Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (42)
- Constitutional Law (12)
- Courts (6)
- Criminal Law (6)
- Labor and Employment Law (6)
-
- International Law (5)
- Judges (5)
- Legal History (5)
- Criminal Procedure (4)
- Disability Law (4)
- Human Rights Law (4)
- Law and Gender (4)
- Law and Race (4)
- Law and Society (4)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (4)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (4)
- Education Law (3)
- Immigration Law (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Juvenile Law (3)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (3)
- Sexuality and the Law (3)
- Sociology (3)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Disability and Equity in Education (2)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (2)
- Education (2)
- Family Law (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (8)
- Selected Works (8)
- SelectedWorks (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (3)
-
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (3)
- University of South Carolina (3)
- Western New England University School of Law (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- Columbia Law School (2)
- DePaul University (2)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- Association of American Law Schools (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Denver (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Michigan Law School (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Publication
-
- Pepperdine Law Review (7)
- Faculty Scholarship (6)
- All Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- Articles (3)
-
- Scholarly Works (3)
- American University International Law Review (2)
- Faculty Working Papers (2)
- Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies (2)
- University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class (2)
- Aaron J Shuler (1)
- Articles & Book Chapters (1)
- Barry Sullivan (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- College of Law Faculty (1)
- Dr David Robertson (1)
- Ellen M. Weber (1)
- Eric Alan Isaacson (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (1)
- Human Rights & Human Welfare (1)
- Human Rights Institute (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Journal of Legal Education (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
- Mark C. Weber (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (1)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 65 of 65
Full-Text Articles in Law
Belford Vance Lawson, Jr.: Life Of A Civil Rights Litigator, Gregory S. Parks
Belford Vance Lawson, Jr.: Life Of A Civil Rights Litigator, Gregory S. Parks
University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class
No abstract provided.
Tangled Up In Law: The Jurisprudence Of Bob Dylan, Michael L. Perlin
Tangled Up In Law: The Jurisprudence Of Bob Dylan, Michael L. Perlin
Fordham Urban Law Journal
In this Article, I will try to create a topography of Bob-as-jurisprudential scholar by looking at selected Dylan songs in these discrete areas of law (and law-and-society): civil rights; inequality of the criminal justice system; institutions; governmental/judicial corruption; equality and emancipation (political and economic); poverty, the environment, and inequality of the civil justice system; and the role of lawyers and the legal process.
Beyond The Private Attorney General: Equality Directives In American Law, Olatunde C.A. Johnson
Beyond The Private Attorney General: Equality Directives In American Law, Olatunde C.A. Johnson
Faculty Scholarship
American civil rights regulation is generally understood as relying on private enforcement in courts rather than imposing positive duties on state actors to further equity goals. This Article argues that this dominant conception of American civil rights regulation is incomplete. American civil rights regulation also contains a set of "equality directives," whose emergence and reach in recent years have gone unrecognized in the commentary. These federal-level equality directives use administrative tools of conditioned spending, policymaking, and oversight powerfully to promote substantive inclusion with regard to race, ethnicity, language, and disability. These directives move beyond the constraints of the standard private …
Inside The Civil Rights Ring: Statutory Jabs And Constitutional Haymakers, Aaron J. Shuler
Inside The Civil Rights Ring: Statutory Jabs And Constitutional Haymakers, Aaron J. Shuler
Aaron J Shuler
Civil rights litigators use statutory and constitutional attacks to combat inequality. Each approach has its advantages and drawbacks developed through interpretation by U.S. courts. The first major decision that shaped modern civil rights was the Civil Rights Cases that dodged a constitutional attack to withdraw most private acts of discrimination out of reach until the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed and validated in Heart of Atlanta v. U.S. In addition to the coupling of statutory attacks with private discrimination and constitutional challenges to state biases, statutory attacks have proven to be more adept at addressing disparate impacts as …
The Long And Winding Road From Monroe To Connick, Sheldon Nahmod
The Long And Winding Road From Monroe To Connick, Sheldon Nahmod
Sheldon Nahmod
In this article, I address the historical and doctrinal development of § 1983 local government liability, beginning with Monroe v. Pape in 1961 and culminating in the Supreme Court’s controversial 2011 failure to train decision in Connick v. Thompson. Connick has made it exceptionally difficult for § 1983 plaintiffs to prevail against local governments in failure to train cases. In the course of my analysis, I also consider the oral argument and opinions in Connick as well as various aspects of § 1983 doctrine. I ultimately situate Connick in the Court’s federalism jurisprudence which doubles back to Justice Frankfurter’s view …