Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Southern Methodist University

Discipline
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 1321 - 1350 of 10187

Full-Text Articles in Law

Agriculture & Blockchain: Identifying Liability And Guaranteeing Quality, Morgan Crider Jan 2019

Agriculture & Blockchain: Identifying Liability And Guaranteeing Quality, Morgan Crider

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Interaction Of Patent Exhaustion And Transactions In Patented Goods After Impression Products V. Lexmark International, Andrew Beckerman Rodau Jan 2019

The Interaction Of Patent Exhaustion And Transactions In Patented Goods After Impression Products V. Lexmark International, Andrew Beckerman Rodau

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.


Corporate Genealogists: The New Homicide Detectives, Morgan Crider Jan 2019

Corporate Genealogists: The New Homicide Detectives, Morgan Crider

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.


Merging Sports Gambling And Technology: What’S Really Going To Happen?, Tucker Davison Jan 2019

Merging Sports Gambling And Technology: What’S Really Going To Happen?, Tucker Davison

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Case For Dhs To Classify The Internet Of Things As Critical Infrastructure In The United States, Jessica G. Martz Jan 2019

The Case For Dhs To Classify The Internet Of Things As Critical Infrastructure In The United States, Jessica G. Martz

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.


Gotta Catch ‘Em All! The Rise Of Esports And The Evolution Of Its Regulations, Elizabeth Chung Jan 2019

Gotta Catch ‘Em All! The Rise Of Esports And The Evolution Of Its Regulations, Elizabeth Chung

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.


Regulations For Smart Mobility: Proceed With Caution, Connor Saenz Jan 2019

Regulations For Smart Mobility: Proceed With Caution, Connor Saenz

SMU Science and Technology Law Review

No abstract provided.


Front Matter Jan 2019

Front Matter

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Professor William J. Bridge, Jennifer M. Collins Jan 2019

Professor William J. Bridge, Jennifer M. Collins

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


A Tribute To Professor William J. Bridge—Teacher, Mentor, And Friend, John K. Horany Jan 2019

A Tribute To Professor William J. Bridge—Teacher, Mentor, And Friend, John K. Horany

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


For My Colleague, Bill Bridge, Thomas Wm. Mayo Jan 2019

For My Colleague, Bill Bridge, Thomas Wm. Mayo

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Bill Bridge: Professor, Mentor, Friend, Polly Rea O'Toole Jan 2019

Bill Bridge: Professor, Mentor, Friend, Polly Rea O'Toole

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Reminiscing About Bill Bridge And His Remarkable Legacy, C. Paul Rogers Iii Jan 2019

Reminiscing About Bill Bridge And His Remarkable Legacy, C. Paul Rogers Iii

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Antidiscriminatory Privacy, Ignacio Cofone Jan 2019

Antidiscriminatory Privacy, Ignacio Cofone

SMU Law Review

Law often blocks sensitive personal information to prevent discrimination. It does so, however, without a theory or framework to determine when doing so is warranted. As a result, these measures produce mixed results. This article offers a theoretical framework for determining, with a view of preventing discrimination, when personal information should flow and when it should not. It examines the relationship between precluded personal information, such as race, and the proxies for precluded information, such as names and zip codes. It proposes that the success of these measures depends on what types of proxies exist for the information blocked and …


Spotify’S Direct Listing: Is It A Recipe For Gatekeeper Failure?, Brent J. Horton Jan 2019

Spotify’S Direct Listing: Is It A Recipe For Gatekeeper Failure?, Brent J. Horton

SMU Law Review

On April 3, 2018, Spotify Technology S.A.—a music streaming company valued in excess of $20 billion—went public by direct listing on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE).A direct listing is distinguishable from the more traditional initial public offering (IPO) in a number of ways, but the most important for purposes of this Article is that it foregoes the traditional underwriter.

First, this Article explains direct listings, why a company would choose to go public by direct listing, and the mechanics of a direct listing.

