Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (990)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (766)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (709)
- Criminal Law (669)
- Criminal Procedure (645)
-
- Human Rights Law (449)
- Legal Education (344)
- Securities Law (337)
- Business Organizations Law (313)
- Courts (305)
- Fourteenth Amendment (266)
- International Law (241)
- Torts (241)
- Labor and Employment Law (234)
- Civil Procedure (229)
- Family Law (211)
- Health Law and Policy (193)
- Environmental Law (186)
- Education Law (175)
- Evidence (164)
- Intellectual Property Law (164)
- Administrative Law (157)
- Law and Society (154)
- First Amendment (152)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (125)
- Banking and Finance Law (124)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (123)
- Property Law and Real Estate (123)
- Science and Technology Law (122)
- Keyword
-
- Capital punishment sentencing (413)
- Legal Education (202)
- Law School (198)
- Bar Exam (197)
- Constitutional Law (169)
-
- Capital punishment (162)
- Constitutional law (117)
- Criminal Law (67)
- Criminal law (67)
- Securities (60)
- Death penalty (59)
- Evidence (56)
- First Amendment (53)
- Civil rights (52)
- Equal protection (51)
- Freedom of speech (50)
- Criminal procedure (49)
- Due process of law (47)
- Securities fraud (47)
- Federal Courts (46)
- Torts (44)
- Civil Rights (40)
- Abortion (39)
- Antitrust law (39)
- Habeas Corpus (39)
- Fifth Amendment (38)
- Civil Procedure (36)
- Damages (36)
- Discrimination (36)
- Capital punishment of offenders with mental disabilities (34)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Washington and Lee Law Review (3361)
- Scholarly Articles (958)
- Supreme Court Case Files (764)
- Capital Defense Journal (596)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (480)
-
- Virginia Bar Exam Archive (232)
- Washington and Lee Law Review Online (198)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Energy, Climate, and the Environment (68)
- Powell Speeches (40)
- Assembled by Congressional Staff c 1958-1976 (36)
- Habeas Corpus Committee (32)
- Newton D. Baker Scrapbooks (27)
- Books and Chapters (20)
- Fragile Coalition Interviews (16)
- Library Scholarship (16)
- Legal Scholarship by Dean Steinheimer (15)
- Assembled by June Nolte Butler c. 1961-2001 (11)
- Butler-Woodlief Recordings (11)
- W&L Law Library Newsletter (7)
- Assembled by Dr. Butler c. 1958-1969 (6)
- Law Library Annual Reports (6)
- Powell Correspondence (6)
- Library Events (5)
- Washington and Lee Legal Scholarship (WaLLS) Newsletter (5)
- Butler-Mooney Recordings (3)
- Powell Writings (2)
- Frances Lewis Law Center Events (1)
- Powell Archives Web Exhibits (1)
- Powell Memorandum: Attack On American Free Enterprise System (1)
- Virginia Supreme Court Records, Volume 168 (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 991 - 1020 of 6925
Full-Text Articles in Law
Micro Essay, Alex Zhang
Micro Essay, Alex Zhang
Scholarly Articles
Ideally, you would want a database that contains everything possible. But life is not perfect, especially when you are already stranded on a deserted island. I would take a magic citator service, which provides the subseque nt history of every single primary source of law: not just cases, statutes, or regulations, but all agency decisions, trial court orders, municipal codes, and ethics opinions, etc. The one that is not only a citation index of legal resources but a “citation index” w/2 (legal-rule! or legal-standard!). May my wish come true (citator % “deserted island!”).
