article is to explain what nullification is and to identify and describe three different situations in which nullification is likely to arise. Another aim is to offer two conceptions of the jury before assessing whether nullification is helpful or harmful to the judicial system. One conception, "a conventional view," largely held by judges, regards the jury as a fact-finding body and little more. My own conception, which I have labeled …
Synopsis Of The Report Of The Second Circuit Task Force On Gender, Racial And Ethnic Fairness In The Courts, Jay C. Carlisle
Synopsis Of The Report Of The Second Circuit Task Force On Gender, Racial And Ethnic Fairness In The Courts, Jay C. Carlisle
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
The recent Report of the Second Circuit Task Force on Gender, Racial, and Ethnic Fairness in the Courts (‘Taskforce‘) observes “some biased conduct toward parties and witnesses based on gender or race or ethnicity has occurred on the part of both judges and lawyers.” “Biased conduct toward lawyers based on gender or race or ethnicity, has occurred to a greater degree.” The Report concludes that such conduct is unacceptable and admonishes all participants in the Second Circuit courts to guard against it. The purpose of this Perspective is to review several sections of the Report. The Perspective is written from …
Jaffee V. Redmond: Towards Recognition Of A Federal Counselor-Battered Woman Privilege, Fernando Laguarda, Michael B. Bressman
Jaffee V. Redmond: Towards Recognition Of A Federal Counselor-Battered Woman Privilege, Fernando Laguarda, Michael B. Bressman
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
Agenda: Regulatory Takings And Resources: What Are The Constitutional Limits?, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, Byron R. White Center For The Study Of American Constitutional Law
Agenda: Regulatory Takings And Resources: What Are The Constitutional Limits?, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, Byron R. White Center For The Study Of American Constitutional Law
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
Sponsored by the University of Colorado's Natural Resources Law Center and the Byron R. White Center for American Constitutional Study.
Conference organizers, faculty and/or moderators included University of Colorado School of Law professors David H. Getches, Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Gene R. Nichol, Jr. and Mark Squillace.
Governmental regulation for environmental protection and other important public purposes can affect the manner in which land and natural resources are developed and used. The U.S. constitution (and most state constitutions) prohibit the government from "taking" property without payment of compensation. Originally intended to apply to situations where the government physically seized private property …
Mysteries Of Violence And Self-Defense: Myths For Men, Cautionary Tales For Women, Marianne Wesson
Mysteries Of Violence And Self-Defense: Myths For Men, Cautionary Tales For Women, Marianne Wesson
Publications
No abstract provided.
Social Enquiry Reports And Sentencing, Jenny M. Roberts, Colin Roberts
Social Enquiry Reports And Sentencing, Jenny M. Roberts, Colin Roberts
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
Judicial Review Of Federal Administrative Action: Quest For The Optimum Forum, David P. Currie, Frank I. Goodman
Judicial Review Of Federal Administrative Action: Quest For The Optimum Forum, David P. Currie, Frank I. Goodman
All Faculty Scholarship
Professors Currie and Goodman present a comprehensive analysis of the variables that must be isolated and weighed in determining the optimum forum for judicial review of administrative action. While the backdrop for this study is the caseload crisis presently confronting the federal courts of appeals, their discussion illuminates the requsites for optimum judicial review generally.
Failing to perceive any compelling reason to single out administrative cases for review (in separate courts, the authors argue against the creation of special administrative appeals courts. Even if such courts were to enjoy broad subject matter jurisdiction over the most demanding aspects of the …