Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (83)
- Intellectual Property Law (17)
- Law and Economics (17)
- Economics (14)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (14)
-
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (11)
- Business Organizations Law (10)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (10)
- Industrial Organization (10)
- Courts (6)
- Law and Society (6)
- Business (5)
- Internet Law (5)
- Commercial Law (4)
- Computer Law (4)
- Consumer Protection Law (4)
- International Law (4)
- International Trade Law (4)
- Legal History (4)
- Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation (4)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (4)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (4)
- Science and Technology Law (4)
- Supreme Court of the United States (4)
- Technology and Innovation (4)
- Communications Law (3)
- Economic Policy (3)
- Health Law and Policy (3)
- Law and Politics (3)
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (30)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (9)
- Pepperdine University (8)
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
- SelectedWorks (6)
-
- University of Tennessee College of Law (6)
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Columbia Law School (3)
- University of Baltimore Law (3)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (2)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Penn State Law (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Connecticut (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Publication
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (12)
- D. Daniel Sokol (12)
- Pepperdine Law Review (6)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Articles (4)
-
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- William H. Page (3)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (2)
- College of Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- George A. Hay (2)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (2)
- Herbert Hovenkamp (2)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Michal Gal (2)
- The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law (2)
- Touro Law Review (2)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (2)
- Wentong Zheng (2)
- Adam Epstein (1)
- Avishalom Tor (1)
- Benjamin Miller (1)
- CommLaw Conspectus: Journal of Communications Law and Technology Policy (1993-2015) (1)
- Contributions to Books (1)
- César F. Rosado Marzán (1)
- Faculty Articles and Papers (1)
- Faculty Lectures and Presentations (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Fordham International Law Journal (1)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 60 of 101
Full-Text Articles in Law
Ncaa Amateurism And Athletics: A Perfect Marriage Or A Dysfunctional Relationship? -An Antitrust Approach To Student-Athlete Compensation, Edward H. Grimmett
Ncaa Amateurism And Athletics: A Perfect Marriage Or A Dysfunctional Relationship? -An Antitrust Approach To Student-Athlete Compensation, Edward H. Grimmett
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trouble Abroad: Microsoft's Antitrust Problems Under The Law Of The European Union, Justin O'Dell
Trouble Abroad: Microsoft's Antitrust Problems Under The Law Of The European Union, Justin O'Dell
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Actavis And Error Costs: A Reply To Critics, Aaron S. Edlin, C. Scott Hemphill, Herbert J. Hovenkamp, Carl Shapiro
Actavis And Error Costs: A Reply To Critics, Aaron S. Edlin, C. Scott Hemphill, Herbert J. Hovenkamp, Carl Shapiro
All Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court’s opinion in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc. provided fundamental guidance about how courts should handle antitrust challenges to reverse payment patent settlements. In our previous article, Activating Actavis, we identified and operationalized the essential features of the Court’s analysis. Our analysis has been challenged by four economists, who argue that our approach might condemn procompetitive settlements.
