Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (10)
- Legal History (8)
- Courts (7)
- Criminal Procedure (7)
- Business Organizations Law (6)
-
- International Law (6)
- Law and Society (6)
- Criminal Law (5)
- Judges (5)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (4)
- Law and Politics (4)
- Legal Profession (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Torts (4)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (3)
- Human Rights Law (3)
- Intellectual Property Law (3)
- Jurisdiction (3)
- Legal Education (3)
- Civil Law (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Law and Gender (2)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (2)
- National Security Law (2)
- Religion Law (2)
- Rule of Law (2)
- Secured Transactions (2)
- Sexuality and the Law (2)
- Tax Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Constitution (3)
- Dictionaries (2)
- Human rights (2)
- Judges (2)
- Race (2)
-
- Supreme Court (2)
- personal jurisdiction (1)
- 10b5; Amgen; Class Actions; Basic; Blackmun; Brennan; Deceit; Dura; Economic Loss; Fraud; Fraud on the Market; Loss Causation; Scienter; Securities Fraud; Tort (1)
- ADR (1)
- Abortion (1)
- Academia (1)
- Access (1)
- Access to courts (1)
- Affordable Care Act (1)
- Africa (1)
- Against Obligation (1)
- Aggregate settlement (1)
- Andrew Koppelman (1)
- Anti-prostitution (1)
- Antitrust liability (1)
- Aroow's paradox (1)
- Artistic freedom (1)
- Autonomous self-interest (1)
- Behavioral genetics (1)
- Bellwether trial (1)
- Biology (1)
- Biomedical research (1)
- Branding (1)
- Brian Leiter (1)
- Cardozo; Calabresi; Chamallas; civil recourse; corrective justice; damages; duty; economic analysis of Tort Law; emotional distress; Holmes; Posner; pragmatic conceptualism; punitive damages; realism; rights of action; Robinette; Rustad; tort; wrongs (1)
Articles 31 - 60 of 66
Full-Text Articles in Law
Why The Supreme Court Should Give The Easy Answer To An Easy Question: A Response To Professors Childress, Neuborne, Sherry And Silberman, Howard M. Erichson
Why The Supreme Court Should Give The Easy Answer To An Easy Question: A Response To Professors Childress, Neuborne, Sherry And Silberman, Howard M. Erichson
Faculty Scholarship
This paper responds to arguments that the Supreme Court should sidestep the core questions of personal jurisdiction in DaimlerChrysler AG v. Bauman. It argues that general personal jurisdiction over a corporation should be limited to the corporation's home state. As a corollary of this point, an agency relationship between a parent and subsidiary does not justify attribution of contacts for purposes of general jurisdiction. The key to the analysis is understanding the fundamental difference between specific jurisdiction and general jurisdiction, and this distinction explains several of the disagreements between myself and other participants in this Roundtable.
Supranational? Federal? Intergovernmental? The Governmental Structure Of The European Union After The Treaty Of Lisbon, Roger J. Goebel
Supranational? Federal? Intergovernmental? The Governmental Structure Of The European Union After The Treaty Of Lisbon, Roger J. Goebel
Faculty Scholarship
The goal of this article is to provide an overview of the progressive augmentation of the supranational character of the governmental structure of the initial EEC, gradually evolving into the present European Union, particularly as a consequence of revisions to the constituent Treaties. Part I of this article presents the European Commission, the initial institution whose structure and operations have always been markedly supranational in character and which has always been dedicated to the promotion of supranational goals. Part II examines the Council of Ministers, the political institution that is intrinsically intergovernmental in character, but whose operational role in the …
Chevron Meets Youngstown: National Security And The Administrative State, Joseph Landau
Chevron Meets Youngstown: National Security And The Administrative State, Joseph Landau
Faculty Scholarship
The past several years have witnessed a burst of scholarship at the intersection of national security and administrative law. Many supporters of this approach endorse a heightened, “super-strong” brand of Chevron deference to presidential decisionmaking during times of emergency. Believing that the Executive’s comparative advantage in expertise, access to information, and accountability warrant minimal judicial scrutiny, these Chevron-backers advance an Executive-centric view of national security powers. Other scholars, by contrast, dispute Chevron’s relevance to national security. These Chevron-detractors argue for an interventionist judiciary in national security matters. Both camps criticize the Supreme Court’s scaling of deference to the Executive after …
International Law And Institutions And The American Constitution In War And Peace, Thomas H. Lee
International Law And Institutions And The American Constitution In War And Peace, Thomas H. Lee
Faculty Scholarship
This Article describes how international law and institutions are not necessarily incompatible with U.S. sovereign interests today and how they were historically accepted as valid inputs to interpreting and implementing the Constitution during the founding and infancy of the United States and through the Civil War.
