Law Commons^™

Museletter: March 2008, Suzanne Corriell

Museletter

This Issue:

Be Prepared for Employment this Summer by Joyce Manna Janto

The OPAC: What's in it for you? by Sally Wambold

Law at the Movies (New on DVD): American Gangster by Gail Zwirner

Trading Spaces: Spring Carrel Swap

Born In The U.S.A.? Rethinking Birthright Citizenship In The Wake Of 9/11, John C. Eastman

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Birthright Citizenship, The Fourteenth Amendment, And State Authority, James C. Ho

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Close To Crucial: The H-2b Visa Program Must Evolve, But Must Endure, Lindsay M. Pickral

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Rights And Obligations Of Americans In Mexico Under Immigration Law And Other Areas Of Mexican Law, Jorge A. Vargas

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Doctrinal Feedback And (Un)Reasonable Care, James Gibson

Law Faculty Publications

The law frequently derives its content from the practices of the community it regulates. Examples are legion: Tort's reasonable care standard demands that we all exercise the prudence of an "ordinary" person. Ambiguous contracts find meaning in custom and usage of trade. The Fourth Amendment examines our collective expectations of privacy. And so on. This recourse to real-world circumstance has in-tuitive appeal, in that it helps courts resolve fact-dependent disputes and lends legitimacy to their judgments. Yet real-world practice can depart from that which the law expects. For example, suppose a physician provides more than reasonable care - extra tests, …

A New "U": Organizing Victims And Protecting Immigrant Workers, Leticia M. Saucedo

University of Richmond Law Review

This article explores the viability and potential effectiveness of immigration law's U visa to contribute to the protection of groups of workers in substandard and dangerous workplaces. Immigration law has increasingly become an obstacle to the enforcement of employment and labor law to protect immigrant workers.Moreover, employment and labor law, with their individual rights frameworks, have proven blunt instruments in eradicating the type of subordinating, sometimes slave-like conditions of immi-grant workers, especially those in low-wage industries. The federal government recently issued long-awaited regulations govern-ing U nonimmigrant visas for certain crime victims. Several of the enumerated eligible crimes in the U …

Save America: Stop Illegal Immigration, Hon. Virgil H. Goode Jr.

University of Richmond Law Review

Security is an overriding issue confronting the United States, and if we want enhanced security, illegal immigration must be stopped. In fact, illegal immigration is an addiction that the United States must break, or it will break the United States.

Help Wanted: Looking For A Visa System The Promotes The U.S. Economy And National Security, Jonathan G. Goodrich

University of Richmond Law Review

No abstract provided.

Testimony Before The Subcommittee On Crime, Terrorism, And Homeland Security, United States House Of Representatives, Legislative Hearing On H.R. 4777: The “Internet Gambling Prohibition Act,” April 5, 2006, John Warren Kindt

Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business

No abstract provided.

Indices

Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest

Index of bills from the House and Senate of the Virginia General Assembly

Bills Passed By The 2008 Session Of The General Assembly

Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest

A legislative summary about the bills that passed in the 2008 Virginia General Assembly

Why All The King's Horses And All The King's Men Couldn't Putsovereign Immunity Back Together Again:An Analysis Of The Test Created In James V. Jane, Colleen F. Shepherd

Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest

In creating the test to determine whether government employees in the Commonwealth of Virginia are entitled to the benefit of sovereign tort immunity, the Supreme Court of Virginia stated, "[a] dmittedly, no single all-inclusive rule can be enunciated or applied in determining entitlement to sovereign immunity." The court, however, managed to formulate a four-part test to be consistently applied to each situation requiring a determination of whether sovereign immunity should be granted to a state employee. This article will examine the discretion prong of the four-part test created by the court in James v. Jane and the reasons why the …

Is Race In Public Schools Still Compelling?Parents Involved In Community Schools V.Seattle School District No. 1justice Breyer's Theory Of Active Liberty, Andpractical Considerations Of Democracy, Andrea Kayne Kaufman

Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest

This article explores why the promise of ending our dual society, as first articulated in Brown v. Board of Education, has not been fulfilled. Specifically this article examines a more recent case, Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, addressing the lost promise of Brown and the implications for our dual society.

