Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Chicago-Kent College of Law

Discipline
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type
File Type

Articles 871 - 900 of 5733

Full-Text Articles in Law

Watching Me: The War On Crime, Privacy, And The State, Kimberly D. Bailey Jan 2014

Watching Me: The War On Crime, Privacy, And The State, Kimberly D. Bailey

All Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.


Gross V. Switzerland And Right To Die Jurisprudence In The European Court Of Human Rights, Stephen Brown Jan 2014

Gross V. Switzerland And Right To Die Jurisprudence In The European Court Of Human Rights, Stephen Brown

Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law

No abstract provided.


Case: H.W. V. Germany, Mark Hamburger Jan 2014

Case: H.W. V. Germany, Mark Hamburger

Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law

No abstract provided.


Child Welfare In Crisis: A Focus On Eastern Europe, Jenna Holtz Jan 2014

Child Welfare In Crisis: A Focus On Eastern Europe, Jenna Holtz

Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law

No abstract provided.


Vol. 31, No. 1, Andrew Malahowski, Jeff Nowak Jan 2014

Vol. 31, No. 1, Andrew Malahowski, Jeff Nowak

The Illinois Public Employee Relations Report

Same-Sex Marriage: Employment and Benefits Issues for Public Sector Employers by Andrew Malahowski and Jeff Nowak

Recent Developments


On Becoming A Lawyer: Your Guide To Life At Chicago-Kent, Iit Chicago-Kent College Of Law Jan 2014

On Becoming A Lawyer: Your Guide To Life At Chicago-Kent, Iit Chicago-Kent College Of Law

Viewbooks

The 2014 viewbook includes a message from the dean, who's who among students, faculty, and alumni, an overview of what students can expect from their first, second, and third years, an overview of programs, clinics, and student organizations, as well as a guide to living and studying in the Chicago area.


Healthcare Workers' Religious Objections To Mandatory Influenza Vaccination: Examining Title Vii's Religious Accommodation Requirement, Amy Berenbaum Jan 2014

Healthcare Workers' Religious Objections To Mandatory Influenza Vaccination: Examining Title Vii's Religious Accommodation Requirement, Amy Berenbaum

Louis Jackson National Student Writing Competition

No abstract provided.


The Legal Enforcement Of "Proper" Gender Performance Through Title Vii, M. Caroline Hyatt Jan 2014

The Legal Enforcement Of "Proper" Gender Performance Through Title Vii, M. Caroline Hyatt

Louis Jackson National Student Writing Competition

No abstract provided.


An Untrustworthy Presumption: Replacing The Moench Presumption With A Sound Standard For Stock-Drop Litigation, Christopher J. Bryant Jan 2014

An Untrustworthy Presumption: Replacing The Moench Presumption With A Sound Standard For Stock-Drop Litigation, Christopher J. Bryant

Louis Jackson National Student Writing Competition

No abstract provided.


Protecting From Endless Harm: A Roadmap For Coercion Challenges After N.F.I.B. V. Sebelius, Eric Turner Jan 2014

Protecting From Endless Harm: A Roadmap For Coercion Challenges After N.F.I.B. V. Sebelius, Eric Turner

Chicago-Kent Law Review

In N.F.I.B. v. Sebelius, a plurality of the Supreme Court struck down the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid (PPACA) expansion. The Court did so by holding that the doctrine “coerced” States into implementing federal policy by threatening to withhold Medicaid funding to states that did not reform their Medicaid programs. This marks the first time a program properly enacted under Congress’ Spending Power has been found to coerce the states. The Court’s coercion analysis, however, has raised more questions than it answered. The plurality’s language is vague, and commentators have struggled to analyze the holding. But what …


Table Of Contents - Issue 1, Chicago-Kent Law Review Jan 2014

Table Of Contents - Issue 1, Chicago-Kent Law Review

Chicago-Kent Law Review

No abstract provided.