As we explain in this reply, such settlements are feasible, however, only under special circumstances. Moreover, even where feasible, the parties would not actually choose such a settlement in equilibrium. These considerations, and others discussed in the reply, serve to …
Non-Price Competition In “Substitute" Drugs: The Ftc's Blind Spot, Gregory Dolin
Non-Price Competition In “Substitute" Drugs: The Ftc's Blind Spot, Gregory Dolin
All Faculty Scholarship
As the recent case of United States v. Lundbeck illustrates, the Federal Trade Commission’s lack of knowledge in medical and pharmacological sciences affects its evaluation of transactions between medical and pharmaceutical companies that involve transfers of rights to manufacture or sell drugs, causing the agency to object to such transactions without solid basis for doing so. This article argues that in order to properly define a pharmaceutical market, one must not just consider the condition that competing drugs are meant to treat, but also take into account whether there are “off-label” drugs that are used to treat a relevant condition, …
Our 'Patchwork' Health Care System: Melodic Variations, Counterpoint, And The Future Role Of Physicians, William M. Sage
Our 'Patchwork' Health Care System: Melodic Variations, Counterpoint, And The Future Role Of Physicians, William M. Sage
Faculty Scholarship
This Foreword to a forthcoming symposium on the "patchwork" health care system to be published in the Houston Journal of Health Law & Policy considers whether current reactions to fragmentation in health care represent minor variations on a longstanding theme in US health policy or offer a more substantial counterpoint to that theme. The theme is this: that perfect physicians should be allowed to control health care even if safeguards are needed in practice because real physicians are not perfect. The Foreword previews four scholarly articles featured in the published symposium. It concludes that, while all the articles present original …
Patents, Antitrust, And The Rule Of Reason, Herbert Hovenkamp
Patents, Antitrust, And The Rule Of Reason, Herbert Hovenkamp
Herbert Hovenkamp
Antitrust law has historically immunized many patent agreements if they fell within the "scope of the patent." Three dissenting Justices in the Actavis case advocated this test: a pharmaceutical pay-for-delay settlement falls within the scope of the patent if it delays a competitor's entry no longer than the remaining life of the patent. In that case the patentee will not be obtaining any more than it would from a valid patent -- namely, the right to exclude infringers for the full patent term.
The "scope of the patent" test is not useful for defining the boundaries of antitrust immunity in …
An Overview Of The Draft China Antimonopoly Law, H. Stephen Harris Jr.
An Overview Of The Draft China Antimonopoly Law, H. Stephen Harris Jr.
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
When Bigger Is Better: A Critique Of The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index’S Use To Evaluate Mergers In Network Industries, Toby Roberts
When Bigger Is Better: A Critique Of The Herfindahl-Hirschman Index’S Use To Evaluate Mergers In Network Industries, Toby Roberts
Pace Law Review
This Article argues that the current framework used by the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) to evaluate mergers is inadequate in that it fails to account for network benefits. In particular, I argue for abandoning the use of the HHI in analyzing network industry mergers because the index generates little useful information about these mergers’ effect on consumer welfare. Part II describes the HHI’s historical and theoretical underpinnings and its integration into the current Merger Guidelines. Part III considers general objections to the HHI before turning to its problems in evaluating network industries. Part IV presents …
International Cooperation And The Patent-Antitrust Intersection, Stephen Yelderman
International Cooperation And The Patent-Antitrust Intersection, Stephen Yelderman
Stephen Yelderman
Commentators have long recognized the need to coordinate questions at the patent-antitrust intersection with other policy levers available under patent law. In the international context, however, control over patent policy has been fractured and entrusted to diverse decisionmakers. Many details of patent law are tightly coordinated by international agreement, while others related to antitrust are left to national discretion. This Article evaluates the consequences of this fracture, and notes ways in which the prevailing treaty regimes (the Paris Convention and the TRIPS Agreement) distort incentives for national policymaking. National discretion at the patent-antitrust intersection can be expected to result in …
On The Public-Law Character Of Competition Law: A Lesson Of Asian Capitalism, Michael Dowdle
On The Public-Law Character Of Competition Law: A Lesson Of Asian Capitalism, Michael Dowdle
Michael Dowdle
This article argues that competition law is best seen as a form of public law – ‘the law that governs the governing of the state – and not as simply a form of private market regulation. It uses the experiences of ‘Asian capitalism’ to show how capitalist economies are in fact much more variegated than the orthodox model of competition law presumes, and that this variegated character demands a form of regulation that is innately political rather than simply technical. Orthodox competition regimes address this complexity by segregating non-standard capitalisms into alternative doctrinal jurisprudences, but this renders conceptually invisible the …
