Law Commons^™

Arizona Law Where Ground And Surface Water Meet, John D. Leshy, James Belanger

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

A Cause Of Action For Option Traders Against Insider Option Traders, William K.S. Wang

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Corporation As Client: Problems, Perspectives, And Partial Solutions, James R. Mccall

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Isolation Of Private International Law, Joel R. Paul

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Judging Judges: How We Choose Our Federal And State Judges, Joseph R. Grodin, Frank K. Richardson

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Exercise Of Jurisdiction Over And Enforcement Of Judgments Against Alien Defendants, Mary Kay Kane, Ronan E. Degnan

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Judgment Call: Theoretical Approaches To Contract Decision-Making, Charles L. Knapp

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Public Law Litigation And Legal Scholarship, Richard L. Marcus

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Discerning Justice When Battered Women Kill, David L. Faigman

UC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Next Century Of Our Constitution: Rethinking Our Duty To The Poor, Peter B. Edelman

UC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Conflicts Of Interest And Fiduciary Duties In The Operation Of A Joint Venture, Zenichi Shishido

UC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Constitutional Right To Jury Trial: A Historical Exception For Small Monetary Claims, Margreth Barrett

UC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Trac To Fairness: Teletext And The Political Broadcasting Regulations, Gail A. Flesher

UC Law Journal

No abstract provided.

If It Ain't Broke, Don't Fix It, John R. Worthington

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The author argues that the Department of Justice and the divested Bell Operating Companies are trying to persuade the divestiture court to do directly what the Dole Bill tried to accomplish indirectly, namely, eliminate the provisions of the AT&T consent decree which restrict those companies from entering lines of business in which they could abuse their bottleneck power. The author suggests that the Department's recommendations to remove these restrictions are fundamentally flawed and completely unprincipled - and that, furthermore, recent history and present realities show that federal regulators cannot prevent the anti-competitive abuses which the decree was crafted to prevent. …

Mfj: Judicial Overkill - Further Perspective And Response, Robert B. Mckenna, Ronald L. Slyter

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The authors postulated in Volume 9:1 of COMM/ENT that the line-ofbusiness restrictions imposed in the AT&T divestiture decree-which sharply limit the business activities in which the divested exchange carriers may operate-were based upon fundamentally flawed premises. In this rejoinder, the authors take issue with those who would oppose the rights of the regional holding companies to own non-telecommunications- related enterprises. The authors suggest that the regulators are fully capable of properly fulfilling their statutory tasks in areas where exchange carriers have market power, and that the United States Congress has the legislative and constitutional power to eliminate the consent decree's …

Freeing The Telephone Company Seven: The Justice Department Joins The Chorus, James P. Denvir

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

In January of this year, the Department of Justice submitted to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia its recommendations concerning the line-of-business restrictions contained in the consent decree which was entered in U.S. v. AT&T. The Department recommended that restrictions on information services and manufacturing be lifted entirely and that the inter-exchange service restrictions be modified. The author discusses the marked departure from earlier positions of the Justice Department that these recommendations represent. The rationale for the Justice Department's change in position, as well as anticipated difficulties the Department would likely encounter in persuading the court …

Congress And The Federal Communications Commission: The Continuing Contest For Power, Harry M. Shooshan Iii, Erwin G. Krasnow

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This article discusses the changing relationship between Congress and the Federal Communications Commission. The authors suggest that the Commission's status as an independent agency has been eroded by the emergence of a new system of checks and balances imposed by Congress. The use of riders on appropriations bills and the enactment of statutory moratoriums have served to increase Congressional involvement in, and control over, Commission decision-making. After discussing specific examples of how these new tools of legislative oversight have affected major Commission decisions, the authors conclude that the challenge for the Commission in the future will be to learn from …

Cameras In The Courtroom: A First Amendment Right Of Access, Richard H. Frank

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

In Westmoreland v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that a per se ban on television access to a federal courtroom does not violate the first amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The author asserts that Westmoreland and two similar courts of appeal decisions upholding absolute prohibition of electronic access to judicial proceedings are indefensible under recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions such as Chandler v. Florida and the Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia line of cases. The author details the widespread success of television access to courtrooms in over eighty percent of the …

Constitutional Struggle Over Telecommunications Regulation, Rita M. Cain

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

For almost two decades, federal telecommunications regulators had preempted state telecommunications regulations based on the supremacy of federal policy. The federal courts consistently upheld this federal exercise of power. This article examines that trend and the recent Supreme Court decision that abruptly reversed the trend, Louisiana Public-Service Commission v. FCC. The immediate and substantial impact of that decision is examined and, in some cases, questioned.

