Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- International Law (1476)
- Intellectual Property Law (980)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (536)
- Constitutional Law (466)
- Criminal Law (412)
-
- Business Organizations Law (366)
- Banking and Finance Law (322)
- Environmental Law (280)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (265)
- Law and Society (241)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (240)
- Administrative Law (163)
- Courts (160)
- Judges (155)
- Law and Politics (151)
- Legislation (145)
- Property Law and Real Estate (142)
- Legal Profession (139)
- Securities Law (133)
- State and Local Government Law (132)
- Business (124)
- First Amendment (120)
- Civil Law (116)
- Litigation (116)
- Legal History (115)
- Torts (112)
- Labor and Employment Law (111)
- Law and Gender (110)
- Civil Procedure (109)
- Keyword
-
- 1984 Presidential Campaign (1151)
- United States Politics (1151)
- Women Politicians (1151)
- Ethics (340)
- Constitution (242)
-
- Copyright (149)
- Antitrust (138)
- Fordham Law Student Newspaper (133)
- First Amendment (127)
- Regulation (124)
- Religion (120)
- Law (119)
- Criminal law (116)
- Bankruptcy (114)
- Privacy (113)
- Constitutional law (109)
- Securities (104)
- Evidence (103)
- Property (103)
- First amendment (97)
- Professional responsibility (96)
- SEC (96)
- Tax (94)
- Presidential Succession (90)
- Twenty-Fifth Amendment (88)
- Internet (87)
- Justice (87)
- Legal ethics (87)
- Race (87)
- Education (86)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Fordham Law Review (5038)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (1635)
- Fordham International Law Journal (1555)
- Faculty Scholarship (1359)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (857)
-
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (469)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (394)
- International (372)
- New York (290)
- New Jersey (181)
- Speeches (160)
- Fordham Law Review Online (139)
- The Advocate (139)
- Connecticut (88)
- Correspondence (60)
- Campaign Materials (56)
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (45)
- Staff Publications (41)
- Congressional Materials (36)
- Fordham Lawyer (35)
- 27th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2019) (31)
- Reports (27)
- Res Gestae (27)
- 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2021) (25)
- 29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022) (25)
- Fordham Competition Law Institute (24)
- Fordham Law School Yearbook (24)
- Lectures (22)
- Miscellaneous (21)
- Amicus Briefs (16)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 691 - 720 of 13339
Full-Text Articles in Law
Fertility, Immigration, And Public Support For Parenting, Eleanor Brown, Naomi Cahn, June Carbone
Fertility, Immigration, And Public Support For Parenting, Eleanor Brown, Naomi Cahn, June Carbone
Fordham Law Review
As this Essay shows, the fertility discourse of the last half century deals with the profound effects that come from the transformation of the economy and the place of modern families within it. Discussions of race and class have been an important—and, often, pernicious—part of a transformation in family values, as the upper-middle-class efforts to channel ever greater investment into children have increased economic inequality and contributed to racial, ideological, and gender division. We see the convergence in fertility rates as an indication that, at a practical level, a much larger part of the country is embracing the new family …
Covid-19 And The Perils Of Free-Market Parenting: Why It Is Past Time For The United States To Install Government Supports For Families, Maxine Eichner
Covid-19 And The Perils Of Free-Market Parenting: Why It Is Past Time For The United States To Install Government Supports For Families, Maxine Eichner
Fordham Law Review
U.S. public policy has for decades rested on the expectation that parents will privately provide the cash and conditions their children need. This expectation is exceptional: most other wealthy countries’ public policies support children through a mix of public and private funds. The COVID-19 pandemic, however, radically changed U.S. policy. The severe economic dislocation that resulted led Congress to pass a series of measures that funneled trillions of public dollars to families and parents. Whether these measures should represent a temporary deviation from the nation’s free-market expectations during an unprecedented emergency or the first step in a long-term shift toward …
