Law Commons^™

Slavery Still Exists And May Have Produced Your Hairdryer, Katherine Pratty

American University International Law Review

In 2020, the International Labour Organization (“ILO”) estimated that forced labor generated $51 billion USD. Many profiteers are not individual bad actors, but rather, corporations. Recently it came to light that one corporate profiteer is the multinational technology manufacturing company, creator of the most awarded hair care device in 2021: Dyson Limited. While Dyson has received praise for its products, Malaysia charged Dyson’s main production factory, ATA IMS, with labor law violations. Shortly thereafter, in February 2022, UK law firm Leigh Day publicly announced its suit against Dyson on behalf of the workers in Dyson’s Malaysia factory.

This Comment analyzes …

Regional Discrimination As A Quasi-Form Of Racial Discrimination: Comparing The Protection Under Anglo-American, International And Chinese Laws, Martin Yc Kwan

American University International Law Review

This article seeks to explore the issue of regional discrimination from two perspectives. First, the article evaluates whether it is possible to remedy the absence of direct protection by fitting regional discrimination within the scope of current anti-racial discrimination laws. Second, it highlights China’s protection against regional discrimination and evaluates the Chinese laws’ scope and gaps in protection.

Restructuring Undefined Assets: Valuation Of Stablecoins And Their Impact On The Bankruptcy Process, Olivia Woodmansee

American University Business Law Review

Difficulties with defining cryptocurrency have plagued federal agencies and courts since crypto’s creation. With the emergence of “crypto winter” in 2022 that saw many crypto-related ventures fail, bankruptcy courts have been challenged to address numerous novel legal issues surrounding crypto-assets. When looking to the Bankruptcy Code fails to provide answers, courts must look to definitions, agency regulations, and an analysis of cryptocurrency’s position in the market to determine its classification. This can quickly become muddled with the voluminous and seemingly conflicting sources that exist. One such issue emerges when courts attempt to determine how to classify a particular cryptocurrency: is …

Plausible To Proper: Clarifying Federal Circuit Jurisdiction Over Walker Process Appeals, Peter James Rozewicz

American University Business Law Review

This Comment will describe what the Walker Process Doctrine is and explain the jurisdictional state of the Federal Circuit. Next, this Comment will examine the impact Gunn v. Minton has had on the scope of the Federal Circuit’s jurisdiction, the support and criticisms of Federal Circuit jurisdiction over Walker Process appeals, and how the Grable test plays into this issue. To do this, it will focus on how the jurisdictional analysis changed after Gunn and will discuss where each court’s argument for and against jurisdiction has merit and where it falters. To advance a solution, this Comment will recommend a …

Out-Of-State Abortion On Company Dime: An Analysis Of State Legislation And Erisa, Erin Elizabeth Hanlon

American University Business Law Review

This Note analyzes the various types of state abortion bans, focusing on those with aiding and abetting clauses. These bans impose civil liability for anyone, including companies providing abortion access benefits, who help a pregnant person gain access to abortion. Additionally, this Note analyzes federal legislation to determine if any retaliatory actions taken against companies violate federal law. This legislation includes the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) which creates uniformity in insurance and benefits coverage by superseding any state law that references or relates to an ERISA plan. Many advocates believe that ERISA is a company’s greatest defense to …

The Validity Of Trade Restrictions On Artificial Intelligence Technology Under The General Agreement On Tariffs And Trade's National Security Exception, Isabelle Brundieck

American University International Law Review

This Comment argues that the U.S. restrictions on the export of semiconductors and other AI technology to China do not violate the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT 1994). Instead, such measures are legitimate expressions under GATT 1994’s Article XXI national security exception, which allows a country to break other articles within the agreement if necessary to protect the country’s essential national security interests. Given the national security risks associated with the rise of AI technology and the likelihood that such technology will be supplied to a military enterprise, the current trade restrictions qualify for the exception. However, …

Defining "Use In Commerce": The Supreme Court's Evolving Extraterritorial Application Of The Lanham Act, Hannah Lief

American University Business Law Review

On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court redefined the scope of the extraterritorial impact of the Trademark Act of 1946, also known as the Lanham Act (the “Act”). Overturning the ruling by the Tenth Circuit, the Court narrowed the focus of the Act to solely domestic uses in commerce. While the Court acknowledged that it had interpreted the statute in a manner that granted Congress expansive power over foreign conduct, it stated that the broad language of the Lanham Act does not indicate international application. By instituting newfound principles on congressional authority under the Lanham Act, U.S. trademark registrants can …

Neglected Riches: Exposing China’S Selective Default On The Hukuang Railway Bonds And The Avenue For Financial Accountability Under The Successor Government Doctrine, William Krag

