Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (6734)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (6439)
- Sociology (6411)
- Criminology (6405)
- Legal Studies (6398)
-
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (6387)
- International Law (518)
- Intellectual Property Law (226)
- International Trade Law (222)
- Constitutional Law (181)
- Law and Society (105)
- Human Rights Law (104)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (97)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (91)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (86)
- Law and Race (73)
- Banking and Finance Law (69)
- Criminal Procedure (68)
- Tax Law (58)
- Business Organizations Law (55)
- Securities Law (52)
- Law and Politics (51)
- Judges (49)
- Administrative Law (47)
- Courts (47)
- First Amendment (43)
- State and Local Government Law (42)
- Jurisprudence (41)
- Environmental Law (38)
- Keyword
-
- Law (148)
- Journal (142)
- NJTIP (138)
- Legal (132)
- Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property (132)
-
- Intellectual property (123)
- Technology (123)
- Northwestern University (114)
- Northwestern University School of Law (81)
- Patent (80)
- International law (66)
- JTIP (66)
- International Law (62)
- Licensing (53)
- Perspective (51)
- Management (50)
- Infringement (48)
- Intellectual property assets (48)
- IP infringement (47)
- IP protection (47)
- Managing intellectual property (47)
- Value of IP (47)
- Internet (44)
- Infringers (43)
- Intellectual property protection (42)
- China (39)
- International trade (38)
- Kellogg School of Business (37)
- Software (35)
- Marketing (33)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- File Type
Articles 91 - 120 of 8303
Full-Text Articles in Law
Video Games And The First Amendment, Eli Pales
Video Games And The First Amendment, Eli Pales
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property
The video game industry is massive, with an annual revenue of $180 billion worldwide; $60 billion of that in America alone. For context, the industry’s size is greater than that of the movie, book, and music industries combined. Yet, despite this market dominance, the video game industry is relatively new. Only in the 2011 decision of Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association did the Supreme Court extend First Amendment protection to games. Still, the Court failed to define the scope of the game medium. As understood by an average person, a video game could be something as simple as Pac-Man or …
Quantum Copyright Law: Schrödinger’S Cat, Banksy’S Shredder, And Art On The Edge, Richard Chused
Quantum Copyright Law: Schrödinger’S Cat, Banksy’S Shredder, And Art On The Edge, Richard Chused
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property
An object has been assembled by artists I know that presents a fascinating set of conundrums about the relationships between quantum physics, shredders, random surprises, the value of art, and copyright law. Seems fantastical, right? And so it is. The object of concern is a metal box a little under four feet tall, about eighteen inches deep, and a bit less than three feet wide. The box is welded together along all twelve of its edges. It has an opening across one side. And there is a small control panel on top.
Before the box was welded shut, a set …
Managing Misinformation On Social Media: Targeted Newsfeed Interventions And Freedom Of Thought, Richard Mackenzie-Gray Scott
Managing Misinformation On Social Media: Targeted Newsfeed Interventions And Freedom Of Thought, Richard Mackenzie-Gray Scott
Northwestern Journal of Human Rights
Whether it is being told a particular politician consumes children, or drinking cow urine will cure your disease, or that Jimi Hendrix is alive and well living the good life in Drumnadrochit, misinformation affects societies in myriad ways. Its spread online via social media platforms raises questions concerning how it can be addressed. This article engages with a related problem: Can the use of targeted behavioral interventions on social media newsfeeds to reduce the spread of misinformation be reconciled with the human right to freedom of thought?
Why Criminal Defendants Cooperate: The Defense Attorney's Perspective, Jessica A. Roth, Anna D. Vaynman, Steven D. Penrod
Why Criminal Defendants Cooperate: The Defense Attorney's Perspective, Jessica A. Roth, Anna D. Vaynman, Steven D. Penrod
Northwestern University Law Review
Cooperation is at the heart of most complex federal criminal cases, with profound ramifications for who can be brought to justice and for the fate of those who decide to cooperate. But despite the significance of cooperation, scholars have yet to explore exactly how individuals confronted with the decision whether to pursue cooperation with prosecutors make that choice. This Article—the first empirical study of the defense experience of cooperation—begins to address that gap. The Article reports the results of a survey completed by 146 criminal defense attorneys in three federal districts: the Southern District of New York, the Eastern District …
The Architecture Of Discretion: Implications Of The Structure Of Sanctions For Racial Disparities, Severity, And Net Widening, Ryan T. Sakoda
The Architecture Of Discretion: Implications Of The Structure Of Sanctions For Racial Disparities, Severity, And Net Widening, Ryan T. Sakoda
Northwestern University Law Review
About four million people are serving a term of probation, parole, or post-release supervision in the United States. Due to the extensive use of incarceration as a punishment for conditions violations, these community supervision programs are a major factor contributing to mass incarceration and, as this Article shows, can play a significant role in exacerbating racial disparities in the criminal legal system.
