Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- International Law (1476)
- Intellectual Property Law (980)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (536)
- Constitutional Law (466)
- Criminal Law (412)
-
- Business Organizations Law (366)
- Banking and Finance Law (322)
- Environmental Law (280)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (265)
- Law and Society (241)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (240)
- Administrative Law (163)
- Courts (160)
- Judges (155)
- Law and Politics (151)
- Legislation (145)
- Property Law and Real Estate (142)
- Legal Profession (139)
- Securities Law (133)
- State and Local Government Law (132)
- Business (124)
- First Amendment (120)
- Civil Law (116)
- Litigation (116)
- Legal History (115)
- Torts (112)
- Labor and Employment Law (111)
- Law and Gender (110)
- Civil Procedure (109)
- Keyword
-
- 1984 Presidential Campaign (1151)
- United States Politics (1151)
- Women Politicians (1151)
- Ethics (340)
- Constitution (242)
-
- Copyright (149)
- Antitrust (138)
- Fordham Law Student Newspaper (133)
- First Amendment (127)
- Regulation (124)
- Religion (120)
- Law (119)
- Criminal law (116)
- Bankruptcy (114)
- Privacy (113)
- Constitutional law (109)
- Securities (104)
- Evidence (103)
- Property (103)
- First amendment (97)
- Professional responsibility (96)
- SEC (96)
- Tax (94)
- Presidential Succession (90)
- Twenty-Fifth Amendment (88)
- Internet (87)
- Justice (87)
- Legal ethics (87)
- Race (87)
- Education (86)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Fordham Law Review (5038)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (1635)
- Fordham International Law Journal (1555)
- Faculty Scholarship (1359)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (857)
-
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (469)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (394)
- International (372)
- New York (290)
- New Jersey (181)
- Speeches (160)
- Fordham Law Review Online (139)
- The Advocate (139)
- Connecticut (88)
- Correspondence (60)
- Campaign Materials (56)
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (45)
- Staff Publications (41)
- Congressional Materials (36)
- Fordham Lawyer (35)
- 27th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2019) (31)
- Reports (27)
- Res Gestae (27)
- 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2021) (25)
- 29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022) (25)
- Fordham Competition Law Institute (24)
- Fordham Law School Yearbook (24)
- Lectures (22)
- Miscellaneous (21)
- Amicus Briefs (16)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 12451 - 12480 of 13339
Full-Text Articles in Law
The Sabbatino Case: The Supreme Court Of The United States Rejects A Proposed New Theory Of Sovereign Relations And Restores The Act Of State Doctrine, William Harvey Reeves
The Sabbatino Case: The Supreme Court Of The United States Rejects A Proposed New Theory Of Sovereign Relations And Restores The Act Of State Doctrine, William Harvey Reeves
Fordham Law Review
A survey of the background and principles involved in the Sabbatino case as that case came for review before the Supreme Court of the United States
Mandamus And Certiorari In New York From The Revolution To 1880: A Chapter In Legal History , Harold Weintraub
Mandamus And Certiorari In New York From The Revolution To 1880: A Chapter In Legal History , Harold Weintraub
Fordham Law Review
No abstract provided.
Problem Of Presidential Inability - It Must Be Solved Now, The, John D. Feerick
Problem Of Presidential Inability - It Must Be Solved Now, The, John D. Feerick
Faculty Scholarship
On August 27, 1787, John Dickinson of Delaware asked the Constitutional Convention these vital questions: "What is the extent of the term 'disability' and who is to be the judge of it?" 'His questions regarding the provision on executive succession were never answered. Today, one hundred and seventy-six years later, they remain unanswered. They have been revived from time to time, usually when a President has died or become disabled. Hundreds of answers have been offered. None has been found acceptable. Although concern about the problem of presidential inability had been aroused by the Eisenhower illnesses in 1955, 1956 and …
Selected Forum Agreements In Western Europe, Joseph Perillo
Selected Forum Agreements In Western Europe, Joseph Perillo
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
George M. Cain To Subcommittee On Constitutional Amendments, New York City Bar Association, George H. Cain
George M. Cain To Subcommittee On Constitutional Amendments, New York City Bar Association, George H. Cain
Correspondence
Letter from Subcommittee Chairman George H. Cain to members of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Amendments, New York City Bar Association. John D. Feerick was an addressee. Cain suggests his fellow members read Feerick's article and speak with Feerick on its contents. Cain suggests that the subcommittee make specific legislative recommendations.
