Law Commons^™

Doing Justice With Empathy: Black Prosecutors In The Age Of Mass Incarceration, Kevin Woodson

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

Taking Integrity Risks Seriously, Miriam H. Baer

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

Conservative Legal Advocacy Organizations And Constitutional Change In The Roberts Court, Ann Southworth

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

A World-Threatening Feeling: Grief, Moral Injury, And Institutional Loss In Rural Courts, Michele Statz

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

Shortcomings Of Law School And Big Law, Julian Velasco

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Illusion Of Inclusion: The False Promise Of The New Governance Project For Content Moderation, Brenda Dvoskin

Fordham Law Review

Because private companies now control the most prominent communication platforms, the most pressing question in the field of content moderation is how to ensure that the governance of public discourse responds to public values. The prevailing approach, given that the state cannot regulate speech directly, is that state regulation can be substituted with audited self-regulation, broad stakeholder participation, and negotiated rulemaking. In this model, which this Article refers to as the “new governance model for content moderation,” companies include advocates as representatives of the public in their processes to govern online speech. Ideally, they negotiate policy goals and share responsibility …

Lawyering As A Public Health Tool: Enforcing Title Ii Of The Americans With Disabilities Act With Preventative Litigation, Elena Cohen

Fordham Law Review

A recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that plaintiffs cannot bring a claim alleging a risk of unnecessary institutionalization under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This directly contradicts the holdings of six other circuit courts and guidance issued by the Department of Justice (DOJ)—all of which maintain that Title II of the ADA (Title II), the integration mandate, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Olmstead v. L.C. ex rel. Zimring permit these claims. This Note explores how the circuit courts have evaluated risk of unnecessary institutionalization claims, including …

A Distinctive Court: A Glimpse Into The History And Significance Of The D.C. Circuit, Hon. J. Michelle Childs, James J. Brudney

Jurist in Residence Lectures

In her lecture, Judge J. Michelle Childs discusses the unique nature of the docket of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, highlighting its collegiality as well as its role in addressing issues of national significance, particularly in administrative cases and those involving the scope of governmental power.

Preparing For Election Disruptions In 2024, Norman J. Ornstein

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

No abstract provided.

The U.S. Electoral System And Foreign Interference, Jeremi Suri

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

No abstract provided.

The Electoral Count Reform Act In 2024, Adav Noti

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

No abstract provided.

The County Certification Problem, Jenny Gimian

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

No abstract provided.

Litigating The 2024 Election, Richard Pildes

Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum

No abstract provided.

“Restating” The Record: Evaluating Ali’S Aided-By-Agency Disclaimer, Danielle Dascher

Staff Publications

No abstract provided.

Human Liability In Semi-Autonomous Vehicles, Omri Rachum-Twaig, Gadi Perl

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

The promise of fully autonomous vehicles has faced repeated delays, with widespread availability now projected to be limited to specific routes or geographic areas in the near future. Instead, conditional or semi-autonomous systems (SAE Level 3) are being introduced, where the vehicle can drive autonomously under limited conditions but still requires a human driver to take control when necessary. This paper examines the regulatory and liability challenges posed by these semi-autonomous vehicles. Existing laws have gaps in addressing the ambiguous responsibility of the human driver in the shared control environment of Level 3 autonomy. Factors like fatigue, lack of …

“Fly Me To The Moon . . . & Back”: The Intricate Interplay Between Copyright Law And Space Law, Marco Franzoso

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

This research focuses on the intricate interplay between two branches of law: copyright and space law. Through various scenarios, some real and some hypothetical, it underlines the inefficacy of the terrestrial copyright principle, namely the lex loci protection, when applied to outer space endeavors. In outer space, the law where the infringement arises is useful only when the jurisdiction is clear, which is on board of registered space objects; however, that is not even the case for all space objects. On board poli-jurisdictional entities, such as the ISS, the lex loci protectionis fails to provide a clear legal framework, at …

Registry Systems As Gatekeepers: How Patent Registries Create Systemic Barriers To Innovation, Miriam Marcowitz-Bitton, Ori Sharon

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

Picture an inventor. Anyone at all. We bet you imagined a man, is that right? If you did, that’s not surprising—our study of over 140,000 patent applications reveals that three out of four patents name all-male inventors, and only three percent of patents represent the inventions of women-only teams. But this massive gender gap is not just about who chooses to invent—it’s about who gets to protect their innovations through the patent system.

This Article presents groundbreaking evidence that women face systemic barriers in securing patents, even when they clear the hurdles to become inventors. Drawing on an unprecedented dataset …

Stopping The Spread Of The World's Oldest Hatred - What U.S. Sports Stakeholders Can Do To Combat Antisemitism, Mark Conrad

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

The consistent rise in reported acts of antisemitism in the United States over the last decade has prompted debate about strategies to combat this age-old menace. The Hamas attack on Israel and the subsequent Israeli military response in Gaza has exacerbated this trend. Many have debated ways to confront the issue, including informing the public about the magnitude of the problem and finding policies to reduce incidents of antisemitism. The sports industry could help in this quest. Because millions of people follow professional, college, high school, and Olympic sports, organizations and individual athletes could participate in activities designed …

Ai In The Courtroom: The Boundaries Of Robolawyers And Robojudges, Hadar Y. Jabotinsky, Michal Lavi

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly developing and undoubtedly impacting every aspect of our lives. From lethal drones, to Apple’s Siri, and improved cancer diagnostics, AI algorithms are also increasingly integrated into decision-making. This article illuminates the impact of AI on the legal system and profession.

