Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 31 - 60 of 122

Full-Text Articles in Law

Eliminationist Discourse In A Conflicted Society: Lessons For America From Africa?, Phyllis E. Bernard Mar 2009

Eliminationist Discourse In A Conflicted Society: Lessons For America From Africa?, Phyllis E. Bernard

Marquette Law Review Conferences

No abstract provided.


In The Global Village, Can War Survive?, Susan G. Hackley Mar 2009

In The Global Village, Can War Survive?, Susan G. Hackley

Marquette Law Review Conferences

No abstract provided.


Derelict Of Duty: The American News Media, Terrorism, And The War In Iraq, Douglas M. Mcleod Mar 2009

Derelict Of Duty: The American News Media, Terrorism, And The War In Iraq, Douglas M. Mcleod

Marquette Law Review Conferences

No abstract provided.


Mediating Post-Conflict Dialogue: The Media's Role In Transitional Justice Processes, Lisa J. Laplante, Kelly Phenicie Mar 2009

Mediating Post-Conflict Dialogue: The Media's Role In Transitional Justice Processes, Lisa J. Laplante, Kelly Phenicie

Marquette Law Review Conferences

No abstract provided.


Terror In Cyberspace, Gabriel Weimann Mar 2009

Terror In Cyberspace, Gabriel Weimann

Marquette Law Review Conferences

No abstract provided.


Observations From An American Conflict Resolution Professional In Serbia On The Effects Of The Accessibility Of International Media, Lynn M. Malley Mar 2009

Observations From An American Conflict Resolution Professional In Serbia On The Effects Of The Accessibility Of International Media, Lynn M. Malley

Marquette Law Review Conferences

No abstract provided.


Tibet And The Media: Perspectives From Beijing, Andrew Wei-Min Lee Mar 2009

Tibet And The Media: Perspectives From Beijing, Andrew Wei-Min Lee

Marquette Law Review Conferences

No abstract provided.


Negative And Positive Roles Of Media In The Belgian Conflict: A Model For De-Escalation, Martin Euwema, Alain Verbeke Mar 2009

Negative And Positive Roles Of Media In The Belgian Conflict: A Model For De-Escalation, Martin Euwema, Alain Verbeke

Marquette Law Review Conferences

No abstract provided.


Is Journalism Interested In Resolution, Or Only In Conflict?, John J. Pauly Mar 2009

Is Journalism Interested In Resolution, Or Only In Conflict?, John J. Pauly

Marquette Law Review Conferences

No abstract provided.


International Media And Conflict Resolution: Making The Connection, Andrea Kupfer Schneider Mar 2009

International Media And Conflict Resolution: Making The Connection, Andrea Kupfer Schneider

Marquette Law Review Conferences

No abstract provided.


Age Discrimination In The Delivery Of Health Care Services To Our Elders, Phoebe Weaver Williams Jan 2009

Age Discrimination In The Delivery Of Health Care Services To Our Elders, Phoebe Weaver Williams

Faculty Publications

The problem of health care providers making age biased decisions when treating elderly patients has received considerable attention and condemnation from both medical and social science researchers. When health care providers offer inappropriate or less care to patients because of their advanced chronological age, they potentially violate the Age Act of 1975. However, a review of the cases litigated under the Age Act suggests that advocates, regulators, and elders have not used the Age Act to address even the most blatant ageist practices in health care. Using methods developed to identify unlawful discrimination under employment and civil rights laws, this …


Explaining Sentences, Michael M. O'Hear Jan 2009

Explaining Sentences, Michael M. O'Hear

Faculty Publications

Despite the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in United States v. Booker, which enhanced the power of district court judges to sentence defendants below the range prescribed by the federal sentencing guidelines, the great majority of federal sentences continue to follow the guidelines' recommendations. As defendants have challenged these practices, one commonly litigated issue has been the question of whether district court judges are obligated to explain themselves when they reject a defendant's argument for a below-guidelines sentence. In the immediate aftermath of Booker, a handful of federal circuits adopted such an explanation requirement. Since 2005, however, the tide has turned, …


Off-Court Misbehavior: Sports Leagues And Private Punishment, Janine Young Kim, Matthew J. Parlow Jan 2009

Off-Court Misbehavior: Sports Leagues And Private Punishment, Janine Young Kim, Matthew J. Parlow

Faculty Publications

This Essay examines how professional sports leagues address (apparently increasing) criminal activity by players off of the field or court. It analyzes the power of professional sports leagues and, in particular, the commissioners of those leagues, to discipline wayward athletes. Such discipline is often met with great controversy - from players’ unions and commentators alike - especially when a commissioner invokes the “in the best interest of the sport” clause of the professional sports league’s constitution and bylaws. The Essay then contextualizes such league discipline in criminal punishment theory - juxtaposing punishment norms in public law with incentives and rationales …


