Law Commons^™

Class Action Activity In Michigan's State And Federal Courts, Neil J. Marchand

Neil J. Marchand

This paper represents the first choice of forum analysis for class action suits filed in Michigan’s courts. This paper also analyzes the Class Action Fairness Act’s (CAFA) effects at the state court level, examining CAFA’s effects on Michigan’s state and federal courts. For Michigan’s state courts, available empirical data from January 2000 through December 2007 shows a decrease in state court class action filings, with a significant decline in filings starting in 2002 and ending in 2004. For Michigan’s federal courts, empirical data from July 2001 through June 2007 shows a modest decrease in class action filings. Four hypotheses are …

A Miscarriage Of Juvenile Justice: A Modern-Day Parable Of The Unintended Results Of Bad Lawmaking, Amy Vorenberg

Amy Vorenberg

Sensationalized cases increasingly create the context for public policy discussion. Stories about violent crime are a common feature of the local evening news and their emotional nature can often create the hook politicians need to showcase their “tough on crime” agendas. Often anecdotal and lurid, stories of criminal misdeeds are widely used to convince the public of a need to create or change laws. This article demonstrates the perils of making law by extrapolating from a few random, albeit attention-grabbing, events. Specifically, the article examines the impact of a 1995 change in New Hampshire state law that lowered the age …

Looking For Fair Use In The Dmca's Safety Dance, Ira Nathenson

Ira Steven Nathenson

Like a ballet, the notice-and-take-down provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") provide complex procedures to obtain take-downs of online infringement. Copyright owners send notices of infringement to service providers, who in turn remove claimed infringement in exchange for a statutory safe harbor from copyright liability. But like a dance meant for two, the DMCA is less effective in protecting the "third wheel," the users of internet services. Even Senator John McCain - who in 1998 voted for the DMCA - wrote in exasperation to YouTube after some of his presidential campaign videos were removed due to take-downs. McCain …

Abolishing The Time Tax On Voting, Elora Mukherjee

Elora Mukherjee

A “time tax” is a government policy or practice that forces one citizen to pay more in time to vote compared with her fellow citizens. While few have noticed the scope of the problem, data indicate that, due primarily to long lines, hundreds of thousands if not millions of voters are routinely unable to vote in national elections as a result of the time tax, and that the problem disproportionately affects minority voters and voters in the South. This Article documents the problem and offers a roadmap for legal and political strategies for solving it. The Article uses as a …

In With The New, Out With The Old: Expanding The Scope Of Retroactive Amelioration, S. David Mitchell

S. David Mitchell

The legislative decision to amend a statute and reduce a sentence but not to apply it retroactively to pending prosecutions or to finalized convictions is in accord with the principles of retroactivity, but contrary to legitimate goals of punishment, i.e. deterrence and retributivism. Genarlow Wilson, convicted at seventeen of aggravated child molestation, a felony, for consensual oral sex with a fifteen-year old classmate, was sentenced to a mandatory minimum of ten years. While his appeal was pending, the Georgia Legislature reclassified the conduct as a misdemeanor and reduced the sentence to a maximum of one year but decided not to …

Friction By Design: The Necessary Contest Of State Judicial Power And Legislative Policymaking, Michael Buenger

Michael Buenger

Courts in the United States have always played an important policymaking role through the exercise of judicial review. Much of our understanding of judicial power and judicial review is based on its exercise in the federal courts. Little attention has been paid to the intersection of judicial power and legislative policymaking at the state level. The tendency to examine judicial power through the lens of the federal bench miscasts the history of the American judiciary and fails to account for the unique role state courts perform as components of quasi-independent states. Even federal judicial review is rooted in state judicial …

The New Battleground Of Museum Ethics And Holocaust Era Claims: Technicalities Trumping Justice Or Responsible Stewardship For The Public Trust?, Jennifer Kreder

Jennifer Kreder

How should museums, collectors and governments handle the ever-increasing number of claims that art in their collections had been looted or subject to a forced sale? Museums can restitute art only if presented with solid proof of looting or else they would violate fiduciary obligations to manage their collections in trust for the public. The current wave of claims attempts to expand the definition of “forced sale” to include all property sold as a result of discriminatory economic persecution during the Nazi era. If courts hearing the many currently pending claims adopt such a definition, the number of art objects …

The Shadow Bankruptcy System, Jonathan C. Lipson

Jonathan C. Lipson

This article exposes and explores a puzzle at the heart of the current economic crisis: The surprising under-use, and increasing misuse, of Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, the principal legal system for salvaging troubled businesses.

The answer offered here: The rise of the shadow bankruptcy system. “Shadow bankruptcy” describes the severely under-regulated non-bank financial institutions (e.g., hedge funds, private equity funds and investment banks) that increasingly dominate and manipulate Chapter 11 reorganizations.

