Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Clawbacks (2)
- Assimilation (1)
- Bernard Madoff (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Corporate governance (1)
-
- Derrick bell (1)
- Executive Bonuses (1)
- Executive Compensation (1)
- Executive compensation (1)
- Interest convergence (1)
- Intersectionality (1)
- Lgbt (1)
- Liberationist (1)
- Masterpiece cakeshop v. colorado civil rights commission (1)
- Obergefell v. hodges (1)
- Ponzi Scheme (1)
- Ponzi Schemes (1)
- Public accommodations (1)
- Queer theory (1)
- Racial fortuity (1)
- Racial sacrifice (1)
- Sexual orientation antidiscrimination (1)
- TARP (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Chatgpt – What An Attorney Needs To Know When Using This New Tool, Grant Gamm
Chatgpt – What An Attorney Needs To Know When Using This New Tool, Grant Gamm
SLU Law Journal Online
There is a large potential impact of ChatGPT, an AI language processing model, on the legal industry. In this article, Grant Gamm highlights the various benefits and limitations of the new technology, while emphasizing ethical considerations that attorneys must keep in mind when using it. The article also touches on the broader issues of bias and "hallucinations" that can arise with AI tools and their potential impact on society. Overall, the article highlights the need for attorneys to maintain competence in technological advancements and be vigilant about ethical implications when adopting new tools like ChatGPT.
Running A Different Route: How Youtube Tv Plans To Avoid Antitrust Violations, Brody Shea
Running A Different Route: How Youtube Tv Plans To Avoid Antitrust Violations, Brody Shea
SLU Law Journal Online
After reaching a deal this past December, YouTube TV is now the sole option for NFL Sunday Ticket subscribers. By providing out-of-market sports games in a bundled package, YouTube TV runs the risk of violating the Sherman Antitrust Act. In this article, Brody Shea addresses how YouTube TV can avoid future litigation.
Queer Sacrifice In Masterpiece Cakeshop, Jeremiah A. Ho
Queer Sacrifice In Masterpiece Cakeshop, Jeremiah A. Ho
All Faculty Scholarship
This Article interprets the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, as a critical extension of Derrick Bell’s interest convergence thesis into the LGBTQ movement. Chiefly, Masterpiece reveals how the Court has been more willing to accommodate gay individuals who appear more assimilated and respectable—such as those who participated in the marriage equality decisions—than LGBTQ individuals who are less “mainstream” and whose exhibited queerness appear threatening to the heteronormative status quo. When assimilated same-sex couples sought marriage in Obergefell v. Hodges, their respectable personas facilitated the alignment between their interests to marry and the Court’s …
Smoke Screens: An Initial Analysis Of The Coronavirus Lawsuits In The United States Against China And The World Health Organization, Ana Santos Rutschman, Robert Gatter
Smoke Screens: An Initial Analysis Of The Coronavirus Lawsuits In The United States Against China And The World Health Organization, Ana Santos Rutschman, Robert Gatter
All Faculty Scholarship
In this short essay we provide a preliminary analysis of the lawsuits filed by Missouri against China, and New York against the World Health Organization over the COVID-19 pandemic. We also situate the lawsuits against the expanding coronavirus-related misinformation “epidemic.”
Reply: Clawback To The Future, Miriam A. Cherry, Jarrod Wong
Reply: Clawback To The Future, Miriam A. Cherry, Jarrod Wong
All Faculty Scholarship
In an earlier article also available on Scholarship Commons, Clawbacks: Prospective Contract Measures in an Era of Excessive Executive Compensation and Ponzi Schemes, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 94, p. 368, 2009, Professors Miriam Cherry and Jarrod Wong set out an initial description and analysis of contractual clawback provisions. In this Reply, Profs. Cherry and Wong address three aspects of Michael Macchiarola's Response: its application of the clawback doctrine to the recoupment of executive compensation; the criticism that the clawbacks doctrine introduces latent subjectivity into contractual analysis; and the apparent operational difficulties in implementing clawbacks.
Clawbacks: Prospective Contract Measures In An Era Of Excessive Executive Compensation And Ponzi Schemes, Miriam A. Cherry, Jarrod Wong
Clawbacks: Prospective Contract Measures In An Era Of Excessive Executive Compensation And Ponzi Schemes, Miriam A. Cherry, Jarrod Wong
All Faculty Scholarship
In the spring of 2009, public outcry erupted over the multi-million dollar bonuses paid to AIG executives even as the company was receiving TARP funds. Various measures were proposed in response, including a 90% retroactive tax on the bonuses, which the media described as a "clawback." Separately, the term "clawback" was also used to refer to remedies potentially available to investors defrauded in the multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme run by Bernard Madoff. While the media and legal commentators have used the term "clawback" reflexively, the concept has yet to be fully analyzed. In this article, we propose a doctrine of …