Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (6)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (3)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (2)
-
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Michigan Law School (1)
- University of Tulsa College of Law (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (7)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (3)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Faculty Working Papers (3)
- Faculty Publications (2)
-
- Scholarly Publications (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (2)
- Articles (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Articles, Chapters in Books and Other Contributions to Scholarly Works (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (1)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (1)
- Reviews (1)
- Student Works (1)
Articles 31 - 33 of 33
Full-Text Articles in Law
Attorney-Client Privilege When The Client Is A Public Official: Litigating The Opening Act Of The Impeachment Drama, Timothy K. Armstrong
Attorney-Client Privilege When The Client Is A Public Official: Litigating The Opening Act Of The Impeachment Drama, Timothy K. Armstrong
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
The divided panel decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in /n re Lindsey, 158 F.3d 1263 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 466 (1998), represented a dramatic shift in that court's thinking on the question whether the attorney-client privilege protects what a government official says to his agency's counsel in confidence. Although the court of appeals in at least four previous decisions had held that a government agency client holds the same privilege any other client would under like circumstances to communicate with counsel in private, the Lindsey court took a quite different view.
State Medical Malpractice Screening Panels In Federal Diversity Actions, Vincent C. Alexander
State Medical Malpractice Screening Panels In Federal Diversity Actions, Vincent C. Alexander
Faculty Publications
During the early 1970's, a medical malpractice crisis was perceived in the United States. An increasing number of costly and time-consuming lawsuits alleging medical malpractice against doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers caused malpractice insurers to raise premiums substantially, which in turn threatened to curtail the availability of adequate health care at reasonable cost. State legislatures responded to the crisis with a variety of substantive and procedural measures intended to reduce the number of litigated claims and the size of jury awards. One of the principal steps taken in a majority of states was the creation of extrajudicial panels …
Comments On Recent Cases, Charles W. Ehrhardt
Comments On Recent Cases, Charles W. Ehrhardt
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.