Law Commons^™

The Media, The Jury, And The High-Profile Defendant: A Defense Perspective On The Media Circus, John C. Meringolo

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.

Jury Nullification, Race, And The Wire, James M. Keneally

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.

Handcuffing The Press: First Amendment Limitations On The Reach Of Criminal Statutes As Applied To The Media, Lee Levine, Nathan E. Siegel, Jeanette Melendez Bead

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.

Fictionalized Criminal Law And Youth Legal Consciousness, Avi Brisman

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Criminalization Of Lying: Under What Circumstances, If Any, Should Lies Be Made Criminal?, Bryan H. Druzin, Jessica Li

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

Understanding The Antecedents Of The “School-To-Jail” Link: The Relationship Between Race And School Discipline, Michael Rocque, Raymond Paternoster

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

Deadly Dilemmas Iii: Some Kind Words For Preventive Detention, Ronald J. Allen, Larry Laudan

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

Sex Offender Exceptionalism And Preventative Detention, Corey Rayburn Yung

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

Racial Discrimination In The Administration Of The Death Penalty: The Experience Of The United States Armed Forces (1984–2005), David C. Baldus, Catherine M. Grosso, George Woodworth, Richard Newell

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

Class Matters, Erica J. Hashimoto

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

The Search For Rapists’ “Real” Motives, David P. Bryden, Maren M. Grier

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

Cost Conscious Justice: The Case For Wholly-Informed Discretionary Sentencing In Kentucky, Emily M. Grant

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Proper Remedy For A Lack Of Batson Findings: The Fall-Out From Snyder V. Louisiana, William H. Burgess, Douglas G. Smith

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

Bark With No Bite: How The Inevitable Discovery Rule Is Undermining The Supreme Court’S Decision In Arizona V. Gant, Scott R. Grubman

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

Everybody’S Got A Price: Why Orange County’S Practice Of Taking Dna Samples From Misdemeanor Arrestees Is An Excessive Fine, Michael Purtill

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

A Law Of Passion, Not Of Principle, Nor Even Purpose: A Call To Repeal Or Revise The Adam Walsh Act Amendments To The Bail Reform Act Of 1984, Michael R. Handler

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

Excusing Behavior: Reclassifying The Federal Common Law Defenses Of Duress And Necessity Relying On The Victim’S Role, Monu Bedi

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

A Lie Is A Lie: An Argument For Strict Protection Against A Prosecutor’S Knowing Use Of Perjured Testimony, Charlie Devore

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

Foreword, Charlie Devore

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

Criminalizing Statements Of Terrorist Intent: How To Understand The Law Governing Terrorist Threats, And Why It Should Be Used Instead Of Long-Term Preventive Detention, Alec Walen

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

The Status Quo Bias And Counterterrorism Detention, Gregory S. Mcneal

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

Mental Disorder And Criminal Law, Stephen J. Morse

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

“Confronting” Foreign Intelligence: Crawford Roadblocks To Domestic Terrorism Trials, John Scott

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

No abstract provided.

Federalism And Criminal Law: What The Feds Can Learn From The States, Rachel E. Barkow

Michigan Law Review

Criminal law enforcement in the United States is multijurisdictional. Local, state, and federal prosecutors all possess the power to bring criminal charges. An enduring question of criminal law is how authority should be allocated among these levels of government. In trying to gain traction on the question of when crime should be handled at the federal level and when it should be left to local authorities, courts and scholars have taken a range of approaches. Oddly, one place that commentators have not looked for guidance on how to handle the issue of law enforcement allocation is within the states themselves. …

Falling Through The Crack: How Courts Have Struggled To Apply The Crack Amendment To Nominal Career And Plea Bargain Defendants, Maxwell Arlie Halpern Kosman

Michigan Law Review

Under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a defendant is normally obligated to attend all of the proceedings against her. However Rule 43(b)(2) carves out an exception for organizational defendants, stating that they "need not be present" if represented by an attorney. But on its face, the language of 43(b)(2) is ambiguous: is it the defendant or the judge who has the discretion to decide whether the defendant appears? That is, may a judge compel the presence of an organizational defendant? This Note addresses the ambiguity in the context of the plea colloquy, considering the text of several of the …

Coercion's Common Threads: Addressing Vagueness In The Federal Criminal Prohibitions On Torture By Looking To State Domestic Violence Laws, Sarah H. St. Vincent

Michigan Law Review

Under international law, the United States is obligated to criminalize acts of torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment. However, the federal criminal torture laws employ several terms whose meanings are so indeterminate that they inhibit the statutes' effectiveness and fail to provide adequate guidance regarding precisely which forms of mistreatment may result in prosecution. These ambiguous terms have given rise to serious and prolonged controversies within the executive branch regarding what torture is-controversies that confirm, and may further compound, the uncertainty of liability under the laws in question.

In order to solve this problem of vagueness and provide definitive …

Prosecuting The Informant Culture, Andrew E. Taslitz

Michigan Law Review

Alexandra Natapoff, in her outstanding new book, Snitching: Criminal Informants and the Erosion of American Justice, makes a compelling case for reform of the system by which we regulate police use of criminal informants. Indeed, as other writers have discussed, law enforcement's overreliance on such informants has led to a "snitching culture" in which informant snitching replaces other forms of law enforcement investigation (pp. 12, 31, 88-89). Yet snitches, especially jailhouse snitches, are notoriously unreliable.

Section 2259 Restitution Claims And Child Pornography Possession, Dina Mcleod

Michigan Law Review

In 2009, a child pornography victim brought a criminal restitution claim against a defendant who possessed images of her abuse. The statutory provision authorizing restitution, 18 U.S.C. § 2259, had never before been used to bring a claim against a defendant who had only possessed, rather than produced or distributed, child pornography ("child pornography possession defendants"). The federal courts have not developed a consistent approach to resolving Section 2259 claims involving such defendants. This Note argues that two conceptions of traditional proximate cause doctrine can provide a framework for analyzing such claims. It examines Section 2259 claims using both a …

Vesting Title In A Murderer: Where Is The Equity In The Georgia Supreme Court's Interpretation Of The Slayer Statute In Levenson?, Mark A. Silver

Georgia Law Review

The recent Georgia Supreme Court ruling in Levenson v.
Word exposes difficult interpretative and equitable
questions posed by Georgia's slayer statute. The case
began after Debra Post inherited her husband's estate but
was then arrested for his murder. She used her husband's
life insuranceproceeds and the real property she acquired
through the murder to pay two law firms to defend her in
the murder trial before pleading guilty.
The court-appointedadministratorof the estate sued the
law firms for conversion for not returning these illegally
and immorally acquired funds. Under the Georgia slayer
statute, a murderer forfeits the right to serve as …

How House Bill 2063 And The Expansion Of Access To Protective Orders Could Have Saved Yeardley Love's Life, Amy Weiss

Richmond Public Interest Law Review

Battered women often face an uphill battle in the legal system. In the 2011 session, the Virginia General Assembly added a new tool to these women's arsenal.o An amended version of House Bill 2063 sponsored by Delegate Rob Bell (R- Albemarle) passed the House and Senate unanimously on February 26, 2011. This paper will examine Virginia protective order law before the enactment of House Bill 2063, how Yeardley Love's death was a catalyst for reform of the law, how the law will change under House Bill 2063, and possible future developments in legislative reform that could further help victims of …