Clerking For God’S Grandfather: Chauncey Belknap’S Year With Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Todd C. Peppers, Ira Brad Matetsky, Elizabeth R. Williams, Jessica Winn
Clerking For God’S Grandfather: Chauncey Belknap’S Year With Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., Todd C. Peppers, Ira Brad Matetsky, Elizabeth R. Williams, Jessica Winn
Scholarly Articles
Most of what we know about law clerks comes from the clerks themselves, usually in the form of law review articles memorializing their Justices and their clerkships or in interviews with reporters and legal scholars. In a few instances, however, law clerks have contemporaneously memorialized their experiences in diaries. These materials provide a rare window into the insular world of the Court. While the recollections contained in the diaries are often infused with youthful hero worship for their employer—in contradistinction to Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.’s claim that no man is a hero to his valet— they offer a real-time, …
The Office Of The Prosecutor: Seeking Justice Or Serving Global Imperialism?, Shannon Fyfe
The Office Of The Prosecutor: Seeking Justice Or Serving Global Imperialism?, Shannon Fyfe
Scholarly Articles
The international criminal courts and tribunals, especially the ICC, have been strongly criticized for their susceptibility to political influence. Some have argued that the ICC has a distinctly Western bias and is participating in a new kind of imperialism in Africa. Others argue that history and the complicity of the West should disqualify the international community from demanding the prosecution of individuals participating in conflicts resulting directly from colonialism. Many have focused on the nature of the creation of the judicial bodies and the inherent political nature of judicial decisions regarding whom to prosecute. In this article, I offer a …
The Corporate Personhood Two-Step, Carliss N. Chatman
The Corporate Personhood Two-Step, Carliss N. Chatman
Scholarly Articles
The corporation cannot exist without its founders complying explicitly with the requirements for incorporation provided by state statutes. The artificial entity theory acknowledges that the corporation cannot and will not exist until its founders comply explicitly with the requirements for corporate formation and in-corporation imposed by the state. A corporation is also, by design, a new and distinct entity divorced from its people. The real entity theory acknowledges that once a corporation is formed, it has rights that belong only to the corporation it-self, wholly separate from its founders. By merging the artificial entity and real entity theories, the Court …
Liability For Unintentional Nuisances: How The Restatement Of Torts Almost Negligently Killed The Right To Exclude In Property Law, Jill M. Fraley
Liability For Unintentional Nuisances: How The Restatement Of Torts Almost Negligently Killed The Right To Exclude In Property Law, Jill M. Fraley
Scholarly Articles
This article argues that nuisance was historically unique in tort law because of its special role in protecting property rights.' In other words, nuisance historically had distinct features addressed to the special situation of land. Most importantly, nuisance protected the right to exclude in a way that no other cause of action did. The Second Restatement's change then diminished our rights to private property to the extent that it has been adopted. The majority of courts retain the more logical and defensible position--that property rights are special and nuisance encompasses something more than the idea of negligence.
Bulk Biometric Metadata Collection, Margaret Hu
Bulk Biometric Metadata Collection, Margaret Hu
Scholarly Articles
Smart police body cameras and smart glasses worn by law enforcement increasingly reflect state-of-the-art surveillance technology, such as the integration of live-streaming video with facial recognition and artificial intelligence tools, including automated analytics. This Article explores how these emerging cybersurveillance technologies risk the potential for bulk biometric metadata collection. Such collection is likely to fall outside the scope of the types of bulk metadata collection protections regulated by the USA FREEDOM Act of 2015. The USA FREEDOM Act was intended to bring the practice of bulk telephony metadata collection conducted by the National Security Agency (“NSA”) under tighter regulation. In …
Corwin V. Kkr Financial Holdings Llc—An After-Action Report, Joseph R. Slights Iii, Matthew Diller
Corwin V. Kkr Financial Holdings Llc—An After-Action Report, Joseph R. Slights Iii, Matthew Diller
Scholarly Articles
Vice Chancellor Slights presented this speech as the Eighteenth Annual Albert A. Destefano Lecture On Corporate, Securities, and Financial Law at the Fordham Corporate Law Center on April 9, 2018. Includes an introduction by Matthew Diller, Dean of the Fordham University School of Law.
State Action That Penalizes Children As Evidence Of A Desire To Harm Politically Unpopular Parents, Catherine E. Smith
State Action That Penalizes Children As Evidence Of A Desire To Harm Politically Unpopular Parents, Catherine E. Smith
Scholarly Articles
This Article is the first to advance the position that when the government takes the extreme step of denying children basic rights and benefits because of their parents, such state action should be recognized not just as evidence of animus against the children, but also as evidence of "a bare desire to harm" their "politically unpopular" parents. Identifying this type of government motivation and calling it what it is--animus toward parents--is just as important as condemning animus against the children themselves. Anti-parent animus that motivates harmful government behavior towards children should be prohibited as an impermissible means to accomplish an …
The Dtsa At One: An Empirical Study Of The First Year Of Litigation Under The Defend Trade Secrets Act, David S. Levine, Christopher B. Seaman
The Dtsa At One: An Empirical Study Of The First Year Of Litigation Under The Defend Trade Secrets Act, David S. Levine, Christopher B. Seaman
Scholarly Articles
This article represents the first comprehensive empirical study of the Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”), the law enacted by Congress in 2016 that created a federal civil cause of action for trade secret misappropriation. The DTSA represents the most significant expansion of federal involvement in intellectual property law in at least 30 years. In this study, we examine publicly-available docket information and pleadings to assess how private litigants have been utilizing the DTSA. Based upon an original dataset of nearly 500 newly-filed DTSA cases in federal court, we analyze whether the law is beginning to meet its sponsors’ stated goals …
Expert Report Of Catherine Smith, J.D.: Juliana V. United States, Catherine Smith
Expert Report Of Catherine Smith, J.D.: Juliana V. United States, Catherine Smith
Scholarly Articles
The Founders created the architecture for the rights of children to self-determination and protection from the sins of their forebears. A central tenet of our democracy is that government, including these federal defendants, should not deprive children (the next generation) of the foundational elements of their lives, liberties or property and should not impose hardships on them for matters of which they have no control. This historical tradition and intent of the Founders of our nation has not always been realized, but has evolved over time as our society gains new insights and understandings of children and our notions of …
Justice Outside Of Criminal Courtrooms And Jailhouses, In Arcs Of Global Justice: Essays In Honour Of William A. Schabas (Margaret M. Deguzman & Diane Marie Amann Eds., 2018), Mark A. Drumbl
Books and Chapters
This chapter examines alternate forms of transitional justice, notably, customary forms of dispute resolution, restitution, reparations, amnesties, and civil sanctions. It suggests that the international community’s preference for criminal trials as accountability mechanisms in the aftermath of genocide results in the ‘othering’ of these alternate forms of justice. Such ‘othering’ narrows legal pluralism to questions of the location of criminal process and the imposition of custodial punishment (who prosecutes, who sentences?), rather than a richer examination of how deployment of a conceptual diversity of overlapping mechanisms could promote shared objectives of accountability, justice, and transition.
