Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Bioethics (1)
- Brain (1)
- Brain scan (1)
- CT (1)
- Capital punishment (1)
-
- Consequentialism (1)
- Crack (Drug) (1)
- Criminal law (1)
- Criminal procedure (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Deterrence (1)
- EEG (1)
- FMRI (1)
- Free will (1)
- Future dangerousness (1)
- H.L.A Hart (1)
- Intention (Law) (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Neuroethics (1)
- Neuroimaging (1)
- Neuroscience (1)
- PET (1)
- Punishment (1)
- Punishment theory (1)
- Race discrimination (1)
- Retribution (1)
- Sentences (Criminal procedure) (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Neuroimaging And The "Complexity" Of Capital Punishment, O. Carter Snead
Neuroimaging And The "Complexity" Of Capital Punishment, O. Carter Snead
Journal Articles
The growing use of brain imaging technology to explore the causes of morally, socially, and legally relevant behavior is the subject of much discussion and controversy in both scholarly and popular circles. From the efforts of cognitive neuroscientists in the courtroom and the public square, the contours of a project to transform capital sentencing both in principle and in practice have emerged. In the short term, these scientists seek to play a role in the process of capital sentencing by serving as mitigation experts for defendants, invoking neuroimaging research on the roots of criminal violence to support their arguments. Over …
At The Intersection Of Race And History: The Unique Relationship Between The Davis Intent Requirement And The Crack Laws, Christopher J. Tyson
At The Intersection Of Race And History: The Unique Relationship Between The Davis Intent Requirement And The Crack Laws, Christopher J. Tyson
Journal Articles
No abstract provided.
What's On Your Mind? Imputing Motive In A Title Vii Case, An Analysis Of Bci Coca-Cola Bottling Co. V. Eeoc, Barbara J. Fick
What's On Your Mind? Imputing Motive In A Title Vii Case, An Analysis Of Bci Coca-Cola Bottling Co. V. Eeoc, Barbara J. Fick
Journal Articles
This article examines the case E.E.O.C. v. BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Los Angeles, which was scheduled for argument before the Supreme Court, but was dismissed before that argument occurred.