Second, this Article explains that a direct listing—with its reliance on a financial advisor to shepherd …


Professor Maureen Armour, Jennifer M. Collins Jan 2019

Professor Maureen Armour, Jennifer M. Collins

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Front Matter Jan 2019

Front Matter

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Maureen Armour, Honorable Jane J. Boyle Jan 2019

Maureen Armour, Honorable Jane J. Boyle

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Maureen Tribute, Michael Foreman Jan 2019

Maureen Tribute, Michael Foreman

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


In Honor Of A Lifetime Of Justice Work, William Holston Jan 2019

In Honor Of A Lifetime Of Justice Work, William Holston

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Notes From The Basement, Mary B. Spector Jan 2019

Notes From The Basement, Mary B. Spector

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Professor Maureen Noble Armour: The Last Lawyer In Town, Jake Torres Jan 2019

Professor Maureen Noble Armour: The Last Lawyer In Town, Jake Torres

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Tribute To Professor Maureen Armour: A Teacher’S Teacher, Jessica Dixon Weaver Jan 2019

Tribute To Professor Maureen Armour: A Teacher’S Teacher, Jessica Dixon Weaver

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


“Show Me The Affidavit”— Ambiguity Persists In The Application Of The Common Law Right Of Access To Pre-Indictment Records, Nathaniel Hopkins Jan 2019

“Show Me The Affidavit”— Ambiguity Persists In The Application Of The Common Law Right Of Access To Pre-Indictment Records, Nathaniel Hopkins

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Delay, Deny, Wait Till They Die: Balancing Veterans’ Rights And Non-Adversarial Procedures In The Va Disability Benefits System, Hugh Mcclean Jan 2019

Delay, Deny, Wait Till They Die: Balancing Veterans’ Rights And Non-Adversarial Procedures In The Va Disability Benefits System, Hugh Mcclean

SMU Law Review

The refrain “Delay, Deny, Wait Till They Die” is more than a slogan for disabled American veterans. It is a battle cry for soldiers, sailors, and airmen who have long put aside their armaments but remain entangled in the unending appeals process of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) disability benefits system. When Congress created a system for the fair and equitable distribution of military benefits, it did so with the intent that the system be non-adversarial. Congress did not want disabled veterans pitted against the nation that they had sought to defend in litigation over disability benefits. However, defining …


Good Faith Concurrent Trademark Use: How The Ninth Circuit Took A Step In The Right Direction For Broad Protection In A Digital Time, Dominic Riella Jan 2019

Good Faith Concurrent Trademark Use: How The Ninth Circuit Took A Step In The Right Direction For Broad Protection In A Digital Time, Dominic Riella

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Liable For Libel?—The Texas Supreme Court’S Opinion On Opinions And Implications, Griffin S. Rubin Jan 2019

Liable For Libel?—The Texas Supreme Court’S Opinion On Opinions And Implications, Griffin S. Rubin

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Tribal Sovereignty And Online Gaming: Fantasy Sports Offer Tribes What Other Games Do Not, Cody Wilson Jan 2019

Tribal Sovereignty And Online Gaming: Fantasy Sports Offer Tribes What Other Games Do Not, Cody Wilson

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


Front Matter Jan 2019

Front Matter

SMU Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Lessons Of 1919, Lackland H. Bloom Jan 2019

The Lessons Of 1919, Lackland H. Bloom

SMU Law Review

One hundred years ago, the Supreme Court embarked on its first serious consideration of the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech. In 1919, the Court upheld four federal criminal convictions over First Amendment defenses. Three of the majority opinions were written by Justice Holmes. In the fourth, he offered a classic dissent. Two of the cases, Frohwerk v. United States and Debs v. United States, are of middling significance. The other two, Schenck v. United States and Abrams v. United States, are iconic. From these cases have sprung an expansive and complex jurisprudence of free speech. The …