Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Health Law and Policy (151)
- Law and Society (25)
- Medical Jurisprudence (23)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (21)
- Legal Writing and Research (17)
-
- Science and Technology Law (15)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (14)
- Constitutional Law (14)
- Food and Drug Law (14)
- Human Rights Law (13)
- Law and Gender (13)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (13)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (12)
- Family Law (12)
- International Law (11)
- Life Sciences (11)
- Administrative Law (10)
- Courts (10)
- Bioethics and Medical Ethics (9)
- Genetics and Genomics (9)
- Social Welfare Law (9)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (9)
- Intellectual Property Law (8)
- Juvenile Law (8)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (8)
- Sexuality and the Law (8)
- Insurance Law (7)
- Law and Politics (7)
- Biotechnology (6)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Timothy S. Jost (31)
- Lori B. Andrews (22)
- Diane Hoffmann (21)
- Mary Ann Chirba (21)
- Charles H. Baron (13)
-
- Michael J. Malinowski (13)
- George P Smith (10)
- Jonathan Todres (6)
- Leslie Meltzer Henry (6)
- Michael L Perlin (5)
- Gabriel Eckstein (4)
- Nadia N. Sawicki (4)
- O. Carter Snead (4)
- Elizabeth A. Weeks (3)
- Jennifer Jackson (3)
- Katharine A. Van Tassel (3)
- Margaret Gilhooley (3)
- Stephen D Sugarman (3)
- Anup Malani (2)
- Cynthia M Ho (2)
- Dana Beldiman (2)
- Daniel Benjamin Schwarcz (2)
- Eli A Alcaraz (2)
- Gregory P. Magarian (2)
- Jennifer Hammitt (2)
- Jessica Berg (2)
- John G. Culhane (2)
- John M. Luce MD (2)
- Kerry L Macintosh (2)
- Lawrence O. Gostin (2)
- File Type
Articles 271 - 289 of 289
Full-Text Articles in Law
Reproductive Technology Comes Of Age, Lori B. Andrews
Reproductive Technology Comes Of Age, Lori B. Andrews
Lori B. Andrews
No abstract provided.
Do The Dead Have Interests? Policy Issues For Research After Life (With D. Nelkin), Lori B. Andrews
Do The Dead Have Interests? Policy Issues For Research After Life (With D. Nelkin), Lori B. Andrews
Lori B. Andrews
No abstract provided.
Adoption, Reproductive Technologies And Genetic Information, Lori B. Andrews
Adoption, Reproductive Technologies And Genetic Information, Lori B. Andrews
Lori B. Andrews
No abstract provided.
Is There A Right To Clone? Constitutional Challenges To Bans On Human Cloning, Lori B. Andrews
Is There A Right To Clone? Constitutional Challenges To Bans On Human Cloning, Lori B. Andrews
Lori B. Andrews
No abstract provided.
Body Science, Lori B. Andrews
The Shadow Health Care System: Regulation Of Alternative Health Care Providers, Lori B. Andrews
The Shadow Health Care System: Regulation Of Alternative Health Care Providers, Lori B. Andrews
Lori B. Andrews
No abstract provided.
Beyond Doctrinal Boundaries: A Legal Framework For Surrogate Motherhood, Lori B. Andrews
Beyond Doctrinal Boundaries: A Legal Framework For Surrogate Motherhood, Lori B. Andrews
Lori B. Andrews
No abstract provided.
The Critical Role Of Erisa In State Health Reform, Mary Ann Chirba, Troyen Brennan
The Critical Role Of Erisa In State Health Reform, Mary Ann Chirba, Troyen Brennan
Mary Ann Chirba
No abstract provided.
Alternative Reproduction (With L. Douglass), Lori B. Andrews
Alternative Reproduction (With L. Douglass), Lori B. Andrews
Lori B. Andrews
No abstract provided.
Torts And The Double Helix: Malpractice Liability For Failure To Warn Of Genetic Risks, Lori B. Andrews
Torts And The Double Helix: Malpractice Liability For Failure To Warn Of Genetic Risks, Lori B. Andrews
Lori B. Andrews
No abstract provided.
Confidentiality Of Genetic Information In The Workplace (With A. Jaeger), Lori B. Andrews
Confidentiality Of Genetic Information In The Workplace (With A. Jaeger), Lori B. Andrews
Lori B. Andrews
No abstract provided.