Currently, AI legal tools support lawyers’ and judges’ work and can assist in tasks such as due diligence, legal analysis, classification of documents by Technology-Assisted Review (TAR), providing legal advice, and engaging in predicting legal judgments. AI can even assist judges in decision making for risk assessments during sentencing. The …

Beyond Agency Authority: Regulating Sulfur Hexafluoride Under An Enhanced Title Ii Framework Of The Clean Air Act, Matthew Gawley

Fordham Environmental Law Review

This paper explores the critical need for robust Congressional action to regulate sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), a greenhouse gas with a global warming potential more than 20,000 times greater than carbon dioxide. Recent Supreme Court decisions––in West Virginia v. EPA and Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo––to restrict EPA authority and end the Chevron doctrine have curtailed federal environmental agencies’ regulatory authority, shifting the responsibility for addressing major environmental challenges back to Congress. Despite being addressed under Title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA) through the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), current SF6 regulations prove grossly inadequate. The utilities industry––the largest …

Navigating The Legal Risk Universities’ Healthcare Providers Potentially Face From Medical Decisions Impacting Collegiate Athletes’ Future Nil Income While Following The Ncaa’S Mental Health Best Practices, Kenneth D. Ferguson

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

Federal Legislation And College Sports: Which Way Forward?, Alfred Yen, Dionne Koller

Fordham Law Review

No abstract provided.

Administrative Forum Shopping, Amy L. Stein

Fordham Law Review

Allowing private parties in litigation to stack the deck in their favor through forum shopping is standard fare in the United States. But not everyone realizes that public legislators engage in a similar exercise when they stack the deck in one party’s favor through “jurisdiction-stripping” or “jurisdiction-channeling” provisions. Congress can strip federal courts of all or some of its jurisdiction, channel jurisdiction over a particular class of cases into one particular court, and even strip the U.S. Supreme Court of its appellate jurisdiction. Understandably, this last category has received the most attention, as scholars are drawn to the penultimate conflict …

In Defense Of Pro Se Parents, Matthew F. Gillam

Fordham Law Review

Who gets to represent children in federal court? Adults have long been permitted to represent themselves in federal court under the plain meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1654. And, many adults do just that every year. But what if the real party in interest is a minor child? Who, if anyone, can exercise that child’s right to proceed pro se?

This Note argues that the correct reading of 28 U.S.C. § 1654 would permit parents to litigate pro se in federal court where the real party in interest is their minor child. This is based on a straightforward, grammatically correct …

Like It Or Not: Recognizing A Special Relationship Between Social Media Companies And Their Users, Alexandra Tran

Fordham Law Review

When the internet plays a role in a plaintiff’s injury, there can be considerable roadblocks barring recovery. At the heart of the dispute over how social media should be legally addressed is the balance between maintaining freedom of expression on the open internet and imposing regulations on social media companies to ensure online safety. When plaintiffs allege that a social media company had a duty to warn them about dangers on its site, courts are generally reluctant to extend the special relationship doctrine to encompass the social media-user relationship. In addition to the high bar set by courts, different jurisdictions …

Article Iii Standing For Cercla Private Cost Recovery Actions: How The Test's Strained Logic Belies Its Authority, Jonathan M. Palacios

Fordham Environmental Law Review

This Note examines how Article III standing doctrine applies to

private plaintiffs’ cost recovery actions under § 107(a)(4)(B) of the

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and

Liability Act. A review of judicial decisions reveals inconsistencies

in the analysis of injury in fact and traceability, and suggests that

current Article III standing doctrine is misaligned with its purported

objectives. In response, this Note proposes a structured framework

for assessing injury in fact and a refined approach to analyzing

traceability that distinguishes between different forms of causal

uncertainty. These doctrinal adjustments should better align case

outcomes with Article III standing doctrine’s constitutional and …

The Implementation And Use Of Intimacy Coordinators In Motion Picture Productions, John J. Chung, Pia Piscitelli

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The History And Future Of Amateurism In College Sports, Jordan Zaia

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

College sports and amateurism have long been intertwined, with the NCAA championing the term “student-athlete” to reinforce the notion that college athletes should not be paid employees. However, this notion has come under fire because college athletes had to risk losing eligibility to receive compensation while helping schools profit. In response, athletes have challenged the system using antitrust, intellectual property, and labor & employment laws.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in NCAA v. Alston dealt a decisive blow to the NCAA’s financial restrictions, declaring that there is no “amateurism exception” to antitrust law. This landmark ruling …

Proposed Rule 3b-16: The Sec's Attempt To Change Definition Of "Exchange" Under The Exchange Act Of 1934 Provides Lessons For A New Era Of Crypto Regulation, Gwyneth Tefft

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Metes And Bounds Of Federal Trade Secret Protections: Deriving Cohesive Damages Principles Under The Defend Trade Secrets Act, Angela Peterson

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

The Defend Trade Secrets Act launched trade secret law, which formerly only reached federal courts in diversity cases or cases involving espionage, into the national spotlight. As these cases begin to progress to trial, courts face new questions about how to appropriately measure monetary damages for trade secret claims. Because many courts take a “flexible and imaginative” approach to trade secret damages generally and most state trade secret statutes do not require damages as a part of a successful trade secret liability case, most courts that have considered damages methodology challenges to DTSA claims have failed to employ …