Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- International Law (1477)
- Intellectual Property Law (980)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (537)
- Constitutional Law (472)
- Criminal Law (412)
-
- Business Organizations Law (367)
- Banking and Finance Law (323)
- Environmental Law (281)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (266)
- Law and Society (244)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (240)
- Administrative Law (165)
- Courts (165)
- Judges (156)
- Law and Politics (152)
- Legislation (149)
- Property Law and Real Estate (142)
- Legal Profession (139)
- State and Local Government Law (136)
- Securities Law (134)
- Business (124)
- First Amendment (124)
- Litigation (120)
- Civil Law (117)
- Legal History (116)
- Torts (113)
- Civil Procedure (112)
- Labor and Employment Law (111)
- Law and Gender (111)
- Keyword
-
- 1984 Presidential Campaign (1151)
- United States Politics (1151)
- Women Politicians (1151)
- Ethics (340)
- Constitution (242)
-
- Copyright (149)
- Antitrust (138)
- Fordham Law Student Newspaper (133)
- First Amendment (127)
- Regulation (125)
- Religion (120)
- Law (119)
- Criminal law (116)
- Bankruptcy (114)
- Privacy (113)
- Constitutional law (109)
- Securities (104)
- Evidence (103)
- Property (103)
- First amendment (97)
- Professional responsibility (96)
- SEC (96)
- Tax (94)
- Presidential Succession (90)
- Twenty-Fifth Amendment (88)
- Internet (87)
- Justice (87)
- Legal ethics (87)
- Race (87)
- Education (86)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Fordham Law Review (5051)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (1635)
- Fordham International Law Journal (1555)
- Faculty Scholarship (1359)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (857)
-
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (469)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (394)
- International (372)
- New York (290)
- New Jersey (181)
- Speeches (160)
- Fordham Law Review Online (141)
- The Advocate (139)
- Connecticut (88)
- Correspondence (60)
- Campaign Materials (56)
- Fordham Law Voting Rights and Democracy Forum (45)
- Staff Publications (41)
- Congressional Materials (36)
- Fordham Lawyer (35)
- 27th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2019) (31)
- Reports (27)
- Res Gestae (27)
- 28th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2021) (25)
- 29th Annual Intellectual Property Law & Policy Conference (2022) (25)
- Fordham Competition Law Institute (24)
- Fordham Law School Yearbook (24)
- Lectures (22)
- Miscellaneous (21)
- Amicus Briefs (16)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1171 - 1200 of 13354
Full-Text Articles in Law
Visions Of The Republic Symposium: The People: A Pre-Primer For Critically Reevaluating Representation & Court Power In The Present, Marvin L. Astrada
Visions Of The Republic Symposium: The People: A Pre-Primer For Critically Reevaluating Representation & Court Power In The Present, Marvin L. Astrada
Fordham Law Review Online
What exactly is an American? Who or what are the People? Is there an authentic, viable American political identity or community? Or do the deep ruptures and balkanization that seem to pervade law and politics— ranging from pandemics, national security, impeachment, and the environment, to issues of an everyday, local nature—indicate a crisis of legitimacy, cohesion, and national community?
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: Do Foreign Nations Have Constitutional Rights?, Robert J. Pushaw Jr.
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: Do Foreign Nations Have Constitutional Rights?, Robert J. Pushaw Jr.
Fordham Law Review Online
Clarity would be promoted by treating Article III—which primarily concerns subject matter jurisdiction over three categories of “Cases” and six types of “Controversies”— separately from Due Process issues such as personal jurisdiction. Moreover, Article III’s text and history indicate that its drafters included “Controversies . . . between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects” to ensure that such disputes would be resolved impartially by federal judges who, unlike their state counterparts, enjoyed tenure and salary guarantees that insulated them from political pressure.
