Law Commons^™

The Evidentiary Nature Of Defendant's Burden In Title Vii Disparate Treatment Cases, Mack Player

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The Right To Communicate, Howard C. Anawalt

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The Joint Enterprise: Collaboration Between The Public And Private Sectors, Howard C. Anawalt, Karen Robbins

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The Limits Of Advocacy: A Proposal For The Tort Of Malicious Defense In Civil Litigation, Jonathan Van Patten

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The Illinois Brick Dilemma: Is There A Legislative Solution?, Edward D. Cavanagh

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

In Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, the United States Supreme Court held that in price-fixing actions brought under section 1 of the Sherman Act, only first purchasers in the chain of vertical distribution are "injured," within the meaning of section 4 of the Clayton Act, by the full amount of any overcharge. The Court's ruling bars plaintiffs who are "indirect purchasers" from offering proof that they have been injured by defendants' illegal overcharges which have been "passed on" to them by middlemen. The Court's holding reaffirmed the principles previously enunciated in Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe Machinery …

The Enigma Of The Era, Jonathan Van Patten

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Admissibility Of Laboratory Reports, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

A New Look At An Old Association: Will Today's Women Be Tomorrow's Jaycees?, Neal Devins

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Who Is Injured When Racially Discriminatory Private Schools Are Tax-Exempt?, Neal Devins

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Arab-Israeli Conflict, Linda A. Malone

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

What Standards Apply When Freedoms Collide?, Neal Devins

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

A Structural Analysis Of The Good Moral Character Requirement For Bar Admission, Michael K. Mcchrystal

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Inverse Liability Of The State Of Wisconsin For A De Facto "Temporary Taking" As A Result Of An Administrative Decision: Zinn V. State, Alemante G. Selassie

Faculty Publications

This Note examines Zinn v. State, a Wisconsin Supreme Court decision, which held that plaintiff stated a claim for inverse condemnation against the State of Wisconsin when, as a result of an erroneous quasi-judicial decision by the DNR, plaintiff lost the use of her property for a little longer than a month. This Note takes the position that Zinn represents the growing tendency among courts to enlarge the scope of fact situations in which they will find a taking. Given this tendency, and given that the substantive test in Wisconsin of what constitutes a taking is identical whether a taking …

A Jurisprudential Perspective For The True Codification Of Payments Law, Peter A. Alces

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Human Rights In The Middle East, Linda A. Malone

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

For Richer Or Poorer, 'Til Decree Do Us Part - A Spouse's Entitlement To Division Of Pension Funds And Professional Degrees As Marital Property, Linda A. Malone

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Diminished Luster In Escambia County?, Neal Devins

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Playing With Numbers: Determining The Majority Of Judges Required To Grant En Banc Sittings In The United States Court Of Appeals, James J. Wheaton

Faculty Publications

This note addresses the effects that these two interests -- majority control of circuit law and judicial integrity -- have on the appropriate definition of majority. Neither legislative history nor Supreme Court constructions of section 46(c) provide an unambiguous rule, and interpretation of the majority requirement remains within the authority of each circuit. The Judicial Conference of the United States, at its meeting in September 1984, recommended that each circuit clearly describe its en banc voting procedures. This note delineates considerations that may assist the circuit courts in their efforts to outline the method by which they should order en …

Your Money Or Your Wife's?: Social Security Changes Considered, Neal Devins

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Are Residential Quotas Constitutional?, Neal Devins

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The 1965 Voting Rights Act: Some Wrongs Still Not Righted, Neal Devins

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Standing And Adverseness In Challenges Of Tax Exemptions For Discriminatory Public Schools, Thomas Mccoy, Neal Devins

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Simulation Of Legal Analysis And Instruction On The Computer, Thomas Lee Hazen, Margaret M. Hazen

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Arthur L. Corbin: His Kansas Connection, Robert H. Jerry Ii

Faculty Publications

When a farm-born Kansan becomes one of the great teachers, authors, and scholars in the history of Anglo-American law, the story of his Kansas connection is worth noting in a law review published in his native state. This is the story of Arthur L. Corbin's early years and of his life-long fondness for the university where his quest for excellence began.

Ohio's Public Employee Bargaining Law: Can It Withstand Constitutional Challenge?, Rebecca Hanner White, Robert E. Kaplan, Michael W. Hawkins

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Minimum Standards Of Constitutional Justice: Federal Floor And State Ceiling, William F. Swindler

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Trends In The Supreme Court: Mr. Jefferson’S Crumbling Wall - A Comment On Lynch V. Donnelly, William W. Van Alstyne

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Rethinking Standing, Gene R. Nichol Jr.

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The Fate Of Constitutional Ipse Dixits, William W. Van Alstyne

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Impressions Of A Not-So-Average Juror, Robert H. Jerry Ii

Faculty Publications

Direct observation of jury decision-making is impossible without tainting the quality of the observations, and perhaps the jury's decision itself. Another reason for the difficulty attorneys have in understanding how juries will respond to their efforts is lack of experience. Because attorneys rarely serve on juries, the typical attorney cannot converse with colleagues about personal observations of how juries decide cases.

It is probably fair to say that I am one of only a few lawyers who has served on a jury. My own recollections of my service may well be incomplete, skewed, and deficient. Generalizations from my recollections must …