In recent years, jurisdictions throughout the United States have made reforms to their community supervision programs. A major trend in community supervision reform is the integration of new sanctioning structures, such as “swift and certain” sanctions, for conditions …
The Failure Of Judicial Recusal And Disclosure Rules: Evidence From A Field Experiment, Dane Thorley
The Failure Of Judicial Recusal And Disclosure Rules: Evidence From A Field Experiment, Dane Thorley
Northwestern University Law Review
U.S. courts rely predominately on judicial self-recusal and in-court disclosure to address judicial conflicts of interest and maintain a critical perception of impartiality. But these approaches fail to account for the legal, institutional, and social dynamics that surround the relationship between judges, attorneys, and the adjudicative process. In reality, judges rarely use their discretion to disclose conflicts or recuse themselves, and attorneys do not ask them to do so. If we understand both the legal and extralegal incentives at play in these decisions, none of these outcomes should be surprising. The shortcomings of recusal and disclosure rules are particularly salient …
Obey Or Abey: An Empirical Examination Of Abeyance Agreements In Public School Discipline, Rachael K. Cox
Obey Or Abey: An Empirical Examination Of Abeyance Agreements In Public School Discipline, Rachael K. Cox
Northwestern University Law Review
“Exclusionary discipline” is widely understood to mean the typical responses to student misbehavior in public schools: suspension and expulsion. But sometimes their lesser-known counterpart, the abeyance agreement, swoops in before the suspension or expulsion is effectuated and gives the student a “second chance” to avoid such exclusionary discipline—provided the student complies with the terms of the agreement. It sounds simple, but the reality is far more complicated. Without a clearly defined, regulated, and tracked practice, abeyance agreements are an off-record discipline device used at the sole discretion of public school district administrators. Joining a landscape of urgent concerns over the …
A Chinese Law Wedge Into The Hong Kong Common Law System: A Legal Appraisal Of The Hong Kong National Security Law, Han Zhu
Northwestern Journal of Human Rights
This paper is the first to comprehensively analyze the key legal controversies surrounding the Hong Kong National Security Law (NSL) and its implementation. Based on doctrinal analysis, case studies, and the most up-to-date statistics, this study centers on three categories of legal disputes: (1) the constitutionality and legality of the NSL; (2) the disputed content of the NSL; and (3) the legislative procedural issues involving the NSL. The study shows that the enactment of the NSL is not only an unprecedented crisis facing the “one country, two systems” framework, but also marks a culmination of the intersection and conflict between …
The Rise And Fall Of Section 502b, John Ramming Chappell
The Rise And Fall Of Section 502b, John Ramming Chappell
Northwestern Journal of Human Rights
The first major foreign policy legislation of the human rights revolution of the 1970s,1 Section 502B of the Foreign Assistance Act (FAA) is a latent oversight tool that Congress could use to promote human rights in U.S. security assistance. Section 502B may be the most potent provision of law regarding human rights and security assistance that has never been used. The provision prohibits U.S. security assistance to governments that engage in a consistent pattern of gross violations of human rights, requires the State Department to report on human rights issues, and provides Congress with a mechanism to enforce the statute’s …
The Immigration Shadow Docket, Faiza W. Sayed
The Immigration Shadow Docket, Faiza W. Sayed
Northwestern University Law Review
Each year, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)—the Justice Department’s appellate immigration agency that reviews decisions of immigration judges and decides the fate of thousands of noncitizens—issues about thirty published, precedential decisions. At present, these are the only decisions out of approximately 30,000 each year, that are readily available to the public and provide detailed reasoning for their conclusions. This is because most of the BIA’s decision-making happens on what this Article terms the “immigration shadow docket”—the tens of thousands of other decisions the BIA issues each year that are unpublished and nonprecedential. These shadow docket decisions are generally authored …
