Law Commons^™

Constitutional Drafting Processes And Constitutional Success, Adam Chilton, Murat C. Mungan, Mila Versteeg

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Several recent constitution-making processes have been celebrated for being participatory, inclusive, and representative. However, many of these processes also failed. We theorize that aspects of these kinds of constitutional drafting processes could reduce the probability of constitutional success. To show why, we construct a “Constitution Drafting game” (CD game) in which representatives from different interest groups must draft a constitution. We consider the case where the probability of constitutional success is single peaked, but the value from successful adoption is increasing in the degree of issue protection chosen. The drafting process then leads to protection choices that are above those …

Purdue Pharma And The New Bankruptcy Exceptionalism, Anthony Casey, Joshua Macey

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

No abstract provided.

Function Over Form In Federal Drug Sentencing, Alison Siegler, Grant Delaune

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

No abstract provided.

Pretrial Detention Without Counsel, Alison M. Siegler, Jaden M. Lessnick

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

In federal courts across the country, judges are locking defendants in jail before trial without first giving them a lawyer. This deprivation-of-counsel crisis not only violates the statutory, regulatory, and administrative right to counsel at initial appearance hearings, but may even contravene the Sixth Amendment. This article builds on our Freedom Denied report—the first nationwide study of federal pretrial detention—and new data collected since. It makes three primary contributions. First, we explain the sources and nature of the right to counsel at federal initial appearance hearings (the first bail hearing in federal court). Second, we provide a data-driven illustration of …

The American Attack On Academic Freedom In Comparative Perspective, Tom Ginsburg

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Academic freedom is under threat in many countries, and the United States is no exception. This chapter places the American framework for academic freedom in comparative perspective, and describes the techniques being deployed against it. A common threat is to leverage the use of government funds as a way to change internal university governance. Less common, however, is something that we have seen in the United States, which is a threat to academic freedom from civil society itself. The trend is accelerating through social media, and is structurally similar to that of the fascist period in Europe in which there …

The International Law Of Land (Grabbing): Human Rights And Development In The Context Of Racial Capitalism, Gabriele Wadlig

Chicago Journal of International Law

This article investigates the concept of tenure security within international law, emphasizing the global legal architectures that influence and shape land tenure governance at the intersections of international human rights law and development. By tracing the evolution of tenure security from colonial practices to modern development paradigms, the article contends that international development and human rights frameworks often perpetuate dispossession and inequality. It critiques the convergence of human rights and development narratives around the formalization of land tenure, demonstrating how this practice reinforces Western legal frameworks and ontologies of land. The article examines a range of instruments including various UN …

The Expressive Effects Of Bilateral Labor Agreements, Ian G. Peacock

Chicago Journal of International Law

Bilateral labor agreements (BLAs) aim to facilitate the movement of temporary migrant workers between countries. So far, studies of BLAs have focused on whether they have effects on migration flows. Despite countries entering hundreds of BLAs, evidence for their effects on migration flows remains limited. Yet, even if BLAs have limited material effects, they may still have important symbolic effects. On this topic, this Comment highlights BLAs’ potential to change rhetoric about international migration among heads of state. Drawing on an original empirical analysis focused on BLAs with the Philippines, the Comment analyzes how BLAs may influence leaders’ expressed attitudes …

Falsifying Tradition, Darrell A.H. Miller

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

From cases spanning gun rights, reproductive freedom, religious liberty, and personal jurisdiction; to separation of powers and other structural features of the Constitution, courts increasingly rely on tradition to guide their decisions. Often, judges appeal to tradition in a vaguely empirical way, as “facts to study, not convictions to demonstrate about,” in the words of Justice Antonin Scalia. Yet, for a claim that purports to be factual, there’s very little agreement, or even analysis, about what renders this factual assertion—tradition—true or false. This Article tackles that foundational issue.

Part I surveys the ways in which courts use tradition in different …

Remedies In The First Hundred Days Of Trump Ii: A Gently Adversarial Collaboration, Samuel Bray, James E. Pfander

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

No abstract provided.

When The Executive Has Unclean Hands, William Baude, Samuel L. Bray

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Those who come into equity must come with clean hands. But what happens when it is the executive who seeks equitable relief? This Essay argues that the unclean-hands doctrine applies to the executive, though in a modified form that reflects the relation- ships between officials in the executive branch, between the executive and legislative branch, and between the government and the people. It then applies the doctrine to current controversies such as government requests for stays from the Supreme Court, and a pending lawsuit against the District of Maryland.

Remedies For A Constitutional Crisis, William Baude, Samuel L. Bray, Marin K. Levy

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Remedies for a Constitutional Crisis William Baude,* Samuel L. Bray,** and Marin K. Levy*** 139 Harv. L. Rev. (forthcoming 2026) Draft of September 29, 2025 In a crisis of authority, where it is unclear whether executive officials will comply with judicial decisions, the courts may seem to have limited remedial options. What can they do other than order that their decisions be followed, and hope for the best? This Essay shows that even once judges are firmly convinced that the executive has violated the law, their remedial options are wide and complicated. Moreover, the best path is frequently not obvious. …

The Exactions Illusion: Sheetz's Missing Dissent, Lee Anne Fennell, Timothy M. Mulvaney

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

No abstract provided.

