Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 31 - 60 of 342
Full-Text Articles in Law
Vagueness And Federal-State Relations, Joel S. Johnson
Vagueness And Federal-State Relations, Joel S. Johnson
University of Chicago Law Review
This Article aims to clarify the content of the void-for-vagueness doctrine and defend its historical pedigree by drawing attention to a fundamental aspect of the Supreme Court’s vagueness decisions—that vagueness analysis significantly depends on whether the law at issue is a federal or state law. That simple distinction has considerable explanatory power. It reveals that the doctrine emerged in the late nineteenth century in response to two simultaneous changes in the legal landscape— first, the availability of Supreme Court due process review of state penal statutes under the Fourteenth Amendment, and second, a significant shift in how state courts construed …
Droughts Of Compassion: The Enduring Problem With Compassionate Release And How The Sentencing Commission Can Address It, Nathaniel Berry
Droughts Of Compassion: The Enduring Problem With Compassionate Release And How The Sentencing Commission Can Address It, Nathaniel Berry
University of Chicago Law Review
Compassionate release, guided by 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), allows a district court to reduce a previously imposed criminal sentence if “extraordinary and compelling reasons” warrant a reduction. Congress delegated the task of describing what constitutes an extraordinary and compelling reason to the U.S. Sentencing Commission. Following the passage of the First Step Act of 2018, most circuit courts held the Commission’s policy statement describing extraordinary and compelling reasons inapplicable, and that until the Commission updated its policy statement, courts enjoyed the discretion to determine what circumstances justify compassionate release.
e. Many have celebrated this newfound discretion and its potential to …
Clean Up Your Act: The U.S. Government’S Cercla Liability For Uranium Mines On The Navajo Nation, Michelle David
Clean Up Your Act: The U.S. Government’S Cercla Liability For Uranium Mines On The Navajo Nation, Michelle David
University of Chicago Law Review
This Comment delves into the Cold War legacy of uranium mining on the Navajo Nation. Today, unremediated hazardous waste from more than five hundred deserted mines has continued to poison the health and lands of the Navajo. This Comment argues that the federal government is ultimately liable for the remediation of these mines under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Specifically, because the federal government held legal title to the mining lands and tightly managed the mining operations, the federal government satisfies CERCLA’s liability regime for “owners” and “operators.” The U.S. government’s liability under CERCLA warrants fuller …
The Rise Of Nonbinding International Agreements: An Empirical, Comparative, And Normative Analysis, Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith, Oona A. Hathaway
The Rise Of Nonbinding International Agreements: An Empirical, Comparative, And Normative Analysis, Curtis A. Bradley, Jack L. Goldsmith, Oona A. Hathaway
University of Chicago Law Review
The treaty process specified in Article II of the Constitution has been dying a slow death for decades, replaced by various forms of “executive agreements.” What is only beginning to be appreciated is the extent to which both treaties and executive agreements are increasingly being overshadowed by another form of international cooperation: nonbinding international agreements. Not only have nonbinding agreements become more prevalent, but many of the most consequential (and often controversial) U.S. international agreements in recent years have been concluded in whole or in significant part as nonbinding agreements. Despite their prevalence and importance, nonbinding agreements have not traditionally …
Unshackling Cities, Felipe Ford Cole
Unshackling Cities, Felipe Ford Cole
University of Chicago Law Review
Scholars have long demonstrated that cities are constrained by states and the federal government in the exercise of their power. While important, the emphasis on these “vertical” constraints on cities does not account for the “horizontal” constraints on city power from private actors. This Article suggests that the emphasis on vertical constraints on city power is due to a misunderstanding of the history of local government law that describes its sole function as the vertical distribution of power between cities and different levels of government. I revise the history of Dillon’s Rule, the doctrinal cornerstone of local government law’s vertical …
Stating The Obvious: Departmental Policies As Clearly Established Law, Eliana Fleischer
Stating The Obvious: Departmental Policies As Clearly Established Law, Eliana Fleischer
University of Chicago Law Review
Qualified immunity is a judge-made doctrine originally created to shield officers from liability only when they could not have been on notice that their actions were wrongful. In the four decades since the Supreme Court first articulated this justification for qualified immunity, the doctrine has become unmoored from its roots and has expanded to protect officers even in the face of clear evidence that the officers should have known better.