Defining Interim Storage Of Nuclear Waste, Max Johnson
Defining Interim Storage Of Nuclear Waste, Max Johnson
Northwestern University Law Review
Nuclear power may be humanity’s best hope to curb climate-altering greenhouse gas emissions. But public fear of its dangers, including the toxicity of nuclear waste, undermines its expansion. To provide for more effective waste disposal, in 2021 and 2022 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) recommended licensing two privately-owned nuclear waste storage facilities—called Consolidated Interim Storage Facilities (CISFs)—to be built in New Mexico and in Texas. Both states vehemently oppose the construction and operation of these facilities: legislators in both states have proposed state laws opposing them, and both states have sued the NRC challenging the legality of the facilities’ licensure. …
The Misunderstood History Of Textualism, Tara Leigh Grove
The Misunderstood History Of Textualism, Tara Leigh Grove
Northwestern University Law Review
This Article challenges widespread assumptions about the history of textualism. Jurists and scholars have sought for decades to distinguish “modern textualism” from the so-called “plain meaning school” of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries—an approach that both textualists and non-textualists alike have long viewed as improperly “literal” and “wooden.” This Article shows that this conventional historical account is incorrect. Based on a study of statutory cases from 1789 to 1945 that use the term “plain meaning” or similar terms, this Article reveals that, under the actual plain meaning approach, the Supreme Court did not ignore context but looked to …
Consequences And The Supreme Court, Aaron Tang
Consequences And The Supreme Court, Aaron Tang
Northwestern University Law Review
May the Supreme Court consider consequences when it decides the hard cases that divide us? The conventional wisdom is that it may not. Scholars have argued, for example, that consequentialism is a paradigmatic “anti-modal” form of reasoning at the Court. And the Court itself has declared that “consequences cannot change our understanding of the law.”
This Article presents evidence of a possible shift in the standard account. Although many kinds of consequentialist arguments remain forbidden, such as naked judicial efforts to maximize social utility, a particular form of consequentialism is now surprisingly common when the Supreme Court confronts hard cases. …
The Counterdemocratic Difficulty, Aziz Z. Huq
The Counterdemocratic Difficulty, Aziz Z. Huq
Northwestern University Law Review
Since the 2020 elections, debate about the Supreme Court’s relationship with the mechanisms of national democracy has intensified. One important thread of that debate focuses critically on the possibility of a judicial decision flipping a presidential election or thwarting the will of national majorities respecting progressive legislation, and pushes concerns about the Court’s effect on national democracy. A narrow focus on specific interventions, however, does not exhaust the subtle and consequential ways in which the Court influences whether and how the American democratic system thrives or fails. A narrow focus is partial because it construes democracy as merely the aggregation …
The Effect Of The Pro Act On Secondary Activity And International Trade, Christopher R. Rodenbaugh
The Effect Of The Pro Act On Secondary Activity And International Trade, Christopher R. Rodenbaugh
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
No abstract provided.
Live And Let Liv?: The Case Against Antitrust Alarm And The Multi-Tour Future Of Professional Golf, Reed Silverman
Live And Let Liv?: The Case Against Antitrust Alarm And The Multi-Tour Future Of Professional Golf, Reed Silverman
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
No abstract provided.