Pillar Two: Much Ado About Next To Nothing?, Julie Roin

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

The OECD has spent the last fifteen years working on the design and implementation of rules for the taxation of the income derived from international transactions, rules that its members hope will both increase corporate tax revenues and minimize “destructive” tax competition. In 2021, it released its two-part “Inclusive Framework.” Although Pillar One of this Framework still languishes, legislation necessary for the implementation of Pillar Two, which is designed to force all countries to impose a minimum tax on income derived by large multinational enterprises, has been enacted by most of the countries in the European Union, Japan, South Korea …

Safety Score Liability, Omri Ben-Shaharz

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

Data technology is increasingly deployed to assign safety scores to people and products. Could these scores be used by tort law to apportion liability for accidents? Instead of basing tort liability on negligence—on the level of care leading to the specific accident—“safety score liability” would impose liability commensurate with a party’s habitual propensity to behave unsafely. This article describes how safety score liability would work, the incentives it would create, and the principles limiting its adoption. The article suggests that the precision of AI tools generating such scores—scores that have already reshaped other channels of safety regulation in society— offers …

Space Over Time: Housing For The Life Cycle, Lee Anne Fennell

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

People need housing throughout the life cycle, and what they need from that housing changes over time. Yet the menu of residential options is often too static, rigid, and limited to respond to these changes. What would it mean to configure housing to adapt to households’ evolving spatial requirements, risk tolerances, health challenges, and financial statuses? How could greater flexibility in the built environment enable communities to deliver better residential services to their populations? Elder housing offers a illuminating window into these questions and their answers. Addressing life-stage correlated housing mismatches could help to loosen the larger supply constraints—and failures …

The Constitution And The War On Dei, Sonja A. Starr, Genevieve Lakier

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

his Article examines how the second Trump Administration’s aggressive attacks on programs, policies, and speech loosely associated with diversity, equity, and inclusion [DEI] intersect with the constitutional guarantees of equal protection and freedom of speech. We argue first that there is little doctrinal support for the administration’s pervasive efforts to justify its war on DEI by invoking the Equal Protection Clause and parallel statutory law. Instead, the administration is stretching existing colorblindness doctrine beyond recognition, into a radical vision that we label “anti-antisubordination.” On this view, vindicating equality values does not only require restricting practices that treat individuals differently based …

Informative Jury Disagreement, Roy Baharad

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

The article introduces a counterintuitive argument, contending that jury disagreement on the defendant’s guilt—a nonunanimous conviction—may well provide a more informative signal, compared to consensus. Because stronger consensus implies higher likelihood of herding, it is shown that beyond some threshold, further accumulation of votes to convict would carry negligible epistemic contribution, barely enhancing the posterior probability of guilt. On the other hand, while dissenting votes provide a direct signal of innocence, they indicate that herding has not been involved in the decision-making process, hence increase the epistemic contribution of any vote generated by said process— including votes to convict—and may …

Family, Faith And Nation: The Roberts Court And The Global Pivot Against Legal Liberalism, Aziz Z. Huq, Tom Ginsburg

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

The Roberts Court has veered sharply in a culturally conservative direction. Traditional solidarities of faith, family, and nation have been elevated above the individual autonomy interests that motivated the justices in the twentieth century. The Supreme Court’s jurisprudence in this vein complements and is reinforced by changes in public law more generally—for example, in recent executive orders that amplify the same values. In legal scholarship, this jurisprudential shift is pervasively framed in terms of domestic electoral politics, in particular as a product of Republican dominance of the presidency and the Senate at key moments.

But expand the analytic lens outward, …

Agonistic Federalism, Aziz Z. Huq, Zachary D. Clopton

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

It’s been called the “oldest question” of American constitutional law: How does the national government deal with its sovereign subnational states? Judges and scholars have tried to capture this dynamic via theories of “dual federalism,” “process federalism,” “cooperative federalism,” or “federalism by integration.” But all these models suddenly seem to have superseded, and even perhaps rendered obsolete, by an unexpected step-change in the intensity of federal-state conflicts. In the place of longstanding federalism models, this article demonstrates, an underappreciated form of intergovernmental relations has emerged. We call this model “agonistic federalism.” The article’s aim is to introduce and theorize this …

Bypassing Agency Adjudication, Brian Lipshutz

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

This Article examines the contested practice of bypassing agency adjudication to accelerate judicial review of non-final executive action. Parties typically challenge final action under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). But parties may also seek an injunction or declaratory judgment with respect to a non-final action that violates a statute or the Constitution. Traditionally, such “ultra vires” review required a clearly unlawful action and an inadequate administrative remedy. But modern courts further limit it by applying three judicially developed timing doctrines—exhaustion, ripeness, and Thunder Basin.

