Law Commons^™

The Christian Lawyer As A Churchman, William Stringfellow

Vanderbilt Law Review

Comparative studies of moral theology and legal philosophy are irrelevant if they are isolated from the concrete life of worship. Similarly, the question of the Christian vocation of the practicing lawyer must not be solely an attempt to articulate some ethics to guide a lawyer in his decisions in work. The Christian life is not so much about deciding and doing as it is about being that which Christians are called to be. Precisely, Christians are what they are called to be in worship. Worship is not an ancillary folk activity to which Christians resort out of sentiment or superstition, …

A Bibliography On Christian Faith And The Law, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Church and State SCM Press, London, 1939

==============================

Christian Ethics and Social Policy Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, N.Y., 1946

==============================

The Destiny of Man Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, N.Y., 1937

==============================

The Divine Imperative Lutterworth Press, London, 1937

==============================

The Theology of Religious Vocation Herder, St. Louis, Mo., 1951.

==============================

Moberly, Responsibility (Riddle Memorial Lectures at the University of Durham, 1951). Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y., 1951

==============================

The Nature and Destiny of Man Charles Scribner's Sons, New York,N.Y., 1943

===============================

Christian Philosophy in the Common Law Blackfriars, Oxford,1947.

Administrative Law -- 1957 Tennessee Survey, James B. Earle

Vanderbilt Law Review

Only a few cases by the Tennessee Supreme Court decided during the survey year considered questions of general administrative law. These concerned the timing and extent of judicial review of administrative action and the conduct of hearings by agencies.

Prerequisites to Judicial Review: Whether available administrative remedies must be exhausted by a litigant before seeking a review or other relief by court action is a question not always capable of exact prediction.' The "long settled rule of judicial administration that no one is entitled to judicial relief for a supposed or threatened injury until the prescribed administrative remedy has been …

Agency -- 1957 Tennessee Survey, F. Hodge O'Neal

Vanderbilt Law Review

Several interesting and significant decisions in the fields of agency and master and servant were handed down during the survey period. This article discusses the decisions in groups, each group being placed under a topic heading which is designed to give the reader an idea of the particular phase of agency law involved in that group of cases.

Establishing that Tort feasor is a Servant of Defendant: It is elementary law of course that a master is liable for the torts of his servant acting within the scope of his employment. A question often arises, however, as to whether a …

Business Associations -- 1957 Tennessee Survey, F. Hodge O'Neal

Vanderbilt Law Review

Very little happened in the field of Business Associations during the survey period. The General Assembly enacted one fairly important set of amendments to the Securities Law, and the Tennessee appellate courts handed down two or three decisions which in a large part merely reiterated principles of corporation law already well-established in this state.

Amendments to the Securities Law Broadening Grounds for Refusing or Revoking Registration of Securities: The Securities Law of 1955 among other things set up a procedure for the registration of securities intended for sale and gave the Commissioner of Insurance and Banking authority to investigate the …

Conflict Of Laws -- 1957 Tennessee Survey, John W. Wade

Vanderbilt Law Review

Martin v. Martin' involved a bill in equity by a wife to set aside a divorce decree as fraudulently obtained by the husband. The parties had been domiciled in Pennsylvania. While in Tennessee as a member of the armed forces the husband obtained the divorce in the state. He was subsequently transferred outside the United States. Complainant's bill to set the decree aside for fraud was sustained by the chancellor, defendant being served by publication. Defendant then made a special appearance to contest the jurisdiction of the court and appealed from an adverse ruling.

The Supreme Court held that there …

Constitutional Law -- 1957 Tennessee Survey, Paul H. Sanders

Vanderbilt Law Review

During the survey period the Tennessee Supreme Court had occasion to deal with a major, though unsuccessful, attack upon the constitutionality of the state legislation providing for the apportionment of Senators and Representatives in the General Assembly. There were also important questions relating to constitutional limitations on the police power in the regulation of insurance and of the number and capacity of gasoline storage tanks by a municipality.

