Law Commons^™

Consumer Protection After A Global Financial Crisis, Melissa B. Jacoby

Faculty Publications

Like other major events, the Global Financial Crisis generated a large and diffuse body of academic analysis. As part of a broader call for operationalizing the study of crises as policy shocks and resulting responses, which inevitably derail from elegant theories, we examine how regulatory protagonists approached consumer protection after the GFC, guided by six elements that should be considered in any policy shock context. After reviewing the introduction and philosophy of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, created as part of the Dodd–Frank Act of 2010, we consider four examples of how consumer protection unfolded in the crises’ aftermath …

Electricity Competition And The Public Good: Rethinking Markets And Monopolies, Jonas J. Monast

Faculty Publications

The United States electricity sector is engaged in a long-term experiment regarding the proper role of market competition. Many states that transitioned to competitive electricity markets in the early 2000s are again reconsidering the relationship between market competition and public policy goals. Low natural gas prices, falling costs of renewable energy and energy storage, and improvements in efficiency are causing early retirements of coal and nuclear power plants and thus affecting environmental policy goals and economic interests. States that continue to rely on monopoly utilities for electricity are also reconsidering the role of competition, but from a different angle. Rather …

The Future Of Administrative Deference, F. Andrew Hessick

Faculty Publications

If one looks at how law affects day-to-day life, administrative law is arguably the most important area of law. Agencies make most laws and adjudicate most disputes. Despite its importance, administrative law is very unsettled. While the basic rules of tort and property law have not changed much over the past one hundred years, that is not the case for administrative law. There are still fights today over the scope of agency power and even the constitutionality of agency action.

Introduction: #Metoo In The Workplace, Jeffrey M. Hirsch

Faculty Publications

This symposium issue examines various impacts of the #MeToo movement in the workplace. “Me Too” was first coined in 1997 by Tarana Burke, who used the phrase as part of her work to help women like her, especially those of color, who had survived sexual violence. “Me Too” later became “#MeToo,” particularly after several famous actresses accused high-powered Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein of sexual assault. The actions of Weinstein, as well as many of the numerous powerful men who subsequently faced similar accusations, involved sexual harassment and assault in a specific context: work. These high-ranking executives used their power over …

Race, Space And Democracy: Locally-Based Strategies For Development -- Panel Discussion From Fourth National People Of Color Legal Scholarship Conference, Hosted At The American University Washington College Of Law, Audrey Mcfarlane, Erika K. Wilson, Ezra Rosser, Michèle Alexander

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The Missing Marketplace Of Ideas Theory, Mary-Rose Papandrea

Faculty Publications

One hundred years ago, Justice Holmes embraced the marketplace of ideas in his dissenting opinion in Abrams v. United States. The same year as this centennial anniversary, Justice Kennedy, one of the most ardent adherents to this theory, retired from the Supreme Court. The dovetailing of these two events offers the perfect excuse to evaluate the marketplace of ideas in the Court’s First Amendment jurisprudence today.

The marketplace of ideas drives many of the Court’s First Amendment decisions, from the public forum doctrine to restrictions on offensive expression to campaign finance. Although the theory is not perfect, this Article …

Consumer Remedies For Civil Rights, Kate Sablosky Elengold

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

The Investment Imperative, Kate Sablosky Elengold

Faculty Publications

This Article names and identifies the “investment imperative” as the widely-held belief that higher education is necessary to increase one’s financial prosperity and social standing in America. Increasingly, higher education policy has supported the investment imperative by shifting the benefit, burden, and risk of higher education from the public to the private consumer. This has resulted in a patchwork of laws that encourage education at any cost, primarily driven by personal debt, and without concomitant regulations that control for instructional quality.