The Enduring Importance Of Parental Rights, Clare Huntington, Elizabeth Scott
The Enduring Importance Of Parental Rights, Clare Huntington, Elizabeth Scott
Fordham Law Review
Parental rights are—and should remain—the backbone of family law. State deference to parents is warranted not because parents are infallible, nor because parents own their children, but rather because parental rights, properly understood and limited, promote child wellbeing.1 This is true for several reasons, but two stand out. First, parental rights promote the stability of the parent-child relationship by restricting the state’s authority to intervene in families. This protection promotes healthy child development for all children, and it is especially important for low-income families and families of color, who are subject to intensive state scrutiny.2 Second, parental rights ensure that …
Multi-Parent Families, Real And Imagined, Courtney G. Joslin, Douglas Nejaime
Multi-Parent Families, Real And Imagined, Courtney G. Joslin, Douglas Nejaime
Fordham Law Review
This piece is the first in a series on functional parenthood growing out of an empirical study of all electronically available cases from the last forty years decided under functional parent doctrines, including cases that feature more than two parental figures.20 Our goal is to provide a more empirically grounded understanding of the circumstances under which a child may have functional parents, including situations in which a child has more than two parents, and an accurate assessment of the range of factual contexts in which courts may be asked to adjudicate the issue. We supply a more comprehensive and detailed …
From Empathy Gap To Reparations: An Analysis Of Caregiving, Criminalization, And Family Empowerment, Charisa Smith
From Empathy Gap To Reparations: An Analysis Of Caregiving, Criminalization, And Family Empowerment, Charisa Smith
Fordham Law Review
America’s legacy of violent settler colonialism and racial capitalism reveals a misunderstood and neglected civil rights concern: the forced separation of families of color and unwarranted state intrusion upon caregiving through criminalization and surveillance. The War on Drugs, the Opioid Crisis, and the COVID-19 pandemic are a few examples demonstrating the precariousness of our nation’s collective empathy well toward caregivers and our tattered social safety net. In fact, these instances illuminate what this Essay coins an “empathy gap” in perception when the general public, policy makers, and the mainstream media view similarly situated families with different identities. Ironically, the COVID-19 …
Domestic Violence As A Factor In Child Custody Determinations: Considering Coercive Control, Lisa A. Tucker
Domestic Violence As A Factor In Child Custody Determinations: Considering Coercive Control, Lisa A. Tucker
Fordham Law Review
Many states1 have begun formally to recognize coercive control2 as a form of domestic violence in several contexts: criminal domestic violence cases,3 civil motions for protection from abuse,4 and child removal proceedings.5 This Essay argues, however, that while new laws recognizing coercive control may be noble and well-meaning, they are unlikely to increase support for mothers who have been victims of coercive control abuse and now seek custody of their children. In fact, this Essay argues, the codification of these laws may do more harm than good; by taking power away from men—and coercive control is practiced almost exclusively by …
Unsafe & Unsound: The Future Of Supervised Injection Sites After United States V. Safehouse, Chloe Rigogne
Unsafe & Unsound: The Future Of Supervised Injection Sites After United States V. Safehouse, Chloe Rigogne
Fordham Law Review
In the past few years, the United States has experienced a dramatic increase in drug overdose deaths due to factors such as a growing prevalence of synthetic opioids like fentanyl and the strains brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. In response to the overdose crisis, states and municipalities have started considering once-taboo harm reduction practices, including the implementation of supervised injection sites that facilitate individuals’ use of drugs under the care and supervision of medical professionals. However, supervised injection sites may run afoul of 21 U.S.C. § 856—often referred to as the “crack house” statute—a law introduced in the 1980s …
5b Patent Law Session. Patent Potpouri, Andrew Bowler, Michael Williams, Sepehr Shahshahani, Ari Laakkonen, Marleen Van Den Horst, Simon Holzer
