Law Commons^™

The First Amendment And Religion After Hosanna-Tabor, Mark W. Cordes

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

The Supreme Court's recent decision in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. EEOC, in which it recognized a "ministerial exception" under the Religion Clauses to antidiscrimination laws, marks an important, though limited, development in protecting religious rights. Prior to Hosanna-Tabor, the Court had increasingly resorted to a neutrality paradigm in resolving religion issues under the First Amendment. Although the focus on neutrality frequently protected religious interests, particularly under the Free Speech and Establishment Clauses, it also failed to accommodate religious interests when they were burdened under neutral laws. As such, religious interests were increasingly vulnerable to government interference from …

Violent Video Games And The Rights Of Children And Parents: A Critique Of Brown V. Entertainment Merchants Association, Martin Guggenheim

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

In 2011, in Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional California's effort to regulate the sale of certain video games to minors. The Court's ruling deserves careful review because it has halted legislative efforts to regulate video games. Although the ruling is unobjectionable to the extent it concluded the challenged statute was unconstitutionally vague, the decision went well beyond that. It would be one thing if the Court left open room for legislatures to draft clearer legislation that eliminated ambiguity regarding what video games are unsuitable for minors. But the Court held that because video games are …

S.B. 9: A Second Chance For Juveniles Serving Life Without Parole In California In Theory - And Why It Won't Make A Difference In Practice, Evan Reese

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

Historically, juveniles have been treated differently than adults when convicted of a crime. They were seen as less culpable than adults and more capable of reform. In California and in many other states, however, some juveniles have been tried as adults in a variety of situations. Recent legislation in California has offered a glimmer of hope, and perhaps a second chance, for some juvenile offenders who have been sentenced as adults to life without parole. S.B. 9 allows such juveniles to petition the court for resentencing after serving the first fifteen years of their life sentence. In theory, if the …

Check, Pleas: Toward A Jurisprudence Of Defense Ethics In Plea Bargaining, Hadar Aviram, Deanna Dyer, S. C. Thomas

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

After years of hesitation to acknowledge instances of ineffective assistance of counsel under the standard set in Strickland v. Washington (1984), the Supreme Court has addressed it head-on in the context of pleabargaining. In three recent cases-Padilla v. Kentucky (2010), Lafler v. Cooper (2012), and Missouri v. Frye (2012)-the Court attempted to define defense counsel professionalism and fashion remedies for lack thereof. But these cases are far from the first effort to regulate the quality of counsel in plea bargaining.

The Article starts by using insights from classic courtroom ethnography to explicate the main issues that influence defense practices in …

Alive Not Dead: The Revival Of Redevelopment Post-Matosantos, Helen Luu Chou

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

In December 2011, the California Supreme Court in California Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos upheld AB 1X 26-a bill eliminating redevelopment agencies in California. Even though redevelopment officially ended with Matosantos, discussion concerning the state of redevelopment has since been revived. The purpose behind the dissolution of redevelopment agencies was to fund special districts in a time of financial crisis, but what instead followed was dissension within California as cities and counties strongly opposed the dissolution of redevelopment and instead filed lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of AB 1X 26, and its subsequent "clean up" bill, AB 1484. Moreover, the redevelopment wind-up …

Concussion Crisis: Regulating The Nfl's Concussion Policy Under The Commerce Clause, Margaret Greer

UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

During a 2009 House Judiciary hearing, California Representative Linda Sanchez, in an exchange with National Football League Chairman Roger Goodell, noted: "[t]he NFL sort of reminds me of the tobacco companies, pre-'90s, when they kept saying, 'no, there is no link between smoking and damage to your health."' In the years following Representative Sanchez's striking commentary on the NFL's refusal to acknowledge a correlation between concussions and long term neurological damage, the NFL has publicly admitted that repeated concussions can have adverse effects on a player's brain. An analysis of the concussion litigation between the NFL and former NFL players …

Profit For Costs, Morris A. Ratner, William B. Rubenstein

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Form 1023-Ez And The Streamlined Process For The Federal Income Tax Exemption: Is The Irs Slashing Red Tape Or Opening Pandora's Box, Manoj Viswanathan

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Double Jeopardy? An Empirical Study With Implications For The Debates Over Implicit Bias And Intersectionality,, Joan C. Williams

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Rule Of Legal Rhetoric, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Fact Determination In Rule 23 Class Actions, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Some Preliminary Observations On The Proposed Eli/Unidroit Civil Procedure Project In The Light Of The Experience Of The Ali/Unidroit Project, Geoffrey C. Hazard Jr.