Military Veterans, Culpability, And Blame, Youngjae Lee
Military Veterans, Culpability, And Blame, Youngjae Lee
Faculty Scholarship
Recently in Porter v. McCollum, the United States Supreme Court, citing “a long tradition of according leniency to veterans in recognition of their service,” held that a defense lawyer’s failure to present his client’s military service record as mitigating evidence during his sentencing for two murders amounted to ineffective assistance of counsel. The purpose of this article is to assess, from the just deserts perspective, the grounds to believe that veterans who commit crimes are to be blamed less by the State than offenders without such backgrounds. Two rationales for a differential treatment of military veterans who commit crimes are …
Translating Fiduciary Principles Into Public Law, Ethan J. Leib, David L. Ponet, Michael Serota
Translating Fiduciary Principles Into Public Law, Ethan J. Leib, David L. Ponet, Michael Serota
Faculty Scholarship
Because public office is a public trust, fiduciary architecture can help orient us in figuring out how political power should be exercised legitimately. Part of the appeal of conceiving the political relationship between representative and represented in fiduciary terms is that it regards politics in more realistic and textured ways — as a constellation of power relationships in a web of trust and vulnerability — rather than as a mere social contract no one ever signed. Thinking of legislators as public fiduciaries tells us much about the nature of the relationship between the governed and their governors and it can …
The Case For Decriminalization Of Sex Work In South Africa, Chi Adanna Mgbako, Katherine G. Bass, Erica Bundra, Mehak Jamil, Jere Keys, Lauren Melkus
The Case For Decriminalization Of Sex Work In South Africa, Chi Adanna Mgbako, Katherine G. Bass, Erica Bundra, Mehak Jamil, Jere Keys, Lauren Melkus
Faculty Scholarship
Activists for sex worker rights in South Africa are leading a sophisticated national campaign to decriminalize sex work. This Article serves as an act of solidarity with these activists’ continued efforts to fight for and realize sex workers’ human rights by examining the negative impact that criminalizing prostitution has on sex workers’ rights and presenting evidence-based arguments to show that South Africa should enact legislation to fully decriminalize sex work. South African sex workers’ real-life experiences with violence, police abuse, and lack of access to health care and the justice system, highlighted through interviews conducted by the authors during fieldwork …
What Direction For Legal Reform Under Xi Jinping?, Carl F. Minzner
What Direction For Legal Reform Under Xi Jinping?, Carl F. Minzner
Faculty Scholarship
In the fall of 2014, Chinese Communist Party authorities made legal reform the focus of their annual plenum for the first time. The Fourth Plenum Decision confirmed a shift away from some of the policies of the late Hu Jintao era, but liberal reforms still remain off the table. The top-down vision of legal reform developing under Xi Jinping’s administration may have more in common with current trends in the party disciplinary apparatus or historical ones in the imperial Chinese censorate than it does with Western rule-of-law norms. This essay attempts to do three things: (1) analyze how and why …
Charter Schools, The Establishment Clause, And The Neoliberal Turn In Public Education, Aaron J. Saiger
Charter Schools, The Establishment Clause, And The Neoliberal Turn In Public Education, Aaron J. Saiger
Faculty Scholarship