5b Patent Law Session. Patent Potpouri, Andrew Bowler, Michael Williams, Sepehr Shahshahani, Ari Laakkonen, Marleen Van Den Horst, Simon Holzer
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
1c Plenary Session. Views From The Judiciary, Hugh C. Hansen, Richard Arnold, Stephen Burley, Paolo Catallozzi, Klaus Grabinski, Simon Holzer, Gordon Humphreys, Robin Jacob, Carl Josefsson, Rian Kalden, F. Scott Kieff, Paul R. Michel, Pauline Newman, Peter Charleton, Edger F. Brinkman
1c Plenary Session. Views From The Judiciary, Hugh C. Hansen, Richard Arnold, Stephen Burley, Paolo Catallozzi, Klaus Grabinski, Simon Holzer, Gordon Humphreys, Robin Jacob, Carl Josefsson, Rian Kalden, F. Scott Kieff, Paul R. Michel, Pauline Newman, Peter Charleton, Edger F. Brinkman
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
5d Patent Law Session. Ptab, John B. Pegram, Adam Mossoff, Patricia Martone, Brian Scarpelli, George E. Badenoch, Brian P. Murphy
5d Patent Law Session. Ptab, John B. Pegram, Adam Mossoff, Patricia Martone, Brian Scarpelli, George E. Badenoch, Brian P. Murphy
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
6d Copyright Law, Competition & Trademark Law Session. U.S. Copyright Developments, Michael S. Shapiro, David O. Carson, Kevin Amer, Joshua L. Simmons, Jennifer Pariser, Sandra Aistars
6d Copyright Law, Competition & Trademark Law Session. U.S. Copyright Developments, Michael S. Shapiro, David O. Carson, Kevin Amer, Joshua L. Simmons, Jennifer Pariser, Sandra Aistars
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
7d Competition, Two Concurrent Sessions & Trademark Law. U.S. Trademark Law Developments, Matthew D. Asbell, Marshall Leaffer, Jennifer Simmons, Rebecca Tushnet, Gerald M. Levine, Maria A. Scungio
7d Competition, Two Concurrent Sessions & Trademark Law. U.S. Trademark Law Developments, Matthew D. Asbell, Marshall Leaffer, Jennifer Simmons, Rebecca Tushnet, Gerald M. Levine, Maria A. Scungio
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
5c Patent Law Session. International Patent Developments, Robin Jacob, Peter Charleton, Brian Cordery, John Richards, Heinz Goddar, Melanie Müller, Eva Ehlich, Kevin Mcgough
5c Patent Law Session. International Patent Developments, Robin Jacob, Peter Charleton, Brian Cordery, John Richards, Heinz Goddar, Melanie Müller, Eva Ehlich, Kevin Mcgough
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
7c Competition, Two Concurrent Sessions & Trademark Law. Trade Secrets, Victoria A. Cundiff, Camilla Alexandra Hrdy, Max Haedicke, James Pooley, Thomas D. Pease, Mark F. Schultz
7c Competition, Two Concurrent Sessions & Trademark Law. Trade Secrets, Victoria A. Cundiff, Camilla Alexandra Hrdy, Max Haedicke, James Pooley, Thomas D. Pease, Mark F. Schultz
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
6c Copyright Law, Competition & Trademark Law Session. Frand, Cordula Schumacher, Jorge L. Contreras, Steven Geiszler, David Por, Jyh-An Lee, Steve Akerley, Wolrad Prinz Zu Waldeck Und Pyrmont
6c Copyright Law, Competition & Trademark Law Session. Frand, Cordula Schumacher, Jorge L. Contreras, Steven Geiszler, David Por, Jyh-An Lee, Steve Akerley, Wolrad Prinz Zu Waldeck Und Pyrmont
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
6b Copyright Law, Competition & Trademark Law Session. Copyright Protections For Publishers, Ted Shapiro, Kimberley Isbell, Danielle Coffey, Ali Sternburg, Jan Bernd Nordemann, Carlo Scollo Lavizzari
6b Copyright Law, Competition & Trademark Law Session. Copyright Protections For Publishers, Ted Shapiro, Kimberley Isbell, Danielle Coffey, Ali Sternburg, Jan Bernd Nordemann, Carlo Scollo Lavizzari
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
7b Competition, Two Concurrent Sessions & Trademark Law. Multilateral Developments, Michele Woods, Steven Tepp, Annabelle Bennett, F. Scott Kieff, Paul Maier
7b Competition, Two Concurrent Sessions & Trademark Law. Multilateral Developments, Michele Woods, Steven Tepp, Annabelle Bennett, F. Scott Kieff, Paul Maier
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
6a Copyright Law, Competition & Trademark Law Session. Fair Use, Ron Lazebnik, Daan G. Erikson, Jane C. Ginsburg, Joseph C. Gratz, Brian W. Gray, Bhamati Viswanathan
6a Copyright Law, Competition & Trademark Law Session. Fair Use, Ron Lazebnik, Daan G. Erikson, Jane C. Ginsburg, Joseph C. Gratz, Brian W. Gray, Bhamati Viswanathan
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