¿Debemos Exigirle Seguridad Jurídica A Una Cláusula Antielusiva General? Reflexiones Sobre Las Líneas Discursivas Contrarias A La Cag, Fernando Loayza Jordán
¿Debemos Exigirle Seguridad Jurídica A Una Cláusula Antielusiva General? Reflexiones Sobre Las Líneas Discursivas Contrarias A La Cag, Fernando Loayza Jordán
Scholarly Articles
Las CAG generan tensiones entre la certidumbre que desean los contribuyentes y la flexibilidad que requiere su naturaleza. Esta tensión se refleja en las líneas discursivas críticas contra la Norma XVI. Hemos resumido estas en tres ideas fuerza: (i) “una CAG vulnera el principio de seguridad jurídica”, (ii) “una CAG solo podría ser aceptable si se enuncia con un lenguaje muy preciso y definido” y (iii) “una CAG interrumpiría la dinámica regular de los negocios y detendría la inversión”. A partir de la experiencia comparada y el análisis de la función de las CAG y la naturaleza del fenómeno de …
The Off-Label Use Of Pom Wonderful: Using Section 43(A) To Eliminate Misleading Off-Label Drug Promotion, Christopher A. Hurley
The Off-Label Use Of Pom Wonderful: Using Section 43(A) To Eliminate Misleading Off-Label Drug Promotion, Christopher A. Hurley
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Whistling Loud And Clear: Applying Chevron To Subsection 21f Of Dodd–Frank, Shaun M. Bennett
Whistling Loud And Clear: Applying Chevron To Subsection 21f Of Dodd–Frank, Shaun M. Bennett
Washington and Lee Law Review
This Note addresses a circuit court split arising from a portion of the anti-retaliation provisions in the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Subsection 21F’s retaliation prohibitions apply to those employers whose employees make required or protected disclosures under the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) or any other rule or regulation under the SEC’s jurisdiction. SOX provides anti -retaliation protections — similar to those available under Dodd–Frank — for employees of publicly traded companies who report misconduct. However, SOX expressly affords protections to those who provide information to “a Federal regulatory or law enforcement agency; any Member of …
Deconstructing The Epistemic Challenges To Mass Atrocity Prosecutions, Nancy Amoury Combs
Deconstructing The Epistemic Challenges To Mass Atrocity Prosecutions, Nancy Amoury Combs
Washington and Lee Law Review
Mass atrocity prosecutions are credited with advancing a host of praiseworthy objectives. They are believed to impose much-needed retribution, deter future atrocities, and affirm the rule of law in previously lawless societies. However, mass atrocity prosecutions will accomplish none of these laudable ends unless they are able to find accurate facts. Convicting the appropriate individuals of the appropriate crimes is a necessary and foundational condition for the success of mass atrocity prosecutions. But it is a condition that is frequently difficult to meet, as mass atrocity prosecutions are often bedeviled by pervasive and invidious obstacles to accurate fact-finding. This Article …
The Federal Law Of Property: The Case Of Inheritance Disclaimers And Tenancy By The Entireties, David Gray Carlson
The Federal Law Of Property: The Case Of Inheritance Disclaimers And Tenancy By The Entireties, David Gray Carlson
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reckoning Contract Damages: Valuation Of The Contract As An Asset, Victor P. Goldberg
Reckoning Contract Damages: Valuation Of The Contract As An Asset, Victor P. Goldberg
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ending Litigation And Financial Windfalls On Time-Barred Debts, Marc C. Mcallister
Ending Litigation And Financial Windfalls On Time-Barred Debts, Marc C. Mcallister
Washington and Lee Law Review
A trap for unsophisticated debtors, debt collectors often attempt to collect time-barred debts through written offers to settle those debts for a fraction of what is owed. Debtors typically respond to such offers in one of four ways. First, some debtors simply pay the offered settlement amount, usually 10%–40% of the total outstanding debt, thereby satisfying the debt in full. Second, those who wish to eliminate the debt but cannot pay the entire offered settlement amount will instead make a small payment, unwittingly reviving the statute of limitations on collections and making the entire debt judicially enforceable for several years …
Canons Of Construction For Dysfunctional Statutes: A Comment On Bennett, Paul G. Mahoney
Canons Of Construction For Dysfunctional Statutes: A Comment On Bennett, Paul G. Mahoney
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Formulary Fix Buries Fritz & Harvey: Drug Promotion Escapes Its Past Constraints, James T. O'Reilly