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: The Rights Of Foreign States In The Unites States Legal System, John Harrison
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: The Rights Of Foreign States In The Unites States Legal System, John Harrison
Fordham Law Review Online
Professor Wuerth’s article is a significant piece of scholarship. This brief comment is devoted, not to the article’s many strengths, but to its principal doctrinal conclusion, with which I disagree. In my view, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment allows Congress to provide any rules it chooses regarding service of process on and personal jurisdiction over foreign sovereigns. That is true, at least, insofar as the judgments of U.S. courts are to be enforced against foreign sovereign assets located in the United States. The rules about personal jurisdiction over foreign sovereigns in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act therefore …
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: Doctrinal Redundancy And The Two Paradoxes Of Personal Jurisdiction, Robin J. Effron
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: Doctrinal Redundancy And The Two Paradoxes Of Personal Jurisdiction, Robin J. Effron
Fordham Law Review Online
At several junctures, scholars have wondered what constitutional personal jurisdiction doctrine can and should add to procedural doctrines that regulate access to courts and parties’ amenability to suit in U.S. jurisdictions, and procedural doctrines that sort lawsuits into geographically suitable or appropriate locations. Professor Wuerth’s Article invites us to refocus on the question of what doctrines can and should regulate the amenability of foreign sovereigns (as well as the agencies and instrumentalities of foreign sovereigns) to suit in American courts.
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: A Commentary On Ingrid Wuerth's The Due Process And Other Constitutional Rights Of Foreign Nations, David P. Stewart
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: A Commentary On Ingrid Wuerth's The Due Process And Other Constitutional Rights Of Foreign Nations, David P. Stewart
Fordham Law Review Online
Are foreign States and governments (and their state-owned enterprises) “persons” for constitutional purposes? Do they—should they—have “due process” rights under the U.S. Constitution? Ingrid Wuerth’s thoughtful and thoroughly researched article addresses those important questions from both the historical and doctrinal perspectives and proposes an innovative approach to resolving the issues. The following commentary provides additional background and context, briefly tracing the origins and history of relevant U.S. case law and noting some of the practical implications of answering the questions affirmatively or negatively, particularly in light of the various exceptions to U.S. jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. It …
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: Foreign Nations, Constitutional Rights, And International Law, Austen Parrish
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: Foreign Nations, Constitutional Rights, And International Law, Austen Parrish
Fordham Law Review Online
Some of the more pressing issues related to global governance and world order lie at the intersection of foreign relations law, international law, and constitutional law. What role does the Constitution play in ensuring the United States lives up to the nation’s international law obligations in an evolving period of globalization? More provocatively, to what degree will the United States uphold its international legal obligations if not mandated by the Constitution? And what role do domestic courts play in enforcing these international law obligations? In this regard, the U.S. Supreme Court has not directly addressed the question of the rights, …
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: Rights, Immunities, And Sovereigns, Katherine Florey
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: Rights, Immunities, And Sovereigns, Katherine Florey
Fordham Law Review Online
This response first looks at the historical understanding of foreign sovereign immunity and the ways in which it should inform our reading of Article III. It then considers the role that sovereign immunity protections for foreign nations currently play. It closes with a suggestion that—while the sovereign immunity regime is largely adequate to protect other nations’ interests—Professor Wuerth’s insights nonetheless have a role to play in our understanding of cases involving foreign sovereigns.
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: Questioning The Constitutional Rights Of Foreign Nations, Donald Earl Childress Iii
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: Questioning The Constitutional Rights Of Foreign Nations, Donald Earl Childress Iii
Fordham Law Review Online
This response evaluates whether Professor Wuerth’s reading of the Constitution is correct. In so doing, this response considers the original understanding of these provisions, the law of nations as understood during the founding era, and Supreme Court case law close to the time of the founding. As explained below, I conclude that it is questionable that the Constitution extends rights to foreign nations.
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: Constructing The Original Scope Of Constitutional Rights, Nathan S. Chapman
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: Constructing The Original Scope Of Constitutional Rights, Nathan S. Chapman
Fordham Law Review Online
This response argues that Wuerth’s paper illustrates the most persuasive way to go about the task—one question at a time, with an emphasis on conventional legal materials and forms of argumentation. Some questions will call for especially imaginative constructions. This does not render them irrelevant, but it does caution some modesty about the extent to which they ought to trump competing constructions arising from practice and precedent. Despite her reluctance, then, Wuerth’s methods are entirely consistent with a confident originalism.