United States Regulation Of Transborder Speech, Stephen R. Barnett

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

Regulation of transborder speech - speech flowing into or out of the country - is a relatively neglected subject that now appears to be attracting increased attention in American law. This article presents a survey and commentary on United States laws regulating transborder speech. Its many topics include ideological restrictions on visitors' visas, regulation of "political propaganda" distributed by foreign agents in the United States, government certification of "educational" films for dutyfree circulation abroad, and restrictions on the reception of television programming from foreign communications satellites for purposes of home viewing, university study, or retransmission by American news organizations. The …

Soviet And American Law On Religion: Freedom Of Conscience Versus Free Exercise, Ellen Ruth Hornstein

UC Law SF International Law Review

The Soviet and American bodies of law on religion are similar in some respects, despite drastically different ideological and political foundations. This Article compares Soviet and American law on religion. It first compares the common law system used by the United States to the civil law system of the Soviet Union. It next examines the politics, ideologies and traditions underlying Soviet and American law on religion and provides a general look at the rights afforded to individuals. The discussion highlights the similarities and differences between Soviet constitutional guarantees and American first amendment rights. It points out that the texts of …

Limits On Extremist Political Parties: A Comparison Of Israeli Jurisprudence With That Of The United States And West Germany, Dan Gordon

UC Law SF International Law Review

In June 1984 an administrative body of the Israeli legislature voted to bar two parties from participating in the July 1984 parliament elections. The Committee banned the parties because they were "antistate" and "antidemocratic." In Naiman v. Chairman of the Central Elections Committee, the Israeli Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Committee and allowed both parties to run. This Article first discusses the background to the Naiman case and then considers in detail the separate opinions of the justices. The Article next summarizes the ways in which the United States and Germany (the only two states with comparable systems and significant …

United States Antiboycott Laws: An Assessment Of Their Impact Ten Years After Adoption, Howard N. Fenton Iii

UC Law SF International Law Review

Since 1945, Arab states have prohibited trade with Israel. In the mid-1970s the sudden economic leverage of the countries participating in this boycott forced the United States to confront the asserted jurisdiction over American businesses. Concerned with the extraterritorial impact of the Arab boycott, Congress enacted two antiboycott laws. This Article adopts a new four-part analysis of boycott participation by American firms. Then, it examines the history of the Arab boycott and the United States government's responses, including the Arab reaction to the antiboycott laws and the record of the United States agencies responsible for enforcing the laws. The author …

Allocation Of Risk Based On The Mechanics Of Injury In Sports: A Proposed Presumption Of Non-Fault, Gerald J. Todaro

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

This article analyzes the interrelationship between sports safety measures and sports injury litigation. The author urges the courts to abandon the doctrine of assumption of the risk and proposes a presumption of non-fault to ensure that unavoidable injuries in sports are excluded from compensation. The evidentiary presumption is predicated on the assumption that some injuries are impervious to injury avoidance practices and techniques. Under the presumption, coaches and instructors who negligently create additional risk of injury for the athletic participant face liability.

Introduction, Dennis Patrick

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

No abstract provided.

The Works Made For Hire Doctrine And The Employee/Independent Contractor Dichotomy: The Need For Congressional Clarification, Bennett J. Fidlow

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

The author examines the "works made for hire" doctrine and the confusion that has arisen in the federal courts over it. The author reviews the development of the doctrine and recent case law interpreting its codification in the 1976 Copyright Act. He concludes that, although the U.S. Supreme Court may render a decision on the doctrine, Congresional legislation would be the best course for its clarification.

California Art Preservation Act: Proving Actual Damages, Ronald T. Michioka

UC Law SF Communications and Entertainment Journal

California became the first state in the nation to statutorily recognize the personal rights of artists in their creations when it enacted section 987 of the California Civil Code. The California Art Preservation Act prohibits the alteration of a work of fine art by anyone other than its creator. In addition to other remedies, an aggrieved artist may seek to recover "actual damages" for an unauthorized alteration of his or her

work. Addressing the difficulty of proving actual damages, this Note discusses the types of proof of actual damages which are allowed in other torts which protect a person's reputation …

A Primer Of United States Tax Considerations For The Foreign Investor, Nicholas S. Freud

UC Law SF International Law Review

The impact of the United States' Tax Reform Act of 1986 has been significant. The Act has created a favorable tax environment that may well stimulate increased foreign investment in the United States. This Article sets out the fundamentals of the income, estate, and gift taxation of nonresident alien individuals and their estates under the Act. The Article first provides an analysis of the question of residence, as taxation varies considerably depending upon an alien's classification. 'The author further discusses the applicable tax bases, withholding requirements, and planning considerations. Finally, the author concludes that the income tax rules generally encourage …

The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act: The Relationship Between The Commercial Activity Exception And The Noncommercial Tort Exception In Light Of De Sanchez V. Banco Central De Nicaragua, Stella Havkin

UC Law SF International Law Review

Sovereign immunity permits a government and its agents to claim immunity from prosecution in the courts of other nations. In 1976 the United States enacted the Foreign Service Immunities Act adopting a restrictive sovereign immunity policy. This Act included two exceptions under which a foreign sovereignty can be denied immunity: the commercial activity exception and the noncommercial tort exception. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in De Sanchez v. Banco Central de Mexico recently announced new tests to determine the application of both exceptions. This Note analyzes the two exceptions and their past interpretation by the courts. It then discusses …

A Sewing Lesson In Political Offense Determinations: Stitching-Up The International Terrorist's Loophole, Douglas Kuber

UC Law SF International Law Review

Extradition treaties and international conventions have often proved ineffective as remedies against terrorism due to the "political offenses" exception which they often contain. This exception forbids the granting of any extradition request when the crime for which the accused is sought is "political in character and purpose." Due to widely varying interpretations of this exception, terrorists often escape justice simply by traveling to another country. This Note examines the policies underlying the political offenses exception and sets forth the interpretations given it by British, French, Swiss and United States courts. Drawing upon the approaches of these courts and a United …