This Article explains why the traditional ultra vires model— without the timing doctrines—should govern the bypassing …

Monarchy, Tom Ginsburg

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

No abstract provided.

A Meditation On The Thirteenth Amendment And Constitutional Redemption, Darrel A. H. Miller

Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers

No abstract provided.

Precedent Terms, Vincent Buccola, David A. Hoffman

Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series

An implicit binary underlies most academic thinking about commercial and corporate contracts. To judge from the theory literature, such agreements consist of just two kinds of terms: those that are negotiated and priced and those that are boilerplate. But on-the-ground realities don’t square with the picture of contract production that the standard assumption yields. That picture can’t easily explain, for example, why sophisticated parties regularly spend large sums quarreling over terms, nor is it compatible with commonly expressed attitudes of negotiating triumph or dismay.

This Article develops a new analytical category that can explain these and other empirical regularities and …

Reorganization By Force, Jared I. Mayer

Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series

Nearly every chapter 11 is “voluntary” in that it’s initiated by the company’s managers. Yet the Bankruptcy Code also allows unsecured creditors to force a company to reorganize under an “involuntary chapter 11.” Involuntary chapter 11s are rare and largely ignored by scholars. That’s potentially because bankruptcy and corporate law largely defer to managers’ business judgment as to how to maximize the company’s value, and investors have several contract and corporate law tools designed to discipline underperforming managers. So, what work can involuntary chapter 11s do?

This Article shows that an involuntary chapter 11 can be the optimal solution for …

The Backstop Party, Vincent S.J. Buccola, Adi Marcovich Gross, Matthew R. Mcbrady

Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series

Bankruptcy exit financing has become a site of recurring conflict in the intra-class creditor skirmishes that now so often mark corporate reorganization. When creditors in an ad hoc group sufficiently large to accept a plan of reorganization on behalf of an impaired class agree to underwrite, or “backstop,” the debtor’s plan-contemplated capital raise, creditors who hold identical claims but are excluded from the backstop group cry foul that the Bankruptcy Code bars their unequal treatment. All-or-nothing arguments have proved unsatisfying, however, because, on the best reading of the Code, the merits depend on a matter of fact that is not …

A Companion Guide To The Restatement Of Consumer Contracts, Oren Bar-Gill, Omri Ben-Shahar, Florencia Marotta-Wurgler

Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series

This short Essay, written by the Reporters of the recently published Restatement of Consumer Contracts, is intended as a companion to the Restatement. It highlights three areas, where the Reporters’ ambition was only partially reflected in the final version of the Restatement. The first was to ground the restated rules and principles in a systematic, empirical analysis of the entire body of consumer contracts cases. The second goal was to avoid an emphasis on disclosure mandates that have been shown to be unhelpful and even counter-productive. The third goal was to infuse the Restatement with social science realism, especially in …

Bankruptcy Minimalism, Douglas Baird

Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series

No abstract provided.

Contract Remedies And Search Efforts, Roy Baharad

Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series

Contract theorists routinely assume that opportunities for efficient breach are exogeneous. This prompts the conventional approach to contract remedies, according to which expectation damages are preferred to the disgorgement rule: when ex-post renegotiations are unfeasible, the former regime facilitates efficient breach while the latter deters it. In this paper, I offer a simple model in which two parties to a contract can exert search efforts to locate better contractual alternatives. The endogeneity of efficient-breach opportunities gives rise to a novel outlook on the choice of remedies for a breach of contract. Specifically, this paper opts out of the expectation damages …

The Economics Of Healthcare Fraud, Jetson Leder- Luis, Anup Malani

Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series

Healthcare fraud imposes a sizable cost on U.S. public healthcare budgets and distorts health care provision. We examine the economics of health care fraud and enforcement using theory and data and connect to a growing literature on the topic. We first offer a new economic definition of health care fraud that captures and connects the wide range of activities prosecuted as fraud. We define fraud as any divergence between the care an insurer says a patient qualifies for, the care a provider provides, and the care a provider bills for. Our definition clarifies the economic consequences of different categories of …

Judge Ai: Assessing Large Language Models In Judicial Decision-Making, Eric A. Posner, Shivam Saran

Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series

Can large language models (LLMs) replace human judges? By replicating a prior 2 x 2 factorial experiment conducted on 31 U.S. federal judges, we evaluate the legal reasoning of OpenAI’s GPT-4o. The experiment involves a simulated appeal in an international war crimes case, with two altered variables: the degree to which the defendant is sympathetically portrayed and the consistency of the lower court’s decision with precedent. We find that GPT-4o is strongly affected by precedent but not by sympathy, similar to students who were subjects in the same experiment but the opposite of the professional judges, who were influenced by …