Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (14)
- Supreme Court of the United States (8)
- Criminal Law (5)
- Courts (4)
- Fourteenth Amendment (3)
-
- Health Law and Policy (3)
- Jurisprudence (3)
- Legislation (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Banking and Finance Law (2)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (2)
- Contracts (2)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Labor and Employment Law (2)
- Law and Society (2)
- Legal History (2)
- National Security Law (2)
- Property Law and Real Estate (2)
- Sexuality and the Law (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Bankruptcy Law (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
- University of Richmond (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Selected Works (2)
-
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (2)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Northern Illinois University (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- SelectedWorks (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (5)
- Articles (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- University of Richmond Law Review (3)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (2)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
- Buffalo Law Review (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Mike Jorgensen (1)
- Missouri Law Review (1)
- Mitchell J Nathanson (1)
- Northern Illinois University Law Review (1)
- Other Publications (1)
- Publications (1)
- Stephen E Henderson (1)
- Studio for Law and Culture (1)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Law Review (1)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 36 of 36
Full-Text Articles in Law
Scrutiny Land, Randy E. Barnett
Scrutiny Land, Randy E. Barnett
Michigan Law Review
Scrutiny Land is the place where government needs to justify to a court its restrictions on the liberties of the people. In the 1930s, the Supreme Court began limiting access to Scrutiny Land. While the New Deal Court merely shifted the burden to those challenging a law to show that a restriction of liberty is irrational, the Warren Court made the presumption of constitutionality effectively irrebuttable. After this, only one road to Scrutiny Land remained: showing that the liberty being restricted was a fundamental right. The Glucksberg Two-Step, however, limited the doctrine of fundamental rights to those (1) narrowly defined …
Substantive Due Process After Gonzales V. Carhart, Steven G. Calabresi
Substantive Due Process After Gonzales V. Carhart, Steven G. Calabresi
Michigan Law Review
This Article begins in Part I with a doctrinal evaluation of the status of Washington v. Glucksberg ten years after that decision was handed down. Discussion begins with consideration of the Roberts Court's recent decision in Gonzales v. Carhart and then turns to the subject of Justice Kennedy's views in particular on substantive due process. In Part II, the Article goes on to consider whether the Glucksberg test for substantive due process decision making is correct in light of the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Article concludes in Parts II and III that Glucksberg is right to confine …
De-Moralized: Glucksberg In The Malaise, Steven D. Smith
De-Moralized: Glucksberg In The Malaise, Steven D. Smith
Michigan Law Review
Ten years down the road, what is the enduring significance of the "assisted suicide" cases, Washington v. Glucksberg and Vacco v. Quill? The cases reflect an unusually earnest, but nonetheless unsuccessful, attempt by the Supreme Court to grapple with a profound moral issue. So, why was the Court unable to provide a more satisfying justification for its conclusions? This Article, written for a symposium on the tenth anniversary of Glucksberg,, discusses that question. Part I examines some of the flaws in reasoning in the Glucksberg and Quill opinions and suggests that these flaws stem from the opinion writers' …
Due Process For The Global Crime Era: A Proposal, Song Richardson
Due Process For The Global Crime Era: A Proposal, Song Richardson
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
This article argues that the adjudication of transnational criminal cases in the United States raises troubling questions about the government's commitment to principled criminal process standards. Concern over global crime has resulted in a criminal process that inadequately protects fairness and legitimacy norms. Over 40 years ago, in his seminal work on the domestic criminal process, Herbert Packer described two models of criminal procedure: the crime control model and the due process model. The crime control model posits that the most important function of the criminal justice system is to suppress crime. The due process model focuses on the fallibility …
The Sovereign Nation Of Baseball: Why Federal Law Does Not Apply To "America's Game" And How It Got That Way, Mitchell J. Nathanson
The Sovereign Nation Of Baseball: Why Federal Law Does Not Apply To "America's Game" And How It Got That Way, Mitchell J. Nathanson
Mitchell J Nathanson
This article examines the relationship between Major League Baseball (MLB) and the law and discusses how it has evolved that MLB has become unofficially exempt from federal law on a wide range of issues due to its unique status within American society. Although its antitrust exemption is well-known, MLB has, in practice, not been subject to the forces of federal law in many other contexts as well, setting it apart from most other corporations and organizations – even other professional sports leagues such as the NFL, NHL and NBA. As a result of the wide berth provided to MLB by …
‘Move On’ Orders As Fourth Amendment Seizures, Stephen E. Henderson
‘Move On’ Orders As Fourth Amendment Seizures, Stephen E. Henderson
Stephen E Henderson
If a police officer orders one to move on, must the recipient comply? This article analyzes whether there is a federal constitutional right to remain, and in particular whether a police command to move on constitutes a seizure of the person for purposes of the Fourth Amendment. Although it is a close question, I conclude that the Fourth Amendment typically does not restrict a move on (MO) order, and that substantive due process only prohibits the most egregious such orders. It is a question of broad significance given the many legitimate reasons police might order persons to move on, as …