The separation between legislative, executive and judicial powers is made express in the Tennessee Constitution.' In addition, each of these coordinate branches of government is expressly enjoined from performing the functions of …

Contracts -- 1957 Tennessee Survey, Paul J. Hartman

Vanderbilt Law Review

Breach of contract to publish advertisement--certainty of lost anticipated profits--nominal damages: The rule of "certainty" with respect to awarding damages for a breach of contract is simply a standard requiring a reasonable degree of persuasiveness in the proof of the fact of damage and of the amount of damage.' Through the use of the standard of certainty, the court is enabled to insist that the jury must have factual data--something more than guesswork--to guide themin fixing the award. Loss of commercial profits, claimed as damages for breach of contract, has become the principal field for the application of the standard …

Creditors' Rights And Security Transactions -- 1957 Tennessee Survey, Paul J. Hartman

Vanderbilt Law Review

Fraudulent Conveyances--Effect of Recordation of Fraudulent Conveyance on Subsequent Creditors: In Butler v. Holland, the Tennessee Supreme Court was faced with the question of whether the constructive notice of a recorded deed which is a fraudulent conveyance prevents a creditor, who became such after the recordation, from setting the conveyance aside. The plaintiff-creditor (Butler), in an effort to collect a debt due him from the estate of one Jesse Nolen, deceased, brought a suit in equity to have set aside, as a fraud against plaintiff, a conveyance of real estate by one Nolen to the defendant (Holland). The conveyance admittedly …

Criminal Law And Procedure -- 1957 Tennessee Survey, James B. Earle

Vanderbilt Law Review

Homicide: The statutory requirement that a killing be "willful; deliberate, malicious, and premeditated" for a finding of murder in the first degree is not applicable to a killing committed while in the perpetration of one of the felonies listed in the statute. This question arose in Farmer v. State, in which it appeared that the killing resulted from the setting on fire of a dwelling, i.e. arson, by the defendant. It was urged on appeal to the Tennessee Supreme Court that there was no proof of felonious homicide because there was no showing of an intent to kill nor even …

Equity -- 1957 Tennessee Survey, Thomas F. Green Jr.

Vanderbilt Law Review

JURISDICTION:

Among what is said' to be the largest number of public laws ever passed by a Tennessee Legislature, the General Assembly passed an act which creates a statutory exception to the doctrine that equity will not enjoin the commission of a crime unless the conduct comes within some recognized head of equity jurisdiction.

EQUITABLE REMEDIES:

Hall v. Briton was a suit in the chancery court to enjoin defendants, who were complainant's former employees, from selling a product produced with the aid of complainant's trade secret.

CONTEMPT:

One of the peculiarities of equity is that its decrees frequently consist of …

Insurance -- 1957 Tennessee Survey, Robert W. Sturdivant

Vanderbilt Law Review

The case of Lee v. Occidental Life Ins. Co.' is one of first impression in this state, and considers the effect of a change in the by-laws and constitution of a labor union--with a corresponding change in coverage under a group insurance policy issued to the union--on the rights of an insured member of the union.

Life, Health and Accident Insurance In Alvis v. Mutual Benefit Health and Acc. Ass'n, the Supreme Court construed certain provisions of a ten-year annual increasing policy issued to the plaintiff's intestate by defendant insuror.

Local Government Law -- 1957 Tennessee Survey, Thomas G. Roady Jr., Robert L. White

Vanderbilt Law Review

The substantial amount of litigation involving local governmental units, their officers and agents, continued during the period covered by this survey and if volume alone were any indication of significant growth and development in a given area of law this survey article would be of considerable importance. But, in general, the cases decided in this period draw on fairly well established legal rules and principles or upon legislation which has been designed to clarify existing problems. In view of this fact it does not appear justifiable to do much more than to present a summary of these decisions with brief …

Personal Property And Sales, F. Hodge O'Neal, Thomas G. Roady Jr.

Vanderbilt Law Review

Sales

Two sales cases were decided during the survey period. One of the cases, Henson v. Wright,' was an action by the buyer of a tractor to rescind the purchase for breach of warranty.

Judd v. Fruehauf Trailer Co. is a questionable decision which perhaps opens a way for a seller in a conditional sale contract to circumvent provisions of the conditional sales act designed to protect the conditional buyer.

Liability of Common Carrier: Is a carrier liable to a shipper for breach of contract for failure to deliver an animal lost en route from point of shipment to point …

Procedure And Evidence -- 1957 Tennessee Survey, Edmund M. Morgan

Vanderbilt Law Review

PLEADING

Generally: Pleadings are construed liberally in favor of the pleader,and this is particularly true when the attack is made after judgment.

