Law Commons^™

Dedication: In Memory Of Professor Russell W. Galloway, Jr., (Santa Clara University School Of Law Professor), Gerald F. Uelmen

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Legal Breakdown: 40 Ways To Fix Our Legal System [Book Review], Margalynne J. Armstrong

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

In Search Of A Normative Principle For Property Division At Divorce [Book Review], Patricia A. Cain

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Ethical Integrity In The Legal Profession: Survey Results Regarding Law Students' Veracity On Resumes And Recommendations For Enhancing Legal Ethics Outside The Classroom, Nancy A. Wright

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Regulating Broadband Communication Networks, Allen S. Hammond Iv

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Memorial Dedication Russell W. Galloway, Jr. 1940-1992, Gerald F. Uelmen, Howard C. Anawalt, Paul J. Goda S.J., George J. Alexander, Monica J. Evans, Margalynne Armstrong, Nancy A. Wright

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Free Speech And School Governance In The Wake Of Hazelwood, Rosemary C. Salomone

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

The Supreme Court's 1988 decision in Hazelwood School District v. KuhImeier upholding public school officials' authority to censor material in a high school student newspaper sent immediate shock waves throughout the educational and legal communities. The Court's sweeping language in Hazelwood moved far beyond the narrow issue of school newspaper censorship. It even moved beyond the question of appropriate or acceptable speech in public secondary schools. It was clear that Hazelwood could have far-reaching consequences for student rights, school governance, and the scope of official authority to make curricular decisions that reflect the values of the local community.

Some …

The Policy, Law, And Facts Of Computer Screen Displays: An Essay, I. Trotter Hardy

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Book Review Of Clement Haynsworth, The Senate, And The Supreme Court, Davison M. Douglas

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Editor's Comments, Charles H. Koch Jr.

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

When First Amendment Values And Competition Policy Collide: Resolving The Dilemma Of Mixed-Motive Boycotts, Kay P. Kindred

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Waiting For The New Emerson: A Critique Of The First Amendment, Democracy, And Romance, David Day

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Justice, Community And Differences: The Challenge From Indian Country, Frank Pommersheim

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Liberation, Dreams, And Hard Work: An Essay On Tribal Court Jurisprudence, Frank Pommersheim

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

A Path Near The Clearing: An Essay On Constitutional Adjudication In Tribal Courts, Frank Pommersheim

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Nonrecourse Liabilities And Real Costs: A Reply To Professor Johnson, Erik M. Jensen

Faculty Publications

This article replies to a comment on "The Unanswered Question in Tufts: What Was the Purchaser's Basis?" by Calvin Johnson.

Scientific Evidence In Criminal Prosecutions, Paul C. Giannelli

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Private Land Use, Changing Public Values And Notions Of Relativity, Lynda L. Butler

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Reflections Upon The Federal Administrative Judiciary, Paul R. Verkuil

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Second Thoughts On Rust V. Sullivan And The First Amendment, William W. Van Alstyne

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Foreword: O Canada, William W. Van Alstyne

Faculty Publications

This forward, written ten years after the adoption of the Constitution of Canada, draws sharp comparisons between Canada’s constitution and the United States’ original governing document, the Articles of Confederation.

Country/Region Reports -- United States Of America, Linda A. Malone

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

When Is A Corporate Executive "Substantially Unfit To Serve"?, Jayne W. Barnard

Faculty Publications

The recently enacted Securities Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990 provides that, in an SEC enforcement action, a federal court may enjoin or "disbar" the defendant from serving in the future as an officer or director of a public company. A court may enter such an order if it finds that the defendant is "substantially unfit" to serve as a corporate executive; the Act, however, does not define "substantial unfitness." In this Article Professor Jayne Barnard provides a framework for defining this term and identifying the defendants to which the Remedies Act should apply. Professor Barnard begins …

Divided Justice: A Commentary On The Nomination And Confirmation Of Justice Thomas, Michael J. Gerhardt

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Legal Education And The Theatre Of The Absurd: "Can't Anybody Play This Here Game?", Paul A. Lebel

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Fundamentalist Christian Educators V. State: An Inevitable Compromise, Neal Devins

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Judicial Matters, Neal Devins

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Correspondence: The Stuff Of Constitutional Law, Neal Devins

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The Silenced Majority: Martin V. Wilks And The Legislative Response, Susan Grover

Faculty Publications

An American worker finds himself disadvantaged by an employer's affirmative action program. The worker heads for the courthouse, reverse discrimination complaint in hand. Will he be allowed to sue? Prior to the Supreme Court's 1989 Martin v. Wilks decision, the answer to that question tended to be "no." Wilks changed the answer to an emphatic ·yes." With the 1991 Civil Rights Act, the answer has become "probably not." This article discusses the bar against such challenges as developed through case law and recent congressional action. It addresses the implications that the new statutory bar will have for the structure of …

The Impropriety Of Expert Witness Testimony On The Law, Thomas E. Baker

Faculty Publications

Professor Baker weighs in on a new trend of allowing expert opinion on the status of the law. He begins with a brief history of lay and expert opinion testimony and continues with an analysis of Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence before concluding that expert opinion on the law simply has no place in federal practice.