Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Indiana Law Journal

Torts

Liability

Articles 1 - 10 of 10

Full-Text Articles in Law

Vicarious Liability For Ai, Mihailis E. Diamantis Jan 2023

Vicarious Liability For Ai, Mihailis E. Diamantis

Indiana Law Journal

When an algorithm harms someone—say by discriminating against her, exposing her personal data, or buying her stock using inside information—who should pay? If that harm is criminal, who deserves punishment? In ordinary cases, when A harms B, the first step in the liability analysis turns on what sort of thing A is. If A is a natural phenomenon, like a typhoon or mudslide, B pays, and no one is punished. If A is a person, then A might be liable for damages and sanction. The trouble with algorithms is that neither paradigm fits. Algorithms are trainable artifacts with “off” switches, …


Patent Accidents: Questioning Strict Liability In Patent Law, Patrick R. Goold Oct 2020

Patent Accidents: Questioning Strict Liability In Patent Law, Patrick R. Goold

Indiana Law Journal

Accidental infringement of patent rights is a pervasive and growing problem in the Information Age. As IP rights proliferate and expand in scope, it is becoming increasingly easy for companies and individuals to inadvertently infringe patents. When such accidental infringement occurs, patent law holds the infringer strictly liable. This contrasts with many areas of tort law where defendants are only liable if they act negligently.

This Article questions the normative desirability of strict liability in patent law. Assuming the primary value of patent law is utilitarian, this Article poses the research question: what liability rule will maximize social welfare? This …


The Prosser Myth Of Transferred Intent, Peter B. Kutner Jul 2016

The Prosser Myth Of Transferred Intent, Peter B. Kutner

Indiana Law Journal

The main theme of this Article is that Prosser advanced a mythical doctrine of transferred intent. What Prosser asserted to be the law was not the law when he wrote his article on transferred intent and amended his treatise. The cases he relied on to support his conclusions on transferred intent did not support them. Moreover, despite Prosser’s great influence on American tort law, Prosser’s position on transferred intent is not the law now and should not be. Its consequences are undesirable. Recognition of transferred intent as a basis of liability is due primarily to its inclusion in the First …


Comparing Fault, David C. Sobelsohn Jul 1985

Comparing Fault, David C. Sobelsohn

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.


The Director's Liability For Negligence, Richard B. Dyson Apr 1965

The Director's Liability For Negligence, Richard B. Dyson

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Liability For Aircraft Damage To Ground Occupiers-A Study Of Current Trends In Tort Law Oct 1955

Liability For Aircraft Damage To Ground Occupiers-A Study Of Current Trends In Tort Law

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Liability Of A Business Proprietor For Attraction Of Crowds Oct 1949

Liability Of A Business Proprietor For Attraction Of Crowds

Indiana Law Journal

Recent Cases: Torts


Governmental Tort Liability In Indiana Jul 1948

Governmental Tort Liability In Indiana

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Indiana Automobile Guest Statute Construed Jan 1944

Indiana Automobile Guest Statute Construed

Indiana Law Journal

Notes and Comments: Automobiles


The Vicarious Liability Of Charitable Corporations Oct 1937

The Vicarious Liability Of Charitable Corporations

Indiana Law Journal

Recent Case Notes