Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 11 of 11

Full-Text Articles in Law

Proposed Maryland Jury Instructionon Cross-Racial Identification, David E. Aaronson Nov 2016

Proposed Maryland Jury Instructionon Cross-Racial Identification, David E. Aaronson

David Aaronson

No abstract provided.


New Rights And Remedies: The Federal Crime Victims' Rights Act Of 2004, David E. Aaronson Nov 2016

New Rights And Remedies: The Federal Crime Victims' Rights Act Of 2004, David E. Aaronson

David Aaronson

No abstract provided.


Mistaken Eyewitness Identifications In Maryland, David Aaronson, Julia Fox Nov 2015

Mistaken Eyewitness Identifications In Maryland, David Aaronson, Julia Fox

David Aaronson

No abstract provided.


Modernizing Jury Instructions In The Age Of Social Media, David Aaronson, Sydney Patterson Apr 2013

Modernizing Jury Instructions In The Age Of Social Media, David Aaronson, Sydney Patterson

David Aaronson

No abstract provided.


Statement Of David E. Aaronson In Support Of Hb 1075 To Repeal The Death Penalty, David Aaronson Mar 2011

Statement Of David E. Aaronson In Support Of Hb 1075 To Repeal The Death Penalty, David Aaronson

David Aaronson

No abstract provided.


Reflections: The Honorable Irma S. Raker – Judge, Teacher, And Role Model, David E. Aaronson Mar 2010

Reflections: The Honorable Irma S. Raker – Judge, Teacher, And Role Model, David E. Aaronson

David Aaronson

This article is a sketch of Judge Irma S. Raker’s career from her days as a law student at Washington College of Law to her distinguished career as a jurist and teacher. Judge Raker’s first legal job was as an Assistant State’s Attorney in Montgomery County, Maryland, where her appointment as the first woman litigator was a milestone in the local legal community. She was appointed in 1980 to serve as a judge on the District Court for Montgomery County and, in 1982, to serve on the Circuit Court for Montgomery County. Judge Raker decided a number of seminal cases, …


Helping Jurors To Make Sense Of Expert Testimony, David Aaronson Dec 1988

Helping Jurors To Make Sense Of Expert Testimony, David Aaronson

David Aaronson

Today's jurors frequently sit in trials where confusing and conflicting expert testimony is likely to be presented by sophisticated and highly trained individuals, using terminology unfamiliar to the average person. Proposals have been made and trial courts are experimenting with various procedures—none thoroughly evaluated— to improve jurors’ ability to cope with such testimony. My purpose here is to more clearly identify the problem and to review some of the reform proposals. 


Improving Police Discretion Rationality In Handling Public Inebriates Part Ii, David Aaronson Dec 1977

Improving Police Discretion Rationality In Handling Public Inebriates Part Ii, David Aaronson

David Aaronson

No abstract provided.


Changing The Public Drunkenness Laws: The Impact Of Decriminalization, David Aaronson Dec 1977

Changing The Public Drunkenness Laws: The Impact Of Decriminalization, David Aaronson

David Aaronson

Laws that decriminalize public drunkenness continue to use the police as the major intake agent for public inebriates under the "new" public health model of detoxification and treatment. Assuming that decriminalization introduces many disincentives to police intervention using legally sanctioned procedures, we hypothesize that it will be fol- lowed by a statistically significant decline in the number of public inebriates formally handled by the police in the manner designated by the "law in the books." Using an "interrupted time-series quasi- experiment" based on a "stratified multiple-group single-I design," we confirm this hypothesis for Washington, D.C., and Minneapolis, Minnesota. However, through …


Improving Police Discretion: Rationality In Handling Public Inebriates, David Aaronson Dec 1976

Improving Police Discretion: Rationality In Handling Public Inebriates, David Aaronson

David Aaronson

No abstract provided.


A Reconsideration Of The Fourth Amendment's Doctrine Of Search Incident To Arrest.Pdf, David Aaronson Dec 1974

A Reconsideration Of The Fourth Amendment's Doctrine Of Search Incident To Arrest.Pdf, David Aaronson

David Aaronson

INTRODUCTION: The doctrine of search incident to arrest provides that, as an incident to every lawful full custody arrest, law enforcement officers have an automatic right to conduct a thorough search of the arrestee and the area within his immediate control.' Although the Supreme Court has stated that the search incident to arrest exception to the fourth amendment's general requirement of a search warrant has been "settled from its first enunciation," the doctrine should be reexamined in terms of constitutional jurisprudence.