Law Commons^™

Agency Capture In Immigration Law, Shalini Bhargava Ray

SMU Law Review

Debates over administrative law doctrine and practice have long occurred in the shadow of agency capture, a phenomenon by which private interests co-opt an agency’s public mission. Scholars posit that capture often operates through the migration of agency personnel to the very industries they previously regulated and vice versa, referred to as the “revolving door.” The tremendous administrative law literature on agency capture, however, has never systematically addressed the potential relevance of capture to immigration regulation and enforcement. Given the vastness of the immigration bureaucracy, the massive annual appropriations it commands, and immigration’s salience in public discourse, the possibility of …

The Homeowner Strikes Back: The Rise Of Antisquatter Laws, Sam Fowler

SMU Law Review

Beginning in 2024, a host of states across the country began enacting or considering new laws targeting squatting that seek to expedite the removal of squatters. Generally, these antisquatting laws create criminal penalties for squatters, allow sheriffs to remove squatters, and shorten the time for eviction. This wave of legislation is generally attributed to several viral videos and news stories about squatters that seem to game the system by moving into unattended homes, even those where the rightful owners or tenants are living, and then claiming they have a lease. The owners will generally call the police, who are unable …

The Granny Flat Rebellion: Preempting Local Adu Restrictions, Andrew Welch

SMU Law Review

States around the country are increasingly facing the challenge of housing shortage and uncooperative localities attempting to keep developers out of their neighborhoods. The “Not in My Backyard” (NIMBY) groups are not representative of the American desire to create affordable housing, and allowing neighborhoods to dictate national and state policy is ineffective. Accessory dwelling units (ADUs)—small, self-contained residential units on single-family-zoned property—are a cost-effective strategy to expand housing options, promote intergenerational living, and foster economic mobility. This Comment addresses how states can chisel away at the housing crisis and how ADUs may alleviate many of the problems if they are …

Front Matter

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Improving Compliance With International Humanitarian Law In An Era Of Maneuver War And Mission Command, Geoffrey S. Corn, Tyler R. Smotherman

SMU Law Review

This Article proposes a new paradigm in international humanitarian law (IHL) to help junior military leaders make ethical combat decisions that are both legally and tactically sound. Driven by the realities of modern maneuver warfare and inspired by the spirit of mission command—a concept that emphasizes quick, decentralized decisions—we propose a new philosophical framework for ethical decision making in ground combat. Specifically, we argue that the traditional balance between the IHL principles of military necessity and humanity is better suited to the detached targeting processes associated with indirect fires and air power than to the split-second decisions required in direct …

Title 18’S Property Conundrum, Karen E. Woody, Joshua L. Clardy

SMU Law Review

“Property,” in legal terms, carries significant weight. Once an object is heralded as “property,” that object becomes a step closer to being afforded the protections of the Constitution, offered equitable remedies at a court’s disposal, or even subjected to taxation by the state or federal government. Defining an object as “property” also puts it within the reach of the Title 18 property fraud statutes. Title 18’s fraud statutes have been often lauded by federal prosecutors for their “extraordinary utility.” In their current iteration, these statutes criminalize schemes to defraud “money,” “property,” and “the intangible right of honest services.” But what …

Front Matter

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Levels Of Generality, The Limits Of Originalism, And The Supreme Court’S Second Amendment Jurisprudence, Amanda L. Tyler

SMU Law Review

Just how originalist is the Court’s Second Amendment jurisprudence after United States v. Rahimi? This is perhaps one of the biggest questions left in the decision’s wake. As it turns out, the answer is not altogether clear post-Rahimi. This is because the case produced some seven separate opinions, many of which—even though they agree as to the bottom line—get there by very different paths. This Article suggests that Rahimi, perhaps more than any other recent decision by the Court, underscores the crucial role that levels of generality in constitutional interpretation play, while illustrating the problems with …

The Mutability Of Dangerousness: Domestic Violence And Second Amendment Restoration After Rahimi, F. Lee Francis

SMU Law Review

This Article considers whether the Constitution permits the permanent disarmament of individuals once deemed dangerous—particularly in cases involving domestic violence. In United States v. Rahimi, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that the Second Amendment protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms, subject only to regulation consistent with historical tradition. That tradition, as examined under New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, does not support lifetime bans absent an ongoing threat.

