Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (23)
- Constitutional Law (20)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (20)
- Jurisprudence (14)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (13)
-
- Law and Society (12)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (10)
- Courts (10)
- Legal History (9)
- Litigation (8)
- Judges (7)
- Law and Economics (7)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (7)
- Arts and Humanities (6)
- Civil Procedure (6)
- Law and Race (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation (5)
- Sociology (5)
- Criminal Law (4)
- Criminal Procedure (4)
- Family Law (4)
- Inequality and Stratification (4)
- Law and Philosophy (4)
- Law and Politics (4)
- Race and Ethnicity (4)
- Securities Law (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Business (3)
Articles 31 - 35 of 35
Full-Text Articles in Law
Taming Negotiated Justice, Stephanos Bibas
Taming Negotiated Justice, Stephanos Bibas
All Faculty Scholarship
After four decades of neglecting laissez-faire plea bargaining, the Supreme Court got it right. In Missouri v. Frye and Lafler v. Cooper, the Court recognized that the Sixth Amendment regulates plea bargaining. Thus, the Court held that criminal defendants can challenge deficient advice that causes them to reject favorable plea bargains and receive heavier sentences after trial. Finally, the Court has brought law to the shadowy plea-bargaining bazaar.
Writing in dissent, Justice Scalia argued that the majority’s opinion “opens a whole new boutique of constitutional jurisprudence (‘plea-bargaining law’).” To which I say: it is about time the Court developed …
Justice Scalia's Constitution--And Ours, Kermit Roosevelt Iii
Justice Scalia's Constitution--And Ours, Kermit Roosevelt Iii
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Arbitration, Consent And Contractual Theory: The Implications Of Eeoc V.Waffle House, Jaime L. Dodge, Elizabeth Pollman
Arbitration, Consent And Contractual Theory: The Implications Of Eeoc V.Waffle House, Jaime L. Dodge, Elizabeth Pollman
All Faculty Scholarship
Consent has long been the foundation of arbitration, giving the process legitimacy and informing decisions about its nature and structure. The Supreme Court has consistently required consent as a precondition for compelling arbitration. However, it remains unclear what actions constitute consent. In First Options v. Kaplan,1 the Supreme Court held that courts should apply state contract law to determine whether an arbitral clause exists, but “added an important qualification” that “[c]ourts should not assume that the parties have agreed to arbitrate unless there is clear and unmistakable evidence that they did so.”2 In the wake of First Options, the courts …
The Qualified Immunity Doctrine In The Supreme Court: Judicial Activism And The Restriction Of Constitutional Rights, David Rudovsky
The Qualified Immunity Doctrine In The Supreme Court: Judicial Activism And The Restriction Of Constitutional Rights, David Rudovsky
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Court Acknowledges The Illegitimate: Levy V. Louisiana And Glona V. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co., John C. Gray Jr., David Rudovsky
The Court Acknowledges The Illegitimate: Levy V. Louisiana And Glona V. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co., John C. Gray Jr., David Rudovsky
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.