Drawing on interdisciplinary scholarship, empirical studies, and original interviews with student loan borrowers across the country, this Article argues …

Citation Stickiness, Kevin Bennardo, Alexa Z. Chew

Faculty Publications

This Article is an empirical study of what we call citation stickiness. A citation is sticky if it appears in one of the parties’ briefs and then again in the court’s opinion. Imagine that the parties use their briefs to toss citations in the court’s direction. Some of those citations stick and appear in the opinion—these are the sticky citations. Some of those citations don’t stick and go unmentioned by the court—these are the unsticky ones. Finally, some sources were never mentioned by the parties yet appear in the court’s opinion. These authorities are endogenous—they spring from the court itself. …

Structural Rights And Incorporation, F. Andrew Hessick, Elizabeth Fisher

Faculty Publications

Under the selective incorporation doctrine, provisions in the Bill of Rights are applied against the states if they are fundamental to the American scheme of ordered liberty or deeply rooted in this nation’s history. By focusing solely on the importance of rights, this doctrine fails to account for the effect of incorporating a right on the states. This Article challenges this approach. It identifies a category of rights whose incorporation most deeply intrudes on state sovereignty. These rights do not simply create individual entitlements; they also have structural features by dictating which government institutions may exercise which government powers. These …

Constituencies And Control In Statutory Drafting: Interviews With Government Tax Counsels, Shuyi Oei, Leigh Z. Osofsky

Faculty Publications

Tax statutes have long been derided as convoluted and unreadable. But there is little existing research about drafting practices that helps us contextualize such critiques. In this Article, we conduct the first indepth empirical examination of how tax law drafting and formulation decisions are made. We report findings from interviews with government counsels who participated in the tax legislative process over the past four decades. Our interviews revealed that tax legislation drafting decisions are both targeted to and controlled by experts. Most counsels did not consider statutory formulation or readability important, as long as substantive meaning was accurate. Many held …

Lenders' Roles And Responsibilities In Sovereign Debt Markets, Susan Block-Lieb, W. Mark C. Weidemaier

Faculty Publications

Academic and policy debates about the multi-trillion-dollar sovereign debt markets presume these markets are unique. The reason is that sovereigns differ from other borrowers. To the extent observers look elsewhere for guidance, they turn to corporate debt as a comparison. For example, official actors have repeatedly intervened in sovereign debt markets by prodding market participants to draft loan contracts that simulate aspects of corporate bankruptcy. We argue that the conventional view of sovereign debt—though useful to a point—has substantially and unjustifiably limited the academic and policy agenda. Rather than dwell on the unique characteristics of sovereign borrowers, we examine the …

Interpreting Forum Selection Clauses, John F. Coyle

Faculty Publications

Over the past half century, courts in the United States have developed canons of construction that they use exclusively to construe forum selection clauses. These canons play an important role in determining the meaning of these clauses and, by extension, whether litigation arising out of a particular contract must proceed in a given place. To date, however, these canons have attracted surprisingly little attention in the academic literature.

This Article aspires to fill that gap. It provides the first comprehensive taxonomy of the canons that U.S. courts use to construe forum selection clauses. These interpretive rules fall into four groups: …

Termination Of Tenancy In Common By Adverse Possession: A Comparative Lesson From The United States, John V. Orth

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Fructifying The First Amendment: An Asymmetric Approach To Constitutional Fact Doctrine, Amanda Reid

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Safeguarding Fair Use Through First Amendment’S Asymmetric Constitutional Fact Review, Amanda Reid

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Of Titles And Testaments: Reflections Of An American Reader Of The Adelaide Law Review, John V. Orth

Faculty Publications

From the point of view of an American lawyer, two Australian innovations in the law of property stand out: titles by registration and the dispensing power in the law of wills. Both originated in South Australia, and both are the subject of articles in the Adelaide Law Review. Both spread rapidly to other Australian states and throughout the Commonwealth. But in the United States, despite some early success, neither achieved widespread adoption. Readers of the Adelaide Law Review, who doubtless view titles by registration and the dispensing power as obvious improvements on earlier property law, may be surprised …

Balancing Justice Needs And Private Property In Constitutional Takings Provisions: A Comparative Assessment Of India, Australia, And The United States, Krithika Ashok, Paul T. Babie, John V. Orth

Faculty Publications

This Article explores the relationship between justice needs and private property in the constitutional takings provisions of the Indian, Australian, and American constitutions. Building upon established scholarship, it develops a theoretical framework within which to consider the way in which a state balances the requirement to provide minimal levels of justice for its citizens through the re-distribution of goods and resources with the need to protect the private property of individuals. We summarize this framework in what we refer to as the “Justice Needs-Protection of Private Property Continuum.” Using the framework developed, the Article provides an outline of the takings …