Regardless whether the American charter school can improve academic performance and provide effective alternatives to traditional public schools, its steady entrenchment as an institution portends significant, destabilizing changes across education law. In no area will its impact be more profound than the law of religion and schooling. Despite the general view that charter schools are public schools, charters’ neoliberal character — they are privately created and managed, and chosen by consumers in a marketplace — makes them private schools for Establishment Clause purposes, notwithstanding their public subsidy. This conclusion, which rests in substantial part on the Zelman v. Simmons-Harris vouchers …
The Attorney-Client Privilege – Selective Compulsion, Selective Waiver And Selective Disclosure: Is Bank Regulation Exceptional?, Bruce A. Green
The Attorney-Client Privilege – Selective Compulsion, Selective Waiver And Selective Disclosure: Is Bank Regulation Exceptional?, Bruce A. Green
Faculty Scholarship
This essay examines three ways in which bank regulation has spawned significant exceptions to the ordinary judicial and administrative understanding of the attorney-client privilege. First, federal banking agencies assert that they have the legal authority selectively to compel banks and other financial institutions they supervise to disclose attorney-client privileged information. Second, when banks disclose privileged material to bank regulators, even if voluntarily, banks retain the privilege with respect to third parties pursuant to specific federal statutory authority. Third, under agency policy, once bank regulators obtain privileged information from a bank, whether through compulsion or voluntarily, the regulators reserve the right …
Staging The Family, Clare Huntington
Staging The Family, Clare Huntington
Faculty Scholarship
For many critical aspects of family life, all the world truly is a stage. When a parent scolds a child on the playground, all eyes turn to watch and judge. When an executive’s wife hosts a work party, the guests are witness to traditional gender roles. And when two fathers attend a back-to-school night for their child, other parents take note of this relatively new family configuration. Family is popularly considered intimate and personal, but in reality much of family life is lived in the public eye. These performances of family and familial roles do not simply communicate messages to …
Towards Engaged Scholarship, Nestor M. Davidson
Towards Engaged Scholarship, Nestor M. Davidson
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Civil Recourse Defended: A Reply To Posner, Calabresi, Rustad, Chamallas, And Robinette, Benjamin C. Zipursky, John C.P. Goldberg
Civil Recourse Defended: A Reply To Posner, Calabresi, Rustad, Chamallas, And Robinette, Benjamin C. Zipursky, John C.P. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
As part of a symposium issue of the Indiana Law Journal devoted to our Civil Recourse Theory of Tort Law, we respond to criticisms by Judge Calabresi, Judge Posner, and Professors Chamallas, Robinette, and Rustad. Calabresi and Posner criticize Civil Recourse Theory as a bit of glib moralism that fails to generate useful answers to the difficult questions that courts face when applying Tort Law. We show with several examples, both old and new, that the glibness is all on their side. From duty to causation to punitive damages, from products liability to fraud to privacy, our scholarship has had …
A Most Useful Ball Of Thread, Review Of Navigating Hud Programs: A Practitioner's To The Labyrinth By George Weidenfeller & Julie S. Mcgovern, Eds., Nestor M. Davidson
A Most Useful Ball Of Thread, Review Of Navigating Hud Programs: A Practitioner's To The Labyrinth By George Weidenfeller & Julie S. Mcgovern, Eds., Nestor M. Davidson
Faculty Scholarship
This book review of Navigating HUD Programs: A Practitioner’s Guide to the Labyrinth (George Weidenfeller & Julie McGovern eds., 2012) discusses the approach the book takes to a range of HUD programs, discusses some intimations of reform efforts suggested by the authors, and explores ways in which the book’s guidance reflects potential benefits in nascent HUD efforts at programmatic consolidation and modernization.