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

To Be Or Not To Be A Funding Portal: Why Crowdfunding Platforms Will Become Broker-Dealers, Shekhar Darke

UC Law Business Journal

The recently enacted JOBS Act created crowdfunding exemption to securities registration, allowing entrepreneurs to raise capital for their ventures from everyday investors. The crowdfunding exemption has many stipulations such as a maximum investment and offering amounts within a given period. Also, investors can only invest in crowdfunding opportunities through intermediaries that are registered as broker-dealers or funding portals. The JOBS Act created funding portal registration as an easier alternative to the more burdensome broker-dealer registration. Thus, many people believe that crowdfunding platforms will opt to register as funding portals. However, this note argues that crowdfunding platforms would rather choose broker-dealer …

Confidential Ideas And Independent Contractors: Trade Secret Ownership In The Age Of The Hired Gun, Rob P. Saka

UC Law Business Journal

Does an independent contractor or a party hiring the contractor own the new, confidential ideas that fall outside of what the contract or is hired to provide, but that arise during the course of that work? The issue of tradesecret ownership is important due to the growing use of contractors, particularly in the tech development industry. This note explores the emerging issue of trade secret ownership in the post- Great Recession era of increased reliance on contractor-inventors. In concluding that-absenta contrary written agreement- contractor- inventors are the rightful owners of their incidentally created trade secrets while assigned to a project, …

Creating A Culture Of Compliance: Why Departmentalization May Not Be The Answer, Michele Destefano

UC Law Business Journal

Over the past few decades, as corporate criminal liability rules, sentencing guidelines, and settlement incentives have changed, there has been increased emphasis on and resources devoted to the compliance function at large publicly held companies. In this article, Professor DeStefano traces the development of the compliance function at large corporations and questions the recent mandate by certain governmental entities that malfeasant corporations designate a chief compliance officer and separate the compliance gatekeeping function from the legal department so that this chief compliance officer does not report to the general counsel. She categorizes the types of arguments made for and against …

Bolstering Competition In The International Remittance Market: A Proposal For Reforming The Current Regulatory Licensing Framework Governing Money Transmission Businesses, Leslie Gutierrez

UC Law Business Journal

State licensing requirements for money transmission businesses involved in international remittances have allowed key players Western Union and MoneyGram to benefit from the high demand for remittances and the lack of competition by enabling these entities to impose inflated prices on migrant consumers. With the growth of remittance flows and the rise of technological innovations, such as Internet and mobile payments, the current state-by-state licensing requirements for money transmission businesses prove to be overly burdensome and expensive and, ultimately, a barrier to entry for small businesses and start-ups. This note proposes to replace the current money-transmitting state licensing framework with …

One Worldwide Set Of Global Accounting Standards? - Hmm, Neal F. Newman

UC Law Business Journal

This paper examines the contemplated worldwide adoption of IFRS. This paper explores whether a one size fits all accounting regime is viable where economies around the globe, though interconnected, have different histories, different cultural norms, different economic dynamics, different investor and capital bases, and therefore, perhaps different uses for financial information. Do these different cultural norms, economic dynamics, investor and capital bases therefore necessitate different uses for financial information? And if so, how does that affect the stated goal of "[a] single set of high quality global accounting standards?" It is possible that these different cultural norms, economic dynamics, investor …

Sentenced To Die In Prison: Life Without Parole As An Eighth Amendment Violation For All Juveniles And Especially Those Who Have Not Killed, Morgan S. Mcginnis

UC Law Journal of Race and Economic Justice

Over the last decade, the Supreme Court of the United States has delivered a series of rulings establishing that juvenile offenders are to have their criminal sentences considered differently from that of adults. Over this span of time, the Court established that it is unconstitutional to sentence a juvenile to the death penalty in any scenario, as well as to life without parole for non-homicide crimes. In the 2012 case of Miller v. Alabama, the Court extended this line of reasoning by declaring that even for juveniles who commit homicides, life without parole may not be imposed as part of …

Forced Evictions, Mass Displacement, And The Uncertain Promise Of Land And Property Restitution In Haiti, Greger B. Calhan

UC Law Journal of Race and Economic Justice

Haiti's devastating 2010 earthquake produced human suffering on an unimaginable scale. The disaster's aftermath-marked by widespread displacement, secondary occupation of land, and consequent forced evictions-raises critical questions of land ownership and housing rights. It also provided a testing ground for the body of restitutionary legal norms developed in the decades following the Cold War. Using the earthquake in Haiti as a lens, this article critically examines the development of the restitution model, from its inception in the Balkans conflicts of the 1990s to its current expression in the United Nation's Pinheiro Principles. While the Pinheiro Principles are positive in many …

No To Bratton: A Rejection Of Stop And Frisk, And A Call For Progressive Reform In Oakland, Robert S. Greer Jr.