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: Punishment Without Process: “Victim Impact” Proceedings For Dead Defendants, Bruce A. Green, Rebecca Roiphe
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: Punishment Without Process: “Victim Impact” Proceedings For Dead Defendants, Bruce A. Green, Rebecca Roiphe
Fordham Law Review Online
When women accuse powerful men of sexual assault, there is increasing public pressure to resolve any doubts in the accusers’ favor before the criminal process is over, if not from the outset. Private individuals and institutions often do so without worrying about due process, but it is different for the trial court, where the presumption of innocence is supposed to apply. This is especially true where public shaming and the accompanying reputational consequences already constitute a kind of punishment. Although they may be sympathetic to accusers, especially those whose cause is championed by a strong and popular social movement, courts …
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: Uncoupling Habeas Corpus And Due Process, Jonathan G. D’Errico
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: Uncoupling Habeas Corpus And Due Process, Jonathan G. D’Errico
Fordham Law Review Online
This exploration concludes by finding that select elements of the Due Process Clause persist even during suspension and thus restrict otherwise forbidden Executive action. Part I overviews the scope of the Great Writ and the effect of its suspension. Part II details two conflicting views of the writ’s relationship with the constitutional demands of due process. Finally, Part III asserts that suspension quiets some facets of the Due Process Clause but does not entirely extinguish the right to procedural due process.
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: Do The Proposed Title Ix Regulations Protect Or Undermine Due Process?, Michelle J. Anderson
Novel Perspectives On Due Process Symposium: Do The Proposed Title Ix Regulations Protect Or Undermine Due Process?, Michelle J. Anderson
Fordham Law Review Online
Due process for those accused of sexual misconduct on college campuses has arisen as an area of increased concern. Many scholars focus on whether the (usually) male students accused of sexual assault and harassment get a fair shake in the quasi-judicial disciplinary proceedings mandated by Title IX, the federal civil rights law that prohibits sex discrimination in educational institutions.
A Note On The Fordham Law Review Online Fall Issue, Novel Perspectives On Due Process, Nora Stewart
A Note On The Fordham Law Review Online Fall Issue, Novel Perspectives On Due Process, Nora Stewart
Fordham Law Review Online
2019 has seen extensive discussion of due process in the American public sphere. There is a cultural sense of eroding norms, of institutions and procedural protections under threat. In response to the central role of due process in the cultural discourse and to the publication of Ingrid Wuerth’s Article, The Due Process and Other Constitutional Rights of Foreign Nations, in the November Issue of our print edition, Fordham Law Review Online presents a Fall Issue comprised both of response pieces to Professor Wuerth’s Article and of Essays engaging other thorny questions about due process.
Harvey: Environmental Justice And Law, Andrea Giampetro-Meyer, Nancy Kubasek
Harvey: Environmental Justice And Law, Andrea Giampetro-Meyer, Nancy Kubasek
Fordham Environmental Law Review
No abstract provided.
How Regulator Can Reduce Fish Mortality From Recreational Fishing, Jonathan (Jack) Agosta
How Regulator Can Reduce Fish Mortality From Recreational Fishing, Jonathan (Jack) Agosta
Fordham Environmental Law Review
No abstract provided.
Flawlessly Strawless?, Marguerite Moloney
Flawlessly Strawless?, Marguerite Moloney
Fordham Environmental Law Review
No abstract provided.
Climate Change, Technology Transfer, And Intellectual Property: A 'Modest Proposal' For An Ip Enforcement Moratorium, Dalindyebo Bafana Shabalala
Climate Change, Technology Transfer, And Intellectual Property: A 'Modest Proposal' For An Ip Enforcement Moratorium, Dalindyebo Bafana Shabalala
Fordham Environmental Law Review
No abstract provided.