John D. Feerick To Leonard F. Manning, John D. Feerick
John D. Feerick To Leonard F. Manning, John D. Feerick
Correspondence
Letter from John D. Feerick to Fordham Law Professor Leonard F. Manning. Feerick informs Manning that their article will be referenced in the New York Times Sunday Magazine and that their same article is being cited by the New York City Bar Association in its study on presidential inability.
Lyndon B. Johnson-John W. Mccormack Letter Agreement, Lyndon B. Johnson, Norbert A. Schlei, United States. Department Of Justice. Office Of Legal Counsel, United States. President (1963-1969: Johnson)
Lyndon B. Johnson-John W. Mccormack Letter Agreement, Lyndon B. Johnson, Norbert A. Schlei, United States. Department Of Justice. Office Of Legal Counsel, United States. President (1963-1969: Johnson)
Executive Branch Materials
Agreement between President Johnson and Speaker McCormack. Because there was no vice president following Johnson's succession, McCormack was the next official in the line of succession. Includes memorandum from United States Attorney General's Office.
John D. Feerick To Louis C. Wyman, John D. Feerick
John D. Feerick To Louis C. Wyman, John D. Feerick
Correspondence
Letter from John D. Feerick to Louis C. Wyman. Feerick expresses pleasure in learning Wyman's interest in resolving the question of presidential inability and succession.
John D. Feerick To Nathan Siegal, John D. Feerick
John D. Feerick To Nathan Siegal, John D. Feerick
Correspondence
Letter from John D. Feerick to Nathan Siegal in which they differentiate between impeachment and presidential inability. Feerick wishes for the declaration of inability to remain within the executive branch.
Louis C. Wyman To John D. Feerick, Louis C. Wyman
Louis C. Wyman To John D. Feerick, Louis C. Wyman
Correspondence
Letter from Representative Louis C. Wyman to John D. Feerick. Wyman discusses the legal mechanism and procedure for declaring presidential inability contained in a recent House statute.
John D. Feerick To The New York Times, John D. Feerick
John D. Feerick To The New York Times, John D. Feerick
Correspondence
Letter from John D. Feerick to the New York Times. Feerick comments on a recent column and highlights the issue of vacancy of the Vice Presidency.
Anthony Lewis To John D. Feerick, Anthony Lewis, John D. Feerick
Anthony Lewis To John D. Feerick, Anthony Lewis, John D. Feerick
Correspondence
Letter from Anthony Lewis, New York Times reporter and columnist, to Dean John D. Feerick, regarding his scholarly article on presidential inability.
Charles A. Halleck To John D. Feerick, Charles A. Halleck
Charles A. Halleck To John D. Feerick, Charles A. Halleck
Correspondence
Letter from House Minority Leader Charles A. Halleck to Dean John D. Feerick, regarding his scholarly article on presidential inability.
Richard M. Nixon To John D. Feerick, Richard M. Nixon
Richard M. Nixon To John D. Feerick, Richard M. Nixon
Correspondence
Letter from President Richard M. Nixon to Dean John D. Feerick, regarding his scholarly article on presidential inability.
Howard W. Robison To John D. Feerick, Howard W. Robison
Howard W. Robison To John D. Feerick, Howard W. Robison
Correspondence
Letter from Representative Howard W. Robinson to Dean John D. Feerick, regarding his scholarly article on presidential inability.