The test for qualified immunity states that officers are immune from liability in the absence of clearly established law that previously condemned their conduct, but the Supreme Court has not …
Insurance Coverage And Induced Infringement: A Threat To Hatch-Waxman’S Skinny Labeling Pathway?, Maya Lorey
Insurance Coverage And Induced Infringement: A Threat To Hatch-Waxman’S Skinny Labeling Pathway?, Maya Lorey
University of Chicago Law Review
In the fall of 2020, Amarin Corporation—a brand-name drug company— brought an unprecedented claim in federal court. Instead of just suing a generic manufacturer for inducing infringement of its method patent, as is typical in litigation over skinny label generic drugs, Amarin also added a health insurance company as a defendant. In its complaint, Amarin alleged that Health Net induced infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) of the Patent Act by charging a lower co-pay for the generic, skinny label version of its brand-name drug. Industry commentators agreed that a finding of liability for Health Net would be a blow …
The Fair Housing Act After Inclusive Communities: Why One-Time Land-Use Decisions Can Still Establish A Disparate Impact, Kate Gehling
The Fair Housing Act After Inclusive Communities: Why One-Time Land-Use Decisions Can Still Establish A Disparate Impact, Kate Gehling
University of Chicago Law Review
The Fair Housing Act (FHA) is a civil rights statute that prohibits housing discrimination against several protected classes. One theory of liability under the FHA is disparate impact, in which a plaintiff alleges that the defendant’s policy or practice, although facially neutral, nevertheless has discriminatory effects because it disproportionately negatively affects a protected class. In its 2015 opinion, Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., the Supreme Court affirmed that the FHA includes disparate impact liability but also potentially limited its applicability—the Court distinguished between a defendant’s policy and a one-time decision by a defendant, …
The Fourth Amendment Without Police, Shawn E. Fields
The Fourth Amendment Without Police, Shawn E. Fields
University of Chicago Law Review
What role will the Fourth Amendment play in a world without police? As academics, activists, and lawmakers explore alternatives to traditional law enforcement, it bears asking whether the amendment primarily tasked with regulating police investigations would also regulate postpolice public safety agencies. Surprisingly, the answer is often no. Courts are reluctant to recognize protections from government searches or seizures outside criminal investigations, and they are even more reluctant to require probable cause or a warrant for such conduct. Thus, by removing most public safety functions outside the criminal sphere, abolitionists also move intrusive government conduct outside these traditional strictures and …
Regulatory Trading, David A. Weisbach
Regulatory Trading, David A. Weisbach
University of Chicago Law Review
Regulatory trading systems, such as the SO2 cap-and-trade system, are ubiquitous in environmental and natural resources law. In addition to cap-and-trade systems for pollutants such as SO2, NOx, and CO2, environmental and natural resources law uses trading in areas such as endangered species, water quality, wetlands, vehicle mileage, and forestry and farming practices. Trading, however, is rarely used as a regulatory approach in other areas of law. This Article seeks to identify the reasons for this dichotomy. To understand the dichotomy, the Article examines the uses of trading in environmental and natural resources law, where it has been successful, and …
The Long Arm Of Bostock V. Clayton County: Opening 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) To Claims Of Anti-Lgbt Discrimination, Jason Hanselman
The Long Arm Of Bostock V. Clayton County: Opening 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) To Claims Of Anti-Lgbt Discrimination, Jason Hanselman
University of Chicago Law Review
42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) is a Reconstruction-era statute that allows one to recover damages from those that conspire to deprive one of one’s constitutional or statutory rights. In the 1970s, the Supreme Court began requiring a showing of discriminatory animus in order to confer liability under the statute. The lower courts have since found that allegations of discriminatory animus against LGBT folks are insufficient to satisfy the requirement. Most circuits have also held that sex-based discrimination is cognizable under § 1985(3), citing federal law’s condemnation of the practice. Other circuits have found sex-based discrimination cognizable under the statute as well, …
Covenant Control: The Case For Treating Uptier Transactions As A Form Of Corporate Control, Ryan Schloessmann
Covenant Control: The Case For Treating Uptier Transactions As A Form Of Corporate Control, Ryan Schloessmann
University of Chicago Law Review
In recent years, uptier transactions have emerged as a novel way for distressed companies to restructure their debt obligations, resulting in unforeseen and inequitable outcomes for investors in corporate debt. Uptier transactions depend on provisions in credit agreements that permit debtholders with a majority stake in a class of debt to make decisions on behalf of all debtholders. Distressed companies take advantage of these provisions by colluding with a majority of debtholders to shift economic value from the remaining debtholders to themselves. As this Comment demonstrates, these transactions are likely to be value destructive and present an issue for capital …
A Gricean Theory Of Expressive Conduct, Richard P. Stillman
A Gricean Theory Of Expressive Conduct, Richard P. Stillman
University of Chicago Law Review
In Spence v. Washington, the Supreme Court devised a two-part test for determining whether a nonverbal action is expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment. According to the Spence test, a nonverbal action is expressive if and only if: (1) it is intended to communicate a particularized message; and (2) in the circumstances in which the action is performed, the likelihood is great that the message will be understood by observers.
