Law Commons^™

The Legal Revolution Against The Place Of Religion: The Case Of Trinity Western University Law School, Barry W. Bussey

BYU Law Review

The special legal status of religion and religious freedom in liberal democracies has become an issue of controversy among legal academics and lawyers. There is a growing argument that religion is not special and that the law should be amended to reflect that fact. This Article argues that religion is special. It is special because of the historical, practical, and philosophical realities of liberal democracies. Religious freedom is a foundational principle that was instrumental in creating the modern liberal democratic state. To remove religion from its current legal station would be a revolution that would put liberal democracy in a …

Human Rights, Religious Freedom, And Peace, David Little

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

When The State Requires Doctors To Act Against Their Conscience: The Religious Freedom Implications Of The Referral And The Direction Obligations Of Health Practitioners In Victoria And New South Wales, Michael Quinlan

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Frontmatter

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Religious Freedom In Faith Based Educational Institutions In The Wake Of Obergefell V. Hodges: Believers Beware, Charles J. Russo

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Eliminating Zero Tolerance Policies In Schools: Miami-Dade County Public School's Approach, Jeremy Thompson

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Student-On-Teacher Violence: A Proposed Solution, Perris E. Nelson

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Making The Grade: A Ground-Level Analysis Of New York State's Teacher Performance Review Under The Appr, Sabrina R. Moldt

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

From Library To Liability—Importing Trade Secret Doctrines To Erase Unfair Copyright Risks Lurking In Youtube’S Creative Commons Library, Adam Balinski

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Adversary Breakdown And Judicial Role Confusion In “Small Case” Civil Justice, Jessica K. Steinberg

BYU Law Review

This Article calls attention to the breakdown of adversary procedure in a largely unexplored area of the civil justice system: the ordinary, twoparty case. The twenty-first century judge confronts an entirely new state of affairs in presiding over the average civil matter. In place of the adversarial party contest, engineered and staged by attorneys, judges now face the rise of an unrepresented majority unable to propel claims, facts, and evidence into the courtroom. The adversary ideal favors a passive judge, but the unrealistic demands of such a paradigm in today’s “small case” civil justice system have sparked role confusion among …

Daily Fantasy Sports As Game Of Chance: Distinction Without A Meaningful Difference?, N. Cameron Leishman

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Quasi-Constitutional Protections And Government Surveillance, Emily Berman

BYU Law Review

The post-Edward Snowden debate over government surveillance has been vigorous. One aspect of that debate has been widespread criticism of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), alleging that the FISC served as a rubber stamp for the government, consistently accepting implausible interpretations of existing law that served to expand government surveillance authority; engaging in tortured analyses of statutory language; and ignoring fundamental Fourth Amendment principles. This Article argues that these critiques have entirely overlooked critical aspects of the FISC’s jurisprudence. A close look at that jurisprudence reveals a court that did, in fact, vigorously defend the interests customarily protected by …

Incentivizing Armed Non-State Actors To Comply With The Law: Protecting Children In Times Of Armed Conflict, Sarah Hafen

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Disentangling Flight Risk From Dangerousness, Lauryn P. Gouldin

BYU Law Review

There is a growing national consensus about the urgent need to shrink the population of pretrial detainees and to fix our broken money bail system. Even as scholars and reformers are showing renewed interest in pretrial detention and bail, however, they have neglected a fundamental pretrial problem: the conflation (by judges and in statutes) of flight risk and danger. Reformers have offered up an array of proposals and increasingly sophisticated risk assessment tools that promise to improve judicial decision-making, but many of these tools merge flight risk and danger in ways that reinforce problematic legislative and judicial practices.

This Article …

Preventing Preemption: Finding Space For States To Regulate Consumers’ Credit Reports, Elizabeth D. De Armond

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Regulating Identity: Medical Regulation As Social Control, Matt Lamkin

BYU Law Review

New biomedical technologies offer growing opportunities not only to prevent and treat illnesses, but also to change how healthy people think, feel, behave, and appear to others. Controversies over these nontherapeutic practices are a pervasive feature of contemporary American culture, from students on “study drugs” and cops on steroids to skin-lightening by black celebrities and the over-prescription of antidepressants. Yet the diversity of these controversies often masks their common root—namely, disputes about the propriety of using medical technologies as tools for shaping one’s identity.