Louis C. Wyman To John D. Feerick, Louis C. Wyman
Louis C. Wyman To John D. Feerick, Louis C. Wyman
Correspondence
Letter from Representative Louis C. Wyman to Dean John D. Feerick, regarding his scholarly article on presidential inability.
James C. Finlay, S.J. To John D. Feerick, James C. Finlay S.J.
James C. Finlay, S.J. To John D. Feerick, James C. Finlay S.J.
Correspondence
Letter from Fordham University President (1972-1984) James C. Finlay, S.J. to Dean John D. Feerick, regarding his scholarly article on presidential inability.
Ralph A. Dungan To John D. Feerick, Ralph A. Dungan
Ralph A. Dungan To John D. Feerick, Ralph A. Dungan
Correspondence
Letter from Ralph A. Dungan, special assistant to President John F. Kennedy, to Dean John D. Feerick, regarding his scholarly article on presidential inability.
Robert F. Kennedy To John D. Feerick, Robert F. Kennedy
Robert F. Kennedy To John D. Feerick, Robert F. Kennedy
Correspondence
Letter from Robert F. Kennedy to Dean John D. Feerick, regarding his scholarly article on presidential inability.
Cornelius W. Wickersham To John D. Feerick, Cornelius W. Wickersham
Cornelius W. Wickersham To John D. Feerick, Cornelius W. Wickersham
Correspondence
Letter from Cornelius W. Wickersham, attorney at Cadwalader, Wickersham and Taft, to Dean John D. Feerick, regarding his scholarly article on presidential inability.
Henry A. Wallace To John D. Feerick, Henry A. Wallace
Henry A. Wallace To John D. Feerick, Henry A. Wallace
Correspondence
Letter from Vice President Henry A. Wallace to Dean John D. Feerick, regarding his scholarly article on presidential inability.
Lewis F. Powell Jr. To John D. Feerick, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Lewis F. Powell Jr. To John D. Feerick, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Correspondence
Letter from Supreme Court Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. (1972-1987) to Dean John D. Feerick, regarding his scholarly article on presidential inability.
Kenneth B. Keating To John D. Feerick, Kenneth B. Keating
Kenneth B. Keating To John D. Feerick, Kenneth B. Keating
Correspondence
Letter from Senator Kenneth B. Keating to Dean John D. Feerick, regarding his scholarly article on presidential inability.
John W. Mccormack To John D. Feerick, John W. Mccormack
John W. Mccormack To John D. Feerick, John W. Mccormack
Correspondence
Letter from Speaker John W. McCormack to Dean John D. Feerick, regarding his scholarly article on presidential inability.
Emanuel Celler To John D. Feerick, Emanuel Celler
Emanuel Celler To John D. Feerick, Emanuel Celler
Correspondence
Letter from Representative Emanuel Celler to Dean John D. Feerick, regarding his scholarly article on presidential inability.
Arthur Krock To John D. Feerick, Arthur Krock
Arthur Krock To John D. Feerick, Arthur Krock
Correspondence
Letter from Arthur Krock, New York Times journalist, to Dean John D. Feerick, regarding his scholarly article on presidential inability.
George E. Reedy To John D. Feerick, George E. Reedy
George E. Reedy To John D. Feerick, George E. Reedy
Correspondence
Letter to White House Press Secretary George E. Reedy (1964-1965) to Dean John D. Feerick, regarding his scholarly article on presidential inability.
Nicholas Deb. Katzenbach To John D. Feerick, Nicholas Deb. Katzenbach
Nicholas Deb. Katzenbach To John D. Feerick, Nicholas Deb. Katzenbach
Correspondence
Letter from Attorney General of the United States Nicholas deB. Katzenbach (1965-1966) to Dean John D. Feerick, regarding his scholarly article on presidential inability.
Carl Albert To John D. Feerick, Carl Albert
Carl Albert To John D. Feerick, Carl Albert
Correspondence
Letter from Speaker Carl Albert to Dean John D. Feerick, regarding his scholarly article on presidential inability.