Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (74)
- Courts (18)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (13)
- Supreme Court of the United States (13)
- Criminal Law (12)
-
- Law and Politics (12)
- Law and Society (12)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (11)
- First Amendment (10)
- Jurisprudence (10)
- Legal History (10)
- Fourteenth Amendment (9)
- Judges (9)
- Law and Race (9)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (8)
- Legal Education (8)
- Administrative Law (7)
- Criminal Procedure (7)
- Immigration Law (7)
- Legal Profession (7)
- Legislation (7)
- President/Executive Department (7)
- State and Local Government Law (7)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (6)
- Health Law and Policy (6)
- Religion Law (6)
- Arts and Humanities (5)
- Juvenile Law (5)
- Legal Writing and Research (5)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (13)
- Fordham Law School (9)
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
- Roger Williams University (6)
- The University of Akron (6)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Columbia Law School (3)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (3)
- Florida State University College of Law (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- Pepperdine University (2)
- Brigham Young University (1)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (1)
- Claremont Colleges (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Fordham University (1)
- Institute of Social Sciences, TOYO University (1)
- Liberty University (1)
- Marquette University Law School (1)
- Ministry of Higher and Secondary Specialized Education of the Republic of Uzbekistan (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (11)
- ConLawNOW (6)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (6)
- Touro Law Review (6)
- Indiana Law Journal (4)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (2)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Fordham Law Review (2)
- Law Library Newsletters/Blog (2)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (2)
- Pepperdine Law Review (2)
- Scholarly Publications (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- Texas A&M Law Review (2)
- All Faculty Publications (1)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Brigham Young University Prelaw Review (1)
- CMC Senior Theses (1)
- Center for Health Law Policy and Bioethics (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Honors Theses (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 94 of 94
Full-Text Articles in Law
War Powers: Congress, The President, And The Courts – A Model Casebook Section, Stephen M. Griffin, Matthew C. Waxman
War Powers: Congress, The President, And The Courts – A Model Casebook Section, Stephen M. Griffin, Matthew C. Waxman
Faculty Scholarship
This model casebook section is concerned with the constitutional law of war powers as developed by the executive and legislative branches, with a limited look at relevant statutes and federal court cases. It is intended for use in Constitutional Law I classes that cover separation of powers. It could also be used for courses in National Security Law or Foreign Relations Law, or for graduate courses in U.S. foreign policy. This is designed to be the reading for one to two classes, and it can supplement or replace standard casebook sections on war powers that are shorter and offer less …
Constitutional War Powers In World War I: Charles Evans Hughes And The Power To Wage War Successfully, Matthew C. Waxman
Constitutional War Powers In World War I: Charles Evans Hughes And The Power To Wage War Successfully, Matthew C. Waxman
Faculty Scholarship
On September 5, 1917, at the height of American participation in the Great War, Charles Evans Hughes famously argued that “the power to wage war is the power to wage war successfully.” This moment and those words were a collision between the onset of “total war,” Lochner-era jurisprudence, and cautious Progressive-era administrative development. This article tells the story of Hughes’s statement – including what he meant at the time and how he wrestled with some difficult questions that flowed from it. The article then concludes with some reasons why the story remains important today.
Symposium: The Puzzling And Troubling Grant In Kisor, Gillian E. Metzger
Symposium: The Puzzling And Troubling Grant In Kisor, Gillian E. Metzger
Faculty Scholarship
From one perspective, the Supreme Court’s decision to grant review in Kisor v. Wilkie is not surprising. Dating back at least to Justice Antonin Scalia’s 2011 concurrence in Talk America v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co., through Decker v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center in 2013 and Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association in 2015, there’s been growing interest on the Supreme Court’s conservative wing in overturning Auer deference, or the doctrine that an agency’s interpretation of its own regulation is “controlling unless plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.” The campaign to overturn Auer v. Robbins then stalled, with the court denying …
Healthy And Unhealthy Responses To American Democratic Institutional Failure, Thomas D'Anieri
Healthy And Unhealthy Responses To American Democratic Institutional Failure, Thomas D'Anieri
CMC Senior Theses
I have set out on the hunch that politics in America “feels different,” that we are frustrated both with our institutions as well as with one another. First, I will seek to empirically verify this claim beyond mere “feelings.” If it can be shown that these kinds of discontent genuinely exist to the extent that I believe they do, I will then explain why people feel this way and why things are different this time from the economic, political, and social points of view. Next, I will examine two potential responses, what I will call the populist and the institutional …