Arbitration Archetypes For Enhancing Access To Justice, Jill I. Gross
Arbitration Archetypes For Enhancing Access To Justice, Jill I. Gross
Fordham Law Review
In the second half of the twentieth century, the use of arbitration proliferated in the United States as part of a greater alternative dispute resolution (ADR) movement, with the promise that using ADR processes would, among other things, enhance disputants’ access to justice. Arbitration offers disputing parties a process to resolve their dispute, which, at least in theory, is known for decreased cost, increased speed, party control, privacy, and finality. These characteristics generally enhance parties’ access to justice because, as compared to litigation, barriers to entry are lower, outcomes are delivered more quickly, substantive outcomes are more equitable, and parties …
Adr, Dynamic (In)Justice, And Achieving Access: A Foreclosure Crisis Case Study, Lydia Nussbaum
Adr, Dynamic (In)Justice, And Achieving Access: A Foreclosure Crisis Case Study, Lydia Nussbaum
Fordham Law Review
This Article proceeds in two parts. Part I argues for a dynamic, rather than fixed, conception of access to justice. It then explores how ADR processes, when placed in this dynamic framework, can create new forms of injustice and intensify preexisting ones. Part II presents a case study from the foreclosure crisis to illustrate how the features of ADR processes are especially well suited to respond to dynamic injustices. It further demonstrates how ADR design must evolve to respond to the dynamic system of (in)justice in which ADR processes operate.
The Cost Of Free Speech: Resolving The Wedding Vendor Divide, Victoria Cappucci
The Cost Of Free Speech: Resolving The Wedding Vendor Divide, Victoria Cappucci
Fordham Law Review
As marriage equality becomes fully realized in the United States, business proprietors increasingly refuse to service same-sex weddings on religious grounds. However, at the same time, state laws protect same-sex couples from discrimination in places open to the public. Such competing values have resulted in a line of “wedding vendor” cases. As the cases continue to proliferate, this Note examines when, and to what extent, the otherwise equally important values of free expression and equality should trump one another. This Note analyzes First Amendment compelled speech claims within the line of wedding vendor cases: specifically, whether wedding goods and services …
Measuring “Access To Justice” In The Rush To Digitize, Amy J. Schmitz
Measuring “Access To Justice” In The Rush To Digitize, Amy J. Schmitz
Fordham Law Review
Access to Justice (A2J) is the hot topic of the day, energizing Twitter and judges alike. Meanwhile, professors and policymakers join in song, singing the praises of online dispute resolution (ODR) as means for expanding A2J. This is because ODR uses technology to allow for online claim diagnosis, negotiation, and mediation without the time, money, and stress of traditional court processes. Indeed, courts are now moving traffic ticket, condominium, landlord/tenant, personal injury, debt collection, and even divorce claims online. The hope is that online triage and dispute resolution systems will provide means for obtaining remedies for self-represented litigants (SRLs) and …
Are Two Minorities Equal To One?: Minority Coalition Groups And Section 2 Of The Voting Rights Act, Kevin Sette
Are Two Minorities Equal To One?: Minority Coalition Groups And Section 2 Of The Voting Rights Act, Kevin Sette
Fordham Law Review
Following Jim Crow, vote dilution is the second-generation barrier standing between minority voters and the polls. Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) protects racial and language minorities from these vote dilution practices. To sustain a section 2 claim, a protected “class of citizens” must satisfy the criteria laid out by the U.S. Supreme Court in Thornburg v. Gingles. First, the class must constitute the majority of a hypothetical single-member voting district. Second, the class must be politically cohesive. Third, the minority class’s preferred candidate must be defeated by a white majority voting bloc. What the …
Arbitrarily Selecting Black Arbitrators, Michael Z. Green
Arbitrarily Selecting Black Arbitrators, Michael Z. Green
Fordham Law Review
Calls for increased diversity among arbitrators have surged with the growth of the employer movement, so-called mandatory arbitration, which requires employees to agree to arbitrate employment discrimination matters as a condition of employment. Despite good-faith efforts by neutral service providers, civil rights organizations, bar associations, and employer and employee groups to identify and address the need for more diverse arbitrators in mandatory arbitration, many commentators still lament that this diversity problem reflects negatively on access to justice. With the #MeToo movement’s focus in recent years on the lack of a public and transparent resolution for sexual harassment matters, as well …
To “Otherwise Make Unavailable”: Tenant Screening Companies’ Liability Under The Fair Housing Act’S Disparate Impact Theory, Shivangi Bhatia
To “Otherwise Make Unavailable”: Tenant Screening Companies’ Liability Under The Fair Housing Act’S Disparate Impact Theory, Shivangi Bhatia
Fordham Law Review
Tenant screening companies present information to housing providers on prospective tenants’ criminal and eviction histories in the form of background screening reports. These screening reports disproportionately impact racial and gender minorities. Two opposing views exist on whether courts should interpret the Fair Housing Act to cover the discriminatory practices and policies of tenant screening companies. Some believe that background screening reports are a vital part of the housing industry, while others criticize them for their inaccurate, misleading, and discriminatory nature. This Note proposes that, moving forward, courts should interpret § 3604(a) and § 3604(b) of the Fair Housing Act to …
Foreword: Achieving Access To Justice Through Adr: Fact Or Fiction?, Jacqueline Nolan-Haley
Foreword: Achieving Access To Justice Through Adr: Fact Or Fiction?, Jacqueline Nolan-Haley
Fordham Law Review
This Symposium will offer a critical analysis of ADR’s access to justice claims and consider the extent to which they should be more modest. An outstanding group of scholars have addressed this question in a variety of contexts, including procedural and substantive justice; restorative justice; arbitration; mediation; online dispute resolution (ODR); and international, comparative, and cross-cultural perspectives.