Fourth Amendment Challenges To Camping Ordinances: A Legal Strategy To Force Legislative Solutions To Homelessness, Nicholas May

Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest

This Article argues that Fourth Amendment challenges to camping ordinances can prompt legislative efforts to solve the problem of homelessness in U.S. cities. By properly employing the Supreme Court of the United States' judicial standard for privacy rights, courts should consider the efforts of individual cities' efforts to curb poverty when asking the following question: does society view a homeless person's expectation of privacy as reasonable?

Another Day In The Life Of The Juvenile Justice System: The Fight Againt The Abolishment Of The System, Antwaneisha Gray

Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest

This article seeks to evaluate that family focused approach of Florida. The first part of the article examines the history and evolution of the juvenile justice system. Part III, surveys the current method of transferring youthful offenders to adult courts and the criticisms of those methods. Lastly, the article considers the reasons that individuals advocate for the abolishment of the juvenile justice system and the family focused model.

New Era Begins: Mental Health Law Reform In Virginia, Jane D. Hickey, Allyson K. Tysinger, William C. Mims

Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest

Amidst calls for mental health reform and a sense of urgency stemming from the tragic events at Virginia Tech, the 2008 session of the Virginia General Assembly convened. The legislative reaction was overwhelming: Legislators introduced a vast array of bills relating to mental health. By the end of the session, the General Assembly enacted the most sweeping revisions to Virginia's mental health laws since the 1970s.

Hava's Matching/Id Requirement: A Meaningless Tale Told By... Congress, Nathan Cemenska

Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest

This Article explores the question of whether HAVA requires matching, as well as the subsidiary question of whether HAVA mandates matching in states requiring voters to present a form of identification at the time of voting. The first question is a close one. However, on the second question, at least some courts are likely to conclude that HAVA exempts a state from having a matching program if the state requires identification from every voter at the polls. This Article makes a few modest recommendations to administrators trying to avoid the possibility of a lawsuit.

Law V. National Security: When Lawyers Make Terrorism Policy, William G. Hyland Jr.

Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business

Are lawyers strangling our government’s ability to fight the first war of the twenty-first century? Does judicial adventurism and the fear of litigation undermine the War Against Terrorism? In essence, is our national security apparatus overlawyered? This article analyzes how some lawyers have produced a synthetic “litigation culture” over the war on terror. It argues that litigation concerning electronic surveillance, interrogation and all manners of prisoner treatment has chilled counterintelligence since 9/11.

Reconsidering The D.C. Circuit’S Proximate Cause Standard For Extraterrotorial Jurisdiction: Precluding The “Globalization” Theory To Promote Global Enforcement, Michelle A. Wyant

Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business

As businesses expanded with the rise of globalization, so did the effects of anticompetitive activity and, in turn, the reach of the U.S. antitrust laws. Though Congress addressed the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the U.S. antitrust laws with its implementation of the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvement Act (“FTAIA”), the statute only created a three-way circuit split that led the Supreme Court to address the issue and determine that the foreign injury must arise from both foreign anticompetitive activity and the activity’s adverse effects on domestic commerce. The D.C. Circuit further clarified the issue on remand by requiring a proximate cause relationship …

Just And Efficient Resolution Of Private International Disputes: Israel’S New Theory Of Jurisdiction, Yaad Rotem

Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business

What is the guiding rationale according to which the rules of international jurisdiction to adjudicate private disputes are to be construed? Israeli law has been contemplating this question for some time now, as the traditional territorial theory seems to be on the decline and is therefore unsatisfactory as a basis for modern legal rules. Unfortunately, a thorough effort to choose an alternative theory is still missing. A painful reminder of this current state of affairs was given recently as the Israeli Supreme Court issued, on the very same day, two decisions concerning cases in which a foreign plaintiff, having no …

Implications Of Global Warming On State Sovereignty And Arctic Resources Under The United Nations Convention On The Law Of The Sea: How The Arctic Is No Longer Communis Omnium Naturali Jure, Parker Clote

Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business

No abstract provided.