American University International Law Review

The People’s Republic of China (“P.R.C.”) is in selective default for refusing to pay back private investors from the Hukuang Railway Bond default of 1911. The P.R.C. is the successor government to the Republic of China (“R.O.C.”) and Qing Dynasty. This Comment argues that though it is the successor government, the P.R.C. retains the legal rights and obligations of the former government and is the legal inheritor of these debts. This Comment takes this syllogism one step further and argues that the successor government doctrine is customary international law—applying the lessons from the Russian bond default of 1918. Finally, this …

Addressing Base Erosion: Impact Of The No Tax Breaks For Outsourcing Act On Tax Inversions And Profit Shifting, T. Scott Shogren

American University Business Law Review

The modern landscape of international taxation presents complex challenges arising from cross-border transactions and diverse tax regimes. This Comment delves into the intricate world of tax inversions, a process whereby U.S. firms shift their corporate headquarters abroad, thereby exploiting different tax jurisdictions. The implications of tax inversions are significant, and some scholars estimate there are substantial global tax revenue losses.

This Comment examines the mechanics of tax inversions, analyzing the tools employed by multinational corporations to reduce their tax liabilities, such as debt concentration and earnings stripping. This Comment also explores legislative responses, including the No Tax Breaks for Outsourcing …

A Little Less Conversation, A Little More Action: How American Unwillingness To Escalate Emboldens Mexico’S Populist Ambitions, David Montero

American University International Law Review

Part II of this Comment will explain the history of Mexico’s relationship with trade, as well as the finer details of the dispute resolution provisions of the USMCA that are of note. Part III will analyze two key violations of the USMCA by AMLO’s administration, contrasting the American response between the two and demonstrating the cycle of violations that has largely been created as a result of the failure to act. Part IV provides a simple recommendation to the U.S. administration for how to effectively halt its southern neighbor’s decline into unfettered populism that harms U.S. trade interests: employ the …

Amnesty Laws In Modern Peace Agreements: An Analysis Of The Northern Ireland Legacy Act Under International Law, Mckenzie Gallagher

American University International Law Review

In September 2023, the United Kingdom passed the Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act (“Legacy Act”), which grants amnesty to anyone who discloses information regarding murders, disappearances, or other unsolved crimes during the period known as “The Troubles” in Northern Ireland. The Legacy Act’s amnesty provision is expected to hinder the peace process in Northern Ireland and in turn, avert accountability for serious international crimes. This Comment considers to what extent the Legacy Act’s amnesty provision violates the Good Friday Agreement, the peace accord ending decades of conflict in Northern Ireland, the European Convention on Human Rights, the United …

Policing The Strait: How China’S Policing Of The Taiwan Strait Violates The U.N. Convention On The Law Of The Sea, Elizabeth C. Parker

American University International Law Review

As tensions continue to grow across the Taiwan Strait, China is using domestic maritime law to justify an expansion of police power in the international waters of the Taiwan Strait in violation of international law. This Comment will argue that the People’s Republic of China has violated the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (“UNCLOS”) by implementing non-resource-related police power in waters meant only for resource exploration and management. In comparing the language of China’s domestic maritime law with that of UNCLOS, this Comment will show that the People’s Republic of China has used domestic law to reinterpret …

“Show Me The Money”: The Sec’S Use Of Distribution As A Tool For Investor Protection, Coleman Gilkey Newton

American University Business Law Review

In Section II, this Comment will present a background on the relevant law of securities regulations by focusing on the SEC’s enforcement remedies, through various statutes, cases, and regulations. Section II further discusses the disgorgement and fair funds provisions that are crucial to the Commission’s distribution practices. Then, Section III shows how this background impacts SEC operations and presents a framework for the relationship between disgorgement and distribution. Finally, Section IV offers recommendations that would allow the SEC to continue to utilize disgorgement to ensure maximum distribution for harmed investors.

The Repeal Of Religious Accommodations -- A Constitutional Analysis, Ronald J. Colombo

American University Law Review

Under modern Supreme Court jurisprudence, the First Amendment ordinarily imposes no heightened standard of review upon neutral laws of general applicability that coincidentally burden the free exercise of religion. To relieve or minimize this burden, however, lawmakers are generally free to promulgate exemptions from, or accommodations to, such laws for the benefit of religious adherents. Such accommodations are common.

When a law is not neutral with respect to religion, or when the law is not generally applicable, then it will be subject to the exacting test of strict scrutiny to the extent that it burdens the free exercise of religion. …

Targeting Children: Liability For Algorithmic Recommendations, Michal Lavi

American University Law Review

We live in the algorithmic society, characterized by massive digital surveillance and data collection by private companies exploiting human information vulnerabilities for profit. The infrastructure of free expression translates into an infrastructure of digital surveillance. This model, dubbed “surveillance capitalism,” includes massive personalized algorithmic targeting that departs from human speakers, allowing a level of influence never witnessed before in scale, scope, or depth.

