Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Judicial Review Of Scientific Uncertainty In Climate Change Lawsuits: Deferential And Nondeferential Evaluation Of Agency Factual And Policy Determinations, Robert L. Glicksman, Daniel Kim, Keziah Groth-Tuft
Judicial Review Of Scientific Uncertainty In Climate Change Lawsuits: Deferential And Nondeferential Evaluation Of Agency Factual And Policy Determinations, Robert L. Glicksman, Daniel Kim, Keziah Groth-Tuft
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
Scientific determinations are often at the heart of environmental disputes. When those disputes take the form of litigation, the courts may be called on to determine whether an administrative agency’s treatment of the science warrants deference. For several reasons, judges are inclined to apply deferential review to agency factual and policy science-based determinations. Most judges are not trained in the language and methods of science. They may be reluctant to intervene on matters on which their lack of expertise risks producing uninformed judgments. If a statute delegates to an agency the responsibility of making those determinations, courts may be loath …
Data Mining And The Security-Liberty Debate, Daniel J. Solove
Data Mining And The Security-Liberty Debate, Daniel J. Solove
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
In this essay, written for a symposium on surveillance for the University of Chicago Law Review, I examine some common difficulties in the way that liberty is balanced against security in the context of data mining. Countless discussions about the trade-offs between security and liberty begin by taking a security proposal and then weighing it against what it would cost our civil liberties. Often, the liberty interests are cast as individual rights and balanced against the security interests, which are cast in terms of the safety of society as a whole. Courts and commentators defer to the government's assertions about …
Occ V. Spitzer: An Erroneous Application Of Chevron That Should Be Reversed, Arthur E. Wilmarth Jr.
Occ V. Spitzer: An Erroneous Application Of Chevron That Should Be Reversed, Arthur E. Wilmarth Jr.
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
This essay criticizes OCC v. Spitzer (S.D.N.Y. 2005), a recent federal court decision dealing with the application of state laws to national banks. The court upheld a regulation issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC"), the federal agency that supervises national banks. The OCC's regulation preempts the authority of state officials to file suit in state or federal courts to enforce state laws against national banks. The OCC's regulation asserts that any decision about whether to enforce state laws against national banks is a matter "within the OCC's exclusive purview."
Based on the OCC's regulation, the …
Fourth Amendment Codification And Professor Kerr's Misguided Call For Judicial Deference, Daniel J. Solove
Fourth Amendment Codification And Professor Kerr's Misguided Call For Judicial Deference, Daniel J. Solove
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
This essay critiques Professor Orin Kerr's provocative article, The Fourth Amendment and New Technologies: Constitutional Myths and the Case for Caution, 102 Mich. L. Rev. 801 (2004). Increasingly, Fourth Amendment protection is receding from a litany of law enforcement activities, and it is being replaced by federal statutes. Kerr notes these developments and argues that courts should place a thumb on the scale in favor of judicial caution when technology is in flux, and should consider allowing legislatures to provide the primary rules governing law enforcement investigations involving new technologies. Kerr's key contentions are that (1) legislatures create rules …
Restraint And Responsibility: Judicial Review Of Campaign Reform, Spencer A. Overton
Restraint And Responsibility: Judicial Review Of Campaign Reform, Spencer A. Overton
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
The First Amendment doctrine governing campaign finance law allows judicial outcomes to turn on often unstated political assumptions about the appropriate role of money in campaigns. As illustrated by the conflicting opinions of different U.S. Supreme Court Justices in McConnell v. FEC, current narrow tailoring and substantial overbreadth tests provide inadequate guidance and compel judges to rely on their own political assumptions in balancing the need for regulation against the right of free speech. Judges skeptical of campaign reform err on the side of protecting speech, while judges supportive of reform lean toward tolerating regulations said to prevent corruption. To …
The Darkest Domain: Deference, Judicial Review, And The Bill Of Rights, Daniel J. Solove
The Darkest Domain: Deference, Judicial Review, And The Bill Of Rights, Daniel J. Solove
GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works
Deference presents one of the greatest threats to liberalism in the modern age, undermining judicial review for fundamental constitutional rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process. In contrast to existing critiques which dismiss deference as an ideological tool wielded by conservative judges, this article explores deference more systematically and rigorously, addressing it at its conceptual underpinnings. Deference has a strong conceptual backbone rooted in the long-accepted principle that the judiciary must avoid doing what was done in Lochner - the substitution of judicial judgment for that of the policymaker or legislature. The article argues that …