The Article argues that dangerousness is not immutable. Founding-era laws recognized disarmament as a temporary, conditional measure tied to present conduct, not a …

You’Ve Got Mail—Or Not? The Deepening, Decades-Long Circuit Split Surrounding The Tax Filing Mailbox Rule, Colton Franks

SMU Law Review

Tax filing deadlines have always been a source of anxiety for U.S. citizens, and the law surrounding the subject is equally perplexing. Federal courts developed a mailbox rule to determine whether a document is timely filed through the mail, but the federal circuits did not agree on how it functioned. Congress subsequently passed Section 7502 of the Internal Revenue Code to clear up confusion among the circuits. However, this only sparked a new debate—whether the statute takes the place of the common law mailbox rule or merely adds another avenue for the taxpayer to prove timely filing. This circuit split …

After Identity: Reverse Discrimination, Anti-Essentialism, And The Future Of Title Vii, Maayan Sudai, Lihi Yona

SMU Law Review

This Article argues that the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services marks a turning point in Title VII’s long-standing struggle with identity. By striking down the “background circumstances” rule, a doctrine that required majority-group plaintiffs to meet a heightened evidentiary burden, the Court appeared at first glance to reaffirm its steady march toward strict anticlassification. We offer a different reading. We contend that Ames gestures toward a third, overlooked normative framework within antidiscrimination law: anti-essentialism. This framework, rooted in feminist, critical race, and queer theory, rejects both the rigidity of anticlassification and the categorical …

The Neuroscience Of Evidentiary Rules: The Case Of The Present Sense Impression, Christopher S. Sundby

SMU Law Review

The Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) play a critical role in federal trials by determining what evidence the jury will be allowed to hear. Nonetheless, the rules are largely premised on untested psychological assumptions. The Present Sense Impression Rule (PSIR), for example, is an exception to the general ban against hearsay based on the assumptions that statements about contemporaneous events have fewer memory errors; are less likely to be lies; and, when they are lies, that listeners are better able to detect the lie than if the declarant has had time to prepare.

The rule, in other words, is based …

Socially Responsible Ai In The Gpt Era, Yussuf A. Aleem

SMU Law Review

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) showcase its rapid evolution and promise, with the potential to profoundly transform decision-making, self-expression, and even the practice of law. However, AI also presents formidable challenges, including the further entrenchment of societal inequalities, widespread labor disruption, and existential threats to humanity. Modern AI systems show early signs of general intelligence, enabling them to perform a wide range of tasks beyond those of chatbots in both virtual and physical environments. Despite industry assurances of responsible AI development, these technologies are easily exploited and often exhibit troubling behaviors that even their creators struggle to understand.

This …

Symposium Preface, Madeleine Nelson

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Ready Or Not: How Congressional Dysfunction And Loper Bright Enterprises V. Raimondo Will Shift U.S. Regulation Of Emerging Technologies To The Federal Bench, Michelle Benedetto Neitz

SMU Law Review

This Article is the first in legal academic literature to consider how the power shift generated by Congressional dysfunction and the Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo will affect emerging technology law. Power is moving toward the judicial branch of government— and away from the legislative and executive branches. As a result, federal courts will now take a leading role in the evolution of emerging technology law in the United States.

Unfortunately, the federal judiciary is not prepared for this new era. Drawing from the information processing theory, this Article explains why federal judges will be deciding …

Collegiate Athletes’ Name, Image, And Likeness As A Constitutionally Protected Interest, Josh Lens

SMU Law Review

Courts have long held that collegiate athletes’ athletics participation does not constitute a liberty or property interest afforded constitutional due process protection. Thus, universities, athletics departments, and coaches generally have not had to provide much process when suspending athletes from their teams for disciplinary reasons, for example.

Recently, however, college athletics’ primary governing entity—the National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA)—altered its longstanding rules to permit athletes to accept remuneration from third parties for the use of their names, images, and likenesses. This newfound ability has significantly benefited athletes in college athletics’ transformative name, image, and likeness (NIL) era.

This Article examines …

History's Identity Crisis, Allison Orr Larsen

SMU Law Review

Lower court judges across the country are struggling to manage the Supreme Court’s new “history and tradition” test that applies to Second Amendment challenges. This Article articulates one fundamental reason for the struggle: nobody is quite sure what a judge is actually doing when she evaluates claims about what happened in the past. Is it traditional legal reasoning—weighing evidence and looking for patterns? Is it fact-finding of the sort we think expert historians should testify about—conveying to a trial judge the best evidence we have about the purpose of colonial gun laws? Or is it a different sort of fact-finding—generalized …

A Tribute To Dean C. Paul Rogers Iii, Michael J. Truncale

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Privatizing Child Welfare: Texas’S Gamble With Community-Based Care, Grace Byers

SMU Law Review

There are arguably few populations with greater vulnerability in the United States than children in active child welfare cases. Beyond the abuse or neglect that triggered a child welfare investigation, the child will endure the trauma of having their life uprooted. A child may encounter dozens of people throughout a child welfare case: investigators, police officers, caseworkers, doctors, psychologists, judges, foster parents, and many others. At this critical junction in a child’s life, the state is appointed as the child’s legal conservator to care for the child, find them a temporary home, and provide services to them and their parents …

Protect My Property, Not My Privacy!: How A Recent Circuit Split Illustrates The Need To Reinstate The Traditional Property-Based Fourth Amendment Framework, Mary Katherine Smith

SMU Law Review

The Fourth and Fifth Circuit’s split calls for reexamination of the Fourth Amendment search framework—a framework that revolves around one’s reasonable expectation of privacy. The underlying question motivating this Comment is how to account for individual privacy in a world where, arguably, old notions of privacy no longer exist. And ironically the answer lies in shifting the focus from privacy to property. The circuit split over geofence searches is a symptom of a larger problem: The current Fourth Amendment search framework is unworkable in the digital age.