Use of Several Counts: It is entirely proper under prevailing practice to state the same cause of action in several counts, each setting forth a different theory or ground of recovery; but they must not be so framed as to make the declaration prolix and unduly repetitious.

Same-Pleading Evidence of Ultimate Fact: In most jurisdictions with a typical code, allegations of evidence from which the ultimate fact may be deduced, whether or not the deduction is expressly averred …

Real Property -- 1957 Tennessee Survey, Thomas G. Roady Jr.

Vanderbilt Law Review

The Rule in Shelley's Case Revisited: During the period covered by this survey the Supreme Court of Tennessee handed down an opinion involving one of those problems periodically recurring in the real property field. In this decision the court revisited the Rule in Shelley's Case, pointing out the classic situation to which it applies and calling attention to the statute in Tennessee which abolished the Rule.

The question before the court was in terms of what estate the grantee, Ralph Parker, acquired where the conveyance was to "Ralph Parker and at his death to his bodily heirs." The court concluded …

Restitution -- 1957 Tennessee Survey, John W. Wade

Vanderbilt Law Review

Compulsion of Judgment: This year's most important decision in the field of Restitution is the famous case of New York Life Ins. Co.v. Nashville Trust Co.' This was the case in which one Buntin disappeared from his home in Nashville under circumstances which led the Supreme Court of Tennessee to hold that he had committed suicide and thus died while an insurance policy was still in effect. As a result the plaintiff insurance company was compelled to pay the defendant trust company, as trustees for the beneficiaries of the policy (Buntin's family), an amount of $60,000. Years later, Buntin was …

Some Procedural Problems In Arbitration, Benjamin Aaron

Vanderbilt Law Review

By training and experience, lawyers are accustomed to deal with problems within a well-defined procedural framework. Familiarity with established rules of conduct, however archaic and nonsensical they may be, apparently does not breed contempt; on the contrary, it seems to enhance the average lawyer's feelings of security and self-confidence. Conversely, he is apt to become uneasy, irritable, even indignant, when compelled to function within a system of loose and flexible procedures, inconsistently applied according to a logic that to him is at best obscure and often inscrutable. The attorney who is not a labor relations specialist, and who only occasionally …

Vacation Of Awards For Fraud, Bias, Misconduct And Partiality, Alan H. Rothstein

Vanderbilt Law Review

The role of the arbitration process in today's society is to supplant the often laborious and time consuming procedures of the courts with a more informal process wherein the parties to a controversy, by agreement, give one or more individuals effective power to render a decision on a particular matter, or on future controversies as they arise. In order that the grant of the power be effective, and that a resulting award be obeyed, the courts will generally enforce a properly made award without examination of the underlying issues or evidence of the controversy developed during the arbitration. Judicial prescriptions …

A Labor Arbitrator Views His Work, Maurice H. Merrill

Vanderbilt Law Review

What follows is, in form and in content, somewhat at variance from the typical law review article. It is not the result of a systematic survey of statutory enactment or of case law. Still less is it based on investigation of the place of arbitration as a part of the social order. Neither is it the product of an inquisition into the materials of the social and behavioral sciences for such light as they may shed upon the arbitral process and its achievements. It is simply an account of the author's own views of arbitration, based on his personal experience …

Informing The Arbitrator, Robert L. Howard

Vanderbilt Law Review

In any arbitration proceeding the representative of each party has a two-fold obligation of major importance to the arbitrator, the effective fulfillment of which is essential to the success of the arbitration process. In the first place, the arbitrator must be advised in clear and concise terms as to exactly what constitutes the issue or issues to be determined, which, of necessity, to be effective, must be preliminary to the presentation of the case proper. In the second place, it is, of course, equally important to have a clear presentation of each party's case after the issue has been formulated. …

The Federal Courts And Indirect Criminal Contempt, Philip L. Peeler

Vanderbilt Law Review

The purpose of this note will be to deal with one method of implementation, i.e., the use of the court's power to punish for criminal contempt particularly in regard to decrees, and the extent to which and under what circumstances persons not directly named in those decrees may be subjected to punishment for conduct of a criminal nature which interferes with the enforcement of those decrees...

Judicial decisions which conflict with settled moral and ethnological convictions are not translated overnight into effective standards of acceptable behavior. The decisions, however, must be implemented.'The purpose of this note will be to deal …

Effect Of Exculpatory Clauses Under The Federal Tort Claims Act, John B. Thurman Jr.