Some observers believe these so-called “enhancement” practices threaten important values, offering unfair advantages to users and …

Guilt-Free Markets? Unconscionability, Conscience, And Emotions, Hila Keren

BYU Law Review

Despite record-level economic inequalities and a vast growth in market exploitation, courts remain surprisingly reluctant to exercise their power to invalidate the resulting predatory contracts. There is no doubt that courts are authorized to invalidate predatory contracts based on their unconscionability. There is, however, an ongoing debate regarding the desirability of utilizing this judicial power in a capitalist society. This Article enters the discussion from a unique angle: it focuses less on the bottom line of jurisprudence and more on the law’s expressive power—the fact that the law’s impact extends beyond its ability to sanction or reward behaviors. Specifically, the …

On Doctrinal Confusion: The Case Of The State Action Doctrine, Christopher W. Schmidt

BYU Law Review

In this Article, I use a case study of the Fourteenth Amendment’s state action doctrine as a vehicle to consider, and partially defend, the phenomenon of persistent doctrinal confusion in constitutional law. Certain areas of constitutional law are messy. Precedents seem to contradict one another; the relevant tests are difficult to apply to new facts and new issues; the principles that underlie the doctrine are difficult to discern. They may become a “conceptual disaster area,” as Charles Black once described the state action doctrine. By examining the evolution of the state action doctrine, this notoriously murky field of constitutional law, …

Trusts No More: Rethinking The Regulation Of Retirement Savings In The United States, Natalya Shnitser

BYU Law Review

The regulation of private and public pension plans in the United States begins with the premise that employer-sponsored plans resemble traditional donative, or gift, trusts. Accordingly, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) famously “imports” major principles of donative trust law for the regulation of private employer-sponsored pension plans. Statutes regulating state and local government pension plans likewise routinely invoke the structure and standards applicable to donative trusts. Judges, in turn, adjudicate by analogy to the common law trust.

This Article identifies the flaws in the analogy and analyzes the shortcomings of a regulatory framework that, despite dramatic …

Saving The Internet: Why Regulating Broadband Providers Can Keep The Internet Open, Emma N. Cano

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Wonky Walden: The Dizzying New Personal Jurisdiction Rule, Adam Balinski

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Upping The Ante: Rethinking Anti-Slapp Laws In The Age Of The Internet, Andrew L. Roth

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Frontmatter

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Zero Tolerance, Threats Of Harm, And The Imaginary Gun: "Good Intentions Run Amuck", Todd A. Demitchell Ed.D, M.A., M.A.T., Elyse Hambacher Ph.D., M.A.

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Is It Really A Choice? How Charter Schools Without Choice May Result In Students Without A Free Appropriate Public Education, Erin Hankins Diaz J.D., M.E.

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Between A Tomahawk And A Hard Place: Indian Mascots And The Ncaa, Stephanie Jade Bollinger

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Off The Constitutional Map: Breaking The Endless Cycle Of School Finance Litigation, Madeline Davis

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Codifying Commonsense: Religious Viewpoint Antidiscrimination Acts And The Free Speech Rights They Protect, Brandon Harvard Riches

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Utilizing Prosecutorial Discretion To Reduce The Number Of Juveniles With Disabilities In The Juvenile Justice System, Mary Willis

Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Local Home Rule In The Time Of Globalization, Kenneth A. Stahl

BYU Law Review

Cities are increasingly taking the lead in tackling global issues like climate change, financial regulation, economic inequality, and others that the federal and state governments have failed to address. Recent media accounts have accordingly praised cities as the hope of our globally networked future. This optimistic appraisal of cities is, however, undermined by local governments’ cramped legal status. Under the doctrine of home rule, local governments can often only act in matters deemed “local” in nature and cannot regulate “statewide” issues that may have impacts beyond local borders. As a result, the global issues that local governments are being praised …