Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (64)
- Law and Society (51)
- Criminal Law (38)
- Judges (36)
- Legal Profession (36)
-
- Courts (33)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (24)
- State and Local Government Law (23)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (21)
- Jurisprudence (19)
- Property Law and Real Estate (16)
- Torts (15)
- First Amendment (14)
- Legal History (13)
- Legislation (13)
- Supreme Court of the United States (12)
- Health Law and Policy (11)
- Labor and Employment Law (11)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (11)
- Contracts (10)
- Religion Law (10)
- Business Organizations Law (9)
- Civil Procedure (9)
- Criminal Procedure (9)
- Law and Economics (9)
- Law and Race (9)
- Civil Law (8)
- Election Law (8)
- Fourth Amendment (8)
- Keyword
-
- Wisconsin (32)
- Constitution (16)
- Law clerks (11)
- Regulation (10)
- First Amendment (9)
-
- Legal ethics (9)
- Legal scholarship (9)
- Influence (8)
- Judges (7)
- Legal academics (7)
- Supreme Court (7)
- Justice (6)
- Justices (6)
- Property (6)
- U.S. Supreme Court (6)
- Criminal law (5)
- Immigration (5)
- Race (5)
- Selection (5)
- Technology (5)
- Artificial Intelligence (4)
- Conflict (4)
- Congress (4)
- Constitutional law (4)
- Criminal (4)
- Discrimination (4)
- Employment (4)
- Ethics (4)
- Federal (4)
- Fourth Amendment (4)
- Publication Year
Articles 121 - 150 of 4292
Full-Text Articles in Law
A Net For A Cooperator’S Leap Of Faith: The Due Process Need For Universal Acceptance Of Bad Faith Review Of Prosecutors’ Substantial Assistance Determinations In Federal Sentencing, Lucius T. Outlaw
Marquette Law Review
Cooperation is critical to federal criminal cases. For the government, cooperation is vital to securing the leads, information, and evidence needed to successfully investigate and prosecute criminal activity, particularly drug trafficking conspiracies and white-collar fraud crimes. For federal defendants, cooperation is the primary way to reduce their prison time exposure. Therefore, how a defendant’s cooperation is evaluated and translated into sentencing leniency is a significant issue for the government and cooperating defendants. Federal law and sentencing guidelines grant the keys to the
evaluation process to federal prosecutors by requiring a prosecutor’s substantial assistance motion before a judge can grant sentencing …
Be Reasonable: The Applicability Of Chevron To Agency Interpretations Of Split-Authority Statutes, Jessica L. Asbridge
Be Reasonable: The Applicability Of Chevron To Agency Interpretations Of Split-Authority Statutes, Jessica L. Asbridge
Marquette Law Review
The well-known Chevron doctrine is under siege as courts continue to carve out exceptions to its scope and some scholars and judges question whether it should be overruled entirely. One ongoing battle concerns whether the doctrine, which requires courts to defer to reasonable agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes, applies to certain “split-authority” statutes administered by multiple agencies, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s whistleblower provisions (SOX) and similar employment statutes. Both the Department of Labor (DOL) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) administer SOX’s whistleblower provisions, with the DOL having formal adjudicative authority and the SEC having rulemaking authority, leading …
Swearing In The Phoenix: Toward A More Sensible System For Seating Members Of The House Of Representatives At Organization, Brian C. Kalt
Swearing In The Phoenix: Toward A More Sensible System For Seating Members Of The House Of Representatives At Organization, Brian C. Kalt
Marquette Law Review
Under U.S. House precedent, any member-elect can challenge the right of
any other member-elect to take the oath of office at the beginning of a new term.
The uncontested members-elect then swear in and decide the fate of those who
were forced to stand aside. If the House is closely divided and there are
disputed elections at the margins, a minority party could exploit this procedure
to try to seize control of the House.