5a Patent Law Session. Patent Prosecution And Litigation, Penny Gilbert, Kenneth R. Adamo, Carl Josefsson, David J. Kappos, Ronald E. Dimock, Otto Licks
5a Patent Law Session. Patent Prosecution And Litigation, Penny Gilbert, Kenneth R. Adamo, Carl Josefsson, David J. Kappos, Ronald E. Dimock, Otto Licks
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
7a Competition, Two Concurrent Sessions & Trademark Law. Antitrust: Developments And Trends, Daryl Lim, Damien Geradin, William E. Kovacic, Thomas B. Nachbar, Thibault Schrepel, Angela Zhang, Eleonor M. Fox
7a Competition, Two Concurrent Sessions & Trademark Law. Antitrust: Developments And Trends, Daryl Lim, Damien Geradin, William E. Kovacic, Thomas B. Nachbar, Thibault Schrepel, Angela Zhang, Eleonor M. Fox
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
Kickoff Session. What Will China's Ip System Look Like In 5 Years?, He Jing, Michael-Yu Ding, Guobin Cui, Zheng Ning Ms, Yang Ming, Chi Xu
Kickoff Session. What Will China's Ip System Look Like In 5 Years?, He Jing, Michael-Yu Ding, Guobin Cui, Zheng Ning Ms, Yang Ming, Chi Xu
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
4c Trademark Law Session. Is The Likelihood Of Confusion Test Getting Out Of Hand?, Anderson Duff, Daniel R. Bereskin, Irene Calboli, Jeffrey A. Handelman, Rebecca Tushnet, Miguel Pérez, Tobias Timmann
4c Trademark Law Session. Is The Likelihood Of Confusion Test Getting Out Of Hand?, Anderson Duff, Daniel R. Bereskin, Irene Calboli, Jeffrey A. Handelman, Rebecca Tushnet, Miguel Pérez, Tobias Timmann
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
2c Patent Law Session. U.S. Patent Developments, Martin J. Adelman, Nicholas P. Groombridge, Laura Sheridan, Carey R. Ramos, Marjan Noor, Nahoko Ono
2c Patent Law Session. U.S. Patent Developments, Martin J. Adelman, Nicholas P. Groombridge, Laura Sheridan, Carey R. Ramos, Marjan Noor, Nahoko Ono
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
3c Copyright Law & Concurrent Session. Copyright Potpourri, Ron Lazebnik, Sean M. O'Connor, Mehdi Ansari, Fiona Phillips, Nicholas Bartlet, Ann Bartow, Mitch Glazier
3c Copyright Law & Concurrent Session. Copyright Potpourri, Ron Lazebnik, Sean M. O'Connor, Mehdi Ansari, Fiona Phillips, Nicholas Bartlet, Ann Bartow, Mitch Glazier
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
4b Trademark Law Session. The Functionality Doctrine In Disarray?, Marshall Leaffer, Mark A. Lemley, Gordon Humphreys, David Stone, Irene Calboli, Jeffrey A. Handelman
4b Trademark Law Session. The Functionality Doctrine In Disarray?, Marshall Leaffer, Mark A. Lemley, Gordon Humphreys, David Stone, Irene Calboli, Jeffrey A. Handelman
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
2b Patent Law Session. Patents And The Public Health, John R. Thomas, Joshua D. Sarnoff, Catherine Fitch, Justin Hughes, James Love, Gustavo De Freitas Morais
2b Patent Law Session. Patents And The Public Health, John R. Thomas, Joshua D. Sarnoff, Catherine Fitch, Justin Hughes, James Love, Gustavo De Freitas Morais
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
3b Copyright Law & Competition Law Session. Artificial Intelligence, Annsley Merelle Ward, Stephen Burley, Colin Birss, Sasha Rosenthal-Larrea, Suzanne Wilson, John Lee, Helen Conlan
3b Copyright Law & Competition Law Session. Artificial Intelligence, Annsley Merelle Ward, Stephen Burley, Colin Birss, Sasha Rosenthal-Larrea, Suzanne Wilson, John Lee, Helen Conlan
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
2a Patent Law Session. Unified Patent Court, Anne-Charlotte Le Bihan, Klaus Grabinski, Aloys Hüttermann, Myles Jelf, Miquel Montañá, Edger F. Brinkman
2a Patent Law Session. Unified Patent Court, Anne-Charlotte Le Bihan, Klaus Grabinski, Aloys Hüttermann, Myles Jelf, Miquel Montañá, Edger F. Brinkman
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
3a Copyright Law Session. Eu Copyright Developments, Stanford Mccoy, Eleonora Rosati, Ursula Feindor-Schmidt, Lauri Rechardt, Jerker Rydén, Martin Schaefer
3a Copyright Law Session. Eu Copyright Developments, Stanford Mccoy, Eleonora Rosati, Ursula Feindor-Schmidt, Lauri Rechardt, Jerker Rydén, Martin Schaefer
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.
4a Trademark Law Session. Eu Trademark Law Update, Sven Schonhofen, James Nurton, Paolo Catallozzi, Joel Smith, Gordon Humphreys, Peter Reuss
4a Trademark Law Session. Eu Trademark Law Update, Sven Schonhofen, James Nurton, Paolo Catallozzi, Joel Smith, Gordon Humphreys, Peter Reuss
29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022)
No abstract provided.