Gideon’S Amici, Why Do Prosecutors So Rarely Defend The Rights Of The Accused?, Bruce A. Green
Gideon’S Amici, Why Do Prosecutors So Rarely Defend The Rights Of The Accused?, Bruce A. Green
Faculty Scholarship
In Gideon v. Wainwright, twenty-three state attorneys general, led by Walter F. Mondale and Edward McCormack, joined an amicus brief on the side of the criminal accused, urging the Supreme Court to recognize indigent defendants’ Sixth Amendment right to appointed counsel in felony cases. This was a unique occurrence. Although amicus filings by public entities have increased significantly since then, including in criminal cases, government lawyers rarely submit amicus briefs in the Supreme Court supporting criminal defendants’ procedural rights, and never en masse as in Gideon. The states’ public support for Gideon’s position points up the special nature of the …
Waylaid By A Metaphor: A Deeply Problematic Account Of Prison Growth. Review Of Plague Of Prisons: The Epidemiology Of Mass Incarceration In America By Ernest Drucker, John F. Pfaff
Faculty Scholarship
This article reviews Ernest Drucker's recent book, "A Plague of Prisons: The Epidemiology of Mass Incarceration in America," which attempts to explain the causes behind the explosion in prison growth over the past several decades. The account proves to be unsatisfying, and this review highlights four major flaws with Drucker's work. First, Drucker places too much weight on the war on drugs. While he argues it is the primary engine of prison growth, the increase in drug incarcerations explains only about 25% of the total growth since the 1970s. Second, he significantly underplays the importance of soaring crime rates between …
The Fraud-On-The-Market Tort, John C.P. Goldberg, Benjamin C. Zipursky
The Fraud-On-The-Market Tort, John C.P. Goldberg, Benjamin C. Zipursky
Faculty Scholarship
Fraud on the market is at the core of contemporary securities law, permitting 10b-5 class actions to proceed without direct proof of investor reliance on a misrepresentation. Yet the ambiguities of this idea have fractured the Supreme Court from its initial recognition of the doctrine in Basic v. Levinson to its recent decision in Amgen, Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds. Amidst divergent views of the coherence and advisability of liability for fraud on the market a fundamental question lurks: is a suit for damages that invokes the fraud-on-the-market theory a claim for common law deceit, such that …
The Market For Preclusion In Merger Litigation, Sean J. Griffith, Alexandra D. Lahav
The Market For Preclusion In Merger Litigation, Sean J. Griffith, Alexandra D. Lahav
Faculty Scholarship
The recent finding that corporate litigation involving Delaware companies very often takes place outside of Delaware has disturbed the long-settled understanding of how merger litigation works. With many, even most, cases being filed and ultimately resolved outside of Delaware, commentators warn that the trend is a threat to shareholders, to Delaware, and to the integrity of corporate law generally. Although the out-of-Delaware trend suggests that litigants are seeking to use the procedural rules of other jurisdictions to their advantage, we argue that the result need not threaten the interests of any of the stakeholders in deal litigation. We reframe the …
Why Strickland Is The Wrong Test For Assessing Violations Of The Right To Testify, Daniel J. Capra, Joseph Tartakovsky
Why Strickland Is The Wrong Test For Assessing Violations Of The Right To Testify, Daniel J. Capra, Joseph Tartakovsky
Faculty Scholarship
A criminal accused has a constitutional right to testify in his own defense. The right has an undisputed place alongside the most important "personal" rights, like the right to remain silent or the right to represent oneself. But in the 1990s, courts began to apply the ineffective-assistance test of Strickland v. Washington to evaluate claims by a defendant that his right to testify was abridged. In practice this nullifies the right. Moreover, the Strickland test is inapposite because it focuses on counsel and not the defendant's right to testify. This Article proposes a new test to better secure and enforce …
China At The Tipping Point? The Tum Against Legal Reform, Carl F. Minzner
China At The Tipping Point? The Tum Against Legal Reform, Carl F. Minzner
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
What Is Philosophy Of Criminal Law?, Youngjae Lee
What Is Philosophy Of Criminal Law?, Youngjae Lee
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A Fiduciary Theory Of Judging, Ethan J. Leib, David L. Ponet, Michael Serota
A Fiduciary Theory Of Judging, Ethan J. Leib, David L. Ponet, Michael Serota
Faculty Scholarship
For centuries, legal theorists and political philosophers have unsuccessfully sought a unified theory of judging able to account for the diverse, and oftentimes conflicting, responsibilities judges possess. This paper reveals how the law governing fiduciary relationships sheds new light on this age-old pursuit, and therefore, on the very nature of the judicial office itself. The paper first explores the routinely overlooked, yet deeply embedded historical provenance of our judges-as-fiduciaries framework in American political thought and in the framing of the U.S. Constitution. It then explains why a fiduciary theory of judging offers important insights into what it means to be …