Like the “shadow banking” system for which it is named, shadow bankruptcy thrives on and promotes opacity and undisclosed, possibly perverse, incentives. Shadow bankruptcy players …

Jon & Kate Plus The State: Why Congress Should Protect Children In Reality Programming, Dayna B. Royal

Dayna B. Royal

As "reality" programming continues to increase in popularity, so too does the number of children living out their young lives in front of the camera. Yet the current legal regime is inadequate to protect these children, whose parents have betrayed their best interests for fame and fortune. This article argues that Congress should enact a statute providing a regulatory sliding scale based on age that would largely prohibit children from participating in reality programming. A federal statute would bring clarity to this unsettled area of the law while ensuring that parents and programming executives cannot skirt individual state laws and …

Pretend “Gun-Free” School Zones: A Deadly Legal Fiction, David B. Kopel

David B Kopel

Most states issue permits to carry a concealed handgun for lawful protection to an applicant who is over 21 years of age, and who passes a fingerprint-based background check and a safety class. These permits allow the person to carry a concealed defensive handgun almost everywhere in the state. Should professors, school teachers, or adult college and graduate students who have such permits be allowed to carry firearms on campus? In the last two years, many state legislatures have debated the topic. School boards, regents, and administrators are likewise faced with decisions about whether to change campus firearms policies. The …

Killing Capital Punishment In New Jersey: The First State In Modern History To Repeal Its Death Penalty Statute., Robert J. Martin

Robert J. Martin

This article examines how opponents of the death penalty were successful in lobbying and eventually achieving statutory repeal of New Jersey’s death penalty statute in December 2007. The primary goal of the article is to offer inspiration and guidance for similar efforts in the thirty-five states that still authorize capital punishment. In reviewing lessons learned from New Jersey, the article demonstrates that abolition proved both difficult and doubtful. Led by a small group of organizers and sympathetic legislators, the advocates of abolition faced multiple challenges. The article focuses special attention on their key strategic decisions: pursuit of both legislation and …

Greenspan's Lament: Incentive Mechanisms And The Contamination Of The Safety And Soundness Of Depository Institutions From Risky Derivative Securities, Daniel J. Boyle

Daniel J Boyle

The attached paper attempts to synthesize the foundational tools of industrial organization economics and how they interacted with law and public policy choices to explain the genesis of the current competitive dynamics in banking and financial products. The paper examines the underlying assumptions of microeconomic theories of efficiency and competitive equilibrium including externalities, information asymmetry, game theory and mechanism design, and how those combine dynamically with the process of formation, implementation and adjudication of the law to allow actors to rationally and systematically adjust their ownership structures and their transaction costs to internalize benefits and externalize costs and risk. This …

Innovative Destruction: Structured Finance & Credit Market Reform In The Bubble Era, Aaron J. Unterman

Aaron J. Unterman

The combination of unregulated financial innovation and human greed has, and will continue to have, dire effects on the international economy. The financial crisis which began in the American sub-prime housing market, and spread across the globe, has devastated the structured finance industry and cast doubts on the new era of credit risk transfer, which had come to represent the achievements of financial innovation. This paper explores the role structured finance played in the credit crisis, dissecting the complex instruments which drove the industry and allowed the American sub-prime housing market to infect the international economy. This paper argues that …

The Idea Eligibility Mess, Mark C. Weber

Mark C. Weber

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees students with disabilities a free public education appropriate to their needs, but students must meet the definition of “child with a disability” to be eligible for that entitlement. The law governing special education eligibility, however, is charitably characterized as a mess. There are several sources of the current eligibility confusion. First, recent court cases have reached conflicting conclusions about how much adverse educational impact the child’s disabling condition must have, what constitutes a sufficient need for special education, and when children with emotional disabilities are eligible. Second, long-established methods for assessing learning …

Legislative Supremacy In The United States?: Rethinking The Enrolled Bill Doctrine, Ittai Bar-Siman-Tov

Dr. Ittai Bar-Siman-Tov

This Article revisits the “enrolled bill” doctrine which requires courts to accept the signatures of the Speaker of the House and President of the Senate on the “enrolled bill” as unimpeachable evidence that a bill has been constitutionally enacted. It argues that this time-honored doctrine has far-reaching ramifications that were largely overlooked in existing discussions. In addition to reexamining the soundness of this doctrine’s main rationales, the Article introduces two major novel arguments against the doctrine. First, it argues that the doctrine amounts to an impermissible delegation of both judicial and lawmaking powers to the legislative officers of Congress. Second, …

Free At Last! Anti-Subordination And The Thirteenth Amendment, Rebecca Zietlow

Rebecca E Zietlow

Notwithstanding the powerful symbolism that liberty has in the American psyche, liberty is largely absent from our late Twentieth Century understanding of civil rights, which instead is based in the Equal Protection Clause and its promise of formal equality. People of color and women of every race have made significant advances under the Equal Protection model of equality, but they continue to lag behind whites and men under virtually every economic index. This paper argues for an alternative model of equality, an anti-subordination model, which allows decision-makers to focus on the material conditions that contribute to inequality in our society, …

Interpreting Initiatives And Referenda, Steven Johansen, Stephen Raher

Stephen Raher

No abstract provided.

Fitting Punishment, Juliet P. Stumpf

Juliet P Stumpf

Proportionality is conspicuously absent from the legal framework for immigration sanctions. Immigration law relies on one sanction – deportation – as the ubiquitous penalty for any immigration violation. Neither the gravity of the violation nor the harm that results bears on whether deportation is the consequence for an immigration violation. Immigration law stands alone in the legal landscape in this respect. Criminal punishment incorporates proportionality when imposing sentences that are graduated based on the gravity of the offense; contract and tort law provide for damages that are graduated based on the harm to others or to society. This Article represents …