Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Complex Litigation (5)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Class Actions (2)
- Complex Litigation (2)
- Jury (2)
-
- Mass Torts (2)
- Trial (2)
- Aggregate Proof (1)
- Aggregation (1)
- Bureaucracy (1)
- Diet Drugs Litigation (1)
- Ethics (1)
- Federal Courts (1)
- Gender Discrimination (1)
- Injustice (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Legal Pluralism (1)
- Mass Tort Litigation (1)
- Multidistrict Litigation (1)
- Procedural Justice (1)
- Procedure (1)
- Professional Ethics (1)
- Settlement (1)
- Statistical Adjudication (1)
- Title VII (1)
- Verdicts (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Curse Of Bigness And The Optimal Size Of Class Actions, Alexandra Lahav
The Curse Of Bigness And The Optimal Size Of Class Actions, Alexandra Lahav
Alexandra D. Lahav
How big is too big when it comes to class actions? This short essay, written for the Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc roundtable on Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. examines that question. Size in itself should not be a barrier to certification, but courts may rightly be concerned with variation within the class. Variation causes manageability problems, but in some cases (like Dukes) variation can be managed within the class context by judicious use of statistical methods. I also demonstrate why the related argument that this class ought not be certified because it is too big and Wal-Mart will be …
Portraits Of Resistance: Lawyer Responses To Unjust Proceedings, Alexandra Lahav
Portraits Of Resistance: Lawyer Responses To Unjust Proceedings, Alexandra Lahav
Alexandra D. Lahav
This Article considers a question rarely addressed: what is the role of the lawyer in a manifestly unjust procedural regime? Many excellent studies have considered the role of the judge in unjust regimes, but the lawyer’s role has been largely ignored. This Article draws on two case studies: that of lawyers representing civil rights leaders during protests in Birmingham, Alabama in 1963 and that of lawyers representing detainees facing military commission proceedings in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. These portraits illuminate the role of the lawyer in a procedurally unjust tribunal operating within a larger liberal legal regime such as our own. …
Rough Justice, Alexandra Lahav
Rough Justice, Alexandra Lahav
Alexandra D. Lahav
This Essay offers a new justification for rough justice. Rough justice, as I use the term here, is the attempt to resolve large numbers of cases by using statistical methods to give plaintiffs a justifiable amount of recovery. It replaces the trial, which most consider the ideal process for assigning value to cases. Ordinarily rough justice is justified on utilitarian grounds. But rough justice is not only efficient, it is also fair. In fact, even though individual litigation is often held out as the sine qua non of process, rough justice does a better job at obtaining fair results for …
Bellwether Trials, Alexandra Lahav
Bellwether Trials, Alexandra Lahav
Alexandra D. Lahav
At the core of the controversy over mass torts lies a fundamental question: what justifies collective litigation? Scholars considering this question make one of two arguments. They either argue that collective justice must be limited by a process-based right to participation based on autonomy values, or they argue that collective justice is justified by utilitarian values and dismiss participation altogether. This Article presents a third alternative: that the democratic nature of the jury trial validates “group typical” justice, a subset of collective justice. The Article re-envisions the trial as a democratic enterprise, rather than solely an atomistic one. An innovative …
Recovering The Social Value Of Jurisdictional Redundancy, Alexandra D. Lahav
Recovering The Social Value Of Jurisdictional Redundancy, Alexandra D. Lahav
Alexandra D. Lahav
This essay, written for the Tulane Law Review Symposium on the Problem of Multidistrict Litigation, argues that the focus of proceduralists on centralization as a solution to the problems posed by modern litigation is misplaced. It is time to refocus on the social value of the multiple centers of authority that jurisdictional redundancy permits. This essay presents the case for multi-centered litigation with particular focus on the potential uses of the Multidistrict Litigation Act to realize pluralist values. The descriptive claim put forward by the essay is that jurisdictional redundancy is imbedded in our federalist system and our preference for …
The Law And Large Numbers: Preserving Adjudication In Complex Litigation, Alexandra Lahav
The Law And Large Numbers: Preserving Adjudication In Complex Litigation, Alexandra Lahav
Alexandra D. Lahav
This Article describes how the power to regulate tortfeasors has been transferred from the courts to private parties. It situates court resistance to administrative resolution of mass torts in the historical debate over bureaucracy in government. Instead of privatizing mass tort settlements, courts should take an active role in administering the resolution of mass torts.