Universal De Novo Review, Chad M. Oldfather Jan 2009

Universal De Novo Review, Chad M. Oldfather

Faculty Publications

This article takes up the question of why appellate courts always review questions of law pursuant to the de novo standard of review. Put another way, it examines the familiar idea that appellate courts owe no deference to the legal rulings of trial judges. They must instead engage in what I refer to as universal de novo review - a practice pursuant to which appellate courts faced with legal questions always enjoy the authority to engage in plenary review, and never have the responsibility (or even the option) to defer to their trial-level counterparts. Despite - or perhaps because of …


Bargaining In The Shadow Of (International) Law: What The Normalization Of Adjudication In International Governance Regimes Means For Dispute Resolution, Andrea K. Schneider Jan 2009

Bargaining In The Shadow Of (International) Law: What The Normalization Of Adjudication In International Governance Regimes Means For Dispute Resolution, Andrea K. Schneider

Faculty Publications

After examining the similar goals and values that drive the simultaneous increase in international trials and the decrease in U.S. trials, the article then examines the challenges international adjudication poses to dealing with human rights violations and transitional justice situations. Simplistically, these tensions can be viewed as the need to strike a balance between peace and justice, top-down implementation and bottom-up impact, and process efficiency and conflict customization. The good news is that these challenges have been slowly working themselves out as the next generation of international adjudication models continues to improve. This continued improvement and normalization leads to an …


Judicial Review Of Olympic And International Sports Arbitration Awards: Trends And Observations, Matthew J. Mitten Jan 2009

Judicial Review Of Olympic And International Sports Arbitration Awards: Trends And Observations, Matthew J. Mitten

Faculty Publications

This article provides an overview of the nature and scope of judicial review of Olympic and international sports arbitration awards, primarily those rendered by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (based in Lausanne, Switzerland) and their review by the Swiss Federal Tribunal pursuant to the Swiss Federal Code on Private International Law. It also describes and compares U.S. courts' review of international sports arbitration awards pursuant to the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards as well as domestic sports arbitration awards. Both Swiss and U.S. courts are permitting CAS arbitration awards to establish a …


The Perils Of Popularity: David Josiah Brewer And The Politics Of Judicial Reputation, J. Gordon Hylton Jan 2009

The Perils Of Popularity: David Josiah Brewer And The Politics Of Judicial Reputation, J. Gordon Hylton

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


He Speaks Not, Yet He Says Everything; What Of That?: Text, Context, And Pretext In State V. Jeffrey Dahmer, Gregory J. O'Meara S.J. Jan 2009

He Speaks Not, Yet He Says Everything; What Of That?: Text, Context, And Pretext In State V. Jeffrey Dahmer, Gregory J. O'Meara S.J.

Faculty Publications

In State v. Dahmer, the defense attempted to lead the jury through a series of inferences to conclude that the defendant was insane at the time he committed each of the fifteen murders charged; it portrayed a client who was fully cooperative and honest once the authorities arrested him. To make this approach work, the defense needed narrative distance between the defendant and the jury so he could not be cross examined about his meticulous planning of each murder or his prior inconsistent statements. This paper briefly lays out the development of the defense of insanity, focusing on the different …


Must God Be Dead Or Irrelevant: Drawing A Circle That Lets Me In, Richard M. Esenberg Jan 2009

Must God Be Dead Or Irrelevant: Drawing A Circle That Lets Me In, Richard M. Esenberg

Faculty Publications

Some scholars claim that current Establishment Clause doctrine can increasingly be explained in terms of substantive neutrality-that is, the idea that government ought to treat religion and irreligion (or comparable secular activities) in the same way. Whether a product of the Court’s commitment to the idea or an artifact of the positions of the “swing” Justices, this proposition has considerable explanatory power. The Supreme Court has, in recent years, permitted the government to make financial support equally available for religious uses, as long as it is done on a neutral basis and through the private choice of the recipients. It …


Outlawing Amnesty: The Return Of Criminal Justice In Transitional Justice Schemes, Lisa J. Laplante Jan 2009

Outlawing Amnesty: The Return Of Criminal Justice In Transitional Justice Schemes, Lisa J. Laplante

Faculty Publications

Until recently, immunity measures like amnesties were considered an acceptable part of promoting transitional justice in countries seeking to address past episodes of systematic violations of human rights. Politically sensitive context of countries seeking to broker peace between oppositional forces often outweighed the moral imperative of punishing those responsible for perpetrating human rights atrocities. Latin America exemplified this trend in the 1980s, while also popularizing truth commissions. The resulting truth v. justice debate eventually sidelined criminal trials in transitional justice schemes, accepting amnesty as lawful. However, growing international human rights and international criminal law jurisprudence began to slowly put in …


Rethinking Drug Courts: Restorative Justice As A Response To Racial Injustice, Michael M. O'Hear Jan 2009