Workplace Transparency Beyond Disclosure: What's Blocking The View?, Lisa J. Bernt
Workplace Transparency Beyond Disclosure: What's Blocking The View?, Lisa J. Bernt
Marquette Law Review
Recent developments have exacerbated informational asymmetry between
employers and workers. Employers increasingly use “black box” automateddecision
systems, such as machine learning processes where algorithms are
used in recruitment and hiring. They have technological tools that enable
intense monitoring of workers. Contemporary work relationships have
changed, with trends toward remote and scattered worksites. Employees are
more frequently bound by nondisclosure agreements, non-disparagement
provisions, and mandatory arbitration agreements. These developments have
made it more difficult for workers to communicate with each other and to act
collectively.
Necessary Coverage For Authentic Identity: How Bostock Made Title Vii The Strongest Protection Against Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Denial Of Gender-Affirming Medical Care., Jennifer A. Knackert
Necessary Coverage For Authentic Identity: How Bostock Made Title Vii The Strongest Protection Against Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Denial Of Gender-Affirming Medical Care., Jennifer A. Knackert
Marquette Law Review
In June 2020, the United States Supreme Court held that Title VII
protection from discrimination on the basis of sex extended to LGBTQ+
employees. The Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia decision dealt with three
separate cases where LGBTQ+ employees had been fired from their jobs based
on either their sexual orientation or gender identity. While the shared issue in
these cases had to do with employee termination, the textualist argument
presented by the Court leads many legal scholars to believe that the holding
would be applicable to other areas of employment discrimination covered by
Title VII such as employer-sponsored healthcare …
Revenge Of The Sixth: The Constitutional Reckoning Of Pandemic Justice, Brandon Marc Draper
Revenge Of The Sixth: The Constitutional Reckoning Of Pandemic Justice, Brandon Marc Draper
Marquette Law Review
The Sixth Amendment’s criminal jury right is integral to the United States
criminal justice system. While this right is also implicated by the Due Process
Clause, Equal Protection Clause, and several federal and state statutes,
criminal jury trial rates have been declining for decades, down from
approximately 20% to 2% between 1988 to 2018. This dramatic drop in the
rate of criminal jury trials is an effective measure of the decreased access to
fair and constitutional criminal jury trials.
Toward Racially Equitable And Accountable Tech, Andrea Giampetro-Meyer, Janae James, Sydney Brooke
Toward Racially Equitable And Accountable Tech, Andrea Giampetro-Meyer, Janae James, Sydney Brooke
Marquette Law Review
This Article examines three distinct areas to consider how we might move
toward racially equitable and accountable tech. The three distinct areas are:
(1) fair housing, (2) surveillance, and (3) social media. Fair housing raises
questions about where today’s racially biased algorithms fit within the context
of historical, racist government housing policy. Surveillance raises questions
about how some tech tools render Black faces invisible, while others render
Black faces dangerously conspicuous. Social media highlights the clash
between civil rights and civil liberties, especially when racial justice conflicts
with freedom of speech. Our analysis leads us to consider the extent to …
Making Preconception Tort Theory Crisper, Mark Strasser
Making Preconception Tort Theory Crisper, Mark Strasser
Marquette Law Review
More and more individuals seeking to expand their families make use of
someone else’s gametes to help create a child. Unsurprisingly, those
considering the use of donated or purchased gametes often seek reassurance
that the use of those gametes will not create an increased risk that a child
thereby produced will have a severe disease. Sometimes, because of negligence
or recklessness, gametes are used that result in children having severe disease
where that outcome would have been avoided though the use of reasonable
