Law Commons^™

Et Tu Raoul? Or The Original Misunderstanding Misunderstood, Stephen B. Presser

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Introduction, William S. Geimer

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Coleman V. Thompson 111 S. Ct. 2546 (1991)

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Ford V. Georgia 111 S. Ct. 850 (1991)

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Lankford V. Idaho 111 S. Ct. 1723 (1991)

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Yates V. Evatt 111 S. Ct. 1884 (1991)

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Schad V. Arizona 111 S. Ct. 2491 (1991)

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Payne V. Tennessee 111 S. Ct. 2597 (1991)

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Stamper V. Muncie 944 F.2d 170 (4th Cir. 1991)

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Fitzgerald V. Thompson 943 F.2d 463 (1991)

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Stockton V. Commonwealth 241 Va. 192, 402 S.E.2d 196 (1991)

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Quesinberry V. Commonwealth 241 Va. 364,402 S.E.2d 218 (1991)

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

The Virginia Supreme Court And Thirteen Years Of Death Sentence Review, Anne E. Mcinerney

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

The Right To A Jury Trial In Complex Commercial Litigation: A Comparative Law Perspective, Paul Lansing, Nina Miley

Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

Striking First: Isreal's Post-Gulf War Options Under International Law, Louis Rene Beres

Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

New South Walves V. Commonwealth: The Australian Tidelands Controversy, Edward A. Fitzgerald

Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review

No abstract provided.

Employer Sexual Harassment Liability Under Agency Principles:A Second Look At Meritor Savingsbank, Fsb V. Vinson, Michael J. Phillips

Vanderbilt Law Review

With its 1986 decision in Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson,the United States Supreme Court put its imprimatur on the Title VII sexual harassment cause of action that had emerged over the preceding decade. Early commentary on the case tended to emphasize this aspect of the Court's decision or to speculate about Meritor's impact on the future course of Title VII sexual harassment litigation. Getting relatively short shrift in this early commentary, however, was the Court's command that "agency principles" --the common law of agency-- be consulted to determine an employer's liability for harassment committed by its employees.' As subsequent …

Anticipatory Search Warrants: The Supreme Court's Opportunity To Reexamine The Framework Of The Fourth Amendment, David P. Mitchell

Vanderbilt Law Review

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures," and provides that "no War-rants shall issue, but upon probable cause."' Although its language is relatively clear, the application of the Fourth Amendment has created more controversy than the application of perhaps any other constitutional amendment.' Given the questions raised by a police-endorsed practice of anticipatory search warrants,' the search and seizure debate is far from over.

An anticipatory search warrant is a warrant based on a showing of probable cause that particular evidence of a crime will exist at a specific location in the future. Challenges …

Investment Securities: Beyond The Scope Of California's Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Melinda Rose Smolin

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

Father Knows Best-But Which Father-California's Presumption Of Legitimacy Loses Its Conclusiveness: Michael H. V. Gerald D. And Its Aftermath, Mindy S. Halpern

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

Drug Courier Profiles, Airport Stops And The Inherent Unreasonableness Of The Reasonable Suspicion Standard After United States V. Sokolow, Jodi Sax

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

No abstract provided.

Section 117 Of The Copyright Act, Robert A. Kreiss

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Liquidated Damages And The Penalty Rule: A Reassessment, David Brizzee

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Market Analysis Of Anticompetition Agreements In Labor Contracts, York Moody Faulkner

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Supervisory Liability Under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983: Searching For The Deep Pocket, Shari S. Weinman

Missouri Law Review

Suits under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 are complex. Section 1983's theory of constitutional wrongdoing without vicarious liability will seem strange to some practitioners. There are circumstances, however, in which a plaintiff may sue the supervisor of the person who immediately inflicted the injury. This Comment examines the intricacies of supervisory liability as determined by recent United States Supreme Court and circuit court decisions and provides pointers to practitioners. In addition, this Comment suggests an amendment to section 1983.

Employee Refusals To Cooperate In Internal Investigations: Into The Woods With Employers, Courts, And Labor Arbitrators, Marvin F. Hill Jr., James A. Wright

Missouri Law Review

Bass v. Nooney Co. established negligent infliction of emotional distress as an independent tort in Missouri. The Missouri Supreme Court, however, left open the question of if and when a bystander can recover under this cause of action. The question remained unanswered for seven years until the Asaro decision. This Note will first analyze that decision, then focus on the traditional rules and restrictions on bystander recovery, and finally set forth for consideration a proposed rule that is less restrictive than the one adopted by the Missouri Supreme Court.

Effects Of Recent Developments On The Telco/Catv Cross-Ownership Prohibitions, The , Philip J. Boeckman

Missouri Law Review

Because of the players' financial stake and the public's interest in cable television, decisions affecting the cross-ownership restrictions probably will be made in one or more forums. This Comment analyzes the cable television market and the effects of telco entry on the CATV industry. It attempts to aid the various forums in considering the effectiveness and necessity of the laws on this crucial issue. First, however, it is important to understand the origins of the cross-ownership prohibitions, current developments in the forums hearing the arguments, and the status of the cable and telecommunications markets.

Minnick V. Mississippi: The Supreme Court Reinforces A Suspect's Right To Have Counsel Present During Custodial Interrogation, Nelson G. Wolff

Missouri Law Review

In 1966, the United States Supreme Court handed down the landmark decision of Miranda v. Arizona, which firmly established the fifth amendment as the basis for ruling on the admissibility of confessions. In Minnick v. Mississippi, the Court considered whether police may reinitiate custodial interrogation after a suspect has consulted an attorney. This Note will summarize the facts and holding of Minnick and examine the legal history of the fifth amendment right to counsel from Miranda to Minnick Once this framework is established, the Note will examine the majority and dissenting opinions. Finally, the Note will critically analyze Minnick by …

Table Of Notes

Missouri Law Review

Table of Notes

Index To Subjects Covered In Volume 55

Missouri Law Review

Index to Subjects Covered in Volume 57