Rethinking Drug Courts: Restorative Justice As A Response To Racial Injustice, Michael M. O'Hear

Faculty Publications

Specialized drug treatment courts have become a popular alternative to more punitive approaches to the "war on drugs," with nearly 2,000 such courts now established across the United States. One source of their appeal is the belief that they will ameliorate the dramatic racial disparities in the nation's prison population - disparities that result in large measure from the long sentences handed out for some drug crimes in conventional criminal courts. However, experience has shown that drug courts are not a "do-no-harm" innovation. Drug courts can produce both winners and losers when compared to conventional court processing, and there are …


Family Law For The Underclass: Underscoring Law's Ideological Function, David Ray Papke Jan 2009

Family Law For The Underclass: Underscoring Law's Ideological Function, David Ray Papke

Faculty Publications

This article underscores the manner in which family law for the contemporary underclass assumes a distinctly ideological function. Marriage promotion programs not only urge members of the underclass to marry but also deplore their declining commitment to marriage as an institution. "Deadbeat dad" legislation suggests the failure of underclass fathers to pay child support regularly and on time is a major cause of poverty in American life. Adoption law facilitates the placement of underclass children in middle and upper-class families, insisting in the process that this must surely be best for the children. Overall, family law for the underclass suggests …


Regulating Wisconsin-Based Businesses: The Wisconsin Uniform Securities Act, Edward A. Fallone Jan 2009

Regulating Wisconsin-Based Businesses: The Wisconsin Uniform Securities Act, Edward A. Fallone

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


The Intersection Of Dispute Systems Design And Transitional Justice, Andrea Kupfer Schneider Jan 2009

The Intersection Of Dispute Systems Design And Transitional Justice, Andrea Kupfer Schneider

Faculty Publications

Dispute Systems Design (DSD), the process of creating structures to deal with repeated or systemic disputes, can be applied to both the most mundane and the most horrific of conflicts. We know that human rights violations can be perpetrated by governments or non-state actors, can be regional or national, and can be targeted against a particular group or have random victims. We know that these violations can occur as a spurt of extreme violence over a short time or can last for generations. We also know, historically, of many different methods by which to deal with human rights violations.

The …


Blogging While (Publicly) Employed: Some First Amendment Implications, Paul M. Secunda Jan 2009

Blogging While (Publicly) Employed: Some First Amendment Implications, Paul M. Secunda

Faculty Publications

While private-sector employees do not have First Amendment free speech protection for their blogging activities relating to the workplace, public employees may enjoy some measure of protection depending on the nature of their blogging activity. The essential difference between these types of employment stems from the presence of state action in the public employment context. Although a government employee does not have the same protection from governmental speech infringement as citizens do under the First Amendment, a long line of cases under Pickering v. Bd. of Education have established a modicum of protection, especially when the public employee blogging is …


Rules Limiting Athletic Performance Or Prohibiting Athletic Participation For Health Reasons: Legal And Ethical Considerations, Matthew J. Mitten Jan 2009

Rules Limiting Athletic Performance Or Prohibiting Athletic Participation For Health Reasons: Legal And Ethical Considerations, Matthew J. Mitten

Faculty Publications

This article analyzes the paradox between: 1) intercollegiate sport's objectives of maximizing athletic performance and providing athletic participation opportunities to those possessing the requisite physical ability and skills to compete successfully; and 2) National Collegiate Athletic Association rules that limit athletic performance by all student-athletes, or university requirements that prohibit individual student-athletes from participating in intercollegiate sports, for health reasons. Some student-athletes seek to maximize athletic performance by taking performance-enhancing substances, even if doing so creates potential future adverse health effects. Others may want to participate in intercollegiate sports with a physical abnormality and are willing to assume an increased …


Did Congress Limit The Appellate Court's Discretion To Stay An Alien's Removal From The United States Pending Appeal?, Jessica E. Slavin Jan 2009

Did Congress Limit The Appellate Court's Discretion To Stay An Alien's Removal From The United States Pending Appeal?, Jessica E. Slavin

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


What Appeals Are Permitted By Section 16(A)(1)(A) Of The Federal Arbitration Act?, Jay E. Grenig Jan 2009

What Appeals Are Permitted By Section 16(A)(1)(A) Of The Federal Arbitration Act?, Jay E. Grenig

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Was A Lawful Permanent Resident Deprived Of Effective Assistance Of Counsel?, Jessica E. Slavin Jan 2009

Was A Lawful Permanent Resident Deprived Of Effective Assistance Of Counsel?, Jessica E. Slavin

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Did Congress Strip The Federal Circuit Courts Of The Power To Review Denials Of Motions To Reopen Immigration Proceedings?, Jessica E. Slavin Jan 2009

Did Congress Strip The Federal Circuit Courts Of The Power To Review Denials Of Motions To Reopen Immigration Proceedings?, Jessica E. Slavin

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.