The Formulary Fix Buries Fritz & Harvey: Drug Promotion Escapes Its Past Constraints, James T. O'Reilly
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reconciling The Lanham Act And The Fdca: A Comment On Chris Hurley’S Note, Christopher B. Seaman
Reconciling The Lanham Act And The Fdca: A Comment On Chris Hurley’S Note, Christopher B. Seaman
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comment On Whistling Loud And Clear: Applying Chevron To Subsection 21f Of Dodd–Frank, Sarah C. Haan
Comment On Whistling Loud And Clear: Applying Chevron To Subsection 21f Of Dodd–Frank, Sarah C. Haan
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Quacks Or Bootleggers: Who’S Really Regulating Hedge Funds?, Jeremy Kidd
Quacks Or Bootleggers: Who’S Really Regulating Hedge Funds?, Jeremy Kidd
Washington and Lee Law Review
Influential scholars of corporate law have questioned previous federal interventions into corporate governance, calling it quackery. Invoking images of medical malpractice, these critiques have argued persuasively that Congress, in responding to crises, makes policy that disrupts efficient private rules and established state laws. This Article applies the Bootleggers and Baptists theory to show that Dodd–Frank’s hedge fund rules are more than just negligent or reckless, but designed to benefit special interests that compete with the hedge fund model. Those rules offer no solutions to any real or perceived risks arising from hedge fund investing, but might offer an advantage to …
Testimonial Injustice In International Criminal Law, Shannon Fyfe
Testimonial Injustice In International Criminal Law, Shannon Fyfe
Scholarly Articles
In this article, I consider the possibilities and limitations for testimonial justice in an international criminal courtroom. I begin by exploring the relationship between epistemology and criminal law, and consider how testimony contributes to the goals of truth and justice. I then assess the susceptibility of international criminal courts to the two harms of testimonial injustice: epistemic harm to the speaker, and harm to the truth-seeking process. I conclude that international criminal courtrooms are particularly susceptible to perpetrating testimonial injustice. Hearers in the international criminal courtroom should practice testimonial justice, but the institution is not structured in a way that …
Ask A Director: Reporting Accomplishments, Caroline L. Osborne
Ask A Director: Reporting Accomplishments, Caroline L. Osborne
Scholarly Articles
None available.
Securing Professional Development: Getting To Yes, Caroline L. Osborne, Carol A. Watson, Amy J. Eaton
Securing Professional Development: Getting To Yes, Caroline L. Osborne, Carol A. Watson, Amy J. Eaton
Scholarly Articles
None available.
Orwell's 1984 And A Fourth Amendment Cybersurveillance Nonintrusion Test, Margaret Hu
Orwell's 1984 And A Fourth Amendment Cybersurveillance Nonintrusion Test, Margaret Hu
Scholarly Articles
This Article describes a cybersurveillance nonintrusion test under the Fourth Amendment that is grounded in evolving customary law to replace the reasonable expectation of privacy test formulated in Katz v. United States. To illustrate how customary law norms are shaping modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, this Article examines the recurrence of judicial references to George Orwell’s novel, 1984, within the Fourth Amendment context when federal courts have assessed the constitutionality of modern surveillance methods. The Supreme Court has indicated that the Fourth Amendment privacy doctrine must now evolve to impose meaningful limitations on the intrusiveness of new surveillance technologies.
A …
Ocasio V. United States: The Supreme Court’S Sudden Expansion Of Conspiracy Liability (And Why Bribe-Taking Foreign Officials Should Take Note), Michael F. Dearington
Ocasio V. United States: The Supreme Court’S Sudden Expansion Of Conspiracy Liability (And Why Bribe-Taking Foreign Officials Should Take Note), Michael F. Dearington
Washington and Lee Law Review Online
Last year, the United States Supreme Court decided a Hobbs Act conspiracy case that could significantly expand the bounds of the general federal conspiracy statute. In Ocasio v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 1423 (2016), the Court held that, under “age-old principles of conspiracy law,” a police officer could conspire with shop owners to extort those very same shop owners in violation of the Hobbs Act. The corollary is that a shop owner can, in theory, conspire to extort himself. If a shop owner can conspire to extort himself as a matter of law, why can’t a bribe-taking foreign …