Thus, this Comment has dual objectives. The first objective is analyzing the geofence …

A Critique Of Findings On Gun Ownership, Use, And Imagined Use From The 2021 National Firearms Survey: Response To William English, Deborah Azrael, Joseph Blocher, Philip J. Cook, David Hemenway, Matthew Miller

SMU Law Review

For a paper that has not yet been through peer review or even been formally published, William English’s “2021 National Firearms Survey” has been remarkably prominent in gun rights advocacy and scholarship. As of December 2024, it has been cited in roughly sixty-five briefs, invoked at oral argument in the Supreme Court and multiple courts of appeals, and regularly cited in public writings and published academic work.

This response is offered in the spirit of a peer review. Our focus is on methodological issues, questionable statistical results, and problematic conclusions. Because of serious methodological issues, English’s draft fails to provide …

Judge–Scholar Collaboration And The Second Amendment, Andrew Willinger, Eric Ruben

SMU Law Review

Legal scholarship is overly abstract and theoretical, making it unhelpful to judges and lawyers. That, at least, is the classic critique from the bench. When it comes to the Second Amendment, however, a different pattern has emerged: judges consistently cite law review articles and look to the academy for guidance. Most recently, in United States v. Rahimi, some Justices went further, implicitly inviting more scholarly work to help the Court answer open questions raised by its novel methodological approach to the Second Amendment. This Article explores this aberrant trend.

We raise several explanations for the distinctive scholarly role in …

Lobbying By Brief: Unveiling The Dominance Of Amicus Lobbying In The Development Of Business Law, W. C. Bunting, Tomer Stein

SMU Law Review

This Article uncovers the pervasive and significant impact of business law amicus lobbying, a strategic tactic whereby lobby groups have commandeered the amicus curiae filing process in state courts to shape business law according to their interests.

This Article makes three primary contributions to the literature. First, it presents the only comprehensive dataset of amicus curiae filings in business law cases. This hand-collected dataset encompasses nearly all business law amicus curiae filings from 2005 to 2022 in the key jurisdictions of New York, California, Delaware, Texas, and Nevada. Second, it reveals a striking empirical finding: lobby groups account for 67% …

Tribute To Professor C. Paul Rogers Iii, Kathrine Maldonado

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Dean Rogers: The Wyoming Whiz Kid, Jake Torres

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Crypto Chaos In The Courtroom: Navigating Bankruptcy’S Digital Gold Rush, Grayson Timmins

SMU Law Review

The explosion of cryptocurrency, along with other digital assets, has led to many new transactions and investment opportunities for those interested in broadening their portfolios. While cryptocurrency is new, the failure of a cryptocurrency exchange requires the application of the same bankruptcy procedures in the same way as parties using traditional U.S. currency. In bankruptcy, these intangible assets are designated property of the estate and are deemed subject to the court’s jurisdiction. At this point, an issue arises: Once classified as property of the estate, how should crypto be classified?

The lack of regulatory infrastructure regarding this classification further complicates …

Front Matter

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Preface: An Homage, Elan Wilson

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Roberts Rules Of (Dis)Order: Doctrinal Doublespeak On Affirmative Action And Stare Decisis, Vinay Harpalani

SMU Law Review

In this Article, I argue that Chief Justice John Roberts engaged in doublespeak in his SFFA v. Harvard/UNC majority opinion. He essentially overruled Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) but did not admit doing so, and even structured the SFFA opinion as if he was following Grutter’s precedent. My Article considers why Chief Justice Roberts engaged in this “stealth overruling” of Grutter and exposes his doctrinal sleight of hand in doing so. I first consider how Chief Justice Roberts may have been concerned about the Court’s legitimacy in the wake of its ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022)—where it …

Students For Fair Admissions Through The Lens Of Interest-Convergence Theory: Reality, Perception, And Fear, Robert A. Garda Jr.

SMU Law Review

In two cases, Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina (SFFA), the Supreme Court held that Harvard and UNC violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act in their use of race in their admissions process. This Article examines the SFFA decision through the lens of interest-convergence theory.

This Article is novel in three respects. It is the first article to explain the SFFA decision in-depth. The opaqueness of the decision has led to significant …