Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (157)
- Criminal Law (34)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (26)
- First Amendment (25)
- Criminal Procedure (24)
-
- Courts (18)
- Law and Society (16)
- Fourteenth Amendment (15)
- Sexuality and the Law (15)
- Legal History (14)
- Law and Politics (13)
- International Law (12)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (11)
- Human Rights Law (11)
- Family Law (10)
- Jurisprudence (9)
- Legislation (8)
- Education Law (7)
- Immigration Law (7)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (7)
- Religion Law (7)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (7)
- Fourth Amendment (6)
- Judges (6)
- Juvenile Law (6)
- Election Law (5)
- Military, War, and Peace (5)
- State and Local Government Law (5)
- Civil Law (4)
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (78)
- SelectedWorks (62)
- William & Mary Law School (9)
- The University of Akron (8)
- University of South Carolina (7)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (5)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- Seattle University School of Law (3)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (2)
- Barry University School of Law (1)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- San Jose State University (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Publication
-
- Adam Lamparello (14)
- Alan E Garfield (10)
- Akron Law Faculty Publications (7)
- John F. Stinneford (6)
- South Carolina Law Review (6)
-
- William & Mary Law Review (6)
- Touro Law Review (5)
- Robert G. Natelson (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (3)
- Khagesh Gautam (3)
- Mel Cousins (3)
- NULR Online (3)
- Sharon E. Rush (3)
- Charles W. Collier (2)
- Corey A Ciocchetti (2)
- Darren L Hutchinson (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Indiana Law Journal (2)
- Juan Carlos Riofrío Martínez-Villalba (2)
- Manoj S. Mate (2)
- Nancy C Marcus (2)
- Renée M. Hutchins (2)
- Richard Broughton (2)
- Seattle University Law Review (2)
- Shubhankar Dam (2)
- Steven J. Andre (2)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (2)
- Adam A Marshall (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 181 - 192 of 192
Full-Text Articles in Law
Land Use Impact Fees: Does Koontz V. St. Johns River Water Management District Echo An Arkansas Philosophy Of Property Rights?, Carl J. Circo
Land Use Impact Fees: Does Koontz V. St. Johns River Water Management District Echo An Arkansas Philosophy Of Property Rights?, Carl J. Circo
Carl J. Circo
Liability For Massive Online Leaks Of National Defense Information, Rodney A. Smolla
Liability For Massive Online Leaks Of National Defense Information, Rodney A. Smolla
Rod Smolla
No abstract provided.
The "Not A Search" Game, John F. Stinneford
When Quacking Like A Duck Is Really A Swan Song In Disguise: How Windsor's State Powers Analysis Sets The Stage For The Demise Of Federalism-Based Marriage Discrimination, Nancy C. Marcus
Nancy C Marcus
The Immigration Detention Risk Assessment, Mark Noferi, Robert Koulish
The Immigration Detention Risk Assessment, Mark Noferi, Robert Koulish
Mark L Noferi
In early 2013, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) deployed nationwide a new automated risk assessment tool to help determine whether to detain or release noncitizens pending their deportation proceedings. Adapted from similar evidence-based criminal justice reforms that have reduced pretrial detention, ICE’s initiative now represents the largest pre-hearing risk assessment experiment in U.S. history—potentially impacting over 400,000 individuals per year. However, to date little information has been released regarding the risk assessment algorithm, processes, and outcomes.
This article provides the first comprehensive examination of ICE’s risk assessment initiative, based on public access to ICE methodology and outcomes as a …
Constitutions As Coordinating Devices, Gillian K. Hadfield, Barry R. Weingast
Constitutions As Coordinating Devices, Gillian K. Hadfield, Barry R. Weingast
Gillian K Hadfield
Why do successful constitutions have the attributes characteristically associated with the rule of law? Why do constitutions involve public reasoning? And, how is such a system sustained as an equilibrium? In this paper, we adapt the framework in our previous work on “what is law?” to the problem of constitutions and their enforcement (see Hadfield and Weingast 2012, 2013a,b). We present an account of constitutional law characterized by two features: a system of distinctive reasoning and process that is grounded in economic and political functionality; and a set of legal attributes such as generality, stability, publicity, clarity, non-contradictoriness, and consistency. …
Presidential Legislation In India: The Law And Practice Of Ordinances, Shubhankar Dam
Presidential Legislation In India: The Law And Practice Of Ordinances, Shubhankar Dam
Shubhankar Dam
India has a parliamentary system. Yet the president has authority to occasionally enact legislation (or ordinances) without involving parliament. This book is a study of ordinances at the national level in India, centred around three themes. First, it tells the story of how an artefact of British constitutional history, over time, became part of India’s legislative system. Second, it offers an empirical account of the ways in which presidents have resorted to ordinances in post-independence India. Third, the book analyses a range of ordinance-related questions, including some that are yet to be judicially adjudicated. In the process, the book explains …
State Constitutions And The Basic Structure Doctrine, Manoj Mate
State Constitutions And The Basic Structure Doctrine, Manoj Mate
Manoj S. Mate
High Courts And Election Law Reform In The United States And India, Manoj Mate
High Courts And Election Law Reform In The United States And India, Manoj Mate
Manoj S. Mate
Equal Protection: Immigrants' Access To Healthcare And Welfare Benefits, Mel Cousins
Equal Protection: Immigrants' Access To Healthcare And Welfare Benefits, Mel Cousins
Mel Cousins
The adoption of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (hereinafter “PRWORA”) led to considerable litigation over immigrants’ rights to welfare benefits and access to health care. The approaches adopted by different courts (both federal and state) diverged significantly based on the various statutory schemes involved as well as distinct approaches to equal protection. However, no “on point” cases have reached the United States Supreme Court, so the “correct” approach remains unclear. Following the fiscal crisis of 2008, several states moved for increased exclusion of certain immigrants residing in the country legally from state healthcare or welfare …
Equal Protection, Immigrants And Access To Health Care And Welfare Benefits – A 2014 Update, Mel Cousins
Equal Protection, Immigrants And Access To Health Care And Welfare Benefits – A 2014 Update, Mel Cousins
Mel Cousins
The introduction of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA) led to considerable litigation on the rights of immigrants to welfare benefits and access to health care. There was significant divergence between the approaches adopted by the different courts (both federal and State) based, in part, on the different statutory schemes involved but also on different approaches to equal protection. However, none of the cases reached the Supreme Court so the ‘correct’ approach remained unclarified. In response to the Great Recession and subsequent budget crises, several States have again excluded certain legal immigrants from the scope …
Beit Din's Gap-Filling Function: Using Beit Din To Protect Your Client, Michael A. Helfand
Beit Din's Gap-Filling Function: Using Beit Din To Protect Your Client, Michael A. Helfand
Michael A Helfand
This article considers how rabbinical courts play an important gap-filling role by providing parties with a forum to adjudicate a subset of religious disputes that could not be resolved in court. Under current constitutional doctrine, civil courts cannot adjudicate disputes that turn on religious doctrine and practice. By contrast, rabbinical courts can resolve such disputes--and the decisions of rabbinical courts can then be enforced by civil courts even as those same civil courts could not resolve the dispute in the first instance. In this way, rabbinical courts--like other religious arbitration tribunals--fill a void created by constitutional law, ensuring that parties …