care. Regrettably, courts addressing whether liability may be imposed in such
cases have sometimes misunderstood and misapplied …
Is The Legal Profession Too Independent?, Limor Zer-Gutman, Eli Wald
Is The Legal Profession Too Independent?, Limor Zer-Gutman, Eli Wald
Marquette Law Review
Faced with mounting pressure to permit national law practice and increase
access to legal services for those who cannot afford to pay for them and
critiques about growing inequality and its failure to lead the battles for greater
gender and racial justice, the legal profession’s response has been to resist
reform proposals by invoking its independence. Lawyers and lawyers alone,
asserts the profession, ought to determine the pace and details of nationalizing
law practice, set the conditions under which nonlawyers and artificial
intelligence can offer legal services, and respond to growing inequality among
lawyers and concerns about the role lawyers …
The Burdens Of All: Progressive Origins Of Accident Cost Socialization In Tort Law, 1870-1920, Joseph A. Ranney
The Burdens Of All: Progressive Origins Of Accident Cost Socialization In Tort Law, 1870-1920, Joseph A. Ranney
Marquette Law Review
Scholars who have studied the Progressive Movement’s contributions to
American law have paid little attention to its impact on tort law. This Article
helps fill the gap by examining the ways in which Progressivism shaped the rise
of employer liability law, workers compensation, and comparative negligence
during the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries. The Article places
these reforms within the broader social history of American tort law—a
gradual, often tortuous transition from free-labor beliefs that the law should
encourage personal responsibility and economic growth above all else to a
realization that injuries are an unavoidable cost of economic modernization,
accompanied by …
Alleviating The Harms Of Substandard Housing To Wisconsin Tenants: Correlating Rent With Assessed Property Value, Ellen Matheson
Alleviating The Harms Of Substandard Housing To Wisconsin Tenants: Correlating Rent With Assessed Property Value, Ellen Matheson
Marquette Law Review
Like other cities across the nation, Milwaukee utilizes a mix of regulatory,
statutory, and common law tools to address the problem of substandard rental
housing. This Comment examines the efficacy of those legal tools, in the
process demonstrating that existing remedies offer insufficient protections to
tenants in need of habitable housing. This Comment then proposes a novel
legal strategy that is designed to ameliorate the problem of low-quality,
overpriced rental housing: amending Wis. Stat. § 66.1015 to permit
implementation of a “rent-value correlation rate”—giving municipalities the
option to cap monthly contract rent as a percentage of the assessed property
value. …
Rico Had A Birthday! A Fifty-Year Retrospective Of Questions Answered And Open, Randy D. Gordon
Rico Had A Birthday! A Fifty-Year Retrospective Of Questions Answered And Open, Randy D. Gordon
Marquette Law Review
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) came into
the world in 1970, a time of great social upheaval that was accompanied by
shifting attitudes towards both crime and civil litigation. From the outset, the
statute’s complexity, ambiguity, and uncertain purpose have confounded courts
and commentators. At least some doubts as to the statute’s meaning and
application arise because it has criminal and civil components that subject it
to the twin—yet antithetical—social impulses to be “tough on crime” while
containing a perceived “litigation explosion.” In this Article, I situate RICO
in this larger context and offer that context as …
Emerging From Davy Jones’ Locker: The Revival Of Counterclaims Against Government In Civil Forfeiture Actions, Jack B. Harrison, Brendan Sullivan
Emerging From Davy Jones’ Locker: The Revival Of Counterclaims Against Government In Civil Forfeiture Actions, Jack B. Harrison, Brendan Sullivan
Marquette Law Review
The thesis of this Article is that a claimant in a civil forfeiture proceeding can assert a counterclaim against the United States government. This assertion is based upon the scope of the Supplemental Rules and in rem jurisdiction.
