Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (58)
- First Amendment (7)
- Intellectual Property Law (6)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (5)
- State and Local Government Law (5)
-
- Education Law (4)
- Administrative Law (3)
- Fourth Amendment (3)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (2)
- Internet Law (2)
- Judges (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Legal History (2)
- President/Executive Department (2)
- Religion Law (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
- Courts (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- European Law (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Housing Law (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Legal Profession (1)
- Institution
Articles 61 - 79 of 79
Full-Text Articles in Law
United States Supreme Court: 1993-94 Term, Paul C. Giannelli
United States Supreme Court: 1993-94 Term, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
United States Supreme Court: 1991-92 Term, Paul C. Giannelli
United States Supreme Court: 1991-92 Term, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Legislative Veto Of Administrative Rules In Missouri: A Constitutional Virus, Kenneth D. Dean
Legislative Veto Of Administrative Rules In Missouri: A Constitutional Virus, Kenneth D. Dean
Faculty Publications
The purpose of this Article is to examine the constitutionality of the legislative veto as it exists in Missouri, specifically the powers of the JCAR. Part II of the Article traces the history of the JCAR and the various types of powers given to it. Part III of the Article examines the experiences of the United States government and other states to determine their applicability to Missouri. Part IV examines the various grants of power to determine whether they comply with the Missouri constitution.
United States Supreme Court: 1990-91 Term, Paul C. Giannelli
United States Supreme Court: 1990-91 Term, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Emergency In The Constitutional Law Of The United States, William B. Fisch
Emergency In The Constitutional Law Of The United States, William B. Fisch
Faculty Publications
In the following report I shall concentrate on the law as pronounced by the United States Supreme Court, which has, within the sphere of judicial competence, the last say on the interpretation of the Constitution. The volume of significant litigation on the subject which stops below the Supreme Court has been relatively light, and the constitutional law declared by the lower courts has played a less significant role than is the case in many other issues. Indeed, as we shall see, the Supreme Court itself has had less to say on the topic than might be hoped for. I shall …
After We're Gone: A Commentary, Michael A. Middleton
After We're Gone: A Commentary, Michael A. Middleton
Faculty Publications
Professor Bell has placed before us a basic question that must be dealt with by all who wish to resolve the difficulties inherent in governing a free society. That question is one with which the framers of our Constitution grappled and that baffles us still. How does a society effectively govern itself and at the same time guarantee equal liberty for all? More specifically, in the racial context presented by The Chronicle of the Space Traders, when may government act for the benefit of society in a manner that is detrimental to some of its citizens because of their race?
U.S. Supreme Court: The 1988-1989 Term, Paul C. Giannelli
U.S. Supreme Court: The 1988-1989 Term, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
U.S. Supreme Court: The 1987-88 Term (Part I), Paul C. Giannelli
U.S. Supreme Court: The 1987-88 Term (Part I), Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
U.S. Supreme Court: The 1987-88 Term (Part Ii), Paul C. Giannelli
U.S. Supreme Court: The 1987-88 Term (Part Ii), Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Securing Justice: A Response To William Bradford Reynolds, Michael A. Middleton
Securing Justice: A Response To William Bradford Reynolds, Michael A. Middleton
Faculty Publications
I doubt that William Bradford Reynolds would disagree that the self evident truths the Framers of the Declaration of Independence spoke about are as applicable today in the 1980's as they were over 200 years ago. I also doubt that Mr. Reynolds would disagree that despite the fact that black people were not considered human beings when the Constitution was framed, the fourteenth amendment to that great document was intended to bring them within the ambit of its protections. On these two basic propositions, I suspect, Mr. Reynolds and I would agree. Beyond that however, Mr. Reynolds advances a fundamentally …
U.S. Supreme Court: The 1986-87 Term (Part I), Paul C. Giannelli
U.S. Supreme Court: The 1986-87 Term (Part I), Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
U.S. Supreme Court: The 1986-87 Term (Part Ii), Paul C. Giannelli
U.S. Supreme Court: The 1986-87 Term (Part Ii), Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
U.S. Supreme Court: The 1983-84 Term, Paul C. Giannelli
U.S. Supreme Court: The 1983-84 Term, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
U.S. Supreme Court: 1982-83 Term: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
U.S. Supreme Court: 1982-83 Term: Part I, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
U.S. States Supreme Court: 1982-83 Term: Partii, Paul C. Giannelli
U.S. States Supreme Court: 1982-83 Term: Partii, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The United States Supreme Court: The 1978-79 Term, Paul C. Giannelli
The United States Supreme Court: The 1978-79 Term, Paul C. Giannelli
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Board Of Curators Of The University Of Missouri V. Horowitz: Academic Versus Judicial Expertise, R. Lawrence Dessem
Board Of Curators Of The University Of Missouri V. Horowitz: Academic Versus Judicial Expertise, R. Lawrence Dessem
Faculty Publications
In Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz' the United States Supreme Court rejected the argument that public university students are constitutionally entitled to a hearing prior to their dismissal from school for academic reasons. In ruling against a former medical student at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, the Court concluded that "the determination whether to dismiss a student for academic reasons requires an expert evaluation of cumulative information and is not readily adapted to the procedural tools of judicial or administrative decisionmaking. ' In this article that conclusion and the several opinions in Horowitz will be …
The Ohio Bill Of Rights, Paul C. Giannelli
Student Due Process Rights In Academic Dismissals From The Public Schools, R. Lawrence Dessem
Student Due Process Rights In Academic Dismissals From The Public Schools, R. Lawrence Dessem
Faculty Publications
This article, however, goes beyond the argument that education is one of the most valuable benefits which government in this country provides. The thesis of the article is that education is not only very important to millions of Americans, but that students have constitutionally protected liberty and property interests in their public educations and the courts should therefore require notice and hearing prior to the deprivation of these interests, even when the deprivation is for strictly academic reasons.