In subsequent cases, however, the Court has made clear that the category of “expressive conduct” embraces a much wider variety of nonverbal behaviors than a literal reading of the …
The Uncertain Judge, Courtney M. Cox
The Uncertain Judge, Courtney M. Cox
University of Chicago Law Review
The intellectually honest judge faces a very serious problem about which little has been said. It is this: What should a judge do when she knows all the relevant facts, laws, and theories of adjudication, but still remains uncertain about what she ought to do? Such occasions will arise, for whatever her preferred theory about how she ought to decide a given case—what I will call her preferred “jurisprudence”— she may harbor lingering doubts that a competing jurisprudence is correct instead. And sometimes, these competing jurisprudences provide conflicting guidance. When that happens, what should she do?
Drawing on emerging debates …
Beyond States: A Constitutional History Of Territory, Statehood, And Nation-Building, Craig Green
Beyond States: A Constitutional History Of Territory, Statehood, And Nation-Building, Craig Green
University of Chicago Law Review
The United States has always been more than simply a group of united states. The constitutional history of national union and component states is linked to a third category: federal territory. This Article uses an integrated history of territory, statehood, and union to develop a new framework for analyzing constitutional statehood. Three historical periods are crucial—the Founding Era, the Civil War, and Reconstruction—as times when statehood was especially malleable as a matter of constitutional law. During each of those formative periods, the most important constitutional struggles about statehood and the union involved federal territories.
Conflicts about territories reveal an important …
Taming Wildcat Stablecoins, Gary B. Gorton, Jeffery Y. Zhang
Taming Wildcat Stablecoins, Gary B. Gorton, Jeffery Y. Zhang
University of Chicago Law Review
Cryptocurrencies, including stablecoins, are all the rage. Investors are exploring ways to profit off of them. Governments are considering ways to regulate them. While the technology underlying cryptocurrencies is new, the economics is centuries old. Oftentimes, lawmakers are so focused on understanding a new technological innovation that they fail to ask what exactly is being created.
In this case, the new technology has recreated circulating private money in the form of stablecoins, which are similar to the banknotes that circulated in many countries during the nineteenth century. The implication is that stablecoin issuers are unregulated banks. Based on lessons learned …
In Defense Of Chapter 11 For Mass Torts, Anthony J. Casey, Joshua C. Macey
In Defense Of Chapter 11 For Mass Torts, Anthony J. Casey, Joshua C. Macey
University of Chicago Law Review
This Essay argues that bankruptcy proceedings are well-suited to resolving mass tort claims. Mass tort cases create a collective action problem that encourages claimants who are worried about available recoveries to race to the courthouse to collect ahead of others. This race can destroy going concern value and lead to the dismemberment of valuable firms. Coordination among claimants is difficult as each one seeks to maximize its own recoveries. These are the very collective action and holdout problems that bankruptcy proceedings are designed to solve. As such, bankruptcy proceedings are appropriate means of resolving mass torts as long as they …
Labor Market Regulation And Worker Power, Hiba Hafiz, Ioana Marinescu
Labor Market Regulation And Worker Power, Hiba Hafiz, Ioana Marinescu
University of Chicago Law Review
Due to a lack of competition among employers in the labor market, employers have monopsony power, or power to pay workers less than what the workers contribute to the employers’ bottom line. “Worker power” is workers’ ability to obtain higher wages and better working conditions. While the antitrust agencies have just begun developing policy and enforcement strategies to regulate employer monopsony, broader government policies that impact market forces, the formation of labor market institutions, and workers’ voices and exit options also play a defining role in shaping worker power relative to employers. For example, in addition to antitrust enforcement, worker …
Worker Welfare And Antitrust, Herbert Hovenkamp
Worker Welfare And Antitrust, Herbert Hovenkamp
University of Chicago Law Review
The field of antitrust and labor has gone through a profound change in orientation. For the great bulk of its history, labor was viewed by antitrust enforcers as a competitive threat. The debate over antitrust and labor was framed around whether there should be a labor “immunity” from the antitrust laws. In just the last decade, however, the orientation has flipped. Most new writing views labor as a target of anticompetitive restraints imposed by employers. Antitrust is increasingly concerned with protecting labor rather than challenging its conduct.