Reconsidering Virginia Judicial Selection, Carl W. Tobias

Law Faculty Publications

The 2008 Virginia General Assembly adjourned this summer without electing judges to vacancies on the State Corporation Commission (the "Commission" or "SCC"), the Supreme Court of Virginia, and numerous circuit courts. Thus, Democratic Governor Tim Kaine recently appointed individuals to fill these openings. Although the jurists whom the Governor appointed seem very well-qualified, the judges may only serve for five months, unless the 2009 General Assembly elects them. The 2008 Assembly's failure to elect judges for these vacancies demonstrates that the selection process is ineffective, and perhaps broken, as this development has eroded the delivery of justice and may have …

The Electronic Workplace, Ann C. Hodges

Law Faculty Publications

The American workplace of the twenty-first century is in the midst of a vast transformation not unlike the Industrial Revolution of the late nineteenth century. The United States has moved from a manufacturing-based economy to a knowledge-based economy. This new era has been variously denominated the Technological Revolution, the Electronic Revolution, or the Digital Revolution. Thomas Friedman has described the transformative change as a flattening of the world. Historians will almost certainly have a name for this monumental change in the economy, which, of course, is affecting not only the United Sttttes but many other countries in the world as …

Fda Regulatory Compliance Reconsidered, Carl W. Tobias

Law Faculty Publications

Many observers consider the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) vital for the protection of consumer health and safety. One hundred years ago, Congress established the entity that would become the FDA and authorized it to regulate foods and drugs, critical responsibilities that the agency has long discharged carefully. Throughout the past century, the FDA's regulatory power has expanded systematically, albeit gradually, while legislatures and courts in the fifty American jurisdictions broadened liability exposure for manufacturers that sold defective products that injured consumers. Observers have recently criticized the agency for overseeing pharmaceuticals too leniently, even as states increasingly narrowed manufacturers' liability …

Corporate Misconduct And The Perfect Storm Of Shareholder Litigation, Jessica M. Erickson

Law Faculty Publications

When it comes to combating corporate misconduct, is more litigation necessarily better? The conventional wisdom is that we should deploy every weapon in the law's arsenal to combat corporate misconduct. This wisdom, however, reflects legal scholarship that is confined to analyzing securities class actions and derivative suits in isolation, with little inquiry into the interplay between them. By Jailing to take a broader view of shareholder litigation, legal scholars have missed an opportunity to provide courts with the conceptual tools necessary to meet the complex challenges of complex corporate litigation. In courtrooms and boardrooms across the country, a debate is …

Baker V. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), Henry L. Chambers Jr.

Law Faculty Publications

Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) marked the U.S. Supreme Court's entry into the "political thicket" of apportionment and electoral politics that Justice Felix Frankfurter, in his opinion in Colegroe v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946), warned the Court that it should avoid.

Random Drug Testing, Henry L. Chambers Jr.

Law Faculty Publications

Random drug testing coexists uneasily with a general Fourth Amendment right to be free of suspicionless government searches. Typically, a governmental search is accompanied by a warrant supported by individualized suspicion, that is, probable cause. Random drug testing involves a search without any particularized suspicion that the subject of the search has used drugs.

Alabama, Timothy L. Coggins

Law Faculty Publications

A report on the state of Alabama's authentication of online legal resources, the first update was recorded in 2007.

Of Inkblots And Originalism: Historical Ambiguity And The Case Of The Ninth Amendment, Kurt T. Lash

Law Faculty Publications

Ever since Justice Goldberg's concurring opinion in Griswold v. Connecticut, the Ninth Amendment has been a flashpoint in debates over the merits of originalism as an interpretive theory. Judge Bork's comparison of interpreting the Ninth Amendment to reading a text obscured by an inkblot has been particularly subjected to intense criticism. The metaphor has been attacked as erasing the Ninth Amendment from the Constitution, and as representing the inevitably selective and inconsistent use of

text and history by so-called originalists.

It turns out, however, that not only was Judge Bork right to reject Justice Goldberg's reading of the Ninth Amendment, …