Situational Duress And The Aberrance Of Electronic Contracts, Nancy S. Kim Jan 2014

Situational Duress And The Aberrance Of Electronic Contracts, Nancy S. Kim

Chicago-Kent Law Review

This article explains how the aberrant nature of electronic contracts has unique implications, which contract law should recognize. Companies, taking advantage of these unique implications, may use electronic contracts in an unfair and coercive manner, which is why this article proposes expanding the definition of duress to include “situational duress.” Situational duress would not encompass all electronic contracting scenarios, but would be limited to situations where (1) a drafting company uses an electronic contract to block consumer access to a product or service; (2) the consumer has a “vested interest” in that product or service; and (3) the consumer accepts …


Tax Ferrets, Tax Consultants, Bounty Hunters, And Hired Guns: The Property Tax Netherworld Fueled By Contingency Fees And Champertous Agreements, J. Lyn Entrikin Jan 2014

Tax Ferrets, Tax Consultants, Bounty Hunters, And Hired Guns: The Property Tax Netherworld Fueled By Contingency Fees And Champertous Agreements, J. Lyn Entrikin

Chicago-Kent Law Review

Contingency fee agreements between local tax assessors and contract auditors on the one hand, and property owners and private tax consultants on the other, create perverse financial incentives that undermine the integrity of state and local property tax administration. When local governments engage outside auditors to identify undervalued or escaped taxable property, the practice raises serious due process and ethical concerns. As a matter of policy, diverting a share of property tax revenue to private third parties in consideration for outsourced tax assessment services undermines public accountability and reduces net property tax revenue for local government services. And when states …


Does State National Bank Of Big Spring V. Geithner Stand A Fighting Chance?, Devon J. Steinmeyer Jan 2014

Does State National Bank Of Big Spring V. Geithner Stand A Fighting Chance?, Devon J. Steinmeyer

Chicago-Kent Law Review

Two years after the start of the 2008 financial crisis and during one of the worst economic recessions since the Great Depression, Congress passed a law designed to insure a financial crisis of the same magnitude would not occur again, and if it did, it would not have the same wide-reaching effects the 2008 crisis had. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act sought to, among other things, end “too big to fail,” consolidate the consumer protection agencies, and provide for the orderly liquidation of defaulting systematically important companies. State National Bank of Big Spring v. Geithner, a …


Rationalising International Law Rules On Self-Defence: The Pin-Prick Doctrine, Abhimanyu George Jain Jan 2014

Rationalising International Law Rules On Self-Defence: The Pin-Prick Doctrine, Abhimanyu George Jain

Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law

No abstract provided.


(Start To) Look Out Below!: Creating A Court To Review Targeted Attacks On United States Citizens, Daniel Bower Jan 2014

(Start To) Look Out Below!: Creating A Court To Review Targeted Attacks On United States Citizens, Daniel Bower

Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law

No abstract provided.


The Parties To The Nauru Agreement’S Vessel Day Scheme: Accounting For The Rare Success Of An International Agreement, Lauren D. Bernadett Jan 2014

The Parties To The Nauru Agreement’S Vessel Day Scheme: Accounting For The Rare Success Of An International Agreement, Lauren D. Bernadett

Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law

No abstract provided.


Fair Trade In A Wal-Mart World: What Does Globalization Portend For The Triple Bottom Line?, Linda L. Barkacs, Craig B. Barkacs Jan 2014

Fair Trade In A Wal-Mart World: What Does Globalization Portend For The Triple Bottom Line?, Linda L. Barkacs, Craig B. Barkacs

Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law

No abstract provided.


Trademarks: Who Should Have The Final Say?, Blake Kocian Jan 2014

Trademarks: Who Should Have The Final Say?, Blake Kocian

Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law

No abstract provided.