Antitrust interest in labor markets is properly focused on two things. The smaller …
Restructuring American Antitrust Law: Institutionalist Economics And The Antitrust Labor Immunity, 1890–1940s, Laura Phillips-Sawyer
Restructuring American Antitrust Law: Institutionalist Economics And The Antitrust Labor Immunity, 1890–1940s, Laura Phillips-Sawyer
University of Chicago Law Review
Labor unions and their leaders were cast as the perennial antitrust defendants for the first fifty years of federal antitrust law, and this historic imbalance fostered a movement in economic scholarship and labor activism to restructure American antitrust law. The progressive liberal-institutionalist movement in economics played an important role in legitimizing trade unions by recasting them, not as anticompetitive cartels, but rather as a necessary corollary to the growing market power of industrial firms. Louis Brandeis, the litigator and future jurist, drew from institutionalists’ work to support antitrust reform. He argued that antitrust law was not necessarily anathema to the …
Conflict Of Laws? Tensions Between Antitrust And Labor Law, Matthew Dimick
Conflict Of Laws? Tensions Between Antitrust And Labor Law, Matthew Dimick
University of Chicago Law Review
Not long ago, economists denied the existence of monopsony in labor markets. Today, scholars are talking about using antitrust law to counter employer wagesetting power. While concerns about inequality, stagnant wages, and excessive firm power are certainly to be welcomed, this sudden about-face in theory, evidence, and policy runs the risk of overlooking some important concerns. The purpose of this Essay is to address these concerns and, more critically, to discuss some tensions between antitrust and labor law, a more traditional method for regulating labor markets. Part I addresses a question raised in the very recent literature, about why antitrust …
Losing Leverage: Employee Replaceability And Labor Market Power, Cynthia Estlund
Losing Leverage: Employee Replaceability And Labor Market Power, Cynthia Estlund
University of Chicago Law Review
Workers’ labor market power matters enormously to their lives at work and beyond. And most workers have too little of it. This Essay highlights one underappreciated set of factors in the decline of workers’ labor market power and explores policy levers that might help to rebalance the bargaining field. This Essay begins with the fairly self-evident observation that workers’ labor market power is a product in part of the ease with which employers can replace employees. That points to the importance of several trends in the organization and technology of work—including both fissuring and automation—that make it easier for private …
Horizontal Collusion And Parallel Wage Setting In Labor Markets, Jonathan S. Masur, Eric A. Posner
Horizontal Collusion And Parallel Wage Setting In Labor Markets, Jonathan S. Masur, Eric A. Posner
University of Chicago Law Review
Horizontal collusion among employers to suppress wages has received almost no attention in the academic literature, in contrast with its more familiar cousin, product-market collusion. The similar economic analysis of labor and product markets might suggest that antitrust should regulate labor and product markets in the same way. But product markets and labor markets do not operate identically: people behave differently as employees and as consumers. Unlike consumers who can switch products relatively easily, employees face significant frictions in changing jobs. Other labor market frictions are created by the pay equity norm and downward nominal wage rigidity. These and related …
Coercive Rideshare Practices: At The Intersection Of Antitrust And Consumer Protection Law In The Gig Economy, Christopher L. Peterson, Marshall Steinbaum
Coercive Rideshare Practices: At The Intersection Of Antitrust And Consumer Protection Law In The Gig Economy, Christopher L. Peterson, Marshall Steinbaum
University of Chicago Law Review
This Essay considers antitrust and consumer protection liability for coercive practices vis-à-vis drivers that are prevalent in the rideshare industry. Resale price maintenance, nonlinear pay practices, withholding data, and conditioning data access on maintaining a minimum acceptance rate all curtail platform competition, sustaining a high-price, tacitly collusive equilibrium among the few incumbents. Moreover, concealing relevant trip data from drivers is both deceptive and unfair when the platforms are in full possession of the relevant facts. In the absence of these coercive practices, customers too would be better off due to platform competition, which would lower average prices by sharpening competition …