Casting A Ballot For Change: How To Overcome Jail Policy Deficiencies And The O’Brien Precedent To Expand Voting Rights For Jailed Individuals, Lorellee Kampschnieder
Casting A Ballot For Change: How To Overcome Jail Policy Deficiencies And The O’Brien Precedent To Expand Voting Rights For Jailed Individuals, Lorellee Kampschnieder
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Prior to the 2020 election, lawmakers in several states sought to expand voting rights for individuals with felony convictions, and while this work is important, a large swath of voters who legally never lost the right to vote are still unable to do so because they are detained in jail. These individuals, often detained prior to trial, have the right to vote pursuant to a 1974 Supreme Court ruling in O’Brien v. Skinner. However, despite the clear legal precedent protecting voting rights for those in jail, the right remains unrealized for most incarcerated individuals due to numerous barriers. Some localities, …
Policing The Danger Narrative, Avlana K. Eisenberg
Policing The Danger Narrative, Avlana K. Eisenberg
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
The clamor for police reform in the United States has reached a fever pitch. The current debate has mainly centered around questions of police function: What functions should police perform, and how should they perform them to avoid injustice and unnecessary harm? This Article, in contrast, focuses on a central aspect of police culture—namely, how police envision their relationship to those policed. It exposes the vast reach of a deeply engrained “danger narrative” and demonstrates the disastrous consequences that this narrative has helped to bring about. Reinforced by police training, codified by courts, and broadly deployed, the danger narrative is …
Restorative Justice Diversion As A Structural Health Intervention In The Criminal Legal System, Thalia González
Restorative Justice Diversion As A Structural Health Intervention In The Criminal Legal System, Thalia González
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
A new discourse at the intersection of criminal justice and public health is bringing to light how exposure to the ordinariness of racism in the criminal legal system—whether in policing practices or carceral settings—leads to extraordinary outcomes in health. Drawing on empirical evidence of the deleterious health effects of system involvement coupled with new threats posed by COVID-19, advocates and academics have increasingly called for race-conscious public health-driven reforms to carcerality in the United States. Recognizing the significance of health to carceral reform, the initiation of a health justice grounded lexicon in criminal justice has opened the doorway to new …
Are Police Officers Bayesians? Police Updating In Investigative Stops, Jeffrey Fagan, Lila Nojima
Are Police Officers Bayesians? Police Updating In Investigative Stops, Jeffrey Fagan, Lila Nojima
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Theories of rational behavior assume that actors make decisions where the benefits of their acts exceed their costs or losses. If those expected costs and benefits change over time, the behavior will change accordingly as actors learn and internalize the parameters of success and failure. In the context of proactive policing, police stops that achieve any of several goals—constitutional compliance, stops that lead to “good” arrests or summonses, stops that lead to seizures of weapons, drugs, or other contraband, or stops that produce good will and citizen cooperation—should signal to officers the features of a stop that increase its rewards …
Beyond Due Process: An Examination Of The Restorative Justice Community Courts Of Chicago, Jackie O'Brien
Beyond Due Process: An Examination Of The Restorative Justice Community Courts Of Chicago, Jackie O'Brien
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
As American society has reckoned with the harmful effects of mass incarceration, there has been a push to consider alternative forms of achieving justice. Restorative justice is one such method. A transformative approach to conflict resolution inspired by the traditions and practices of indigenous peoples, restorative justice offers a comprehensive means of addressing harm, emphasizing the community, rather than the single act that caused harm. Many jurisdictions and communities have turned to restorative justice to divert cases from the punitive criminal legal system. While there are variations in programs and approaches, many communities integrate restorative justice practices as a means …
Enforcement Penalties At The Itc, Andrea R. Hugill, John C. Jarosz, Katherine D. Cappaert
Enforcement Penalties At The Itc, Andrea R. Hugill, John C. Jarosz, Katherine D. Cappaert
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
The U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC” or “Commission”) has grown in importance as a venue for U.S. companies to pursue intellectual property (“IP”) violators and to block the sale or importation of goods from overseas that infringe U.S. IP rights. Once a violation of the Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 is found, an order halting further infringement, including importation, is almost always entered. In theory, potentially sizeable penalties may be imposed on entities that do not comply with the terms of an import restriction. In practice, the terms of an import restriction are almost always honored, but …
Friendly Skies, Unfriendly Terms: Class Action Waivers And Force Majeure Clauses In Airline Contracts Of Carriage, Grant Glazebrook
Friendly Skies, Unfriendly Terms: Class Action Waivers And Force Majeure Clauses In Airline Contracts Of Carriage, Grant Glazebrook
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
The airline contract of carriage. These unassuming bits of language govern the relationship between passengers and their airlines. Over the past three years, a new term has sprouted in these agreements: the class action waiver. Before March 2020, only two of the ten largest United States-based airlines’ contracts of carriage had class action waivers. But as of April 2023, eight now have class action waivers. Why have airlines quickly adopted these copycat terms? What are the implications of this new contractual trend for flyers, airlines, and regulators? This note aims to contribute to the scholarship around these questions in three …
Submission Of Amici Briefs In Arbitration Related To Environmental Concerns: Developing A Better Framework For Their Consideration Under Icsid Rule 37(2), Clarissa Galaviz Lizarraga
Submission Of Amici Briefs In Arbitration Related To Environmental Concerns: Developing A Better Framework For Their Consideration Under Icsid Rule 37(2), Clarissa Galaviz Lizarraga
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
This note examines the consideration of amicus curiae briefs in international arbitration matters under the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”), specifically focusing on arbitration cases involving environmental concerns. The note explores trends in consideration of amicus briefs in environmental arbitration by taking a historical look at cases and the rationales behind the decisions of the tribunals to consider amicus briefs and raises concerns regarding a better, uniform approach to amicus briefs.