Growing Up Behind Bars: Pathways To Desistance For Juvenile Lifers, Laura S. Abrams, Kaylyn Canlione, D. Michael Applegarth
Growing Up Behind Bars: Pathways To Desistance For Juvenile Lifers, Laura S. Abrams, Kaylyn Canlione, D. Michael Applegarth
Marquette Law Review
In the wake of the landmark Supreme Court decision Miller vs. Alabama, a variety of state laws have paved the way for the resentencing and potential release of “juvenile lifers.” Desistance theories pertaining to youth with histories of violent offending suggest that a blend of maturation, internal motivation and identity shifts, and opportunities to adopt and fulfill adult roles will lead to cessation of criminal behavior. Yet, these theories may not apply to young people serving life sentences, as they have limited opportunity to adopt adult responsibilities while imprisoned, less motivation to desist if freedom is not viewed as attainable …
Violence Risk Assessment: Current Status And Contemporary Issues, Sarah L. Desmarais, Samantha A. Zottola
Violence Risk Assessment: Current Status And Contemporary Issues, Sarah L. Desmarais, Samantha A. Zottola
Marquette Law Review
Despite the increased use of violence risk assessment instruments in the criminal justice system, they remain the topic of continued discussion and debate. This Article will discuss the state of science and practice as it relates to assessing risk for violent recidivism, highlighting current issues of concern and empirical investigation. We first provide an overview of violence risk assessment and describe the role of violence risk assessments instruments in this process. We then discuss their current status in science and practice, including the accuracy with which violence risk assessment instruments forecast violent recidivism, their impact on criminal justice decisions, and …
Violent Crime And Media Coverage In One City: A Statistical Snapshot, Michael O'Hear
Violent Crime And Media Coverage In One City: A Statistical Snapshot, Michael O'Hear
Marquette Law Review
Many commentators have argued that high levels of public fear and anger regarding violent crime result, at least in part, from distorted coverage of crime in the news media. Among other distortions, it is said that the news media devote greatly disproportionate coverage to the most outrageous instances of violent crime, and that the media fail to provide information that would helpfully contextualize the offenses or humanize the perpetrators. In order to test these latter claims, crime stories from a daily newspaper and an Internet news site in one mid-sized city were collected for one year. As expected, in comparison …
Fully Funded Pensions, Jonathan Barry Forman
Fully Funded Pensions, Jonathan Barry Forman
Marquette Law Review
At retirement, workers want to have enough income to support themselves throughout their retirement years. In that regard, financial planners often suggest that retiring workers should aim to replace 70 to 80% of their annual preretirement earnings. Social Security benefits typically replace around 35% of the typical worker’s preretirement earnings, and the purpose of this Article is to show how pensions could and should be designed to replace, say, 40% of the typical worker’s preretirement earnings throughout her retirement years. In particular, because so many public and private pension plans are underfunded, this Article focuses on how to fully fund …
When Food Is A Weapon: Parental Liability For Food Allergy Bullying, D'Andra Millsap Shu
When Food Is A Weapon: Parental Liability For Food Allergy Bullying, D'Andra Millsap Shu
Marquette Law Review
Food allergies in children are rising at an alarming pace. Increasingly, these children face an added threat: bullies targeting them because of their allergies. This bullying can take a life-threatening turn when the bully exposes the victim to the allergen. This Article is the first major legal analysis of food allergy bullying. It explores the legal system’s failure to adequately address the problem of food allergy bullying and makes the case for focusing on the potential tort liability of the bully’s parents. Parents who become aware of their child’s bullying behavior and fail to take adequate steps to stop it …
Women's Spaces, Women's Rights: Feminism And The Transgender Rights Movement, Christen Price
Women's Spaces, Women's Rights: Feminism And The Transgender Rights Movement, Christen Price
Marquette Law Review
None
Balancing Sorna And The Sixth Amendment: The Case For A "Restricted Circumstance-Specific Approach", John F. Howard
Balancing Sorna And The Sixth Amendment: The Case For A "Restricted Circumstance-Specific Approach", John F. Howard
Marquette Law Review
The Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) is in place to protect the public, children especially, from sex offenders. Under SORNA, anyone and everyone convicted of what the law defines as a “sex offense” is required to register as a “sex offender,” providing accurate and up-to-date information on where they live, work, and go to school. Failure to do so constitutes a federal crime punishable by up to ten years imprisonment. But how do federal courts determine whether a particular state-level criminal offense constitutes a “sex offense” under SORNA? Oftentimes when doing comparisons between state and federal law for …
