Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Torts (9)
- Consumer Protection Law (7)
- Other Law (6)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- State and Local Government Law (5)
-
- Courts (3)
- Health Law and Policy (3)
- Law and Politics (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Computer Law (2)
- Internet Law (2)
- Labor and Employment Law (2)
- Legal Education (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Food and Drug Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Land Use Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
- Religion Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Casebook (7)
- Seattle University (6)
- Seattle University Law Review (6)
- Torts (6)
- Initiative system (3)
-
- Initiatives (3)
- Representative governement (3)
- ADA (2)
- Advertising (2)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (2)
- Cases and Materials on Torts (2)
- EEOC (2)
- Employment discrimination (2)
- Epstein (2)
- Referendum (2)
- Republican government (2)
- Washington State (2)
- AIDS (1)
- Affirmative action (1)
- Albrecht v. Herald Oil (1)
- Aldous Huxley (1)
- Anatomical sex (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Antitrust injury doctrine (1)
- Aspen (1)
- Brave New World (1)
- Burma (1)
- Canons of statutory construction (1)
- Cigarettes (1)
- Cipollone v. Ligget Group (1)
Articles 31 - 36 of 36
Full-Text Articles in Law
Initiative Process In Washington, Philip A. Talmadge
Initiative Process In Washington, Philip A. Talmadge
Seattle University Law Review
This is an introduction to the Seattle University Law Review's Symposium on the initiative process in Washington. In this Symposium, the authors address a variety of issues associated with the initiative process in our state. They examine the specific case of Initiative 695, the role of the courts in reviewing initiatives, the application of the Republican Government Clause in the United States Constitution to Washington's initiative process, and the larger question of whether the entire initiative process is unconstitutional. These articles are timely analyses of a pressing public issue. This Seattle University Law Review Symposium on initiatives will highlight difficult …
Public Health Versus Civil Liberties: Washington State Imposes Hiv Surveillance And Strikes The Proper Balance, Robin Sheridan
Public Health Versus Civil Liberties: Washington State Imposes Hiv Surveillance And Strikes The Proper Balance, Robin Sheridan
Seattle University Law Review
The article examines the controversy surrounding the Washington HIV surveillance system in light of a long-standing conflict between public health concerns and civil liberties. 7 Part I of the article briefly describes the inception of the AIDS epidemic. Part II focuses on AIDS legislation and the justifications for surveillance. Part III discusses the tension between public health and civil liberties. Part IV describes AIDS’s social stigmatization and deterrence. Part V addresses the nature of medical information and the potential for government misuse. Part VI describes the types of HIV surveillance available and the benefits and burdens which accompany both tracking …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Volume Index, Seattle University Law Review
Volume Index, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Thou Shall Not Strike: Religion-Based Peremptory Challenges Under The Washington State Constitution, Justin Dolan
Thou Shall Not Strike: Religion-Based Peremptory Challenges Under The Washington State Constitution, Justin Dolan
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment will first define the peremptory challenge and discuss its history and normative values. It will then examine the United States Supreme Court's treatment of the peremptory challenge, focusing on how the peremptory challenge has changed from a litigation device that lawyers could exercise without explanation to one that at times requires an explanation for it to survive constitutional challenge. Next, this Comment will discuss state courts' independent interpretation of fundamental rights, Washington courts' decisions in harmony with this principle, and State v. Gunwall, the guide to independent constitutional interpretation in Washington. This Comment will show that under …
Employers Beware: The Ninth Circuit's Rejection Of The "Direct Threat To Self" Disability Discrimination Defense In Echazabal V. Chevron, Sheehan Sullivan
Employers Beware: The Ninth Circuit's Rejection Of The "Direct Threat To Self" Disability Discrimination Defense In Echazabal V. Chevron, Sheehan Sullivan
Seattle University Law Review
This Note will address whether the Ninth Circuit should have upheld the "direct threat to self" defense in Echazabal v. Chevron. First, the Note will introduce the "direct threat to self" debate in the context of the ADA's language, the EEOC-outlined regulatory provisions, and the case law surrounding the direct threat question. Specifically, the Note will address (1) the relationship between the ADA and the EEOC, (2) the compatiblity of the ADA with the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and (3) the case law applying the EEOC regulations, the ADA provisions, and the Rehabilitation Act provisions. Next, the Note will …