Judicial Review Of Mediated Settlement Agreements: Improving Mediation With Consent, Jacqueline Nolan-Haley
Judicial Review Of Mediated Settlement Agreements: Improving Mediation With Consent, Jacqueline Nolan-Haley
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Who Is Responsible For Libor Rate-Fixing?, Mark R. Patterson
Who Is Responsible For Libor Rate-Fixing?, Mark R. Patterson
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Pension System And The Rise Of Shareholder Primacy, Martin Gelter
The Pension System And The Rise Of Shareholder Primacy, Martin Gelter
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Language, Legal Origins, And Culture Before The Courts: Cross-Citations Between Supreme Courts In Europe, Martin Gelter, Mathias M. Siems
Language, Legal Origins, And Culture Before The Courts: Cross-Citations Between Supreme Courts In Europe, Martin Gelter, Mathias M. Siems
Faculty Scholarship
Should courts consider cases from other jurisdictions? The use of foreign law precedent has sparked considerable debate in the United States, and this question is also controversially discussed in Europe. In this article and within the larger research project from which it has developed, we study the dialogue between different European supreme courts quantitatively. Using legal databases in Austria, Belgium, England and Wales, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, and Switzerland, we have hand-collected a dataset of transnational citations between the highest courts of these countries for the time between 2000 and 2007. In the present article we show …
What Is Constitutional Obligation?, Abner S. Greene
What Is Constitutional Obligation?, Abner S. Greene
Faculty Scholarship
Mike Seidman’s book, On Constitutional Disobedience, offers an impressive challenge to constitutional fidelity. With much of it, my book Against Obligation is on all fours – we both share the view that our Constitution’s meaning should not be bound by past sources. Seidman seems to go further, though, and reject the bindingness of the Constitution as a text. What does it mean to ask whether the Constitution itself obligates? Most of the Constitution doesn’t set rules for citizens; rather, it establishes powers, and what we might consider conditional obligations, for officials. All government officials in the United States swear an …
Firearms Policy And The Black Community: An Assessment Of The Modern Orthodoxy, Nicholas J. Johnson
Firearms Policy And The Black Community: An Assessment Of The Modern Orthodoxy, Nicholas J. Johnson
Faculty Scholarship
The heroes of the modern civil rights movement were more than just stoic victims of racist violence. Their history was one of defiance and fighting long before news cameras showed them attacked by dogs and fire hoses. When Fannie Lou Hamer revealed she kept a shotgun in every corner of her bedroom, she was channeling a century old practice. And when delta share cropper Hartman Turnbow, after a shootout with the Klan, said “I don’t figure I was being non-nonviolent, (yes non-nonviolent) I was just protecting my family”, he was invoking an evolved tradition that embraced self-defense and disdained political …
What Real-World Criminal Cases Tell Us About Genetics Evidence, Deborah W. Denno
What Real-World Criminal Cases Tell Us About Genetics Evidence, Deborah W. Denno
Faculty Scholarship
This Article, which is part of a symposium on "Law and Ethics at the Frontier of Genetic Technology," examines an unprecedented experimental study published in Science. The Science study indicated that psychopathic criminal offenders were more likely to receive lighter sentences if a judge was aware of genetic and neurobiological explanations for the offender’s psychopathy. This Article contends that the study’s conclusions derive from substantial flaws in the study’s design and methodology. The hypothetical case upon which the study is based captures just one narrow and unrepresentative component of how genetic and neurobiological information operates, and the study suffers from …
Shields, Swords, And Fulfilling The Exclusionary Rule's Deterrent Function, James L. Kainen
Shields, Swords, And Fulfilling The Exclusionary Rule's Deterrent Function, James L. Kainen
Faculty Scholarship
When the exclusionary rule prevents the prosecution from using evidence necessary to bring a case to trial, the rule deters illegality while raising no issue about how it might interfere with usual factfinding processes. However, when a case proceeds to trial although a court has suppressed some prosecution evidence, courts need to decide the extent to which the defendant may benefit from the absence of the proof without opening the door to its admission. The exclusion of any relevant evidence raises similar questions, and courts often say the exclusionary rule is a shield from suppressed evidence, but not a sword …