Online Resources And Family Cases: Access To Justice In Implementation Of A Plan, Kristen M. Blankley
Online Resources And Family Cases: Access To Justice In Implementation Of A Plan, Kristen M. Blankley
Fordham Law Review
This Article discusses access to justice in the implementation of orders in family cases. Parenting, financial, and other types of family court orders may last up to eighteen or twenty-one years in the case of minor children or longer in the case of protected adults. In the case of financial obligations, these orders set forth ongoing requirements to make monthly payments (such as child support, alimony, and medical expense reimbursements) and to maintain other financial obligations (such as maintaining health insurance, daycare expenses, and payment of costs for extracurricular activities). Most importantly, these court orders allocate parenting time, which may …
American Diversity In International Arbitration: A New Arbitration Story Or Evidence Of Things Not Seen, Benjamin G. Davis
American Diversity In International Arbitration: A New Arbitration Story Or Evidence Of Things Not Seen, Benjamin G. Davis
Fordham Law Review
This Essay suggests that the unseen presence of blacks and other underrepresented groups (such as women, minorities, LGBTQ individuals, and persons with disabilities) in the shadows of the development of international arbitration law in the United States helps us to see that diversity, while unrecognized, has been inherent in American international arbitration for hundreds of years.
The Dark Side Of Consensus And Creativity: What Mediators Of Mass Disputes Need To Know About Agency Risks, Howard M. Erichson
The Dark Side Of Consensus And Creativity: What Mediators Of Mass Disputes Need To Know About Agency Risks, Howard M. Erichson
Fordham Law Review
This Essay looks at how mediators describe their role, and it asks whether—in negotiations to resolve mass disputes—the mindset and skill set of mediators may sometimes exacerbate rather than mitigate risks of self- serving conduct by lawyers. The Essay applies general concerns about class settlements and nonclass settlements to the particular problem of mass dispute mediation.
Remedy Without Diagnosis: How To Optimize Results By Leveraging The Appropriate Dispute Resolution And Shared Decision-Making Process, Mariana Hernandez-Crespo Gonstead
Remedy Without Diagnosis: How To Optimize Results By Leveraging The Appropriate Dispute Resolution And Shared Decision-Making Process, Mariana Hernandez-Crespo Gonstead
Fordham Law Review
This Article aims to realize the untapped potential of the dispute resolution field beyond traditional understandings of access to justice for everyone’s benefit. It argues that, by developing skills, citizens can significantly contribute to altering the course of history in our global economy, especially in Latin America and Venezuela. It introduces and familiarizes citizens with the knowledge developed in the dispute resolution field for the past fifty years. As a new field, dispute resolution is rapidly growing and evolving. Even though the knowledge produced is vital to help us interact more effectively, the materials are complex, dispersed, and, in some …
Does Adr Feel Like Justice?, Jennifer W. Reynolds
Does Adr Feel Like Justice?, Jennifer W. Reynolds
Fordham Law Review
This Article contends that modern conflict spectacles, fueled by snap disputing dynamics and foisted upon the polity through media and social media, are so far afield from traditional ADR principles and practices that they may keep ADR from “feeling” like justice to many people. How people feel about alternative practices and processes will have an impact on whether they avail themselves of those methods in their own disputes. In other words, even if we had widely available, high-quality, and free ADR services available to everyone, we might still have an access to justice problem because those services would not be …