Females On The Fringe: Considering Gender In Payday Lending Policy, Amy J. Schmitz Jan 2014

Females On The Fringe: Considering Gender In Payday Lending Policy, Amy J. Schmitz

Chicago-Kent Law Review

Payday lending may provide a much-needed safety net for some consumers in need of quick cash for emergencies. However, data suggest that most payday loan borrowers become repeat users caught in a cycle of high-cost debt. Furthermore, empirical evidence indicates consistent overrepresentation of women, including many single mothers, among payday loan borrowers. This takes a toll not only on these women and their families, but also on society as a whole. Indeed, context matters in payday lending debates. It is thus time to think creatively and consider contextualized programs that aim to increase women’s and all consumers’ safe borrowing options, …


Interest Rate Caps, State Legislation, And Public Opinion: Does The Law Reflect The Public's Desires?, Timothy E. Goldsmith, Nathalie Martin Jan 2014

Interest Rate Caps, State Legislation, And Public Opinion: Does The Law Reflect The Public's Desires?, Timothy E. Goldsmith, Nathalie Martin

Chicago-Kent Law Review

In scholarly circles, debates about the benefits and burdens of high-costs lending are prevalent, as are debates about whether to cap interest on certain kinds of consumer loan. Despite this scholarly interest, few scholars actually know what the general public thinks or knows about interest rates on common consumer credit products. This article tries to close this gap through an empirical study of consumer attitudes about interest rates in the state of New Mexico, a state in which high-cost loans such as payday loans and title loans are ubiquitous. Our data show that the general public overwhelmingly supports interest rate …


Securitization Of Aberrant Contract Receivables, Thomas E. Plank Jan 2014

Securitization Of Aberrant Contract Receivables, Thomas E. Plank

Chicago-Kent Law Review

Originators of traditional receivables, such as automobile loans, use securitization and structured finance debt transactions to obtain financing at lower net costs than traditional secured financing. The typical securitization or structured finance debt transaction combines (i) a sale of receivables to a separate, bankruptcy remote, special purpose legal entity (an “SPE”) and (ii) a loan to the SPE secured by the receivables. This combination produces lower net financing costs because the SPE’s lender can obtain repayment of its loan from the receivables while avoiding the costs that the Bankruptcy Code imposes on direct secured lenders to originators that could become …


Legal Uncertainty And Aberrant Contracts: The Choice Of Law Clause, William J. Woodward Jr. Jan 2014

Legal Uncertainty And Aberrant Contracts: The Choice Of Law Clause, William J. Woodward Jr.

Chicago-Kent Law Review

Legal uncertainty about the applicability of local consumer protection can destroy a consumer’s claim or defense within the consumer arbitration environment. What is worse, because the consumer arbitration system cannot accommodate either legal complexity or legal uncertainty, the tendency will be to resolve cases in the way the consumer’s form contract dictates, that is, in favor of the drafter. To demonstrate this effect and advocate statutory change, this article focuses on fee-shifting statutes in California and several other states. These statutes convert very common one-way fee-shifting terms (consumer pays business’s attorneys fees if business wins but not the other way …


Some Economic Insights Into Application Of Payments Doctrine: Walker-Thomas Revisited, James W. Bowers Jan 2014

Some Economic Insights Into Application Of Payments Doctrine: Walker-Thomas Revisited, James W. Bowers

Chicago-Kent Law Review

Contractual relations frequently involve multiple transactions, which might give rise either to a single aggregate debt, or else to multiple differing obligations. This conflict creates the application of payments problem. Unsurprisingly, the common law developed long-standing rules for the application of partial payments to multiple, but remedially distinguishable debts. The subject is made timely again by the recent enactments of the 1999 revision of Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. Article 9 instructs courts how to solve the application of payments problem when some partial payments might satisfy “purchase money” security interests. The enactments repealed the common law application …


Tenure, The Aberrant Consumer Contract, James J. White Jan 2014

Tenure, The Aberrant Consumer Contract, James J. White

Chicago-Kent Law Review

The tenure contract that prevails among the faculty at nearly all American colleges and universities is unusual, for the employee, who is normally the weaker, is favored by the contract over the employer, who is normally the stronger. The first part of the paper explains what tenure means and how it came about in the early twentieth century. The second part of the paper argues that the contract protects not only academic freedom but also bad teaching and weak scholarship. Finally the paper argues that the tenure contract should be abolished or restricted to minimize the inefficiencies that are now …


