Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 8 of 8

Full-Text Articles in Law

What Exactly Is Market Integrity? An Analysis Of One Of The Core Objectives Of Securities Regulation, Janet Austin Feb 2017

What Exactly Is Market Integrity? An Analysis Of One Of The Core Objectives Of Securities Regulation, Janet Austin

William & Mary Business Law Review

One of the main objectives of securities regulation around the world is to protect the integrity or fairness of the markets. This, together with protecting investors, improving the efficiency of markets, and protecting the markets from systemic risk, form the four fundamental goals of securities regulation.

However, what exactly is envisaged by this concept of market integrity or fairness? Are these simply norms of behaviour incapable of further definition? Despite their importance, relatively little attention has been given to these concepts in the literature. Do they, for example, require securities regulators to just work towards eliminating dishonest trading practices such …


Taking Stock: Insider And Outsider Trading By Congress, Jeanne L. Schroeder Feb 2014

Taking Stock: Insider And Outsider Trading By Congress, Jeanne L. Schroeder

William & Mary Business Law Review

Spring 2012 saw the enactment of the “Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012” or “STOCK Act.” It supposedly repealed an exemption from the federal securities laws that made insider trading by members of Congress “totally legal.” As every securities lawyer knows, however, there never was such an exemption. Representatives and Senators have always been subject to the same rules as the rest of us. It is just that insider-trading law is so incoherent that legal scholars sharply disagreed as to when, or even if, trading by government officials on the basis of material nonpublic information gleaned from their …


Insider Trading, Informed Trading, And Market Making: Liquidity Of Securities Markets In The Zero-Sum Game, Stanislav Dolgopolov Feb 2012

Insider Trading, Informed Trading, And Market Making: Liquidity Of Securities Markets In The Zero-Sum Game, Stanislav Dolgopolov

William & Mary Business Law Review

This Article reexamines the nexus of relationships among informed transactions, information asymmetry, and liquidity of securities markets in the context of public policy debates about insider trading and its regulation.The Article analyzes this nexus, with the emphasis on recent empirical studies and developments in the securities industry, from a variety of perspectives and considers the validity of the alleged link between insider trading—as opposed to other forms of informed trading—and market liquidity as a justification for the existence of regulation.


Sec Rule 14e-3 In The Wake Of United States V. O'Hagan: Proper Prophylactic Scope And The Future Of Warehousing, Jeff Lobb May 1999

Sec Rule 14e-3 In The Wake Of United States V. O'Hagan: Proper Prophylactic Scope And The Future Of Warehousing, Jeff Lobb

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


From Horse Trading To Insider Trading: The Historical Antecedents Of The Insider Trading Debate, Paula J. Dalley Apr 1998

From Horse Trading To Insider Trading: The Historical Antecedents Of The Insider Trading Debate, Paula J. Dalley

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Insider Trading And Family Values, Judith G. Greenberg Apr 1998

Insider Trading And Family Values, Judith G. Greenberg

William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice

No abstract provided.


An Economic Analysis Of Section 16(B) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934 Dec 1976

An Economic Analysis Of Section 16(B) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Securities Regulation - Trading By Insiders - S.E.C. V. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 401 F.2d 833 (2d Cir. 1968), Dennis C. Hensley Mar 1969

Securities Regulation - Trading By Insiders - S.E.C. V. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 401 F.2d 833 (2d Cir. 1968), Dennis C. Hensley

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.