The Rise And Rise Of The One Percent: Getting To Thomas Piketty's Wealth Dystopia, Shi-Ling Hsu
The Rise And Rise Of The One Percent: Getting To Thomas Piketty's Wealth Dystopia, Shi-Ling Hsu
Shi-Ling Hsu
Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-first Century, which is surely one of the very few economics treatises ever to be a best-seller, has parachuted into an intensely emotional and deeply divisive American debate: the problem of inequality in the United States. Piketty's core argument is that throughout history, the rate of return on private capital has usually exceeded the rate of economic growth, expressed by Piketty as the relation r > g. If true, this relation means that the wealthy class – who are the predominant owners of capital – will grow their wealth faster than economies grow, which …
Antitrust Analysis After Actavis: Applying The Rule Of Reason To Reverse Payments, Benjamin Miller
Antitrust Analysis After Actavis: Applying The Rule Of Reason To Reverse Payments, Benjamin Miller
Benjamin Miller
Abstract In F.T.C. v. Actavis, Inc. the Supreme Court resolved a circuit split regarding the proper evaluation of reverse payment settlements under federal antitrust law, holding that they must be evaluated under a rule of reason analysis. However, the Court simultaneously created significant uncertainty by declaring that the lower courts were responsible for structuring the analysis. While a few cases are currently in the pre-trial phase, the only decisions relating to reverse payments since Actavis have been rulings on pre-trial motions—there have been no decisions on the merits. Given the intricate intersection between antitrust and intellectual property principles in these …
Death By Daubert: The Continued Attack On Private Antitrust, Christine P. Bartholomew
Death By Daubert: The Continued Attack On Private Antitrust, Christine P. Bartholomew
Journal Articles
In 2011, with five words of dicta, the Supreme Court opened Pandora’s box for private antitrust enforcement. By suggesting trial courts must evaluate the admissibility of expert testimony at class certification, the Court placed a significant obstacle in the path of antitrust class actions. Following the Supreme Court’s lead, most courts now permit parties to bring expert challenges far earlier than the traditional summary judgment or pretrial timing. Premature rejection of expert testimony dooms budding private antitrust suits — cases that play an essential role in modern antitrust enforcement. The dangers for private antitrust plaintiffs are compounded by the Court’s …
In Search Of Effective Ethics & Compliance Programs, Maurice Stucke
In Search Of Effective Ethics & Compliance Programs, Maurice Stucke
Scholarly Works
The U.S. Sentencing Commission's Organizational Guidelines for over twenty years have offered firms a significant financial incentive to develop an ethical organizational culture. Nonetheless, corporate crime persists. Too many ethics programs remain ineffective.
As this Article explores, the Guidelines' current approach is not working. The evidence, including sentencing data over the past twenty years, reveals that few firms have effective ethics and compliance programs. Nor is there much hope that the Guidelines' incentive will induce companies, after the economic crisis, to become more ethical.
The problem is not attributable to three assumptions underlying the Guidelines. The empirical research, while still …
Where Do We Go From Here: Open Questions And Policy Considerations, Jonathan Baker, Fiona Scott Morton, Daniel Crane, Richard Steuer, Michael Whinston, C. Hemphill, Deborah Feinstein, Renata Hesse
Where Do We Go From Here: Open Questions And Policy Considerations, Jonathan Baker, Fiona Scott Morton, Daniel Crane, Richard Steuer, Michael Whinston, C. Hemphill, Deborah Feinstein, Renata Hesse
Presentations
The Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice held a one-day public workshop on June 23, 2014 to explore the economics and legal policy implications of certain pricing practices, such as loyalty and bundled pricing. The workshop, consisted of presentations and roundtable discussions, that focused on practices in which prices are explicitly or effectively contingent on commitments to purchase or sell a specified share or volume of a single product or a mix of multiple products. Workshop participants considered theoretical and empirical developments in the economic understanding of these practices, discussed developments in the relevant …
Crossing The Rubicon: Why The Comcast/Time Warner Cable Merger Should Be Blocked, Maurice Stucke, Allen Grunes
Crossing The Rubicon: Why The Comcast/Time Warner Cable Merger Should Be Blocked, Maurice Stucke, Allen Grunes
College of Law Faculty Scholarship
Comcast and Time Warner Cable say their proposed $45 billion merger would not raise prices -- and instead lead to real benefits -- for cable and broadband customers across the country.But, as we discuss, the deal raises serious concerns of a creeping monopolist and the ability of a powerful media buyer to harm rivals.