Are You Free To Contract Away Your Right To Bring A Negligence Claim?, Scott J. Burnham Jan 2014

Are You Free To Contract Away Your Right To Bring A Negligence Claim?, Scott J. Burnham

Chicago-Kent Law Review

This article explores the enforceability of the exculpatory clause—a contract term in which one party agrees to give up the right to bring a negligence claim against the other party. A spectrum of views on whether a contract containing such a clause is aberrant or not is presented and analyzed, followed by the author’s view of the rubric by which the enforceability of the clause should be measured. The article concludes by deconstructing one contract in which the clause was found.


The Seventh Circuit Got It Wrong: Supervisors Should Not Face Individual Liability Under Section 1981, Emily Aleisa Jan 2014

The Seventh Circuit Got It Wrong: Supervisors Should Not Face Individual Liability Under Section 1981, Emily Aleisa

Chicago-Kent Law Review

In Smith v. Bray, the Seventh Circuit, on a case of first impression, determined that supervisors with retaliatory motives can and should be individually liable under section 1981 when they cause the employer to retaliate against an employee. This article argues against the Seventh Circuit’s holding for four reasons. First, courts are required to analyze section 1981 the same way they analyze Title VII, and Title VII does not allow for individual supervisor liability. Second, the Seventh Circuit justified its decision based on a flawed comparison between section 1981 and section 1983, a similar but distinct civil rights statute. Third, …


Missing The Forest For The Trees: Why Supplemental Needs Trusts Should Be Exempt From Medicaid Determinations, Jeffrey R. Grimyser Jan 2014

Missing The Forest For The Trees: Why Supplemental Needs Trusts Should Be Exempt From Medicaid Determinations, Jeffrey R. Grimyser

Chicago-Kent Law Review

Supplemental needs trusts are trusts designed to assist individuals with disabilities by paying for services and items that Medicaid will not pay for. Federal law, however, is unclear as to whether using one of these trusts automatically disqualifies someone from receiving Medicaid, thereby causing the circuit courts to split on their interpretation. Some circuits have held that the Medicaid statute allows states to enact laws prohibiting the use of these trusts while receiving Medicaid benefits based on the federal law’s statutory language. While other circuits have ruled that individuals can simultaneously receive Medicaid benefits and use supplemental needs trusts given …


Third Party Funding Of Personal Injury Tort Claims: Keep The Baby And Change The Bathwater, Terrence Cain Jan 2014

Third Party Funding Of Personal Injury Tort Claims: Keep The Baby And Change The Bathwater, Terrence Cain

Chicago-Kent Law Review

In the early 1990s, a period of high-risk lending at high interest rates, a new entrant emerged in civil litigation: the Litigation Finance Company (“LFC”). LFCs advance money to plaintiffs involved in contingency fee litigation. The money is provided on a non-recourse basis, meaning the plaintiff repays the LFC only if she obtains money from the lawsuit through a settlement, judgment, or verdict. If the plaintiff recovers nothing, she will not owe the LFC anything. When she does repay the LFC, however, she could end up paying as much as 280% of the amount advanced by the LFC. As one …


An Economic Perspective On Subprime Lending, Michael H. Anderson Jan 2014

An Economic Perspective On Subprime Lending, Michael H. Anderson

Chicago-Kent Law Review

This article aims to provide a concise economic overview of several interesting subprime financing mechanisms, which are becoming increasingly common on the U.S. financial landscape. In particular, rent-to-own, payday lending, pawn broking, and (vehicle) title loans are considered. Generally speaking, a common thread with these loans is their relatively small size and short duration as well as the absence of a credit check or any of the traditional processes for determining credit-worthiness. Due to the ready availability of these loans, they appeal to low-income consumers, including the “working poor,” and to those who have suffered financial setbacks. Because the natural …