UC Law Journal of Race and Economic Justice

On January 23, 2012, the City of Oakland voted to retain the services of William Bratton, former police chief of both New York and Los Angeles, as a consultant to the Oakland Police Department. Oakland Community members reacted with concern and resistance to the City's decision, largely due to Bratton's promotion of aggressive stop and frisk search techniques. This note provides an analysis of Bratton's appointment in light of the Oakland Police Department's egregious history of constitutional violations and misconduct charges. Additionally, this note explores the empirical and theoretical flaws underpinning aggressive stop and frisk policies, and demonstrates why adopting …

Lessons From Mt. Holly: Leading Scholars Demonstrate Need For Disparate Impact Standard To Combat Implicit Bias, Equal Justice Society, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

UC Law Journal of Race and Economic Justice

In 2013, the United States Supreme Court was set to hear oral arguments in Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc. However, weeks before the hearing, the parties settled. Despite the settlement, the arguments raised by plaintiffs and amici remain valuable. Mt. Holly represented the second time in two years that the Supreme Court granted certiorari to decide whether the Fair Housing Act of 1968 ("FHA") allows plaintiffs to bring claims challenging official housing decisions and policies that are not necessarily the result of intentional discrimination, but have a disproportionately harmful impact on minorities or other groups …

What Is Still Radical In The Antislavery Legal Practice Of Salmon P. Chase, Matthew A. Axtell

UC Law Journal of Race and Economic Justice

This Article is an in-depth study of the early commercial law career of Salmon P. Chase, U.S. Secretary of Treasury between 1861 and 1864 and President Abraham Lincoln's choice to replace Roger B. Taney (author of the Dred Scott opinion) as the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Occasionally portrayed in his latter political career as "the most radical" member of Lincoln's war cabinet, Chase's early law practice is best known for its defense of people of color seeking to escape slavery, at the time earning him the nickname as the "Attorney General for Fugitive Slaves." In recent years, …

Illegal Reentry And Denial Of Bail To Undocumented Defendants: Unjust Tools For Social Control Of Undocumented Latino Immigrants, Patrick Kirby Madden

UC Law Journal of Race and Economic Justice

Historical, structural, statistical, and constitutional context is elemental to a proper understanding of the true purpose and effect of a criminal statute and its execution. Illegal Reentry, 8 U.S.C. § 1326, may seem like a basic rule to deter potential criminals from entering the United States. A prosecutor's argument that a defendant must be detained prior to trial due to the possibility of Immigration and Customs Enforcement removing the defendant may seem like a logical argument. However, once these actions are viewed in the succession of events that constitutes the history of undocumented Latino immigrants in the United States, are …

How Mainstream Reformers Design Ambitious Reentry Programs Doomed To Fail And Destined To Reinforce Targeted Mass Incarceration And Social Control, Gerald P. Lopez

UC Law Journal of Race and Economic Justice

The most influential publication on how to design and implement comprehensive and effective reentry programs is the 2005 REPORT OF THE REENTRY POLICY COUNCIL, produced by the bipartisan Council of State Governments (CSG). Triggered by the disturbingly high price of the reigning criminal justice system, and aiming to reduce costs and enhance safety, the REPORT manages both to champion an ambitious approach and to doom its chances of success. Perhaps this effect can be described as predictable and even intentional, especially given the overlapping interests of the elected and appointed officials (and the staffers and collaborators) who comprise CSG. But …

The Real Id Act: Proposed Amendments For Credibility Determinations, Linda Lam

UC Law Journal of Race and Economic Justice

United States refugee law governs asylum applicants and therefore plays a critical role in shaping the American population. Asylum officers and immigration judges' credibility assessments often dictate whether asylum applications are granted. The REAL ID Act of 2005, a series of statutes passed by Congress to aid the fight against terrorism, changed the standard for rendering credibility determinations. It allows triers of fact-asylum officers and immigration judges-to base adverse credibility decisions on immateral inconsistencies in an asylum applicant's story. These minor inconsistencies often arise from cultural differences or trauma stemming from the applicant's past experiences. This note addresses the inherent …

Morris L. Cohen: A Bibliography Of His Works, Camilla Tubbs

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Startup Lawyers At The Outskirts, Abraham Cable

Faculty Scholarship

Startup lawyering is a distinctive style of law practice first observed in Silicon Valley decades ago. Like other business lawyers, startup lawyers form entities, protect intellectual property rights, and document financing transactions for clients starting new businesses. But startup lawyers also encourage entrepreneurship more broadly by promoting Silicon Valley’s practices and conventions, such as standard contract terms that streamline negotiations with venture capital investors.

Today, startup lawyers practice not only in established entrepreneurial centers such as Silicon Valley or Boston, but also in the shadow of economic development efforts to promote entrepreneurship. In this new context, startup lawyering is susceptible …

Hits, Misses, And False Alarms In Blind And Sequential Administration Of Lineups, Roger C. Park

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Protecting Your Environment, Exacerbating Justice: Avoiding "Mandate Havens", David Takacs

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Juvenile Pariahs, Amy E. Halbrook

UC Law Journal

Under federal and some state laws, juveniles who have been adjudicated delinquent for sex offenses can be required to register on sex offender registries for extended periods or life. In some jurisdictions, lifetime sex offender registration, community notification, and other sex offender restrictions are mandatory.This Article explores whether mandatory lifetime sex offender registration, community notification and other sex offender restrictions violate the Eighth Amendment’s guarantee against cruel and unusual punishment as applied to juveniles. Citing Roper v. Simmons and Graham v. Florida, the United States Supreme Court recently held in Miller v. Alabama that assigning mandatory life-without-parole prison sentences to …