Crossing The Rubicon: Why The Comcast/Time Warner Cable Merger Should Be Blocked, Maurice Stucke, Allen Grunes
Crossing The Rubicon: Why The Comcast/Time Warner Cable Merger Should Be Blocked, Maurice Stucke, Allen Grunes
Scholarly Works
Comcast and Time Warner Cable say their proposed $45 billion merger would not raise prices -- and instead lead to real benefits -- for cable and broadband customers across the country.
But, as we discuss, the deal raises serious concerns of a creeping monopolist and the ability of a powerful media buyer to harm rivals.
Antitrust And The Close Look: Transaction Cost Economics In Competition Policy, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
Antitrust And The Close Look: Transaction Cost Economics In Competition Policy, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
This paper briefly examines the contributions of Transaction Cost Economics (TCE) to antitrust analysis, focusing on vertical integration and its contractual substitutes, mainly, minimum and maximum resale price maintenance, vertical nonprice restraints, tying, bundled discounts and exclusive dealing and related exclusionary contracts.
TCE generally assumes that business firms organize their activities so as to maximize their value, which they can do both by economizing and also by obtaining higher prices. Sensible antitrust policy recognizes that both advantageous contracting and monopoly can be profitable to a firm, and it can be expected to pursue both when they are available. Nevertheless, the …
Avishalom Tor Presented At 3rd Haifa-Loyola Conference On Recent Challenges To Antitrust, Avishalom Tor
Avishalom Tor Presented At 3rd Haifa-Loyola Conference On Recent Challenges To Antitrust, Avishalom Tor
Faculty Lectures and Presentations
Professor Tor presented his work on Boundedly Rational Consumers: Three Challenges for Antitrust at the 3rdHaifa-Loyola Conference on Recent Challenges to Antitrust on May 9.
Avishalom Tor Presented At 3rd Haifa-Loyola Conference On Recent Challenges To Antitrust, Avishalom Tor
Avishalom Tor Presented At 3rd Haifa-Loyola Conference On Recent Challenges To Antitrust, Avishalom Tor
Avishalom Tor
Professor Tor presented his work on Boundedly Rational Consumers: Three Challenges for Antitrust at the 3rdHaifa-Loyola Conference on Recent Challenges to Antitrust on May 9.
The Competing Approaches To The Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act: A Fundamental Disagreement, Morgan Franz
The Competing Approaches To The Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act: A Fundamental Disagreement, Morgan Franz
Pepperdine Law Review
This Comment explores the history and reasoning behind a recent reexamination of the FTAIA in light of Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp., examines both the propriety and the implications of the competing interpretations of the FTAIA, and argues that the resolution of the competing approaches is beyond the purview of the lower courts. Part II provides an overview of the extraterritorial reach of the Sherman Act leading up to the FTAIA, as well as the judicial treatment of the FTAIA prior to Arbaugh. Part III discusses the impact of Arbaugh and subsequent Supreme Court cases applying the “clearly states” …
Market Impact, Loss Causation And Multiple Regression Modeling - The Importance Of Modular Theories Of Damage Causation In Antitrust Class Certification Motion Practice After Comcast V. Behrend, Laurence A. Steckman, Robert E. Conner, Stuart J. Rosenthal
Market Impact, Loss Causation And Multiple Regression Modeling - The Importance Of Modular Theories Of Damage Causation In Antitrust Class Certification Motion Practice After Comcast V. Behrend, Laurence A. Steckman, Robert E. Conner, Stuart J. Rosenthal
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Patent Misuse And Antitrust: Rebirth Or False Dawn?, Daryl Lim
Patent Misuse And Antitrust: Rebirth Or False Dawn?, Daryl Lim
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