Personalized targeting can garner many benefits, as it allows individuals to find content that interests them without needing to invest energy in seeking out that content. However, personalized targeting can also cause tremendous harm because it can …

Blacklisting Or Banning Technologies That Scare Us: Ai, Cryptocurrencies, And More, Nizan Geslevich Packin, Hadar Yoana Jabotinsky

American University Law Review

Policymakers often play a critical role in regulating the use and advancement of technology. Their decisions can have significant positive impacts on the development, adoption, and use of various technologies, but also negative ones if they decide to limit or even block a certain technology. Italy’s temporary banning of the Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) platform ChatGPT, much like New York City’s Department of Education, demonstrates administrations’ and policymakers’ reliance on blacklisting and banning.

Blacklisting and banning are often used interchangeably. Nevertheless, in the context of regulation, the terms are different and used for different purposes, and it is key to …

Securing Workers' Futures: Why Replacing Union Workers With Artificial Intelligence In Creative Professions Is The New Subcontracting, Katherine J. Kyriakoudes

American University Law Review

Artificial intelligence poses a significant threat to unionized professionals in creative industries, particularly as employers may be tempted to replace unionized workforces with artificial intelligence. However, Supreme Court precedent and the National Labor Relations Act paves a path forward for unionized workers in creative fields to safeguard themselves from job displacement through collective bargaining.

This Comment argues that replacing a unionized workforce with artificial intelligence is analogous to subcontracting under Fibreboard Paper Products Co. v. NLRB, First National Maintenance Corp. v. NLRB, and congressional intent behind the National Labor Relations Act. Consequently, artificial intelligence should be a mandatory subject of …

"Background Principles" In The Law Of Takings, David A. Dana

American University Law Review

The Supreme Court appears to be on a mission to enhance the scope of liability under the Takings Clause, the result of which could be the chilling of federal, state, and local regulation. However, the Court has acknowledged that there is no takings liability when, under “background principles,” the property owner lacked the very right she is claiming the government has taken via regulation. The rationale for, and hence proper scope of, the background principles exception to takings liability is opaque in the case law. This Article offers three possible rationales for the background principles exception that could guide courts …

More Than Friends: A New Theory For The Third-Party Doctrine, Eang L. Ngov

American University Law Review

When a person gives information or something tangible to someone or a business, the Fourth Amendment’s third-party doctrine allows the government to obtain that evidence without a warrant or probable cause. The third-party doctrine is premised on the rationale that we hold no reasonable expectation of privacy when we voluntarily expose information to others, that we assume the risk that the third party would share the information, and that we must deal with the consequences of that misplaced trust. The doctrine originated from a series of cases where law enforcement obtained information revealed by criminals through their mistaken trust of …

Pro-Natalism In Probate Law, Diane Kemker

American University Law Review

“Pro-natalism” is a term that has been variously used to describe any and all government policies that favor birth, babies, children, families, and population growth, as well as more focused laws that incentivize childbirth; burden, ban, or criminalize abortion and/or contraception; and otherwise disfavor the childless. Whether and to what extent U.S. law is or should be pro-natalist is central to current and ongoing debates about reproductive rights and the deeply vexed question of when life begins. A robust legal feminist literature has aimed to identify and critique pro-natalist law and policy, particularly in forms that constrain the autonomy of …

Green Eggs And Law: Evaluating Dr. Seuss’ Impact On The Legal System, John Browning

American University Law Review

For decades, the simple wisdom of Dr. Seuss (a/k/a Theodore Geisel) has occupied a beloved spot in the hearts of the countless millions who grew up with his children's books and the animated specials they spawned. And since some children grow up to become lawyers and judges, it is hardly surprising to see Dr. Seuss's lessons enshrined in our legal system. Judges from trial courts to the U.S. Supreme Court have referenced Dr. Seuss's works in addressing everything from environmental concerns to personhood to inmate rights. No less a figure than U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan referenced Seuss's 1960 …

The Delaware-Inspired Next Step Toward Brazil Becoming The South American Leader In Corporate Law: Making Public Company Arbitrations A Matter Of Public Record, Caio Machado Filho, Francisco Rüger Antunes Maciel Müssnich, Leo E. Strine Jr.