Labor Market Concentration And Competition Policy Across The Atlantic, Satoshi Araki, Andrea Bassanini, Andrew Green, Luca Marcolin, Cristina Volpin
Labor Market Concentration And Competition Policy Across The Atlantic, Satoshi Araki, Andrea Bassanini, Andrew Green, Luca Marcolin, Cristina Volpin
University of Chicago Law Review
Drawing upon data from the largest cross-country study of labor market concentration to date, this Essay analyzes the level of concentration of labor-input markets in Europe and North America and provides a comparative perspective on employers’ monopsony power. It explores the characteristics of monopsony in labor markets and documents its impact by looking at the magnitude of employer concentration in selected jurisdictions. Using a harmonized dataset of online vacancies, this Essay shows that European labor markets are no more competitive than North American ones. It also supports the view that the effects of concentration on labor markets are broadly similar …
Antitrust Worker Protections: The Rule Of Reason Does Not Allow Counting Of Out-Of-Market Benefits, Laura Alexander, Steven C. Salop
Antitrust Worker Protections: The Rule Of Reason Does Not Allow Counting Of Out-Of-Market Benefits, Laura Alexander, Steven C. Salop
University of Chicago Law Review
Anticompetitive conduct toward upstream trading partners may have the effect of benefiting downstream consumers even as the conduct harms the firms’ workers or suppliers. Defendants may attempt to justify their upstream conduct—and may rely on the ancillary restraints doctrine in doing so—on the grounds that the restraints create efficiencies benefitting downstream purchasers, rather than focusing solely on the impact of the restraints on the workers or suppliers in the upstream market. Such balancing of harms against out-of-market benefits achieved by a different group should be rejected by antitrust doctrine generally, and specifically in the case of harms to workers. This …
Quasi Tripartism: Limits Of Co-Regulation And Sectoral Bargaining In The United States, César F. Rosado Marzán
Quasi Tripartism: Limits Of Co-Regulation And Sectoral Bargaining In The United States, César F. Rosado Marzán
University of Chicago Law Review
Disproportionate employer power is at least partly responsible for the sharp increase in economic inequality in the United States, which threatens the fabric of the Republic. Workplace law reform could provide workers with an institutional source of power that countervails employer power and compresses inequality. Ideas for workplace law reform include modest ones, such as instituting “co-enforcement,” and more ambitious ones, such as “sectoral bargaining.” According to their adherents, both require tripartite arrangements where capital, labor, and government provide inputs on how to regulate work.
But can the United States, with its liberal market economy typically devoid of meaningful tripartism, …
Introduction To The Symposium On Labor Market Power, Eric A. Posner
Introduction To The Symposium On Labor Market Power, Eric A. Posner
University of Chicago Law Review
Recent empirical work on labor markets reveals that they are beset by frictions, including high levels of concentration and frequent collusion, contrary to the traditional view of labor markets as being perfectly competitive.1 The implications of this work for law and policy have only begun to be explored. The University of Chicago Law Review convened a symposium to bring together scholars from various disciplines and with different subject matter expertise but with a common interest in understanding the regulation of labor markets in light of new empirical results. The papers delivered at the symposium have been published in this symposium …
On Firms, Sanjukta Paul
On Firms, Sanjukta Paul
University of Chicago Law Review
This Essay is about firms as a type of economic coordination and about how we think about them in relation to other forms of coordination as well as in relation to competition and markets. A prominent stream of thought about firms—which has both strongly influenced contemporary competition law and, more indirectly, served as a support to the fundamental ideas of neoclassical price theory that guide many areas of law and policy—ultimately explains and justifies the centralization of both decision-making rights and flows of income from economic activity on productive efficiency grounds. The Essay makes two simple points, drawing upon and …
Stakeholderism Silo Busting, Aneil Kovvali
Stakeholderism Silo Busting, Aneil Kovvali
University of Chicago Law Review
No abstract provided.