State Liability For A Mishandled Response: Strategic Remedies On The Heels Of Covid-19, Captain Matthew H. Ormsbee Usaf
State Liability For A Mishandled Response: Strategic Remedies On The Heels Of Covid-19, Captain Matthew H. Ormsbee Usaf
Marquette Law Review
In early 2020, as the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) shocked many health experts and world leaders with its ease of transmission and slow but unyielding spread from Wuhan, China, the initial state response centered on how to contain an epidemic and help those who are infected. Many months later, as some states enjoy a flattened curve following austere social distancing measures, many states may turn their attention from health response to legal response for China’s initial mishandling of the COVID-19 outbreak. China is certainly not alone in implementing containment measures that were not maximally prompt or effective. Still, China occupies a …
The Myth Of Optimal Expectation Damages, Theresa Arnold, Amanda Dixon, Madison Sherrill, Mitu Gulati
The Myth Of Optimal Expectation Damages, Theresa Arnold, Amanda Dixon, Madison Sherrill, Mitu Gulati
Marquette Law Review
A much-debated question in contract law scholarship is what the optimal measure of damages for breach should be. The casebook answer—drawing from the theory of efficient breach—is expectation damages. This standard answer, which was a major contribution of the law and economics field, has come under attack by theoreticians within that field itself. To shed an empirical perspective on the question, we look at data on the types of damages provisions parties contract for themselves in international debt contracts. Specifically, we examine issuer call provisions, which are economically equivalent to damages for prepayment, yet not viewed as legally problematic in …
Mozart V. Beethoven: Consequences Of Ninth Circuit Copyright Law On Classical Creativity, Amanda E.B. Collins
Mozart V. Beethoven: Consequences Of Ninth Circuit Copyright Law On Classical Creativity, Amanda E.B. Collins
Marquette Law Review
none
Is The Constitution’S Convention For Proposing Amendments A “Mystery”? Overlooked Evidence In The Narrative Of Uncertainty, Robert G. Natelson
Is The Constitution’S Convention For Proposing Amendments A “Mystery”? Overlooked Evidence In The Narrative Of Uncertainty, Robert G. Natelson
Marquette Law Review
Since the 1960s, leading academics and other commentators have claimed that the composition and protocols of the Constitution’s “Convention for proposing Amendments” are unknowable, subject to congressional control, or both. Today those claims are on a collision course with growing public sentiment for an amendments convention to address federal dysfunction.
Climate Change, Sustainability, And The Failure Of Modern Property Theory, Jill M. Fraley
Climate Change, Sustainability, And The Failure Of Modern Property Theory, Jill M. Fraley
Marquette Law Review
Property rights are, I argue, the single largest legal limitation on our ability to respond effectively to the climate change crisis. This is because our understanding of the scope of property rights shapes and limits legal concepts such as regulatory takings, land use law, common law tort and property claims, and statutory environmental regulation. Property sets our cultural norms about how much the government can or should control the uses of land. The goals of this Article are to (1) historically demonstrate the failures of socially oriented property theory as they are represented in the analytical framework of doctrines such …
Unconstitutional Parenthood, Jeffrey A. Parness
The Online Defamation Dilemma: Adapting An Age-Old Doctrine To The Reality, Elizabeth Elving
The Online Defamation Dilemma: Adapting An Age-Old Doctrine To The Reality, Elizabeth Elving
Marquette Law Review
none.
Factually Baseless Enforcement Of Criminal Law Is Okay. Full Enforcement Is Not., Darryl K. Brown
Factually Baseless Enforcement Of Criminal Law Is Okay. Full Enforcement Is Not., Darryl K. Brown
Marquette Law Review
none.
Property Rights In Celestial Bodies: A Question Of Pressing Concern To All Mankind, Megan Alexa Mackay
Property Rights In Celestial Bodies: A Question Of Pressing Concern To All Mankind, Megan Alexa Mackay
Marquette Law Review
Commercial interest in outer space is increasing, thanks in part to technological developments and private sector investment. Major spacefaring nations—including the United States, China, and Russia—are suddenly having to grapple with issues of space law that have not been so hotly debated since the Cold War. Unfortunately, the foundational document governing the use of outer space and its resources is the Outer Space Treaty from 1967. Written from the perspective of an earlier era and intentionally nonspecific in much of its phrasing, this agreement has stymied the economic development of space resources by its ambiguously worded prohibition on the appropriation …
Ice Detention Contracts, Third-Party Beneficiary Suits, And Private Contracts In Immigrant Detention, Patrick Kennedy
Ice Detention Contracts, Third-Party Beneficiary Suits, And Private Contracts In Immigrant Detention, Patrick Kennedy
Marquette Law Review
none.