American University Business Law Review

Brazil is South America’s leading domicile for listed public companies and has enjoyed substantial economic growth in the last generation. But it remains a nation constrained by limited resources to address all of its challenges and opportunities. Because of this reality, Brazil has chosen to use arbitration as the method to resolve disputes between the stockholders of public companies about critical issues such as the fairness of interested transactions and other claims for breach of fiduciary duty or compliance with statutory law and securities laws.

Likewise, important commercial disputes involving public companies are also resolved in arbitration. This is problematic …

The Failure Of "Quick Look" Analyses Of Antitrust Claims, Jonathan Berman

American University Business Law Review

Before courts can determine whether a defendant may have violated antitrust laws, they must first select the appropriate mode of analysis: the fact-intensive rule of reason, summary condemnation under the per se rules, or a quick look analysis. “Quick look” is intended to shorten and simplify inquiries into conduct that does not fall under the per se rules but that nonetheless has obvious anticompetitive effects.

The quick look doctrine, however, has failed to streamline antitrust litigation, and the related caselaw has failed to develop concrete or usable rules. Despite decades of litigation, the quick look doctrine remains of dubious legal …

The Rhetoric Of Abortion In Amicus Briefs, Jamie Abrams

Presentations

No abstract provided.

Do Ndcs Submitted By The Parties Under The Paris Agreement Imply Binding Commitments? A Legal Analysis, Sharaban Tahura Zaman

American University International Law Review

NDCs submitted by State Parties under the PA genuinely do not represent commitments and intentions from the author State to be legally bound by the pledges they’ve communicated within their submitted NDCs. While NDCs reflect the political will and aspirations of nations, tied to their socio-economic realities, they lack concrete, enforceable domestic mitigation standards. This dilemma poses pressing questions: If NDCs are primarily political declarations and domestic courts don’t hold states accountable for their submitted mitigation targets, how can we ensure states fulfill their pledges for mitigation? Can NDCs genuinely drive state behavioral change for energy transition? Furthermore, there is …

U.S. Strikes Against The Houthis: A "Splendid Little War" Of Self-Defense, Benjamin W. Haight

American University National Security Law Brief

No abstract provided.

Sticker Shock: The Icj, Russia, And A $300 Billion Price Tag For War, Caitlyn Quinn

American University National Security Law Brief

Ukraine has experienced unprecedented devastation since Russia launched a full scale invasion into its Eastern territory in February 2022. Thousands have been killed, and billions of dollars of infrastructure has been damaged. As a result, over the past three years, the international community has been evaluating ways to hold Russia accountable and to help rebuild Ukraine upon the cessation of the war. Billions of dollars in Russian Central Bank assets have been frozen, and multiple states have proposed seizing Russia’s frozen assets to meet these objectives. However, outright asset seizure presents genuine legal concerns about foreign sovereign immunity and may …

The Eu-China Cai And The Uyghur Challenge In The Context Of China's Domestic Law Barriers To International Labor And Human Rights Standards, Ronald C. Brown

American University Business Law Review

While China engages in world commerce as a global player and is signatory to international labor and human rights standards, at the same time it uses treaty reservations and its own domestic laws to limit and undermine the full application of those standards. Concern from Western governments and global human rights groups regarding China’s longstanding treatment of the Uyghur people has resulted in a freeze in negotiations for the EU-China Comprehensive Investment Agreement (CAI). This was also a result of China’s failure to ratify or implement relevant United Nations (U.N.) covenants and International Labour Organization (ILO) conventions and placing reservations …

Businesses Beware: The Changing Face Of Attorney-Fee Awards In U.S. Courts, Aaron Bartholomew, Sharon Yamen

American University Business Law Review

The American Rule, creating a presumption against attorney-fee awards, is axiomatic in litigation in United States’ courts. Established by the very early U.S. Supreme Court case of Arcambel v. Wiseman in 1796, the rule rejected the British tradition of a “loser-pays” system, in which the losing party pays all parties’ attorney fees and litigation costs. While the Court’s reasoning for the rules creation is murky, later decisions have justified it on various grounds. Critics of the American Rule argue that the rule encourages the assertion of unmeritorious claims and defenses and fails to sufficiently encourage the settlement of those that …

Foreclosure Sales As Fraudulent Transfers, David Gray Carlson

American University Business Law Review

The Supreme Court has declared that noncollusive, regularly conducted foreclosure sales are not “constructive” fraudulent transfers voidable by a bankruptcy trustee. Uniform state legislation ratifies this instinct for private creditor enforcements. But collusive or irregular foreclosure sales or sales that are intended to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors are subject to creditor attack, even though unsecured creditors are not proper parties to the foreclosure process. In such cases, unsecured creditors can cloud the title obtained from foreclosure in the cases of collusion, irregularity or fraudulent intent. This article examines precisely when foreclosure sales can be avoided by unsecured creditors of …