Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law and Gender (30)
- Family Law (11)
- Law and Society (9)
- Human Rights Law (8)
- Sexuality and the Law (7)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (6)
- Health Law and Policy (6)
- Labor and Employment Law (5)
- Criminal Law (4)
- Juvenile Law (4)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Civil Law (3)
- Contracts (3)
- Courts (3)
- International Law (3)
- Internet Law (3)
- Legal History (3)
- Legal Remedies (3)
- Arts and Humanities (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Law and Psychology (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Social Welfare Law (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Publication
-
- Leigh S. Goodmark (9)
- Jennifer Jackson (4)
- Danaya C. Wright (3)
- Jonathan Todres (2)
- Leti Volpp (2)
-
- Nancy Dowd (2)
- Amy L Moore (1)
- Cathren Page (1)
- Colleen McGloin (1)
- Felice J Batlan (1)
- Hadar Aviram (1)
- Herma Hill Kay (1)
- Jonathan S Simon (1)
- Kerry L Macintosh (1)
- Lisa Avalos (1)
- Mel Cousins (1)
- Michelle S Jacobs (1)
- Paula A Monopoli (1)
- Sahar F. Aziz (1)
- Stephanie Bornstein (1)
- Winston E. Langley (1)
- File Type
Articles 31 - 37 of 37
Full-Text Articles in Law
Veiled Discrimination, Sahar F. Aziz
Veiled Discrimination, Sahar F. Aziz
Sahar F. Aziz
Should employees have the legal right to “be themselves” at work? Most Americans would answer in the negative because work is a privilege, not an entitlement. An employer’s workplace rules that define professionalism, therefore, are his prerogative and defined by the demands of the marketplace. Underlying this conclusion is the false premise that objective and neutral factors shape modern notions of professionalism. To the contrary, professionalism is a subjective concept dependent on the decision makers’ worldview, norms, values, and definitions of propriety. Employees who belong to the employer’s social group or fall within society’s majority are advantaged as minimal effort …
Tell Us A Story, But Don't Make It A Good One: Resolving The Confusion Regarding Emotional Stories And Federal Rule Of Evidence 403, Cathren Page
Cathren Page
Abstract: Tell Us a Story, But Don’t Make It A Good One: Resolving the Confusion Regarding Emotional Stories and Federal Rule of Evidence 403 by Cathren Koehlert-Page Courts need to reword their opinions regarding Rule 403 to address the tension between the advice to tell an emotionally evocative story at trial and the notion that evidence can be excluded if it is too emotional. In the murder mystery Mystic River, Dave Boyle is kidnapped in the beginning. The audience feels empathy for Dave who as an adult becomes one of the main suspects in the murder of his friend Jimmy’s …
The Importance Of Realizing 'Other Rights' To Prevent Sex Trafficking, Jonathan Todres
The Importance Of Realizing 'Other Rights' To Prevent Sex Trafficking, Jonathan Todres
Jonathan Todres
International law has long prohibited sex trafficking. The current international legal framework on sex trafficking sets forth a three-pronged approach to anti-trafficking efforts: (1) criminalization of acts of trafficking, (2) trafficking prevention programs, and (3) aid for victims of trafficking. To date, efforts undertaken by various countries have focused primarily on the first component, with comparatively minimal resources being allocated to prevention or victim assistance programs. Those countries that have initiated prevention measures tend to adopt a narrow view of "prevention programs" – focusing on activities such as public awareness campaigns warning of the penalties associated with such crimes or …
Rife With Latent Power: Exploring The Reach Of The Irs To Determine Tax-Exempt Status According To Public Policy Rationale In An Era Of Judicial Deference, Amy Moore
Amy L Moore
Using the case of Bob Jones University v. United States as a springboard, this article contends that the IRS has the legal authority to revoke the 501(c)(3) tax-exempt statuses of any institution that the IRS deems to be in violation of public policy. The first step to such an expansion might be to apply to private, religious universities that practice discrimination in areas other than race (e.g. gender and sexual orientation). This article traces the background and analysis of the Supreme Court decision in Bob Jones and how the Court left the door open for the IRS to make other …
California Egg Toss - The High Costs Of Avoiding Unenforceable Surrogacy Contracts, Jennifer Jackson
California Egg Toss - The High Costs Of Avoiding Unenforceable Surrogacy Contracts, Jennifer Jackson
Jennifer Jackson
In an emotionally charged decision regarding surrogacy contracts, it is important to recognize the ramifications, costs, and policy. There are advantages to both “gestational carrier surrogacy” contracts and “traditional surrogacy” contracts. However, this paper focuses on the differences between these contracts using case law. Specifically, this paper will focus on the implications of California case law regarding surrogacy contracts. Cases such as Johnson v. Calvert and In Re Marriage of Moschetta provide a clear distinction between these contracts. This distinction will show that while gestational carrier surrogacy contracts are more expensive, public policy and court opinions will provide certainty and …
Legal History And The Politics Of Inclusion, Felice Batlan
Legal History And The Politics Of Inclusion, Felice Batlan
Felice J Batlan
Surrogacy Leave And Eu Law: Case C 167/12, C.D. V S.T. And Case C 363/12, Z. V A Government Department, Judgements (Grand Chamber) Of 18 March 2014, Mel Cousins
Mel Cousins
Advances in reproductive technology have tended to outpace the capacity of legislators to respond to these changes, leading to difficult legal questions for the courts. Surrogacy is one particular area where advances in technology have led to many legal challenges and have highlighted the failure (in several jurisdictions) to enact appropriate legislation in response to technological developments and/or differing views about what is ‘appropriate’. Two recent cases before the European Court of Justice (CJEU) have raised the issues as to whether either EU secondary legislation (in particular the Pregnant Workers Directive 92/85/EEC and/or the Equal Treatment Directives 2006/54/EC and 2000/78/EC) …