Vanderbilt Law Review

The effect of an exculpatory clause' in a federal contract was the subject of two recent cases brought against the government under the Federal Tort Claims Act. In United States v. Kelly the subject of the contract was the sale of "edible garbage," and the contract provided that the garbage was sold "as is" and "without recourse" against the government, and that in any case where the liability of the government was established, the recovery would be limited to the contract price. In Air Transport Associates v. United States the subject of the contract was the use by plaintiff's commercial …

A Lawyer's View Of Labor Arbitration, George E. Strong

Vanderbilt Law Review

The future of labor arbitration and the viewpoint of the lawyer with reference thereto depend very largely upon the arbitrators and their procedures, conduct and decisions. Of course, the parties and their counsel are under a duty, in the words of the Code of Ethics and Procedural Standards for Labor-Management Arbitration prepared by the American Arbitration Association and the National Academy of Arbitrators and approved by the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, "to approach arbitration in a spirit of cooperation with the arbitrator and should seek to aid him in the performance of his duties." Nevertheless, the arbitrator, like the …

Foreword, Sylvan Gotshal

Vanderbilt Law Review

Twenty years ago an article on arbitration would have been an oddity in a law review. Significant of the change in thinking with regard to arbitration on the part of attorneys, bar associations, and law schools is the fact that within the past few months several law journals and reviews have had major articles devoted to various aspects of arbitration. This new literature in the legal field serves as notice to the practitioner and to the law student that arbitration has come of age. The editors of the Vanderbilt Law Review and the faculty of the Law School are, therefore, …

The Nature Of The Arbitration Process, William M. Hepburn, Pierre R. Loiseaux

Vanderbilt Law Review

The process of reaching a decision in labor-management arbitrations involves many uncertain factors. As to the final result in a case, we can perhaps say that it is in accord with the contract of the parties or that it is not; that it is "fair" or not; "practical" or unworkable; or that it accords with "public policy" or violates it. Some or all of the criteria discussed in this article may be satisfied in a particular case, but, as is proper, the parties are most often interested in basic equities, in whether an award can be brought within the ambit …

The Proposed Uniform Arbitration Act Should Not Be Adopted, Alexander H. Frey

Vanderbilt Law Review

The primary reason why the proposed Uniform Arbitration Act should not be adopted is because, by an express provision in section 1, the Act is made applicable to "arbitration agreements between employers and employees or between their respective representatives." My experience as an arbitrator has been confined almost exclusively to labor disputes of which I have arbitrated hundreds. Consequently, I do not purport to be able to judge whether or not the proposed Act would be a valuable adjunct to the existing arbitration law in the area of commercial arbitration. But I am convinced that, if applied to labor arbitrations, …

Act Relating To Arbitration And To Make Uniform The Law With Reference Thereto, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

A written agreement to submit any existing controversy to arbitration or a provision in a written contract to submit to arbitration any controversy thereafter arising between the parties is valid, enforceable and irrevocable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract. This act also applies to arbitration agreements between employers and employees or between their respective representatives (unless otherwise provided in the agreement.)

Collective Bargaining, Labor Arbitration And The Lawyer, Nathan P. Feinsinger

Vanderbilt Law Review

The role of the lawyer in labor arbitration must be appraised in the light of his function in society generally and the unique demands of the institution of collective bargaining, of which arbitration has become an integral part.

The role of the lawyer generally is to assist in resolving conflicts among individual and group interests within a framework of rules developed by the common law or by legislation, as interpreted and applied by courts and administrative agencies. Operating within that framework, the lawyer advises his client whether and how he can accomplish his immediate objective. The professional skills which he …

Some Comments On Arbitration Legislation And The Uniform Act, Maynard E. Pirsig

Vanderbilt Law Review

Common-law arbitration rests upon a voluntary agreement of the parties to submit their dispute to an outsider. The submission agreement may be oral and may be revoked at any time before the rendering of the award. The tribunal, permanent or temporary, may be composed of any number of arbitrators. They must be free from bias and interest in the subject matter and may not be related by affinity or consanguinity to either party. The arbitrators need not be sworn. Only existing disputes may be submitted to them. The parties must be given notice of hearings and are entitled to be …