The Legal Status Of The Embryo, Lori B. Andrews
The Concept Of Person In The Law, Charles Baron
The Concept Of Person In The Law, Charles Baron
Charles H. Baron
The focus of the abortion debate in the United States tends to be on whether and at what stage a fetus is a person. I believe this tendency has been unfortunate and counterproductive. Instead of advancing dialogue between opposing sides, such a focus seems to have stunted it, leaving advocates in the sort of “I did not!” – “You did too!” impasse we remember from childhood. Also reminiscent of that childhood scene has been the vain attempt to break the impasse by appeal to a higher authority. Thus, the pro-choice forces hoped they had proved the pro-life forces “wrong” by …
Licensure Of Health Care Professionals: The Consumer's Case For Abolition, Charles Baron
Licensure Of Health Care Professionals: The Consumer's Case For Abolition, Charles Baron
Charles H. Baron
While state medical licensure laws ostensibly are intended to promote worthwhile goals, such as the maintenance of high standards in health care delivery, this Article argues that these laws in practice are detrimental to consumers. The Article takes the position that licensure contributes to high medical care costs and stifles competition, innovation and consumer autonomy. It concludes that delicensure would expand the range of health services available to consumers and reduce patient dependency, and that these developments would tend to make medical practice more satisfying to consumers and providers of health care services.
Taking Care Of The Doctor-Patient Relationship (Reviewing Robert Burt, Taking Care Of Strangers), Lori B. Andrews
Taking Care Of The Doctor-Patient Relationship (Reviewing Robert Burt, Taking Care Of Strangers), Lori B. Andrews
Lori B. Andrews
No abstract provided.
Review Of Future Issues In Health Care: Social Policy And The Rationing Of Medical Services, By David Mechanic, Charles Baron
Review Of Future Issues In Health Care: Social Policy And The Rationing Of Medical Services, By David Mechanic, Charles Baron
Charles H. Baron
No abstract provided.
Medical Paternalism And The Rule Of Law: A Reply To Dr. Relman, Charles Baron
Medical Paternalism And The Rule Of Law: A Reply To Dr. Relman, Charles Baron
Charles H. Baron
In this Article, Professor Baron challenges the position taken recently by Dr. Arnold Relman in this journal that the 1977 Saikewicz decision of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts was incorrect in calling for routine judicial resolution of decisions whether to provide life-prolonging treatment to terminally ill incompetent patients. First, Professor Baron argues that Dr. Relman's position that doctors should make such decisions is based upon an outmoded, paternalistic view of the doctor-patient relationship. Second, he points out the importance of guaranteeing to such decisions the special qualities of process which characterize decision making by courts and which are not …
Assuring "Detached But Passionate Investigation And Decision": The Role Of Guardians Ad Litem In Saikewicz-Type Cases, Charles Baron
Assuring "Detached But Passionate Investigation And Decision": The Role Of Guardians Ad Litem In Saikewicz-Type Cases, Charles Baron
Charles H. Baron
The author focuses this Article upon the aspect of the Saikewicz decision which determines that the kind of "proxy consent" question involved in that case required for its decision "the process of detached but passionate investigation and decision that forms the ideal on which the judicial branch of government was created." This aspect of the decision has drawn much criticism from the medical community on the ground that it embroils what doctors believe to be a medical question in the adversarial processes of the court system. The author criticizes the decision from an entirely opposite perspective, arguing that the court's …
Live Organ And Tissue Transplants From Minor Donors In Massachusetts, Charles Baron, Margot Botsford, Garrick Cole
Live Organ And Tissue Transplants From Minor Donors In Massachusetts, Charles Baron, Margot Botsford, Garrick Cole
Charles H. Baron
This article examines the system of providing court approval for organ and tissue transplants from minor donors as it operates in Massachusetts. It focuses principally on the substantive interests of prospective donors and on the extent to which the current procedures afford them adequate protection. It begins by examining the requirement of consent and demonstrates the necessity of judicial authorization of minor donors' participation in transplant procedures. Next, it analyzes the current Massachusetts practice and assess its capacity to afford minor donors adequate protection from the possible dangers of serving as an organ or tissue donor. It suggests that the …