To achieve a better system of consideration of amicus briefs when environmental concerns are at play, given their public and ecologic interest, the author suggests reworking …
Disciplining Cbdcs: Achieving The Balance Between Privacy Protection And Central Bank Independence, Cheng-Yun Tsang, Yueh-Ping Yang, Ping-Kuei Chen
Disciplining Cbdcs: Achieving The Balance Between Privacy Protection And Central Bank Independence, Cheng-Yun Tsang, Yueh-Ping Yang, Ping-Kuei Chen
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
Central bank digital currency (“CBDC”) is a crucial FinTech development that aspires to overhaul the current payment system. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, CBDCs’ promises to reduce personal contact, facilitate socially desirable use of money, and initiate more targeted monetary measures have increased their popularity. In addition, CBDCs can potentially serve as a tool to internationalize a sovereign’s currency. World central banks, thus, have gradually formulated a consensus on structuring CBDCs, leaving the regulatory aspects of CBDCs deserving more attention. Among the regulatory issues related to CBDCs, observers often mentioned their association with privacy concerns, but comprehensive studies …
Leveling The Playing Field: How To Get International Student-Athletes Paid Under Name, Image And Likeness, Justin Auh
Leveling The Playing Field: How To Get International Student-Athletes Paid Under Name, Image And Likeness, Justin Auh
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
No abstract provided.
Felony Murder Liability For Homicides By Police: Too Unfair And Too Much To Bear, Maria T. Kolar
Felony Murder Liability For Homicides By Police: Too Unfair And Too Much To Bear, Maria T. Kolar
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
On November 23, 2020, a fifteen-year-old boy was gunned down by five Oklahoma City police officers, after he exited a convenience store and dropped the gun that he and a sixteen-year-old partner had earlier used to rob the store’s owner. Initially, the boy’s non-present partner was charged with first-degree (felony) murder for this killing. But after months of efforts by the boy’s mother and local activists, the district attorney also charged five officers with first-degree manslaughter for this same killing.
This case raises the question of whether Oklahoma—or any American state—can convict a defendant of felony murder based upon a …
The Problem Of Habitual Offender Laws In States With Felony Disenfranchisement, Daniel Loehr
The Problem Of Habitual Offender Laws In States With Felony Disenfranchisement, Daniel Loehr
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Habitual offender laws operate to increase the sentence of an individual if that person already has a felony conviction. At the same time, many people with felony convictions cannot vote or run for office due to felony disenfranchisement laws. Thus, habitual offender laws target a formally disenfranchised group—people with felony convictions. That creates an archetypal political process problem. As John Hart Ely argued, laws that target a formally disenfranchised group are tainted and deserve heightened constitutional scrutiny. When reviewing habitual offender laws under the Eighth Amendment, however, courts have applied the opposite of heightened scrutiny—they have applied an extreme form …
Trends In China-Africa Economic Relations And Dispute Settlement, Won Kidane
Trends In China-Africa Economic Relations And Dispute Settlement, Won Kidane
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business
The rapid rise in the last two decades of China-Africa economic interactions in trade, investment, construction projects, and loans require sustained inquiry into the substantive rules of engagement and mechanisms of dispute settlement. Evidently, however, it would quickly emerge that the improvements in supranational legal frameworks have not kept pace with the growing scale and complexity of the economic interactions. While trade relations between China and Africa are theoretically subject to the same multilateral World Trade Organization (WTO) rules, they are in practice mostly based on informal unilateral concessions. Moreover, investment relations are partially governed by fragmented and mostly outdated …
Copyright And Federalism: Why State Waiver Of Sovereign Immunity Is The Best Remedy For State Copyright Infringement, Leroy J. Ellis V
Copyright And Federalism: Why State Waiver Of Sovereign Immunity Is The Best Remedy For State Copyright Infringement, Leroy J. Ellis V
Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property
When a photographer intentionally takes a picture of a subject, or a writer puts a story to paper, the resulting works are protected by copyright. That protection is bolstered after the authors register their works with the Copyright Office. All private parties, from individuals to corporations, can be sued for infringing on the work should they use it without pay or permission.
However, what happens when the infringer is not a private party? What happens when the state or a state entity is the infringer? What happens when a public university decides to use a copyright owner’s work without pay …