This Article examines how two recent cases, F.T.C. v. Actavis and Kimble v. Marvel Enterprises Inc. could affect both the equitable defense of patent misuse and the patent-antitrust interface more generally. It begins by tracing the history of patent misuse and its reformulation into an “antitrust-lite” doctrine by the Federal Circuit. This Article presents new empirical data confirming this reformulation, and unveils the surprising influence of the Seventh Circuit and the Chicago School on that reformulation. The Article then explores Actavis and Kimble. It explains why Actavis will catalyze more antitrust challenges when patent rights are exercised, and why it …
Pay-For-Delay Settlements In The Wake Of Actavis, Michael L. Fialkoff
Pay-For-Delay Settlements In The Wake Of Actavis, Michael L. Fialkoff
Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review
“Pay-for-delay” settlements, also known as reverse payments, arise when a generic manufacturer pursues FDA approval of a generic version of a brand-name drug. If a patent protects the brand-name drug, the generic manufacturer has the option of contesting the validity of the patent or arguing that its product does not infringe the patent covering the brand-name drug. If the generic manufacturer prevails on either of these claims, the FDA will approve its generic version for sale. Approval of a generic version of a brand-name drug reduces the profitability of the brand-name drug by forcing the brand-name manufacturer to price its …
Foot Faults In Crunch Time: Temporal Variance In Sports Law And Antitrust Regulation, Jeffrey Standen
Foot Faults In Crunch Time: Temporal Variance In Sports Law And Antitrust Regulation, Jeffrey Standen
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Penn State "Consent Decree": The Ncaa's Coercive Means Don't Justify Its Laudable Ends, But Is There A Legal Remedy?, Matthew J. Mitten
The Penn State "Consent Decree": The Ncaa's Coercive Means Don't Justify Its Laudable Ends, But Is There A Legal Remedy?, Matthew J. Mitten
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Modest Proposal For Taming The Antitrust Beast, Gabe Feldman
A Modest Proposal For Taming The Antitrust Beast, Gabe Feldman
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Antitrust Exemption For The Ncaa: Sound Policy Or Letting The Fox Loose In The Henhouse?, Daniel E. Lazaroff
An Antitrust Exemption For The Ncaa: Sound Policy Or Letting The Fox Loose In The Henhouse?, Daniel E. Lazaroff
Pepperdine Law Review
This Article focuses on the issues presented by the debate over granting the NCAA an exemption from federal antitrust law. Part II briefly describes the history of antitrust litigation involving the NCAA. Part III discusses some of the proposals for affording some type of antitrust immunity to the NCAA. Part IV explains the rationales utilized for some of the numerous antitrust exemptions Congress and the Supreme Court have created for some businesses and forms of commercial activity. Part V addresses the question of whether any of those rationales justifies providing the NCAA with a legislative or judicial antitrust exemption and …
Symposium Introduction: The New Normal In College Sports: Realigned And Reckoning, Maureen A. Weston
Symposium Introduction: The New Normal In College Sports: Realigned And Reckoning, Maureen A. Weston
Pepperdine Law Review
On Friday, April 5, 2013, Pepperdine University School of Law in Malibu, California convened the Pepperdine Law Review Symposium on The New Normal in College Sports: Realigned and Reckoning. Highlights included a conversation with institutional leaders of major intercollegiate athletic programs; a consideration of the possibility of an antitrust exemption for the NCAA; the impact of conference realignment, digital media, broadcasting, and commercialization; and other emerging hot topics in college sports.
Aftermarketfailure: Windows Xp's End Of Support, Andrew Tutt
Aftermarketfailure: Windows Xp's End Of Support, Andrew Tutt
Michigan Law Review First Impressions
After 12 years, support for Windows XP will end on April 8, 2014. So proclaims a Microsoft website with a helpful clock counting down the days. "What does this mean?" the website asks. "It means you should take action." You should "migrate to a current supported operating system - such as Windows 8.1 - so you can receive regular security updates to protect [your] computer from malicious attacks." The costs of mass migration will be immense. About 30% of all desktop PCs are running Windows XP right now. An estimated 10% of the U.S. government's computers run Windows XP, including …